PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions.
One from Americans with Disabilities
that information with the source
you got it from and stop posting plain wrong information here which
might confuse other people.
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
I don't use the MAC, but I can see your problem. Change the X's to the
valid ip address of your Exchange Server.
You may need to reboot, or if the MAC supports NBTSTAT do a NBTSTAT -RR
HTH
--Felicity
Hello Mac supporters,
I have a couple Mac clients connecting to Exchange 5.5 using a
Dang! Here is was thinking that I was so smart and I goof again.
I am such a doofus.
--Felicity
That WAS a deliberate ploy to get him to do a NetBIOS name cache refresh =
wasn't it (NBTSTAT -RR) ? :-P
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04
How did you know?
--Felicity
So the operation was a success then?
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac
Cuter:)
--Felicity
Hey Felicity I replaced
?
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I
the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back
I take it you are running WebDav. If so some of the legacy proxy server
trap for non standard verbs in the IIS protocol. So when they see some of
the WebDav verbs coming through they drop the packets. Have a look at
your proxy logs to see what happens when it sees WebDav coming through.
future purchases are based on experiences like that.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Where is everyone?
Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I
wasn't
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Where is everyone?
Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I
wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over
I just wanted to correct my earlier post. Sorry if I led anyone astray.
OWA and other web clients running WebDav might encounter problems with
some legacy proxy server's detecting the WebDav http verbs and not forward
them.
However you should not experience this problem locally. The IIS SMTP
Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as
logging to a file.
IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are
reading must be incorrect.
A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process.
So entries are flushed to disk when
Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions. One
from Americans with Disabilities Act which requires greater richness - ie
text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - greater thinness -
ie minimalism for text based phones - which strip away all conten but
.
Just my $.02US
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
=20
I just wanted to correct my earlier post. Sorry if I led anyone
You should use the Outlook View Control. I will paste the code in my next
email and you can run it. I fear that if I post it in this message the
antivirus detectors for everyone who subscribes to this list will howl.
This is so sexy when I first discovered it I almost... well, I'd better
not
XXXOBJECT classid=CLSID:0006F063---C000-0046
id=ViewCtlFolder
width=100%
height=1000
codebase=http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.CAB#ver=9,0,0,3203YYY
XXXparam name=Namespace value=MAPIYYY
XXXparam name=Folder
You can open up OLE objects in Outlook 2000 SP2. It will prevent people
from programtically sending out email.
BUT - you can always use Outlook Redemption which is way sexy!
This is a set or programmatic objects that mimic the function of most
Outlook methods so you can send out email even if
can't you just whack them?
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange
-
From: Felicity Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management
can't you just whack them?
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ
causing something to be corrupted?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management
=20
=20
Dang, it there I go again, forgetting to check the quote=20
(which I would whack).
--Felicity
So this is one place where you can do stuff outside of Exchange without
causing something to be corrupted?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange
Who is the I company? I despise that company whose name begins with D and
rhymes with Hell.
I was adminstering this Dell server and we started getting error messages
in the event log which looked strange and were coming from the disk drive.
So I called the D company and every support engineer
is for cookie, that's good enough for me
Oh, cookie, cookie, cookie starts with C
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
Who is the I company
This is beginning to sound like my love life.
My dates are bold either and I didn't have any last year:(
--Felicity
Outlook version? Not shown Do they no longer exist? Are the dates not
bold? What happens if you change views? Have they been autoarchived?
-Original Message-
Oops, I meant to say my date's AREN'T bold and I didn't have any DATES
last year, Get your mind out of the gutter, Andy.
--Felicity
Outlook version? Not shown Do they no longer exist? Are the dates not
bold? What happens if you change views? Have they been autoarchived?
-Original
All right what does argle mean?
--Felicity
Argle.
- Original Message -
From: MS Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
Maybe it's time to go with D
I also believe the Q article is incorrect. If you open the stm and the
edb, it looks like messages are stored as XML. I have looked at messages
that are coming from OutlookXP which should be arriving as MAPI.
Thanks alot for all of your input guys and gals.
--Felicity
note you may have to do this many times before you will get any
compaction.
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Stop being so snippy:)
Sorry.
--Felicity
note you may confuse us if you continue to snip threads.
--Andycity
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST
note you may
pervert!
--Felicity
He snips AND snaps his Thong
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST
Stop being so snippy:)
Sorry.
