RE: Exchange Security Breach????

2002-09-19 Thread Tom Meunier
It's Klez. Don't worry about it. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 19, 2002 09:28 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange Security Breach Subject: Exchange Security Breach Hello

RE: Exchange Security Breach????

2002-09-19 Thread Tom Meunier
and we do block most of the extensions (.exe,.vbs, etc.) from coming in. Rama Arumugam Network Administrator Wire DynamiX.com (253) 395-4527 -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-18 Thread Tom Meunier
Because. He's. An. Idiot. This thread is proof of the existence, presence, and sadistic power of an evil deity. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:04 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation:

RE: BadMailFrom

2002-09-17 Thread Tom Meunier
They're saying you fit their definition of someone that they don't want to talk to. QMAIL uses a badmailfrom file, add a domain to that and they won't spam you any more. Many domains now have taken to blocking all Asian top-level domains, since it's proven impossible to get (a large portion of)

RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.

2002-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a one-time deal and you don't have the in-house expertise. http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm http://www.exclaimer.co.uk -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday,

RE: recommendation please

2002-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Minesweeper: Start Programs Accessories Games Minesweeper and hit F1. Mimesweeper: http://www.mimesweeper.com might have something. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 02:27 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Do it for free. Throw 'em in your bank's night drop. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 05:55 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Backup Hardware Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Ah

RE: Slow performance

2002-09-11 Thread Tom Meunier
If so, that would be hilarious, right up there with 640k should be enough for anybody. I would hope it's just as much an urban legend. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:05 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing

RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name

2002-09-11 Thread Tom Meunier
Yeah, they'll love the interface and switch to complaining about the performance. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:38 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Internal Exchange Name vs. external

RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name

2002-09-11 Thread Tom Meunier
Messageware, not MessageOne, makes Outlook Plus Pak. MessageOne, not Messageware, keeps Chris Scharff off the streets of Austin. -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:45 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name

2002-09-11 Thread Tom Meunier
/Name Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Speaking of Austin streets... 1409 Lavaca, Friday at 11:30? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Services fail after SP2

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
When you cut paste from a support site, do you mind referencing the source? It's bad form, otherwise. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7001source= -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 07:59 AM Posted

RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
When you get something from a support site, you should reference it. And don't delete the authors' names and present it as your own. Bad form, otherwise. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=36source= -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: OALGen

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
When you get something from a support site, you should reference it. And don't delete the authors' names and present it as your own. Bad form, otherwise. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9127source= -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: .STM database file growing much larger than .EDB file

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
Sounds like expected behavior to me. The STM file is storing all your non-MAPI stuff. Since this server is a connector server as you described, I wouldn't expect much growth of the EDB at all. -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 09,

RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
Are you going to keep posting this question until your IMC explodes? -Original Message- From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, September 08, 2002 01:21 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook

RE: Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
Network connectivity and name resolution (WINS or LMHOSTS DNS) is your starting point. -Original Message- From: Irwan Hadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 09:04 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Clients can't connect to Microsoft

RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
Andy Webb answered this question very succinctly 11.5 hours ago. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 06:46 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook

RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
Mailing List Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Tom... Notice the sent date. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10

RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
and not the sender. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Are you going to keep posting

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
No, there's no must be a simple way about it. There's not. But here's a good article that solved this problem for me, and taught me a little bit about RSM and NTBACKUP and scripting, too: http://www.jsiinc.com/sube/tip2200/rh2265.htm -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
You are correct. The following file types, up to 16mb in size by default, change-able with a reg hack: .doc, .xls, .ppt, .html, .htm, .asp, .txt, and .eml -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:40 AM Posted

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
Whatever you're reading, you should be using to wrap fish or line birdcages. What's Windows NT 2000? -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:59 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NT 2000 backup of

Attn: FAY.COM admin

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
Not only is your content filter set to some ridiculous parameters, but you should ask your email admin to set up a [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. Do an [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a [EMAIL PROTECTED] while you're at it. Jeesh. Nice to get an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] telling me there's no such user in

