Ya, you can set up a really good proxy and firewall on your isp connection
then dedicate FTE to keeping up on all the free pop services that are out
there, don't forget to turn off all IM services as well.
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
But that is only about 25% of the battle, you also need to stop port 80
email as well, and there are only about a million of those.
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I don't know of a set ratio that MS recommends, I do believe the feedback
that I remember seeing on this around here a while back was simply, why? I
can say the only time in 3 years that I have ran a defrag was after our
array went south, and that was only a matter of the DR procedures. Our DB
Where did you get that the supreme court has been hit? Just wondering as I
have not seen any news on that yet.
Thanks
Jeff
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Velazquez, Carlos F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
We are currently running the 515 in HA mode. I love it! I can run in turn
of the active PIX and the users don't even know about it. Currently I have
about a thousand users going through this setup. The one thing I would
recommend that we did not do up front as we were trying to save a buck or
If you have the server setup to run maintenance at night, it is doing all
the regular maintenance you need to do. Check the log files daily for
problems, make sure your backups are good, get an old system and go through
a disaster recovery until you can run it blind folded. Read the FAQ here,
I started blocking them about a month ago. We had a user receive one, then
when it was opened up it had an .exe in it as an attachment. I decided to
block them as I did not want this used as a conduit to bypass our .exe
blocking. The good news is that it has worked, I have blocked about 6 or
Jennifer,
Most everyone has already hit on the obvious, most of us use the auto-update
feature from the A/V product of our choosing. Then we go the extra step and
use some sort of filtering, be it at the fire wall or just simple attachment
blocking in our e-mail server A/V product. Here I block
My users don't use OWA right now, that is something we are not even talking
about until Exchange 2000, but then we will be back in the business of
running IIS in patch and run mode as we did before we got rid of it. I have
very strong feelings about admins that run servers and don't keep them
ya but, would you want him there when you were trying to fix it. I prefer
the it broke at 8 and I fixed it at 9. No I didn't need to call you.
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Desmond Witherspoon
Thanks,
Sorry I usually check the archive, this was just one of those got me hot
under the collar things. I wanted to stop it before it started.
Thanks again.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001
5.5 admin internet mail service, internet mail, advance options.
Have fun
Jeff
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Phil Labonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange
Because Toto we are not in Kansas any more.
Go Cyclones!
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
177 (977)
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak
What is the latest Trend Pattern?
Time to crank out the check book and get you some IP's
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Blackberry Enterprise software takes about 10min to get setup and running,
or he could install it on his own system. If its on his system, it will
only work when it is on, which makes it a bad idea in my book.
Have fun
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Wolf, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
DMZ? WHY?
-Original Message-
From: MJN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server
We've had MAJOR problems! We are running Exchange 2000 Sp1 on Win2k SP2.
Our Exchange Server sits in the
I would tell him it is his e-mail, and if he really wants it he could create
a rule to forward all the messages and run it. Other wise after he leaves
the mail goes poof!
What is it Ed says...???
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
, but the fact is we
don't currently).
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export Import permissions?
Since I am the if its not a human, its a PF type of admin. Can I ask why
you are doing
So are you moving your entire exchange deployment to the DMZ?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Change password for Exchange in DMZ
Exchange 5.5 SP3.
I've been
Questions. What DC is in the DMZ, the Primary or the Backup? What ports do
you have open through your firewall? Tell us again why you are doing this?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:37 PM
To: Exchange
Are you using a PIX Firewall, if so have your network administrator turn off
the smtp fixup protocol.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same
As granddad once said, if it ain't broke don't fix it!
-Original Message-
From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: eseutil /d
I have some team members here that believe that regular defragmentation
(offline)
True, however I didn't do the service pac's because I thought it would
reduce my white space, or even decrease my backup times. I (as most of us?)
did/do the upgrades, service pac's, hot fixes, etc. for very specific
reasons. I get the should we be doing (insert your utility here) on a
Get a refund!
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cerification question
There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was
being discussed at
Let me rephrase that:
Lets see you've been out of college for 3 months and have your MCSENext
or
Let see you've been out of college for 3 months and have your CCIENext
See the difference..
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So because you had a paper MCSE, and a very little experience, you chose
to say that they were lazy because they didn't have their MCSE? Don't
follow the logic.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM
To: Exchange
Thank You!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
I have yet to pick up an exchange or Cisco Book. Infact I was given my
first exchange book just yesterday by a
track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the
outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system
attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really
has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Attack ??
I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the
track message flag on exchange.
Thanks,
Jorge Cardenas.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL
Not even going to talk about the Bass Fish'n. Can you say Table Rock. See
I knew you could.
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Wal-Mart
Say it with me: Ozark mountains. Sounds
the SMTP Fixup Enabled
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages
are you behind a PIX Firewall?
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL
money says yes and they have the SMTP Fixup Enabled
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages
are you behind a PIX Firewall?
-Original Message-
From
ROFLMAO -- wait does this count?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the
message. Once the Exchange
is subadmin the service account?
