All,
I have a questions. We are are in native mode with our Exchange
organization. In one site we have an E2K server with a Notes connector
that connects with our corporate office. My question is, I remember on
the Notes connector on Exchange 5.5 there was a file where you can edit
to make the
Are these utils on the E2K cd?
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Messaging Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You'd preferably would like to set it up as a member server. The less
services running on an Exchange server the better. Exchange utilizes a
lot of resources. I would think everyone would agree with that.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Messaging Team
Celera
Sounds like a bunch of horse$hittell the user. You can only use one address.
Then tell him to go back to playing his 80's music on his computer.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Messaging Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Testes123? That's pretty random huh?
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Messaging Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Todd Bentley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM
To:
]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one
of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then
it passes it on to our
the redundant system.
If you do have a need for this system could you please tell us what's in
the /etc/sendmail.cf file and in the /etc/mail/ directory?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1
Discussions
Subject: Re: Mailbox Stuck Under Outlook Today
Eh? I'm not sure I really understand the problem based on the
description, but remove the old profile and create a new profile named
More Beer. The new profile must be named More Beer or the gods will
be angry.
On 1/14/03 15:53, Bowles, John L
idea, the latter doesn't necessarily matter as
much.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail
Did you ever answer my question? By [EMAIL PROTECTED] do you mean
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
On 1/13/03 13:57, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all I'm not managing this site
- Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent
All,
As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing
tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point
me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving
myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for
you help!
Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Under servers, servername, smtp, default smtp virtual server, properties
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL
answer that question
specifically if I can)?
On 1/10/03 14:22, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing
tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point
me to where I can find the equivalent
All,
Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And
should I be worried?
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
The list of email addresses are below.
, 2003 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Delay
Was there a DSN code with this message?
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Bowles, John L.
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2003 07:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Message
All,
What we have our 2 user accounts setup as conference rooms. (Don't ask
me why I just inherited this) and a user is trying to book a recurring
meeting appointment to this account but keeps returning the error of:
The Conference Room declined your meeting because it's recurring. You
must
for resources.
Nikki
Bowles, John L. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
All,
What we have our 2 user accounts setup as conference rooms. (Don't
ask me why I just inherited this) and a user is trying to book a
recurring meeting appointment to this account but keeps returning the
error of: The Conference
, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error
Nikki,
Let me take a look. I
And you said that you've made yourself the Owner of this calendar
correct? Cause that should let you do anything on that calendar.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've
been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail
loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're
right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for
that fact. Cause
mail loops unless you are unwisely using a
rule.
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM
Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
I finally got my manager to allow me
- Security Risk
Deny auto-replies to the Internet and you wont have to worry about users
setting it up incorrectly.
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: Ouut Oof
I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19
, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K,
aren't you?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM
]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab,
maintenance interval.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
L.
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM
All,
I'm trying to decommission my last Exch 5.5 server in my site. What
I've noticed is that this server has a direction replication connector
setup to another site that has a 5.5 server. But their accounts are
located on a W2K server. Now, what I'm trying to figure out since all
our servers
12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 - E2K
Clark who?
--
From: Bowles, John L.
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 - E2K
I don't want to be like Clark
Does this person work off multiple workstations? For instance using a laptop (using
.ost files) and then using a desktop as well? One thing you might want to check out
is Q article Q276248. My users have multiple workstations and can't understand why
they keep getting duplicates and missing
, December 17, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC2003
Ummm
That's the quickest way to get fired - er - laid off.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC2003
Or you could just tell your bosses that their wives have been hitting on
you since you were hired?
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Wall
I see those fish tacos go to you too.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 5:40 PM
To: Exchange
All,
I'm getting his error message on my SMTP Connector/Notes Connector
server on E2K SP3. I can't find anything regarding this issue on
technet. Has anyone seen this event? If so, can you please point me in
the right direction?
Thank you,
___
John Bowles
Exchange
All,
I'm looking on Slipstick now for the reg hack for Outlook to allow
certain file types to not be delete on transmission. Does anyone know
what I'm looking for and point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L.
