RE: Backup rituals
I thought it was a good question. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I'm not asking how to administer my infrastructure. I've got my ways of doing things and I'm asking my peers if they have better ideas. If I started asking you guys how to add user accounts or What is SMTP, then yes, I deserve to be pimp-slapped. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals If you have a issue that is one thing. But to ask us how to administer your infrastructure is another. If your new to Exchange then take some training courses first. Many of your questions as of late are basic. From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Backup rituals Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:36:47 -0600 I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space. I thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and time, but maybe not. Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)??? Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I prefer full backup every day. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get holiday tips for festive fun. http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Oh yeah...I forgot to add that we do a full backup with Backup Exec each night. Also, beer is good for youG. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Totally valid question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Agreed. Particularly seeing as how I did weekly full, daily incremental, and am now switching Backup Exec to daily full as I write this! Tony, might I suggest a nap. ;) Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I thought it was a good question. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I'm not asking how to administer my infrastructure. I've got my ways of doing things and I'm asking my peers if they have better ideas. If I started asking you guys how to add user accounts or What is SMTP, then yes, I deserve to be pimp-slapped. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals If you have a issue that is one thing. But to ask us how to administer your infrastructure is another. If your new to Exchange then take some training courses first. Many of your questions as of late are basic. From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Backup rituals Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:36:47 -0600 I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space. I thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and time, but maybe not. Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)??? Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I prefer full backup every day. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get holiday tips for festive fun. http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Backup rituals
But then they get in the original bad mood referenced in the December 03, 2003 9:43 AM e-mail below G. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Tequila! -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 December 2003 16:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Real men drink Stout! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Oh yeah...I forgot to add that we do a full backup with Backup Exec each night. Also, beer is good for youG. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Totally valid question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Agreed. Particularly seeing as how I did weekly full, daily incremental, and am now switching Backup Exec to daily full as I write this! Tony, might I suggest a nap. ;) Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I thought it was a good question. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I'm not asking how to administer my infrastructure. I've got my ways of doing things and I'm asking my peers if they have better ideas. If I started asking you guys how to add user accounts or What is SMTP, then yes, I deserve to be pimp-slapped. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals If you have a issue that is one thing. But to ask us how to administer your infrastructure is another. If your new to Exchange then take some training courses first. Many of your questions as of late are basic. From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Backup rituals Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:36:47 -0600 I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space. I thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and time, but maybe not. Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)??? Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I prefer full backup every day. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Backup rituals
Other than my three year old daughter saying the word tit#y to her teacher, that was the best laugh of the day! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals At this point, the name of this discussion thread should be changed from Backup rituals to Back up, fell over in a drunken stupor and disgusting kareoke rituals. --E Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I'll have an Anchor Porter and a Jameson's on the rocks and get the lady whatever she wants. Jim -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals whiskey. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Tequila! -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 December 2003 16:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Real men drink Stout! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Oh yeah...I forgot to add that we do a full backup with Backup Exec each night. Also, beer is good for youG. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Totally valid question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Agreed. Particularly seeing as how I did weekly full, daily incremental, and am now switching Backup Exec to daily full as I write this! Tony, might I suggest a nap. ;) Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I thought it was a good question. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I'm not asking how to administer my infrastructure. I've got my ways of doing things and I'm asking my peers if they have better ideas. If I started asking you guys how to add user accounts or What is SMTP, then yes, I deserve to be pimp-slapped. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals If you have a issue that is one thing. But to ask us how to administer your infrastructure is another. If your new to Exchange then take some training courses first. Many of your questions as of late are basic. From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Backup rituals Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:36:47 -0600 I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space. I thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and time, but maybe not. Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)??? Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I prefer full backup every day. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week
Error associated with deceased employee
The event log of the Exchange 2000 server keeps logging the message below. The kicker is that the name shown is the name of an employee that worked for us that died about two months ago. Any idea what causes it?? Arch Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Date: 11/19/2003 Time: 9:11:06 AM User: N/A Computer: TRUCK Description: Error 80040305-8000 occurred while processing message from 'Jane Doe'. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
Last week, I applied the newest pst SP3 fixes (KB824282 - Exchange 2000Server
Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup) to our Exchange servers (one is in a child domain).
Everything worked fine that day until about midnight when I started getting tons of
e-mails saying something like the following:
Multiple edits have been made to Jane Doe. The conflicting edits have been attached
to a conflict message in Cmpy Phonebook. Conflicting edits have been made to the
same item. To resolve this conflict, select the item in the list below you wish to
keep and then choose Keep This Item, or choose Keep All to preserve all the
versions.
If you go into the eventviewer, you sees tons of errors like the ones shown at the
bottom. When it does this store.exe pegs the CPU at the child site to 100%. You also
end up with tons of messages in two SMTP queues at the child site:
1. PreSubmissionQueue (Messages pending submission)
2. WRGLE Routing (Routing Group Connector - Remote delivery)
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
Arch Willingham
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Conflicts
Event ID: 3067
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
An item conflict occurred in public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Cmpy Phonebook
.
Message ID: c-2B5D
From: ---
Subject: P H H
Received: 12/22/1999 8:47:34 PM
Database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (DOG).
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Backfill
Event ID: 3073
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
A backfill request (-1 of 69) for public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Parks
Cmpy Phonebook
was removed from server
/o=CAT/ou=Food2/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=FOOD2SV/cn=Microsoft Public
MDB.
CNSET:{0}
CNSET FAI:
21-14B5342,21-14B5344
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
The tech guy that was here installed some kind of help desk application. I don't know
what kind it was?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange
2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
You don't have a product called Outlook Helpdesk from www.kalmstrom.nu set
up in your PF's by chance, do you?
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange 2000 Server
Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
Last week, I applied the newest pst SP3 fixes (KB824282 - Exchange
2000Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup) to our Exchange servers (one is in a
child domain). Everything worked fine that day until about midnight when I
started getting tons of e-mails saying something like the following:
Multiple edits have been made to Jane Doe. The conflicting edits have been
attached to a conflict message in Cmpy Phonebook. Conflicting edits have
been made to the same item. To resolve this conflict, select the item in the
list below you wish to keep and then choose Keep This Item, or choose
Keep All to preserve all the versions.
If you go into the eventviewer, you sees tons of errors like the ones shown
at the bottom. When it does this store.exe pegs the CPU at the child site to
100%. You also end up with tons of messages in two SMTP queues at the child
site:
1. PreSubmissionQueue (Messages pending submission)
2. WRGLE Routing (Routing Group Connector - Remote delivery)
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
Arch Willingham
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Conflicts
Event ID: 3067
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
An item conflict occurred in public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Cmpy Phonebook
.
Message ID: c-2B5D
From: ---
Subject: P H H
Received: 12/22/1999 8:47:34 PM
Database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (DOG).
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Backfill
Event ID: 3073
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N/A
Computer: DOG
Description:
A backfill request (-1 of 69) for public folder (c-1A) IPM_SUBTREE\Parks
Cmpy Phonebook was removed from server
/o=CAT/ou=Food2/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=FOOD2SV/cn=Microsoft Public
MDB. CNSET:{0}
CNSET FAI:
21-14B5342,21-14B5344
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Exchange server to new hard drive?