RE: REPLY for ED Crowley

2002-08-26 Thread Tom Meunier
Sorry, I'm not Ed. But it looks like your DNS is screwed up. Shouldn't have anything to do with mailguard, since it's an outbound SMTP connection. Unless your PIX is between your E2k server and a smarthost. Make sure your SMTP virtual server is pointed to a good DNS server that is set up to

RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

2002-08-19 Thread Tom Meunier
require Win2K Server Advanced? If you run without /3GB switch, you will see errors in the Application Event Log saying that your memory has become fragmented. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 7:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

2002-08-18 Thread Tom Meunier
Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Win2k Server is fine. As long as you're happy with 4 or less CPUs and 4 or less GB of system RAM. The only reason

RE: How to discover smtp host?

2002-08-18 Thread Tom Meunier
Nslookup -q=mx domain.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 16, 2002 06:42 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: How to discover smtp host? Subject: How to discover smtp host? Without resorting to

RE: routing messages to a unique mailbox

2002-08-18 Thread Tom Meunier
Try Q324021 -Original Message- From: Con Raducanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, August 18, 2002 05:14 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: routing messages to a unique mailbox Subject: routing messages to a unique mailbox Hi List, Is it

RE: Re[2]: Virtual Directories under OWA 2000

2002-08-15 Thread Tom Meunier
I don't know or care. I was ignoring the M: drive. Did you need it for something? so exch2000 sp3 hide the m drive by default ? -Original Message- From: Frédéric Médery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:14 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: MEC early registration

2002-08-14 Thread Tom Meunier
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: MEC early registration Subject: RE: MEC early registration Looks like maybe not as many people registered yet as they had hoped? Anyone one of the first 1000 to get a DVD? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

MEC early registration

2002-08-13 Thread Tom Meunier
Just got a note from the event coordinators for MEC. The $300 early registration discount which was supposed to have expired yesterday has been extended until August 16. Hope to see many of you at MEC. -tom _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Virtual Directories under OWA 2000

2002-08-13 Thread Tom Meunier
The red x's: that's normal. The www service starts before the Exchange IS does. Restart the w3svc service if it bothers you, but it's normal. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q259373 If it really annoys you, you can add a DependOnService line for MSExchangeIS to

RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

2002-08-13 Thread Tom Meunier
Win2k Server is fine. As long as you're happy with 4 or less CPUs and 4 or less GB of system RAM. The only reason to go to Advanced is to increase to 8cpus, 8GB RAM, clustering. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/serverfamily/default.asp -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst

RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

2002-08-13 Thread Tom Meunier
of RAM. So A/S might be good, but, as you said, probably isn't necessary. M - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:32 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Win2k

RE: OWA Address book

2002-08-11 Thread Tom Meunier
I don't remember how OWA 5.5 works, but if I go into OWA 2000, and type Tom in the To: field, when I hit SEND it will display a list of all of the people named Tom[1] in my organization. I can then choose which one to send it to. Also, as Tony pointed out, messageware puts out the Plus Pack for

RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5

2002-08-09 Thread Tom Meunier
Excellent workup, William. Could you save that as HTML and put it up next to your Computer Associates um... exposé page? Also, I like to keep this link handy in my bookmarks list: http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5

2002-08-08 Thread Tom Meunier
It's not supposed to skip it because it's in use. It's supposed to skip it because you MANUALLY EXCLUDED it from your backup job. As well as the logfile directories. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, August 08, 2002 02:44 PM

RE: SBS

2002-08-02 Thread Tom Meunier
IIRC he specifically ruled out Usenet, which is exactly where all of Microsoft's SBS MVPs hang out and give good info. Start digging around here: http://www.sbslinks.com/ http://www.sbs2000.info/ http://www.smallbizserver.com/ (Where you'll find the SBS YahooGroup link...) -Original

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Meunier
Holy cow. More expensive than Messageware, with less features. Such a deal. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 06:48 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange.NET anyone ? Subject: RE:

RE: Exchange 2000 question

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Meunier
Change your default recipient policy, iirc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 02:29 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 question Subject: Exchange 2000 question I have

RE: None Exchange related

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Meunier
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8q=sensorsoft -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 04:15 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: None Exchange related Subject: RE: None Exchange related

RE: Do I need to kill badmail files?