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Attachemnt Problem
All,
I'm looking on Slipstick now for the reg hack for Outlook to allow
certain file types to not be delete on transmission. Does
All,
How do I disable auto-response to the internet in Exchange 2000? I know
when you went into the IMC in Exchange 5.5 you could disable it there.
Is there such an option in E2K?
Please let me know,
Thank you,
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise
, December 13, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto-Response To The Internet
I believe it's in the following location:
ESM-Internet Message Formats-Advanced
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:34 PM
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto-Response To The Internet
I believe it's in the following location:
ESM-Internet Message Formats-Advanced
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
All,
I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our
Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to
accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the
Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But
how do I get rid of
for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin
program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You
then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is that
what you did?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
, December 09, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
IIRC, it takes time to replicate the change through to AD. So, it may
be a problem with your Config CA.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
. Is that
what you did?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
All,
I have a question for everyone. I've retired
Servers
So you've ruled out a problem with the Config CA, then?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:13
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
So you've ruled out a problem with the Config CA, then?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:13
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
I thought you could only do that from 5.5 Manager.
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
All,
I have this weird problem with one of the sites that I'm managing. It seems
that everyone in the site can send and receive SMTP mail. But if you create
a new user. It won't send or receive SMTP mail. They are entirely on W2K
and E2K SP3. I've also narrowed it down to just this site
Johnny,
You have to do the same thing. You need to create a contact. Then on the
user property pages go to Exchange General. On there you'll have Delivery
Options. In there you can forward to that contact that you created.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
can be seen from some users just fine, but others see
no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the
client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still
nothing.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:John.Bowles;celera.com]
Sent
You are not getting any information at all? Or just partial info?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart;sanantonio.gov]
Sent: Tuesday,
All,
Has anyone seen that when a use replies to a message from a personal folder
that the message hangs in the Outbox? If anyone has any insight on how they
resolved this problem please let me know.
Backend: Using E2K SP3
Client: Outlook 2K
Thank you,
__
John
All,
I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from one Exchange server
to another. I'm in mixed mode right now and it doesn't matter if I move a
mailbox between 5.5-E2K. Or E2K-E2K. But what seems to happen is once
the mailbox is moved admins who have been manually added to their
?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
All,
I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from one
Exchange server
Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
And how are the other users accessing the mailbox (File | Open Other Users
folder) or Tols | Services | MSE | Advanced ADD)?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:28
]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
Is it only the calendar folder which has this issue?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L
out in our test lab.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
All,
I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from one
All,
Quick quesiton. Does Instant Messaging for Exchange 2000 require that you
install Advanced Server? Please let me know.
Thank you,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is required for Exchange 2k anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:12 AM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange and Instant Messaging
Subject: Exchange and Instant Messaging
All,
Quick quesiton. Does Instant
Please pass on the message to your co-worker for her instructor and tell
him that there are such things as Q articles on Microsoft's site. If he
needs help it's www.microsoft.com Read em, Learn em, Live em. Have a
great day! Buh-bye.
___
John Bowles
Exchange
All,
I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on the server in question. I'm running
OWA off this server. And it seems as of yesterday OWA isn't functioning
correctly. I've tried and restart the WWW services. Once Ive done
that it will work for about 3-5 mins and then return the same error when
you try
the
Windows debuggers attached to the IIS service processes to see what is
going on.
Hope this helps.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:39 AM
Subject: OWA Problems
All,
I'm
Why don't you just get a viable AV Scanner? i.e. ScanMail?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:40
What about granting these permissions on the AG? I might have missed
that already since I'm jumping in an already warm conversation.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
The last time I asked what an abbreviation stood for, one of the guys on
the list wanted to draw and quarter me so, at the risk of getting shot
for this questionwhat's an AG?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto
I'm going to take a stab without even reading the entire post. You need
to and instance of the Free/Busy system folder on E2K.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
All,
We have users that their workstations are not in a domain. They are
able to logon onto our Exchange server by giving their credentials to
get in. My question is, can you disable that function? And if so, are
there any repercussions if you disable it?
Thank you,
by not letting them get onto their mailbox while logging on locally?