I ended up doing most of what you said. I used Ghost 2002 to do a disk to disk copy, let it resize the partitions on the new drive (SCSI), removed the old drive, re-booted and it worked perfectly! Once it re-booted, it said it found new hardware and that I needed to re-boot. After it did I ran a check disk and it is working great. Took about 45 minutes start to finish. Thanks for everyone's help! Arch -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Exchange server to new hard drive? Agreed. I would install the new disk, use Ghost to image the disk across (while making the second partition fill the remainder of the new disk, and then shut down and remove the old drive for safe keeping. Once the new drive came up ok, I would shut it down again then install another identical disk and bring it back up and have windows mirror the disks. I am assuming you are using IDE disks in this system, and considering that most of them only have one year warranties, I'd add the second one to cover my rear a bit. --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 9:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Exchange server to new hard drive? I think he means the system files, too. Personally I would use some disk imaging software and push the image onto the new drive and take the old drive off line. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: July 5, 2003 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Exchange server to new hard drive? Install the new drive. Then, with the Exchange services running, in the properties for the storage group you can relocate the transaction logs, and in the properties for the store you can relocate the database files. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move Exchange server to new hard drive? What's the best way to put a new disk in an exchange 2000 server? Right now, its sitting in a N2000 server with one 17 MB SCSI disk broken into two partitions (one 6gb and one 11gb). I'd like to put it on one big drive (say around 70 GB) but still broken into two partitions so that I don't have to re-install a ton of software. Any ideas? Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving users between one domain and child domain
Is there an easier way to move users from the base domain to the child domain then doing the exmerge thing? I have done exmerge numerous times but its a pain in the bootie as there ends up being a conflict in the e-mail names while the two domains are synchig up...every time it takes about a day before the domain where the user leaves tells the other domain it is gone. I.E. when I delete John Doe from the base domain and create a John Doe in active directory in the child domain, the child domain thinks there are two John Does for about a day. Thanks! Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving users between one domain and child domain
I tired that but when you click move, he child domain does not show up. I found a utility called ADMT which worked great. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Moving users between one domain and child domain Can't you just remove the exchange attributes (and mailbox) from the from one account and connect them to the other? Is exmerge really necessary? You may also want to look at your AD replication topology and schedule if that type of replication is taking such an extreme amount of time to replicate. On 07/14/03 10:14, Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there an easier way to move users from the base domain to the child domain then doing the exmerge thing? I have done exmerge numerous times but its a pain in the bootie as there ends up being a conflict in the e-mail names while the two domains are synchig up...every time it takes about a day before the domain where the user leaves tells the other domain it is gone. I.E. when I delete John Doe from the base domain and create a John Doe in active directory in the child domain, the child domain thinks there are two John Does for about a day. Thanks! Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Exchange server to new hard drive?
10-4 on what you and Henry said (Yes...you are right...system files, other software...everything.). I am using a SCSI drive. Arch -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Exchange server to new hard drive? Agreed. I would install the new disk, use Ghost to image the disk across (while making the second partition fill the remainder of the new disk, and then shut down and remove the old drive for safe keeping. Once the new drive came up ok, I would shut it down again then install another identical disk and bring it back up and have windows mirror the disks. I am assuming you are using IDE disks in this system, and considering that most of them only have one year warranties, I'd add the second one to cover my rear a bit. --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 9:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Exchange server to new hard drive? I think he means the system files, too. Personally I would use some disk imaging software and push the image onto the new drive and take the old drive off line. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: July 5, 2003 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Exchange server to new hard drive? Install the new drive. Then, with the Exchange services running, in the properties for the storage group you can relocate the transaction logs, and in the properties for the store you can relocate the database files. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move Exchange server to new hard drive? What's the best way to put a new disk in an exchange 2000 server? Right now, its sitting in a N2000 server with one 17 MB SCSI disk broken into two partitions (one 6gb and one 11gb). I'd like to put it on one big drive (say around 70 GB) but still broken into two partitions so that I don't have to re-install a ton of software. Any ideas? Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move Exchange server to new hard drive?
What's the best way to put a new disk in an exchange 2000 server? Right now, its sitting in a N2000 server with one 17 MB SCSI disk broken into two partitions (one 6gb and one 11gb). I'd like to put it on one big drive (say around 70 GB) but still broken into two partitions so that I don't have to re-install a ton of software. Any ideas? Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 e-mail will not go to msn.com
None of our e-mail mail will go to any e-mail address that ends in msn.com. We are able to receive mail from them but not vice versa. I did what it said in the 257265 XCON KB. It worked fine until about a week ago. Now, I get the following entry in the event log: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeTransport Event Category: Connection Manager Event ID: 4000 Date: 03/05/2003 Time: 1:38:55 PM User: N/A Computer: WARDMEAGLE Description: Message delivery to the remote domain 'msn.com' failed for the following reason: The connection was dropped by the remote host. Any ideas? Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office SP-3 and Outlook/Exchange and the file attachment debacle
TechNet just sent out an e-mail about a future Webcast called Support WebCast: Microsoft Office 2000: Deploying Service Pack 3 ...is there such a thing for Office 2000? I thought the latest was SR-2??? If you are interested, the link is http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/servicedesks/webcasts/wc111902/wcblurb111902.asp Do any of you know if that fix to unblock attachments using OutlookSecurity.oft and Outlk9.adm will work with SP3? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WIN 2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3
Lets try againmy last post had a description that was not well received. Has anyone installed WIN 2000 SP3 on a machine using Exchange SP3? Any problems? Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NT2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3
Has anyone installed NT2000 SP3 on a machine using Exchange SP3? Any problems? Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do I need to kill badmail files?