2002-07-27 Thread Tom Meunier
Only if you want your 34mb of drive space back. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 26, 2002 03:05 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Subject: Do I need to kill

RE: How to build an Exchange 5.5 recovery server

2002-07-27 Thread Tom Meunier
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRest ore.asp -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 26, 2002 03:24 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: How to build an Exchange 5.5 recovery server

RE: Synchronizing Outlook for Offline use...

2002-07-27 Thread Tom Meunier
Novelist Douglas Adams, not cartoonist Scott Adams. I think this is in the FAQ. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 26, 2002 03:13 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Synchronizing Outlook for Offline use...

RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well?

2002-07-26 Thread Tom Meunier
*MAY* wrap? LOL. Decapitation may be hazardous to your health, too. For future reference, you can always get a shorter link to Symantec's KB articles by clicking on the Printer-friendly version link at the top of the page. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Haku Friday

2002-07-26 Thread Tom Meunier
Is Haku sort of like Haiku only without any rules whatsoever? -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:13 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Haku Friday Subject: Haku

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-07-26 Thread Tom Meunier
Conversation: Haiku Friday Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Yes starting a new trend. Okay I missed spelled it. At least I kept it to 15 words -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE

RE: Question regarding ñ and other characters

2002-07-25 Thread Tom Meunier
Charmap says it's 241. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, July 25, 2002 01:21 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Question regarding ñ and other characters Subject: RE: Question regarding ñ and other characters

RE: Default SMTP address for ex2000 site...

2002-07-24 Thread Tom Meunier
Yes, it can be anything as long as it's valid. However, without adding new http virtual servers, you're going to need to ensure all your OWA users have at least one smtp address that matches the one you'll see as a top-level folder when you browse your M: drive. It can be completely random, as

RE: Default SMTP address for ex2000 site...

2002-07-24 Thread Tom Meunier
: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default SMTP address for ex2000 site... Yes, it can be anything as long as it's valid. However, without adding new http virtual servers, you're going to need to ensure all

RE: Storage Groups and Databases

2002-07-24 Thread Tom Meunier
getting senile something about fragmented virtual memory when you have a bunch of mailbox stores... I don't remember and I'm too lazy to go look right now. If you break it down, do it for other reasons, like you want your top brass to be in one store for quicker DR or something. Although Because

RE: outlook client installed version

2002-07-24 Thread Tom Meunier
Regedit. And hopefully the answer you find will be no. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q266418; -Original Message- From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 04:15 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: outlook

RE: Titanium (aka: Exchange 2003)?

2002-07-23 Thread Tom Meunier
By relative I'll assume you mean relevant. Basking in the glow of that successful assumption, I'll further assume that Titanium will ship on a DVD, with deleted scenes and director's commentary. It'll be out of beta once it quits burning waffles. -Original Message- From: David N.

RE: Unable to add user as owner to Client Permissions of public folde r

2002-07-23 Thread Tom Meunier
Patch your server and try again. At least SP2 on Win2k and E2k. PFs were all screwed up in Exchange 2000 Gold. -Original Message- From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 22, 2002 09:47 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Unable to add

RE: How to configure SMTP/POP for home users

2002-07-23 Thread Tom Meunier
Didn't I just tell you last week that OWA is inseparable from Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:59 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: How to configure SMTP/POP for home users

RE: mail trap for outgoing message.