-Original Message-
From: Subbi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 2:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: URGENT HELP for Exchange 5.5
hi,
I am using Exchange 5.5 and is running sucveffuly for last 4 years, now
due to security
PF I use about a dozen of them here.
-Original Message-
From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: access to multiple mailboxes
I have individuals using their own email. No problem.
Now we have a dummy user that
Have you looked at using public folders for this? They are easy to setup,
easy to maintain, never require a visit to the users desktop, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
folder?
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: access to multiple mailboxes
Have you looked at using public folders for this? They are easy to setup,
easy to maintain, never require
We use the controls in our AC units. The room is on its own loop with 4
units running. If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system
calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call person
to alert them of the problem. We over did the room by one unit, and we
, July 31, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July
freak too! We're in the same building as UUNET and
I have a special access card to the Data Centre. We have our own
cabinets in the Data Centre to keep our toys in.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 02:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Just to ask, are you only going to use this for exchange? If so then just
like everyone has said. However if you are going to be doing other backups
with this software then the OFO is worth the cash. We currently run 8.6 with
the OFO, Exchange, and SQL options installed, however we run 3 drives
If you can't do a ping systemname and you are running wins, they are
probably going to be coming from the UNIX system. These will not be
registered in your WINS database. Have you tried to ping using the FQDN?
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
os, logs, store
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5
for 100 points
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
os, logs, store
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday
stating the question...
So far Jeff Waters has a 100point for the right question to the answer...
will he risk it and go for the bonus?
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
just jumping in late here but why not play this the other way, ask him for
permission to run a DR drill using the take home drive. Invite him to play,
then when it fails you can start talking about a real DR backup plan. You
know its crap, we know its crap, the secret is to show the idiot this
yes/no
What is your hardware config? We have about 750 on one PII 450 Xeon system
and are not having any performance issues at all. What else is running on
this box. Need input.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:24
.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Netfinity Ultra 160 4M. RAID 5
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Netfinity Ultra 160 4M. RAID 5
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:52
Utilization
well we have a multi channel card but how do I do this now that everything
is configured this way?
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization
sorry
-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Oh it's a 86565RY.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:14 PM
Utilization
We have Netbay3. Am I going to have to rebuild the box to do all this?
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Do you have the Netfinity
for
about a year and a half and still no time for us to complete one. That's a
whole nother story.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization
If you are a single
. They said it
wouldn't work with Compaq's either but it does. I know that it doesn't with
these though.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Any time, I
I think you should use raid 1 with the 9gig drives x 2. One arm for the OS
and one arm for the logs. Even at 400 users I could see the performance
increase by putting the logs on a different arm. Why would this save you
money? Even if you put the Logs and OS on the same Channel but different
I'm sure there are a few (ok more than a few) but the question would be why
would you want to. Even in the best managed desktop environment you can't
ensure that all the desktops are at the latest definition level, or that you
user hasn't chosen to turn off the protection, or worse yet an admin
We have a formal Comp Time policy, it's a 1 for 1 and we can pool up to 80
hours. I have also worked in places that were not so formal, that was more
of a give/take type deal. Usually unless it's 2 or more hours I'm not
turning it in, it all works out after you add in lunches, leaving 10min
as already stated, bcc.
The other side, is that by the subject I am assuming this is one of the
mighty send me your bank account number and I'll send you my money. We have
been getting about a dozen of these a week. I can also say that for the
ones we are getting I have been working with our
It will be the original site when you get the DR done. Take a look at the
DR white papers on the MS site, they will walk you right through this.
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
-Original Message-
From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL
Question, as we are a BlackBerry site, and I just saw this wonderful
Goodlink. If it is a mirror sync, what happens to mail after the device
gets to 8meg's? Can you set a folder to not be synced, so the users could
move mail to that folder to keep for archive?
Not that I wouldn't love to have
be a problem, then again the download time
would stink...
For my sales guy's the sync with their inbox and contacts is critical,
everything else is nice to have...
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:36 PM
To: Exchange
I know this is kind of off exchange, however since I trust ya'all on this
list I have a quick question. Are any of you running IBM DNS for your AD
infrastructure? We are running it and getting ready for our AD lab and roll
out, however I just found something that is troubling me. IBM does not
I was wondering if there is a good way to export all the mailbox properties
for users. I have ran the export, however it does not contain all the
mailbox information. I am looking for an easy way to get the limits page of
the mailbox properties.
Thanks
Jeff
Thanks
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mailbox Properties Export
Use header.exe to build an export file which contains the field data you
want.
On 2/21/03 8:59, Waters
Well, we have just started our internal HIPAA audit with the help of an
outside counsel and engineer's. Encryption was brought up as an
addressable but was strongly stressed as being pushed up in our
schedule. Hope you are having just as much fun as we are.
-Original Message-
From:
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
Yeah, tell me about it. I just got hipaa-tized yesterday...
It is going to be fun.
Have you guys found anything remotely plausible?