Based on another posting I just saw, I looked in the Exch2k Mailroot\vs1 directory and found that I have 9039 files in the Bad Mail directory (taking up 34 MB of space). Do I need to kill them? Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
I am trying to install SP3 on Exchange 2000 at a child site. When it gets to the stage of doing the setup, I tried to change the install status of the top item to UPDATE. Once I do it gives me an error that says it can't install for three reasons (see below). If I go into the log that the setup routine creates (Exchange Server Setup Progress.log), the errors all say a derivation of the following: [09:44:44] Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services failed: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Update because: - You must be at least an Exchange Full Administrator at the Administrative Group level to run update. You must use an account that has been granted the Exchange Full Administrator role on the current administrative group, or a higher-level role, using the Exchange Administrative Delegation Wizard. - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. I am logged in as the administrator of that machine...why won't it work? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
I sort of see where you are going with this but to ask a really dumb question...I don't see a group/user called Exchange Full Administrator on the main site and it works here. Is there some specific permission that gives what you are talking about? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Administrator of the machine or 'Exchange Full Administrator'.. these are two different things. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I am trying to install SP3 on Exchange 2000 at a child site. When it gets to the stage of doing the setup, I tried to change the install status of the top item to UPDATE. Once I do it gives me an error that says it can't install for three reasons (see below). If I go into the log that the setup routine creates (Exchange Server Setup Progress.log), the errors all say a derivation of the following: [09:44:44] Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services failed: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Update because: - You must be at least an Exchange Full Administrator at the Administrative Group level to run update. You must use an account that has been granted the Exchange Full Administrator role on the current administrative group, or a higher-level role, using the Exchange Administrative Delegation Wizard. - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. I am logged in as the administrator of that machine...why won't it work? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
If it is the administrator of the child domain, how do I set it (the permissions) the way you are talking about It is the same account I used to install it at the child site and had no trouble with it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site ...why won't it work? Because the account you are using is not recognized an administrator at the administrative group level in Exchange, setup is unable to access AD and setup is unable to contact the schema master. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 7/24/2002 8:52 AM Subject: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I am trying to install SP3 on Exchange 2000 at a child site. When it gets to the stage of doing the setup, I tried to change the install status of the top item to UPDATE. Once I do it gives me an error that says it can't install for three reasons (see below). If I go into the log that the setup routine creates (Exchange Server Setup Progress.log), the errors all say a derivation of the following: [09:44:44] Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services failed: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Update because: - You must be at least an Exchange Full Administrator at the Administrative Group level to run update. You must use an account that has been granted the Exchange Full Administrator role on the current administrative group, or a higher-level role, using the Exchange Administrative Delegation Wizard. - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. I am logged in as the administrator of that machine...why won't it work? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
I did what you are talking about at the child site, I started Exchange System Manager, right clicked on the root, and clicked delegate, the properties of the current users popped up and the user I am logged in as says Exchange Full Administrator. I am really confused. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Permissions for Exchange are delegated in the Exchange System Manager. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 7/24/2002 9:17 AM Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I sort of see where you are going with this but to ask a really dumb question...I don't see a group/user called Exchange Full Administrator on the main site and it works here. Is there some specific permission that gives what you are talking about? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Administrator of the machine or 'Exchange Full Administrator'.. these are two different things. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
Also, I gave that particular user Schema Admin and Enterprise Admin permissions in the main site. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Permissions for Exchange are delegated in the Exchange System Manager. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 7/24/2002 9:17 AM Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I sort of see where you are going with this but to ask a really dumb question...I don't see a group/user called Exchange Full Administrator on the main site and it works here. Is there some specific permission that gives what you are talking about? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Administrator of the machine or 'Exchange Full Administrator'.. these are two different things. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
The last time I asked what an abbreviation stood for, one of the guys on the list wanted to draw and quarter me so, at the risk of getting shot for this questionwhat's an AG? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site What about granting these permissions on the AG? I might have missed that already since I'm jumping in an already warm conversation. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Also, I gave that particular user Schema Admin and Enterprise Admin permissions in the main site. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Permissions for Exchange are delegated in the Exchange System Manager. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 7/24/2002 9:17 AM Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I sort of see where you are going with this but to ask a really dumb question...I don't see a group/user called Exchange Full Administrator on the main site and it works here. Is there some specific permission that gives what you are talking about? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Administrator of the machine or 'Exchange Full Administrator'.. these are two different things. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
You got it! It turns out that there was a wrong setting in AD and once I set it, ka-pow...it all worked fine. Thanks for all y'all's help! Arch Willingham -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Sounds like there may be some issues communicating with the AD server and the schema master then... just to double check... you're logged into the domain and not the local machine? If so, NetIQ has a free utility which you can run from your machine which might be helpful in troubleshooting: http://www.netiq.com/adcheck/frequentlyaskedquestions.asp -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I did what you are talking about at the child site, I started Exchange System Manager, right clicked on the root, and clicked delegate, the properties of the current users popped up and the user I am logged in as says Exchange Full Administrator. I am really confused. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Permissions for Exchange are delegated in the Exchange System Manager. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 7/24/2002 9:17 AM Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I sort of see where you are going with this but to ask a really dumb question...I don't see a group/user called Exchange Full Administrator on the main site and it works here. Is there some specific permission that gives what you are talking about? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Administrator of the machine or 'Exchange Full Administrator'.. these are two different things. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees personalmail
I followed this advise and it has worked great. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees personalmail Rather than set a mailbox and fill it with smtp addresses from ex employees do the same with a distribution list and assign no members. This way the mails will just disappear into oblivion. -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 June 2002 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees personalmail I am having a similar problem, I have created a new mailbox and I made myself the owner, my question now is how to set the rule to delete messages delivered to this mailbox. In the past I have not been able to set a rule that applies to a secondary mailbox. I can set rules through outlook 2000 rule wizard to apply to may main box but not to a secondary one ie one setup for the above purpose. My platform is NT4 and exchange 5.5. service pack 6. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Nope...I only have 512k in it. -Original Message- From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Are you running win2k adv srvr with = 1Gb RAM? Are you using /3GB switch in boot.ini? XGEN: Exchange 2000 Requires /3GB Switch with More Than 1 Gigabyte of Physical RAM (Q266096) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: 24 June 2002 20:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Now to get that Woodruff guy really pissed off at my ignorance. I set up the now infamous DL with the dead e-mail addresses, and it works great...thanks to all of you that provided the solution! Now for the $64,000 question.where do those e-mails go? Do the just get wiped out our are they sitting in Exchange somewhere building up like my wife's pregnant midsection? BTW Chris...your future house/hospital/parking garage/church can be seen at www.tuparks.com G Thanks! Arch -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees I must respectfully disagree Mr. Slinger, and not just because you sided with Mr. Woodruff or because Mr. Willingham is working on the specs for my new house. Per 1, not knowing an acronym is hardly the same thing as not being prepared for class. I didn't chastise Mrs. Koslosky when she saw YMMV in usage for the first time and e-mailed me to ask what it meant. Course, I did give her a fishing lesson. Per 3, 100% might be a bit high, but 78.2% of all statistics are made up on the fly. I don't doubt that he has learned a lot from this list and occasionally dips his toe in. I like to think I do the same. Per 4, it might explain why the acronym DL was such a foreign concept to him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail is hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must say I was quite startled by its simplicity. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Per 1, that kinda goes to the original purpose of this list. You were kinda expected to know that stuff before you showed up here. But that's clearly shot to hell. Per 3, bullshit. Per 4, Not relevant to the conversation. It pains me to defend Woodruff given his previous (lack of) contributions, but there you go. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees 1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not only Exch Admins but also server double duty by working in other functions in their company. In the case a vice president of a construction company...I.E. work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's, holler at subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost, maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a crappy construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as money is too tight. 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring a bell. Have you ever forgotten a person's name? 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by someone else. I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every once in a while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question. 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had someone walk up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards and forwards, you had no idea it would do? We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough questions because some old superintendent that knew everything bit their head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound familiar? Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees How could you not know what a DL is? I just thought it was kind of weird for an Exch Admin not to know that. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Nice response...thanks...very helpful -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Uhhh Whats Exchange Server? -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Don't laugh but what's a DL? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees create a DL with all the email addresses, no members and hide it. No rule required. -Original Message- From
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Coolthanks! -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees They go into the air. Boom. Gone. :) - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Now to get that Woodruff guy really pissed off at my ignorance. I set up the now infamous DL with the dead e-mail addresses, and it works great...thanks to all of you that provided the solution! Now for the $64,000 question.where do those e-mails go? Do the just get wiped out our are they sitting in Exchange somewhere building up like my wife's pregnant midsection? BTW Chris...your future house/hospital/parking garage/church can be seen at www.tuparks.com G Thanks! Arch -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees I must respectfully disagree Mr. Slinger, and not just because you sided with Mr. Woodruff or because Mr. Willingham is working on the specs for my new house. Per 1, not knowing an acronym is hardly the same thing as not being prepared for class. I didn't chastise Mrs. Koslosky when she saw YMMV in usage for the first time and e-mailed me to ask what it meant. Course, I did give her a fishing lesson. Per 3, 100% might be a bit high, but 78.2% of all statistics are made up on the fly. I don't doubt that he has learned a lot from this list and occasionally dips his toe in. I like to think I do the same. Per 4, it might explain why the acronym DL was such a foreign concept to him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail is hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must say I was quite startled by its simplicity. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Per 1, that kinda goes to the original purpose of this list. You were kinda expected to know that stuff before you showed up here. But that's clearly shot to hell. Per 3, bullshit. Per 4, Not relevant to the conversation. It pains me to defend Woodruff given his previous (lack of) contributions, but there you go. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees 1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not only Exch Admins but also server double duty by working in other functions in their company. In the case a vice president of a construction company...I.E. work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's, holler at subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost, maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a crappy construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as money is too tight. 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring a bell. Have you ever forgotten a person's name? 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by someone else. I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every once in a while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question. 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had someone walk up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards and forwards, you had no idea it would do? We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough questions because some old superintendent that knew everything bit their head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound familiar? Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees How could you not know what a DL is? I just thought it was kind of weird for an Exch Admin not to know that. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Nice response...thanks...very helpful -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Uhhh Whats Exchange Server? -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
10-4 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees No recipients? Only the shadow knows where they go. Just another tip: Keep a list somewhere of all the emails you stick in there. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Now to get that Woodruff guy really pissed off at my ignorance. I set up the now infamous DL with the dead e-mail addresses, and it works great...thanks to all of you that provided the solution! Now for the $64,000 question.where do those e-mails go? Do the just get wiped out our are they sitting in Exchange somewhere building up like my wife's pregnant midsection? BTW Chris...your future house/hospital/parking garage/church can be seen at www.tuparks.com G Thanks! Arch -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees I must respectfully disagree Mr. Slinger, and not just because you sided with Mr. Woodruff or because Mr. Willingham is working on the specs for my new house. Per 1, not knowing an acronym is hardly the same thing as not being prepared for class. I didn't chastise Mrs. Koslosky when she saw YMMV in usage for the first time and e-mailed me to ask what it meant. Course, I did give her a fishing lesson. Per 3, 100% might be a bit high, but 78.2% of all statistics are made up on the fly. I don't doubt that he has learned a lot from this list and occasionally dips his toe in. I like to think I do the same. Per 4, it might explain why the acronym DL was such a foreign concept to him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail is hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must say I was quite startled by its simplicity. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Per 1, that kinda goes to the original purpose of this list. You were kinda expected to know that stuff before you showed up here. But that's clearly shot to hell. Per 3, bullshit. Per 4, Not relevant to the conversation. It pains me to defend Woodruff given his previous (lack of) contributions, but there you go. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees 1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not only Exch Admins but also server double duty by working in other functions in their company. In the case a vice president of a construction company...I.E. work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's, holler at subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost, maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a crappy construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as money is too tight. 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring a bell. Have you ever forgotten a person's name? 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by someone else. I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every once in a while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question. 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had someone walk up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards and forwards, you had no idea it would do? We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough questions because some old superintendent that knew everything bit their head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound familiar? Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees How could you not know what a DL is? I just thought it was kind of weird for an Exch Admin not to know that. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Nice response...thanks...very helpful -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Uhhh Whats Exchange Server? -Original Message- From
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
No..its called a change order. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Isnt joyful killing part of SM? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Per 1, it's all an act. :) Re. sm: I coulda joyfully killed you. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Per 1, just using it to illustrate a point. I think the fact that you're acronym impaired, yet otherwise so knowledgeable about Exchange (and many, many other things) was quite illustrative. Re: Short and mousey.. that was what, 3 years ago? Talk about intensely funny. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Per 1, I'm completely acronym impaired. And that was what, four years ago? Talk about dead dogs. Just call me short and mousey, why don'tcha? - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:23 AM Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees I must respectfully disagree Mr. Slinger, and not just because you sided with Mr. Woodruff or because Mr. Willingham is working on the specs for my new house. Per 1, not knowing an acronym is hardly the same thing as not being prepared for class. I didn't chastise Mrs. Koslosky when she saw YMMV in usage for the first time and e-mailed me to ask what it meant. Course, I did give her a fishing lesson. Per 3, 100% might be a bit high, but 78.2% of all statistics are made up on the fly. I don't doubt that he has learned a lot from this list and occasionally dips his toe in. I like to think I do the same. Per 4, it might explain why the acronym DL was such a foreign concept to him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail is hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must say I was quite startled by its simplicity. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Per 1, that kinda goes to the original purpose of this list. You were kinda expected to know that stuff before you showed up here. But that's clearly shot to hell. Per 3, bullshit. Per 4, Not relevant to the conversation. It pains me to defend Woodruff given his previous (lack of) contributions, but there you go. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees 1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not only Exch Admins but also server double duty by working in other functions in their company. In the case a vice president of a construction company...I.E. work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's, holler at subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost, maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a crappy construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as money is too tight. 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring a bell. Have you ever forgotten a person's name? 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by someone else. I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every once in a while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question. 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had someone walk up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards and forwards, you had no idea it would do? We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough questions because some old superintendent that knew everything bit their head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound familiar? Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees How could you not know what a DL is? I just thought it was kind of weird for an Exch Admin not to know that. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Can you still create dummy mailboxes with Exchange 2000? I thought thy all had to have a valid NT account to create one. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees The best method I have seen for this is to create a dummy mailbox. Assign it all the SMTP addresses for the former employees. Open this mailbox and set up an inbox rule wizard to permanently delete the messages as they come in. For all practical purposes they become vaporized. Not exactly RCW and such compliant, but it works. Scott -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Is there some brilliant way to delete all of the junk e-mail that ex-employees get? I.E. I have it (Exchange 2000) set to send me any e-mail message that does not resolve to one of our employees. When we kill their old e-mail box, they have inevitably set them selves to receive every piece of junk e-mail known to man so I get tons of them. I realize I could just create a rule in my e-mail box to kill it as it comes to me, but is there some kid of way to return an e-mail to the sender that acts like the domain is no longer available (I.E. it would act like it bounced and we no longer exist). For example, when our server went down during the conversion, all of the e-mails I get for this list service got bounced back and my account get set to on-hold. What ever it looks like when my e-mail gets bounced is what I would like to do for specific addresses. Does this make sense or am I barking up the wrong tree? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Don't laugh but what's a DL? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees create a DL with all the email addresses, no members and hide it. No rule required. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees The best method I have seen for this is to create a dummy mailbox. Assign it all the SMTP addresses for the former employees. Open this mailbox and set up an inbox rule wizard to permanently delete the messages as they come in. For all practical purposes they become vaporized. Not exactly RCW and such compliant, but it works. Scott -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Is there some brilliant way to delete all of the junk e-mail that ex-employees get? I.E. I have it (Exchange 2000) set to send me any e-mail message that does not resolve to one of our employees. When we kill their old e-mail box, they have inevitably set them selves to receive every piece of junk e-mail known to man so I get tons of them. I realize I could just create a rule in my e-mail box to kill it as it comes to me, but is there some kid of way to return an e-mail to the sender that acts like the domain is no longer available (I.E. it would act like it bounced and we no longer exist). For example, when our server went down during the conversion, all of the e-mails I get for this list service got bounced back and my account get set to on-hold. What ever it looks like when my e-mail gets bounced is what I would like to do for specific addresses. Does this make sense or am I barking up the wrong tree? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Nice response...thanks...very helpful -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Uhhh Whats Exchange Server? -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Don't laugh but what's a DL? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees create a DL with all the email addresses, no members and hide it. No rule required. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees personalmail The best method I have seen for this is to create a dummy mailbox. Assign it all the SMTP addresses for the former employees. Open this mailbox and set up an inbox rule wizard to permanently delete the messages as they come in. For all practical purposes they become vaporized. Not exactly RCW and such compliant, but it works. Scott -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Is there some brilliant way to delete all of the junk e-mail that ex-employees get? I.E. I have it (Exchange 2000) set to send me any e-mail message that does not resolve to one of our employees. When we kill their old e-mail box, they have inevitably set them selves to receive every piece of junk e-mail known to man so I get tons of them. I realize I could just create a rule in my e-mail box to kill it as it comes to me, but is there some kid of way to return an e-mail to the sender that acts like the domain is no longer available (I.E. it would act like it bounced and we no longer exist). For example, when our server went down during the conversion, all of the e-mails I get for this list service got bounced back and my account get set to on-hold. What ever it looks like when my e-mail gets bounced is what I would like to do for specific addresses. Does this make sense or am I barking up the wrong tree? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not only Exch Admins but also server double duty by working in other functions in their company. In the case a vice president of a construction company...I.E. work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's, holler at subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost, maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a crappy construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as money is too tight. 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring a bell. Have you ever forgotten a person's name? 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by someone else. I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every once in a while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question. 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had someone walk up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards and forwards, you had no idea it would do? We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough questions because some old superintendent that knew everything bit their head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound familiar? Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees How could you not know what a DL is? I just thought it was kind of weird for an Exch Admin not to know that. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Nice response...thanks...very helpful -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Uhhh Whats Exchange Server? -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Don't laugh but what's a DL? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees create a DL with all the email addresses, no members and hide it. No rule required. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees personalmail The best method I have seen for this is to create a dummy mailbox. Assign it all the SMTP addresses for the former employees. Open this mailbox and set up an inbox rule wizard to permanently delete the messages as they come in. For all practical purposes they become vaporized. Not exactly RCW and such compliant, but it works. Scott -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Is there some brilliant way to delete all of the junk e-mail that ex-employees get? I.E. I have it (Exchange 2000) set to send me any e-mail message that does not resolve to one of our employees. When we kill their old e-mail box, they have inevitably set them selves to receive every piece of junk e-mail known to man so I get tons of them. I realize I could just create a rule in my e-mail box to kill it as it comes to me, but is there some kid of way to return an e-mail to the sender that acts like the domain is no longer available (I.E. it would act like it bounced and we no longer exist). For example, when our server went down during the conversion, all of the e-mails I get for this list service got bounced back and my account get set to on-hold. What ever it looks like when my e-mail gets bounced is what I would like to do for specific addresses. Does this make sense or am I barking up the wrong tree? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Now those are some answers that make sense!G -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees -Original Message- 1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not only Exch Admins but also server double duty by working in other functions in their company. In the case a vice president of a construction company...I.E. work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's, holler at subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost, maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a crappy construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as money is too tight. Hmm.. I need a new house, wonder if we could work something out in trade. 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring a bell. Have you ever forgotten a person's name? I'm sorry, who are you again? 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by someone else. I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every once in a while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question. I once dropped a brick on my foot, didn't really need someone else to tell me not to do that again. Damn brick. 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had someone walk up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards and forwards, you had no idea it would do? Someone told me the other day that people actually use Excel can be used to tally up numbers. Who knew? We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough questions because some old superintendent that knew everything bit their head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound familiar? Um... let's not use any of those young carpenters on my new house ok? Or, at least give them an Exchange manual to read before they start... I'll bring the coffee and doughnuts to the job site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages
I did exactly what you said (it was set wrong) but that did not fix it. I ended up changing the extra X-400 address (it had a weird one that was pointing to the other site) and added a hot fix file from Optus and one of the two items fixed it. Thanks for the help! Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages If you have used ADSI Edit, set your connection point to Domain NC, drill down through your OU's to your problem account. Right click, properties, and look at the Target Address property. Hope this helps. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Michael: I hate to bother you but where did you find the the users Target Address attribute in ADSI? Can you give me an example of what one yours looks like? Thanks, Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird m essages I had a problem similar to this. Use something like ASDI and look at the users Target Address attribute. It might have something in it. Not sure how it gets there, but that is what happened to me. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages This is from www.Eventid.net We have seen this message when an Exchange custom recipient is deleted and someone tries to send an email to that account BEFORE the global address list is recreated. However there are other potential reasons for this message to occur. See the articles below for more info. Try these links Q259343 , Q230497 , Q169715 , Q180547 - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You can't really ask Optus anymore...you have to buy a support incident from their tech support provider. It seemed like it was something I did and not them due to the weird routing message. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Is the mail flowing between the two sites OK. What did Optus say? - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM Subject: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages We use Optus's Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector with Exchange 2000. We had previously used the same company's fax connector with Exchange 5.5 with great success. After we upgraded to Exchange 2000, we installed the new Facsys software and sent some test e-mails to fax numbers and it worked fine. Later, we has installed the site connector with another site (I think that's not what its called now but that's my terminology - sorry) and now any messages that get sent to a fax number give an error message like the following: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 06/05/2002 Time: 10:28:44 AM User: N/A Computer: DOG Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;L=DOG-020605142840Z-115. It was originally destined for C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;O=Truck;DDA:FAX=Arch Willingham(a)+1 (800) 555-1212; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12) Also, it sends me an NDR that says: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Arch Willingham (Business Fax) on 06/05/2002 10:29 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=Parks;l=DOG-020605142840Z-115 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:AREA1:DOG The weird part is that it looks like it is trying to send it to the other site (Truck) instead of going on out the fax server. Any ideas? Thanks, Arch
RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages
Michael: I hate to bother you but where did you find the the users Target Address attribute in ADSI? Can you give me an example of what one yours looks like? Thanks, Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird m essages I had a problem similar to this. Use something like ASDI and look at the users Target Address attribute. It might have something in it. Not sure how it gets there, but that is what happened to me. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages This is from www.Eventid.net We have seen this message when an Exchange custom recipient is deleted and someone tries to send an email to that account BEFORE the global address list is recreated. However there are other potential reasons for this message to occur. See the articles below for more info. Try these links Q259343 , Q230497 , Q169715 , Q180547 - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You can't really ask Optus anymore...you have to buy a support incident from their tech support provider. It seemed like it was something I did and not them due to the weird routing message. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Is the mail flowing between the two sites OK. What did Optus say? - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM Subject: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages We use Optus's Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector with Exchange 2000. We had previously used the same company's fax connector with Exchange 5.5 with great success. After we upgraded to Exchange 2000, we installed the new Facsys software and sent some test e-mails to fax numbers and it worked fine. Later, we has installed the site connector with another site (I think that's not what its called now but that's my terminology - sorry) and now any messages that get sent to a fax number give an error message like the following: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 06/05/2002 Time: 10:28:44 AM User: N/A Computer: DOG Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;L=DOG-020605142840Z-115. It was originally destined for C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;O=Truck;DDA:FAX=Arch Willingham(a)+1 (800) 555-1212; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12) Also, it sends me an NDR that says: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Arch Willingham (Business Fax) on 06/05/2002 10:29 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=Parks;l=DOG-020605142840Z-115 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:AREA1:DOG The weird part is that it looks like it is trying to send it to the other site (Truck) instead of going on out the fax server. Any ideas? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages
10-4 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages If you have used ADSI Edit, set your connection point to Domain NC, drill down through your OU's to your problem account. Right click, properties, and look at the Target Address property. Hope this helps. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Michael: I hate to bother you but where did you find the the users Target Address attribute in ADSI? Can you give me an example of what one yours looks like? Thanks, Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird m essages I had a problem similar to this. Use something like ASDI and look at the users Target Address attribute. It might have something in it. Not sure how it gets there, but that is what happened to me. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages This is from www.Eventid.net We have seen this message when an Exchange custom recipient is deleted and someone tries to send an email to that account BEFORE the global address list is recreated. However there are other potential reasons for this message to occur. See the articles below for more info. Try these links Q259343 , Q230497 , Q169715 , Q180547 - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You can't really ask Optus anymore...you have to buy a support incident from their tech support provider. It seemed like it was something I did and not them due to the weird routing message. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Is the mail flowing between the two sites OK. What did Optus say? - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM Subject: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages We use Optus's Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector with Exchange 2000. We had previously used the same company's fax connector with Exchange 5.5 with great success. After we upgraded to Exchange 2000, we installed the new Facsys software and sent some test e-mails to fax numbers and it worked fine. Later, we has installed the site connector with another site (I think that's not what its called now but that's my terminology - sorry) and now any messages that get sent to a fax number give an error message like the following: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 06/05/2002 Time: 10:28:44 AM User: N/A Computer: DOG Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;L=DOG-020605142840Z-115. It was originally destined for C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;O=Truck;DDA:FAX=Arch Willingham(a)+1 (800) 555-1212; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12) Also, it sends me an NDR that says: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Arch Willingham (Business Fax) on 06/05/2002 10:29 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=Parks;l=DOG-020605142840Z-115 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:AREA1:DOG The weird part is that it looks like it is trying to send it to the other site (Truck) instead of going on out the fax server. Any ideas? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages
I checked and all of ours are empty...is that good or bad? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages If you have used ADSI Edit, set your connection point to Domain NC, drill down through your OU's to your problem account. Right click, properties, and look at the Target Address property. Hope this helps. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Michael: I hate to bother you but where did you find the the users Target Address attribute in ADSI? Can you give me an example of what one yours looks like? Thanks, Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird m essages I had a problem similar to this. Use something like ASDI and look at the users Target Address attribute. It might have something in it. Not sure how it gets there, but that is what happened to me. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages This is from www.Eventid.net We have seen this message when an Exchange custom recipient is deleted and someone tries to send an email to that account BEFORE the global address list is recreated. However there are other potential reasons for this message to occur. See the articles below for more info. Try these links Q259343 , Q230497 , Q169715 , Q180547 - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You can't really ask Optus anymore...you have to buy a support incident from their tech support provider. It seemed like it was something I did and not them due to the weird routing message. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Is the mail flowing between the two sites OK. What did Optus say? - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM Subject: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages We use Optus's Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector with Exchange 2000. We had previously used the same company's fax connector with Exchange 5.5 with great success. After we upgraded to Exchange 2000, we installed the new Facsys software and sent some test e-mails to fax numbers and it worked fine. Later, we has installed the site connector with another site (I think that's not what its called now but that's my terminology - sorry) and now any messages that get sent to a fax number give an error message like the following: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 06/05/2002 Time: 10:28:44 AM User: N/A Computer: DOG Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;L=DOG-020605142840Z-115. It was originally destined for C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;O=Truck;DDA:FAX=Arch Willingham(a)+1 (800) 555-1212; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12) Also, it sends me an NDR that says: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Arch Willingham (Business Fax) on 06/05/2002 10:29 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=Parks;l=DOG-020605142840Z-115 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:AREA1:DOG The weird part is that it looks like it is trying to send it to the other site (Truck) instead of going on out the fax server. Any ideas? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages
We use Optus's Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector with Exchange 2000. We had previously used the same company's fax connector with Exchange 5.5 with great success. After we upgraded to Exchange 2000, we installed the new Facsys software and sent some test e-mails to fax numbers and it worked fine. Later, we has installed the site connector with another site (I think that's not what its called now but that's my terminology - sorry) and now any messages that get sent to a fax number give an error message like the following: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 06/05/2002 Time: 10:28:44 AM User: N/A Computer: DOG Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;L=DOG-020605142840Z-115. It was originally destined for C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;O=Truck;DDA:FAX=Arch Willingham(a)+1 (800) 555-1212; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12) Also, it sends me an NDR that says: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Arch Willingham (Business Fax) on 06/05/2002 10:29 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=Parks;l=DOG-020605142840Z-115 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:AREA1:DOG The weird part is that it looks like it is trying to send it to the other site (Truck) instead of going on out the fax server. Any ideas? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages
Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You can't really ask Optus anymore...you have to buy a support incident from their tech support provider. It seemed like it was something I did and not them due to the weird routing message. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Is the mail flowing between the two sites OK. What did Optus say? - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM Subject: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages We use Optus's Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector with Exchange 2000. We had previously used the same company's fax connector with Exchange 5.5 with great success. After we upgraded to Exchange 2000, we installed the new Facsys software and sent some test e-mails to fax numbers and it worked fine. Later, we has installed the site connector with another site (I think that's not what its called now but that's my terminology - sorry) and now any messages that get sent to a fax number give an error message like the following: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 06/05/2002 Time: 10:28:44 AM User: N/A Computer: DOG Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;L=DOG-020605142840Z-115. It was originally destined for C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;O=Truck;DDA:FAX=Arch Willingham(a)+1 (800) 555-1212; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12) Also, it sends me an NDR that says: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Arch Willingham (Business Fax) on 06/05/2002 10:29 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=Parks;l=DOG-020605142840Z-115 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:AREA1:DOG The weird part is that it looks like it is trying to send it to the other site (Truck) instead of going on out the fax server. Any ideas? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird m messages
We had a problem with the initial Exchange 2000 install and had to re-do it. I noticed that my name does not have any FAX or FACSYS attributes...should it? Arch -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird m essages I had a problem similar to this. Use something like ASDI and look at the users Target Address attribute. It might have something in it. Not sure how it gets there, but that is what happened to me. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages This is from www.Eventid.net We have seen this message when an Exchange custom recipient is deleted and someone tries to send an email to that account BEFORE the global address list is recreated. However there are other potential reasons for this message to occur. See the articles below for more info. Try these links Q259343 , Q230497 , Q169715 , Q180547 - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You can't really ask Optus anymore...you have to buy a support incident from their tech support provider. It seemed like it was something I did and not them due to the weird routing message. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages Is the mail flowing between the two sites OK. What did Optus say? - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM Subject: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird messages We use Optus's Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector with Exchange 2000. We had previously used the same company's fax connector with Exchange 5.5 with great success. After we upgraded to Exchange 2000, we installed the new Facsys software and sent some test e-mails to fax numbers and it worked fine. Later, we has installed the site connector with another site (I think that's not what its called now but that's my terminology - sorry) and now any messages that get sent to a fax number give an error message like the following: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 06/05/2002 Time: 10:28:44 AM User: N/A Computer: DOG Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;L=DOG-020605142840Z-115. It was originally destined for C=US;A= ;P=Reagan;O=Truck;DDA:FAX=Arch Willingham(a)+1 (800) 555-1212; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12) Also, it sends me an NDR that says: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Arch Willingham (Business Fax) on 06/05/2002 10:29 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=Parks;l=DOG-020605142840Z-115 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:AREA1:DOG The weird part is that it looks like it is trying to send it to the other site (Truck) instead of going on out the fax server. Any ideas? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762)
Now we are getting somewhere. Yes, I have is set to send me NDR's and I understand that part. One of the machines died and had to have a fresh install of Exchange 2000 (using the old databases which were OK) and that's where I get confused. Once it was re-built (side note...a guy from Microsoft's tech support helped me do itone of the most helpful people I have ever worked with), I assume it knows nothing about the old Exchange 5.5 and it is no longer an upgrade??? As such, my ADC connection agreements do not seem to be working. I tried to get them to work but it does not see the Exchange server on port 379, 389 or 390 (my wild a## guesses). Any idea what I am doing wrong? It sounds like if I can get that part figured out, it will alleviate the other?? To say the least, I am confused. Arch -Original Message- From: Saunders, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762) You are correct, they do have to do with directory replication. This is a dir-rep message directed to the DSA on a server named TRUCK. Do you still have this server? Are your ADC Connection Agreements in order, especialy your ConfigCA? Apparently the active directory doesn't see the address, hence the 5.1.1 DSN. Also, most likely the reason you got this is because the SMTP virtual server is set to send a copy of NDR's to you. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762) Since I swapped over to Exchange 2000 from Exchange 5.5, I keep getting these messages in my inbox. I assume they have something to do with the Exchange site/directory replication?? What do I do to stop them? The message is: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762) Sent: 05/30/2002 7:57 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/30/2002 7:56 AM The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address. car.dog.com #5.1.1 Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762)
Since I swapped over to Exchange 2000 from Exchange 5.5, I keep getting these messages in my inbox. I assume they have something to do with the Exchange site/directory replication?? What do I do to stop them? The message is: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762) Sent: 05/30/2002 7:57 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/30/2002 7:56 AM The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address. car.dog.com #5.1.1 Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Because, and this will probably be a very unscientific answer, but if your server is down for a while, the list thing starts getting the bounced messages and it appears that they shut you off from receiving more. Once you send a message, they start back. That's why I did it anyway. Arch -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test LoL... Why in God's name do ppl insist in sending test messages to mailing lists? Filipe Joel de Almeida -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: sábado, 25 de Maio de 2002 5:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Test You passed now get out and enjoy the weekend - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Test Test _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is this LDAP error?
I looked in the KB and I don't see much on this error. I just installed Ex 2000 a few days ago and I am trying to clean up all of the errors: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSRS Event Category: LDAP Interface Event ID: 1309 Date: 05/23/2002 Time: 1:11:53 PM User: N/A Computer: TRUCK Description: Register LDAP SSL protocol failed with error 10048. The LDAP SSL server is not available. Make sure port number 44843 is not used by another application. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
I was the bonehead that posted the original question. I liked the first answer I got Don't worry about it G! Arch Willingham -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: Sarcasm is the word you need to become familiar with. Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory info?
I'm new to Exchange 2K and I'm having problems figuring out how to get my two servers to connect and replicate directory info. I'm running 2 windows 2k servers in 2 different, untrusted domains and in 2 different locations connected via WAN link. I had the same setup with Exchange 5.5 and it ran perfectly for years. If anyone could share a simple step by step way to do this I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory info?
That was not the answer I was hoping forG! Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory info?
Oops...sorry about thathe said: Sounds like a consulting engagement to me... Arch -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory info? Arch, just an FYI, it's absolutely impossible to make any sense of a message when the prior history has all been deleted. We don't have time to look back down the list and see what you're talking about! -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory info? That was not the answer I was hoping forG! Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Drive m:????
Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict? Do we need it? Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 - where is the equiv. of the IMS eventvwr?
I just installed Exchange 2000 and am having difficulties finding things where there used to be. I used to set Exchange 5.5 so that I could see (in the eventvwr) when messages flowed in and out of our site (via IMS connector). Is there a way to do that now? Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange not connecting to remote sites
Prior to our upgrade, had our Exchange 5.5 server receive all e-mails and then they got forwarded to our remote site. I installed the ADC connector and then upgraded to Exchange 2000. The remote site is still on Exchange 5.5. Two questions: 1. It is very difficult to tell how the replication is supposed to work (it was easy in 5.5). The connector came over in the upgrade but I can't tell if it works. 2. How do you make it where the users at the other site show up in the GAL like they did in 5.5? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
I believe I opened a can of worms!g -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the possibility of the existence of such a thing. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive m: Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018 ?