2002-07-23 Thread Tom Meunier
Set up a different SMTP server, enter that in his account data (by IP address) and log it from that server. Most users don't know what an IP address IS. Other than that, IIRC, you'll need to log all SMTP traffic and extract that one user's data from there. -Original Message- From:

RE: Removing a server from Admin program

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
I know this isn't the answer to the exact question, but why would you want to do it from the registry rather than just finding it in the Admin program, and selecting Edit Delete? Or just whacking on the delete key, for that matter... -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua

RE: Adding another smtp address to receipient policy

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
Yeah. Heck, add ten. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:44 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Adding another smtp address to receipient policy Subject: Adding another smtp address to receipient

RE: Unique Exchange Account

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
Go into the properties of the mailbox, LIMITS tab. Put a check in the box that says prohibit send and put it at 2kb. Send the user a 3kb welcome message. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:39 AM Posted To:

RE: Adding another smtp address to receipient policy

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
-Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding another smtp address to receipient policy Yeah. Heck, add ten. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Exchange 2000 SP3 available

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
articles mentioned in it include fixes found in SP2. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:50 PM

RE: Titanium (aka: Exchange 2003)?

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
No, but I hear that the upcoming version of Outlook has a sort by thread feature. Until then, you can find rumours of it including a waffle iron, comments about it being stronger yet lighter than the current metal that William Lefkovics is using, and find out how far behind in consumer gadgetry

RE: E2k and Public Folders

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
The most common reasons for this is that you have a ton of public folders. Other people will experience this problem if they have a ton of stuff in their inbox. The funny thing that sometimes helps it is to go run all the updates for Office XP, specifically that alternative user input patch

RE: E2k and Public Folders

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
Are the PFs homed on a different server from the one that the users' mailboxes are on? That would do it. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:09 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: E2k and Public Folders Subject: RE:

RE: NDR's

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
Does this work for you? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q281926; -Original Message- From: Stein, Mr. Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:21 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NDR's Subject: NDR's Hi Everyone, I

RE: NDR's

2002-07-22 Thread Tom Meunier
get the NDR. Fred Fred Stein Network Administrator The Hill School 717 High Street Pottstown, PA 19464 610-326-1000 ext. 7356 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thehill.org -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Exchange 2000 SP3 available

2002-07-21 Thread Tom Meunier
http://support.microsoft.com/common/canned.aspx?R=dH=List%20of%20Fixes %20in%20Microsoft%20Exchange%202000%20Server%20SP3LL=supportSz=kbexcha nge2000sp3fixCDID=EN-US-KBLCID=1033 Helluva URL, that. But it works. I'll cut paste the text of the thing so you don't have to screw with URLs.

Exchange 2000 SP3 list of fixes (long)

2002-07-21 Thread Tom Meunier
Sorry about the formatting; I don't have the patience to make it look pretty. --- XADM: A Memory Leak in Store.exe Degrades Performance (Q322125) Over time, an Exchange 2000 server that is part of a mixed Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 and Exchange 2000

RE: Exchange 2000 SP3 list of fixes (long)

2002-07-21 Thread Tom Meunier
Yeah, OWA has a new help file. You have to remember to go back and install it by hand, though. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:25 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 SP3 list of

RE: Some messages viewed in OWA 2000 give 404 errors?

2002-07-17 Thread Tom Meunier
Do the message subjects contain punctuation in the subject line that has been denied by URLscan? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q309508 -Original Message- From: Jason Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 02:08 PM Posted To:

RE: Hide IP Address from the Mail Headers

2002-07-16 Thread Tom Meunier
No. You can get yourself a spam-friendly ISP, though, who may give you more discussion about the alternatives. -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:55 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Message Filtering

RE: Need file

2002-07-15 Thread Tom Meunier
Call PSS. If it's referenced in a Q-Article as being necessary and yet it's not, it will be a free call. Imcupg.dll is not part of SP1 or SP2's distribution, afaics. I'm assuming you're talking about Q281456. -Original Message- From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: Ex2k, cannot receive after backup w/veritas