--Felicity
note you may confuse us
I am not sure if this helps or not, but I installed Visual Studio.Net on a
laptop running Exchange Server 2000.
It worked great, however all of my code wouldn't work any more as the COM
based model is gone - there are ways to get around this and use COM, but
no more stuff like
set
BTW - my laptop was running win2k server, sp2
--Felicity
Forest prep? Domain Prep?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 May 2002 15:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST
pervert!
--Felicity
He snips AND snaps his Thong
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Management is getting all hot and bothered by all this new Microsoft
licensing schemes. What they are doing is making a big noise about this,
and threatening to leave Microsoft's warm embrace for *nix, and Novell.
Pay no attention to them, they will never do it. Its all smoke to try to
make MS
Pardon me for asking, but who is Ed Crowley and why should I worship at
his feet?
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Oops, sorry I was searching on just Crowley!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is he some relation to Aleister Crowley who seems to be some devil
worshipper?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
I am going out on a limb here, but I think Event Sinks might be an option.
It seems to me that this event sink would run on every inbonud message
and look to see if it was addressed to the particular receipent, and then
do a redirect based on the previous number of emails regarding the job
Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to
it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the
Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a
word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but
everything
Oooh!! very nice.
Thanks Neil!
--Felicity
Q232323 might clear things up a bit.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: STM Question
Subject: RE: STM Question
I hope you can tolerate one more question from me.
I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I
am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server,
not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public
folder that I created in
Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question
Oooh!! very nice.
Thanks Neil!
--Felicity
Q232323 might clear things up a bit.
Neil
-Original Message-
From
in my opinion is full of filler).
--Felicity
MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ? about public folders
I hope you can tolerate one more
Mark, locate this file. At the top of the file just after the %
do this
server.scripttimeout=300
This will allow your page to take up to 5 minutes to render.
It is also possible that the resource you are trying to connect to does
not exist.
Is the exchange server running? Is your IIS Server
Thank you Julian, Damn you guys are good!
--Felicity
Try looking on MS support website for Q241689, Q258509 etc..
Or just search for 'public folder tree'
Yours,=20
Julian Stone=20
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Sent: 23 May 2002 15
If you are using Exchange 2000 you should Full Text Index your database
and then you could search on the subject matter you are looking for.
For instance
select DAV:DisplayName from scope(DEEP TRAVERSAL) where
DAV:Subject contains('love')
if you are looking for love :)
You can also use this
pardon me for sounding so partonizing, but the M drive is the installable
file system that ships with exchange. As you know all internet protocols
(http, smtp, nntp, pop, imap) are now server by the same engine that does
IIS. IIS consults the Exhcange store and a file handle to the item you
are
Thanks John, I guess my question is regarding the relationship of Network
Courier, MS Mail and Exchange.
Did Exchange start off as MS Mail, or as Network Courier?
TIA
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ:
Thanks again John, however MS Mail was first developed for the Mac in
1987.
Do you know where Network Courier fit into this equation? Did MS purchase
Network Courier and repackage it as MS Mail for the Mac, or was this done
somewhere later down the line.
oh, sorry, thanks for being so patient with me. I am new here and I
didn't realize you weren't being serious.
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
There is no C: drive.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
oh, sorry, thanks for being so patient with me. I am
. --Bruce Lee
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ? about MS Mail
Thanks again John, however MS Mail was first developed for the Mac in
1987.
Do you know where Network
.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange
2000 server.
I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage
groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the
Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed.
If
Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of
stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange
2000 server
.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM
Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of
stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange
2000 server.
I currently have 4 storage
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.
I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there.
TIA
--Felicity
What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro?
Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a
while? Christ on cracker
22, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
It is a candy bar.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.
I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned
do any of you know how to administer full text search programmtically?
CDOEXM doesn't work?
Nor do any of the other exchange management objects I have checked.
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ:
Can anyone tell me if the first version of MSMail (the one made for the
MAC) shipped with its own postoffice or was it simply a client for other
post offices.
Also when Microsoft purchased Network Courier did they use that to make
Exchange or MSMail.
TIA
I though MS Mail was purchased from Network Courier in the late 80's, but
I was speaking with someone who said that in actual fact it was first
developed by Microsoft from scratch for blechThe Mac/blech
Can anyone confirm this for me?
63 matches
Mail list logo