This past weekend, I had a problem with Exchange 5.5 SP4. It would not start and gave errors like these: Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Database Page Cache Description: MSExchangeIS (3196) A read of the database file d:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB between offsets 0x13D6 and 0x13D60FFF failed after 16 failed read attempts with error -1018. Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Database Page Cache Event ID: 116 Description: MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018 ((1:81247 1:4294967295) (4294967295-4294967295) (0-103810989)) occurred. I can't restore from backup as I think this has been going on for a while. After reading through KB articles, I tried running eseutil /d but it stopped about half way through. I ran isinteg -pri -fix -test alltests and it made a variety of fixes (4) and gave 7 warnings. I then ran isinteg -patch and was able to start everything up just fine. I thought it was all fine at that point. I ran checkdsk /f /r /v which found a few weird errors. Last night, when the backup software ran I found the following errors (about 8 of them) in the event log: Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Online Defragmentation Event ID: 184 Description: MSExchangeIS (3196) Online defragmentation of database 'd:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1018. Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Database Page Cache Event ID: 116 Description: MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous read page checksum error -1018 ((1:81247 1:4294967295) (4294967295-4294967295) (0-103952452)) occurred. I read enough about eseutil to know that it sounds like it can really screw the pooch. Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this? Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed as I type this. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Arch -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? 1018 errors? Oh oh. I would call PSS. Dont wait on us. Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
His name was Fred. He gave me the same warnings about the -1018. Unfortunately My hardware vendor is not one person. That machine is a generic Intel machine that has been an Exchange server for years. It has an Adaptec 394x controller, 512 MB or RAM, two pretty fast, name brand hard drives, etc. As you know, that makes it worse as you don't know where to begin. Its like an umpire at a MLB game getting beaned by a bottle of Bud...who in the world threw it? Arch -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? People who bitch about Microsoft (PSS at least) are generally also the same people who are incapable of formulating an intelligent technical question. You ought to be on the phone with your hardware vendor at the moment as well, your -1018 error is a hardware related issue, and you'll need some parts swapage to keep this from happening again. Oh and take good notes from the PSS feller and tell him we all say hi. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed as I type this. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Arch -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? 1018 errors? Oh oh. I would call PSS. Dont wait on us. Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install ADC connector on Domain controller
OK...I missed something in the instructions last night at 3:00AM and installed the Exchange 2000 ADC on the same machine as Exchange Server 5.5 which is also a domain controller. I finally figured out that was a bad idea Can the ADC be installed on another Domain controller (NT2000)? I don't have any machines that are just member servers. Also, I tried doing that part where you change the LDAP port to 390 and it causes tons of problems. Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Can someone out there smarter than me tell me how to figure out how much it costs to upgrade an Exchange 5.5 site with a 5 CAL to the same thing in Exchange 2000? I have gone to both CDW and Microsoft's sites and there are a zillion options but none says diddly squat about an upgrade. The impression I got was that it is almost like you have to buy the whole thing brand new and you don't get any credit for already owning the product? Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two questions on upgrade to 2k from 5.5
1. I think I do.I have one IMS connector. 2. I'm not sure how to tell the total size of IS but PRIV.EDB is 2.6 GB and PUB.EDB is 1 GB so I should be OK right??? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Two questions on upgrade to 2k from 5.5 1. do you have site connections? if yes, then create site connection after you have upgraded. that is how I did it. 2. Standard IS is maxed at 16GB. - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:35 AM Subject: Two questions on upgrade to 2k from 5.5 We have two remote Exchange sites that have their own Exchange servers with their own site names. I set them up so long ago, I am not sure I remember how I did it. Anyway, we get all of the mail for the domain and forward on the mail to the appropriate exchanges servers at the other site. Two questions: 1. If I upgrade our Exchange Server from 5.5 SP4 to Exchange 2000, will it stop working with those two sites if they stay at 5.5? 2. Can I use the standard Exchange Server? I.E. is there any reason to have to go to the Enterprise thing? Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Thanks a million! -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Me..milage may differ.. 1.) I find it easier to call the sales rep. to get a straight answer. 2.) After July31? 2002..yes you will have no chioce but to buy the whole thing new...at least thats the way I understand it. Note: At =5 users I think you will qualify for the MOLP lic. Now they will get you for the upgrade cost and then theres the software assurence stuff. Call the rep it is a lot easier on the brain..I found... I found it to be cheaper now then if I said..NO I will never upgrade and then decided to laterfor approx +100 users. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Can someone out there smarter than me tell me how to figure out how much it costs to upgrade an Exchange 5.5 site with a 5 CAL to the same thing in Exchange 2000? I have gone to both CDW and Microsoft's sites and there are a zillion options but none says diddly squat about an upgrade. The impression I got was that it is almost like you have to buy the whole thing brand new and you don't get any credit for already owning the product? Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where is global text set for outgoing messages?
We need to append text to the bottom of every e-mail message leaving our Exchange 5.5 site. I saw how to do it a long time ago but do not remember where you set it in Exchange. Can anyone help? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is global text set for outgoing messages?
Thanks...I found it. -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is global text set for outgoing messages? FAQ Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is global text set for outgoing messages? We need to append text to the bottom of every e-mail message leaving our Exchange 5.5 site. I saw how to do it a long time ago but do not remember where you set it in Exchange. Can anyone help? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that our new mailing address is: Parks Construction P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline access to Global Address Book
FantasticI found it! One more question - when I went where you told me to go and click add, I see the address book for each site however there is also a possible selection called Global Address Bookdo I pick that one too? Arch Willingham -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline access to Global Address Book The contents of the OST is configured under DS Site Configuration. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline access to Global Address Book We have three sites that sync together. When you open the global address book, all of the names from each site show up together...I.E. If Arch is at site A, Doug is at site B and Jimmy is at site c, when you click on the drop down list for names in the GAL you see: Arch Doug Jimmy If you tell Outlook that you want an off-line OST file with the GAL in it and you go off line, you only see Arch in the drop down list for the GAL. Is there any way to make is so that all of the users are available off line? Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline access to Global Address Book
I just tried it, synchronized the ost and went off line. None off the other sites people showed up. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline access to Global Address Book I think the GAL is all you want. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline access to Global Address Book FantasticI found it! One more question - when I went where you told me to go and click add, I see the address book for each site however there is also a possible selection called Global Address Bookdo I pick that one too? Arch Willingham -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline access to Global Address Book The contents of the OST is configured under DS Site Configuration. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline access to Global Address Book We have three sites that sync together. When you open the global address book, all of the names from each site show up together...I.E. If Arch is at site A, Doug is at site B and Jimmy is at site c, when you click on the drop down list for names in the GAL you see: Arch Doug Jimmy If you tell Outlook that you want an off-line OST file with the GAL in it and you go off line, you only see Arch in the drop down list for the GAL. Is there any way to make is so that all of the users are available off line? Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Offline access to Global Address Book
We have three sites that sync together. When you open the global address book, all of the names from each site show up together...I.E. If Arch is at site A, Doug is at site B and Jimmy is at site c, when you click on the drop down list for names in the GAL you see: Arch Doug Jimmy If you tell Outlook that you want an off-line OST file with the GAL in it and you go off line, you only see Arch in the drop down list for the GAL. Is there any way to make is so that all of the users are available off line? Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any way to change items in IMS queue
Daniel: Good idea! It worked...sort of. If I stop and restart the IMS service, it now gives me an error saying: The Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 8 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 0 milliseconds: No action. I scooted all of the messages over to a temp directory and re-started it. It started fine. I stopped it and moved a few at a time and re-started it. A couple of the messages are causing the problem - any idea why? Arch -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Any way to change items in IMS queue Ouch... 1. A search-and-replace utility. Run it against the \exchsrvr\imcdata\out directory and replace all instances of 1.2.3.4 with a name. That name will exist in the HOSTS files mapping to the correct IP. 2. Set the IMS to accept messages for 1.2.3.4 and redirect to the correct name or correct IP. Move those messages out of the \out folder and into the \in folder. - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 2:24 PM Subject: RE: Any way to change items in IMS queue I'll make it worse...the old name was just an IP address. The guy that set it up used the ip address instead of a name. Will it still work? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Any way to change items in IMS queue Fastest way would be to make an entry in the server's HOSTS file pairing the old name with the new IP. Keep it until those items flush out. - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:52 PM Subject: Any way to change items in IMS queue I have a bunch of items that are stacked up in the IMS queue. The site name where they used to get delivered to has changed and has a new ip address. Is there any way to change the existing items so that they will go to the new address? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any way to change items in IMS queue
I have a bunch of items that are stacked up in the IMS queue. The site name where they used to get delivered to has changed and has a new ip address. Is there any way to change the existing items so that they will go to the new address? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possible to use Exchange folders for database reporting?
Is it possible to use the folder in Exchange 5.5 to report on an ODBC database? I'd like the user to be able to click on the public folder and have it list all the info in an ODBC database. Am I crazy or is this possible? Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