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February
Remember we are dealing with a Government regulation here. Yes it does, and
that is probably what they want.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
The problem with all of this is that a large encryption infrastructure that
covers multiple vendors is a nightmare that I don't even want to start
working with. Having some very high level experience with encryption this
is a big game, and there is no real way to work it out for this situation.
Since HIPPA is the thread of the day. We are running 5.5 sp3 and I have the
Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail tab selected in the Routing tab of the IMS
selected. The magic tool that the consultant used, and I don't know what it
is, and the CFI LANguard scanner I just used is reporting that the
Sorry, bad day we are using sp4 on the server.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HIPPA and mail relaying
Since HIPPA is the thread of the day. We are running 5.5 sp3 and I have
!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HIPPA and mail relaying
Since HIPPA is the thread of the day. We are running 5.5 sp3 and I have
the Do
and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: HIPPA and mail relaying
It's a great tool, it says the site is an open relay. What
I am running XP SP1 and having no problems what so ever. Can you resolve
the exchange server from the command prompt?
A side note, 1st thing I always do to any new system, dump the OEM
configuration and put our configs on the systems. I have found this to
solve more than one or two problems
Public Folder
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HIdden Mailboxes
Exchange 5.5 - SP4
W2K - SP3
I guess it's not possible to hide a mailbox and still be able to access it
by another user??
Sounds like it's time for you to test your DR procedure. I haven't done
this for 2K however this was my standard for 5.5 server upgrades.
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Done, will we get a confermation e-mail, or just show up and drink?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Underground MEC ED List
Event
One last
Is not talking to AOL a bad thing?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I make sure my exchange server is not acting as an
Open Relay?
I checked, and didn't see that you are running
I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to
do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a
new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool
to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain
they invented ADC. Must have been a good reason.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange
then you don't need it.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 12:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to
do etc
Hopefully we all noted that on the wonderful evaluation forms (my evil
coworker got cash for doing one of those things, I've been each year since
97 and on his first trip he gets money). I will be the bad guy, I am very
pleased that they have joined MEC and Tech-Ed together, working for a
Thanks Martin, got the new definition but learned something strange at the
same time
Using Trend 3.52 with Ex5.5 SP4, NT4.0 SP6a and have the update set to every
hour and it has been working great. I just checked to see what version we
were on and all should have been well but we were on 355
SIS = only one copy until everyone deletes it.
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachments and the Priv
Hi,
I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out.
I have submitted this to Trend, however I didn't know if anyone here had
experienced this before. We are running Trend 3.51 and have the autoupdates
set to hourly. They stopped working on the 30th, I can still do the manual
update but it doesn't show up in the log's. The log has 2000 events in
, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers
as of Aug. 4.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Simple really, NO.
Why would you need it? All that a software inventory, management, etc. tool
is going to do is add overhead to a central resource. Have you had problems
in the past with strange software just showing up on your servers? We do an
annual inventory check of all our core systems.
load on the
machine its inventorying, you bought the wrong package.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
is anyone else getting the update source not found error?
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Watch Out - New Virus
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB
Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then
go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3
AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep
running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and
Out - New Virus
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700
Aye
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
is anyone else getting the update source not found error
Running fine for us in a mixed nt/2k/xp area. We have about 800 users on a
PIII-450 Xeon with 1gig of ram and 3 arms. No performance problems for any
of the users. Have you checked your DNS and WINS setting on the XP systems,
how does name resolution to your exchange server work from the cmd
1st, why not skip Ex2K and go right to E2K3, while your at it go ahead and
install Win2K3
2nd, get some books fast
3rd,
Exchange 5.5 will run on Win2K or NT4.0
Exchange 2K will run on Win2K
take a look at http://support.microsoft.com/?id=810591 for more information.
Have fun
I don't, I am glad that at 3pm on Friday it is an anti-climactic virus
event.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
This is the most anti climactic virus ever. I
This is the very reason the hey you idiot you sent me a virus messages
don't work. Now if we could only get those automated messages turned off.
We to have been fighting this with SOBIG, I spent over 8 hours trying to
convince a user who only has is a custom recipient on our system that his
They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same
server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and
procedures.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We have sort of the same problem here due to daylight savings time and our
AS/400's. The time is set correctly on each of them, the zones are the
same, however our Windows systems use DST and the 400's could give a rip
about that. So what happens is that the systems that support DST offset the
I have tossed this out on the NT list, but wanted to ask over here just in
case any of you had ran into this. I have googled it, and have an open
question on the newsgroups as well.
I am running ADMT and trying to migrate my computer, and every time I get an
access is denied to the a registry
Or this could be a good time to schedule some weekend work and test your D/R
procedures.
If ease and lack of any downtime is your number one concern and this box is
going to stay around for a while, I would look at getting an external drive
cage. This would allow you to setup your new raid
Give me one business (I was going to say good, but that's not possible)
reason for this, and I'll give you ten times that many technical reason why
the PST solution is a bad one. I hope you went down kicking and screaming
on this one. I for one would also be polishing up my resume and kicking
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