Not that I know of.
We have to make it policy here so that the antivirus updates work.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Authentication Question
Well our Security Team is wondering if there is a way we can disable
this. Off the top of my head I have no idea. That's why I
address from DHCP (or use static IP addresses). You
could also implement Kerberos if you're a W2K shop.
[1] Seriously.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Authentication Question
You solved your own problem my friend. There really isn't a good reason
why someone's email should be delivered to a .pst Cause I'm sure that
.pst file is sitting right on his workstation/laptop w/out any backups.
T
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise
Man that's a good one. I'm LMAO!!!
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Exchange
you have
added them to security.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folders
I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people
inside those groups
]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folders
Yes that's it, sorry I worded it wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public
must admit for all my
customers so far, we've implemented native mode domains and so I've
avoided this problem.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 10 July 2002 15:38
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Public Folders
Subject: RE
Is his mailbox over it's limit? Or not allowed to Send and Receive?
I had a problem with a user like the one you are describing. I
bascially had an account they were trying to access their mailbox limit
and send and receive limit set to 0. After I reinstated it, it worked
fine. Just throwing
Ronald,
Check out Q article Q184535 That should be what you are looking for.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
All,
I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5
to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing
that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were
given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure
out
Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folders
Are you running Native Mode in Active Directory?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folders
All,
I have a question concerning rehoming
Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good
dewd!!
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
, July 08, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
You don't? And you guys have the genome thingy? You're scaring me...
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:08 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Subject: RE: New Virus?
Not to blow my own horn...
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm
OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New
Got it...testing back..did you get it?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange
All,
I'm trying to update my default recipient policy to add another SMTP
address. But when I create new users it doesn't seem to apply the
policy and create the SMTP address that I want. I'm using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Any ideas? Am I missing something here?
TIA,
___
Better make sure that those prices that are falling don't land on your
Exchange server...cause god knows people need to get their jokes from
their friends.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope you wanna try the Linux list. If they don't answer your question
come back and we will figure something out.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Matt Usher
All,
I'm getting this message in all my event logs on my Exchange servers.
Does anyone know what is going on?
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSExchangeIMC
Event Category: (5)
Event ID: 3010
Date: 6/7/2002
Time: 8:32:21 AM
User: N/A
Computer: EXCHSVR
Description:
The description for Event
All,
Server in question:
E2K server SP2
2 Storage Groups (2 mail stores)
Ok, currently I'm unable to mount the store of my second storage group
(which has nothing on it) It keeps giving me the error: The Database
Files on this store are inconsistent. Now all the transaction logs are
all
: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 16:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Failure To Mount Store
All,
Server in question:
E2K server SP2
2 Storage Groups (2 mail stores)
Ok, currently I'm unable to mount the store of my second storage group
(which has nothing
it will work if
you leave the old directory intact.
I'd be curious to know why you can't mount the store though. Did you
create the storage group and store remotely? Why do you think the
e00.log is corrupt?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
All,
Is there anyway to remove the Delegation wizard that comes along with
the install of Exchange 2000? Currently we have admins that think that
it's fun to add themselves as Full Admins on our site. Can I take care
of this somehow? And what privileges do you need to add yourself? I
can't
and reversing what you've done?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
L.
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:49 AM
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
L.
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delegation Wizard
Ed,
What permissions are you talking about? Cause as of now. They don't
have any permissions on the Org or the administrative
to
change permissions.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
L.
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:55 PM
I'm here?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where
All,
I have a situation here. I'm in the process of migrating my public
folders over from 5.5 to E2K. There is one thing that I'm not too sure
of. On our Exchange 5.5 public folders we used distribution lists for
access to certain public folders. So my questions to everyone is, how
can I
LOL atta boy!! There is always someone with their head in the gutter.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Situation
They won't?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Migration Situation
All,
I have a situation here. I'm in the process of migrating my
public folders over from 5.5
What's wrong with being a pervert?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange
All,
Does anyone know off the top of their head if Outlook 2000 SP2 doesn't
allow you to open OLE objects? If anyone knows about this please let me
know.
Thank you,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