2002-07-15 Thread Tom Meunier
Shouldn't have stumped Microsoft. You should've excluded the \exchsrvr directories and the logfile directories too. Call them back and tell them to read their disaster recovery whitepaper at http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Krecovery. asp and do a find for the word

RE: backup of public folders

2002-07-12 Thread Tom Meunier
In the GUI, select \microsoft exchange server\servername\microsoft information store. If you have multiple storage groups, just back up the first one and you'll get the public folders unless you've created additional public folder stores in the other storage groups. If you only want to backup

RE: OWA2000 Spell Check and GAL

2002-07-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Cha-CHING! WTG Mark. :) -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:00 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OWA2000 Spell Check and GAL Subject: RE: OWA2000 Spell Check and GAL Yes, Mark, that is the one

RE: Archives

2002-07-11 Thread Tom Meunier
Because SWYNK is all fscked up and disorganized. Er... Subscribes to a laissez-faire, decentralized management philosophy. Whereas Simpler-Webb (http://www.swinc.com) is a dynamic company that does its shizatt right. -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Archives

2002-07-11 Thread Tom Meunier
- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:37 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Archives Subject: RE: Archives Because SWYNK is all fscked up and disorganized. Er... Subscribes to a laissez-faire, decentralized management

RE: Front-End DC

2002-07-08 Thread Tom Meunier
I've never seen a white paper that says either. For ease of disaster recovery, I'd leave them separate if you have the hardware. You'll want to fix your problem, rather than sweeping it under a rug. In ESM, in the properties pages of your server, Directory Access tab, are all the servers

RE: New Virus?

2002-07-08 Thread Tom Meunier
You don't? And you guys have the genome thingy? You're scaring me... -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:08 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Virus? Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're

RE: Exchange 2000 GAL: Hosting two floors

2002-07-06 Thread Tom Meunier
Nope, can't base your LDAP queries on OU. -Original Message- From: Nikolaj Friis Larsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, July 06, 2002 3:08 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 GAL: Hosting two floors Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 GAL: Hosting

RE: Please tell me where to go

2002-07-03 Thread Tom Meunier
You've come to the right place: EdCrowley I will be on vacation for the next two months in the South of France. Please feel free to drop by my house at 123 Any Street, Anytown, IA and help yourself to anything you want. If you're a Spammer, then contratulations! You've won the lottery! You

RE: Please tell me where to go

2002-07-03 Thread Tom Meunier
Well, the OOF is only gonna fire once per user. But allow OOF and allow automatic replies are two different things, and the latter will kill you, because sure as anything your users are gonna use a RULE instead of an OOF, and then it's only a matter of time. Even if you don't allow it, it's a

RE: Outlook Web Access

2002-07-01 Thread Tom Meunier
Tell him to try domain\userid for the login credentials, if he's not being presented with the domain box. -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 01, 2002 01:42 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Outlook Web

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Stop posting this over and over again. It's mind-numbingly annoying. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it ain't you I guess. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:14 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Stop posting this over and over again. It's mind-numbingly annoying. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it ain't you I guess. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:14 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Stop posting this over and over again. It's mind-numbingly annoying. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it ain't you I guess. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:14 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Stop posting this over and over again. It's mind-numbingly annoying. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it ain't you I guess. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:14 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it ain't you I guess. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:14 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Stop posting this over and over again. It's mind-numbingly annoying. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it ain't you I guess. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:14 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Stop posting this over and over again. It's mind-numbingly annoying. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it ain't you I guess. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:14 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Stop posting this over and over again. It's mind-numbingly annoying. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: ASP

RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000

2002-05-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it ain't you I guess. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:14 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: ASP

Fw: NAV Corporate Ed. ate my e00 log

2002-05-28 Thread Tom Meunier
From the newsgroups. Need we say more, about scanning Exchange directories. Send me your retched spam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks for reading this. Sorry my newsreader does not have spell check. NAV Corp Edition found a virus in/on an e00 log in

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >