RE: 2nd Exchange server

2002-07-15 Thread Gary Aiston
It all depends on what spec. the server is. If the server is low spec. and you are experiencing performance problems then by all means build a new server on nice new hardware, follow william's instructions and then move mailboxes, if you intend decommisioning the old server and it is the first

RE: Exchange 5.5 and Active Directory Native Mode

2002-06-27 Thread Gary Aiston
Here's another. The ADC replicates all Exch5.5 DLs to the AD as universal distribution groups (UDG's), these can exist in either a mixed or native mode AD. But, if you plan to use the E2K equivalent DL object for access to PF's, E2K will need to convert the UDG to a Universal Security Group

RE: AD field forwardingAddress

2002-06-25 Thread Gary Aiston
As in forwarding address for a mail enabled contact? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 25 June 2002 19:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AD field forwardingAddress Just wondering if this field could be used for

RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU

2002-06-24 Thread Gary Aiston
Are you running win2k adv srvr with = 1Gb RAM? Are you using /3GB switch in boot.ini? XGEN: Exchange 2000 Requires /3GB Switch with More Than 1 Gigabyte of Physical RAM (Q266096) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: 24

RE: Off Topic

2002-06-24 Thread Gary Aiston
In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the

RE: need to export Ex Org info

2002-02-09 Thread Gary Aiston
exmap -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 08 February 2002 20:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need to export Ex Org info Sorry if this is a repeat post, I tried using the web based tool and I don't think it

RE: Autoforwarding Rules.

2002-02-04 Thread Gary Aiston
why not use the 1st rule to forward on to the other mailbox instead of to another folder? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: 04 February 2002 21:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Autoforwarding Rules. Outlook 98,

RE: IMC Access Violation

2002-01-31 Thread Gary Aiston
Can you please supply information describing the error (event log entries etc). You changed the service account...more info please. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of GJ Sent: 31 January 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw:

RE: Free/Busy Connector: not updating -- please offer advice

2002-01-31 Thread Gary Aiston
Q165914, hope that does it for ya. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DEBYSINGH Bruce Sent: 31 January 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Connector: not updating -- please offer advice Hello All, I am having

RE: Exchange to Notes Replication Problems

2002-01-30 Thread Gary Aiston
Glad I sorted this.obviously no-one else employs the Notes connector...damn table files... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: 25 January 2002 17:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange to Notes Replication

Exchange to Notes Replication Problems

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Exchange5.5 SP4 NT4 SP6a I have a problem where our Notes connector to a subsidiary is playing silly buggers. Mail delivery is fine in both directions but the daily scheduled dir sync at 01:30 does not seem to have the desired effect, some mailboxes were deleted recently from the exchange GAL

RE: Forms administrator permissions

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
I would assume owner? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Condron Sent: 25 January 2002 09:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forms administrator permissions All, I have created an area on the forms administrator (EX5.5 sp4) called

RE: Remote exchange administration

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Do you mean the Exchange Administrator program?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rama Arumugam Sent: 25 January 2002 16:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote exchange administration Can some one please tell me what/where is

RE: IMS

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Message size increases due to conversion...set the limit a little higher than your maximum message size. eg, for a 10Mb limit, set it to 14Mb -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Ballester Sent: 24 January 2002 15:42 To: Exchange

RE: event 7024 on is/ds consistency check

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Have a look, and add this site to favs. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7024source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon, Josh Sent: 25 January 2002 17:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: event 7024 on is/ds consistency

RE: Outhouse email

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Check your IMS settings for allowing forwarding to the Internet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of louis Sent: 24 January 2002 21:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outhouse email Scenario: A rule specifies to forward all emails to an

RE: Electronic forms designer

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Dunno if this is any good to you. http://developer.grup.com.tr/misc/mapi/ch5.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Condron Sent: 24 January 2002 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Electronic forms designer All, I have

RE: Profile Maker???

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Whats wrong with good old profgenit's free too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: 25 January 2002 18:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Profile Maker??? Guys and Gals, Has anyone ever used a product

RE: Norton AV installation

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
What does your manual say? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Boettcher, Keith Sent: 24 January 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Norton AV installation MS Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT Server 4.0 SP6 I want to install Norton

RE: Stopped Relaying, but now internal LAN user has problem (Exch 5.5)

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
On the routing restrictions tab enter the IP address of the server/client which connects to the exchange IMS to deliver your newsletter. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of S Verne Sent: 24 January 2002 21:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Norton AV installation

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
with a 600-page instruction manual. .. .. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: 25 January 2002 18:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Norton AV installation The what??? -Original Message- From: Gary Aiston

RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
cynic :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: 25 January 2002 20:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations What's the FAQ? Why u no answer my question! -Original

RE: Users lost email between certain dates

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Any rules/views? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric Sent: 25 January 2002 20:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Users lost email between certain dates Sent items and some user created folders. Eric Sabo NT Administrator

RE: Profile Maker???

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
We have to keep certain e-mails for a period of 75 yearsyes, I guess so you can jail all your long deceased 100+ year old staff when the FBI/IRS/CIA/whoever audits your archive :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim)

RE: View Internet Headers

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Someone once said... There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fred Sent: 25 January 2002 21:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: View Internet Headers Anyone know how I can

RE: View Internet Headers

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
- From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 25, 2002 03:15 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: View Internet Headers Subject: RE: View Internet Headers Someone once said... There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems

RE: View Internet Headers

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Ben, You win a cigar my friend. I shall be copying and pasting that post for future reference (unless you are claiming intellectual property rights) ;-) Thank crunchie its Friday -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent:

RE: Exchange 2000 Upgrade

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
You CANNOT upgrade to E2K without AD. AD is the DS for E2K. You CAN run E2K in mixed mode (a combination of W2k and NT4 DC's). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Sent: 25 January 2002 23:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange

RE: distribution list not working

2002-01-25 Thread Gary Aiston
Any NRs's we can see? Exc version O/S version, more info. please. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fred W. Macondray Jr. Sent: 26 January 2002 00:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: distribution list not working Hi All, I've just

RE: Exchange 5.5 ISDN...

2002-01-21 Thread Gary Aiston
It's all here...(link may wrap) http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Love Sent: 21 January 2002 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 ISDN... Just a quick one, we have an

RE: IS Maintenance

2002-01-15 Thread Gary Aiston
The view we have is dont fix it if it isnt broken. Although, if you have recently migrated a lot of data off the server it may be worthwhile running ESEUTIL to defrag the database, daily IS maintenance should take care of defragmenting the databases though. -Original Message- From:

RE: IS Maintenance

2002-01-15 Thread Gary Aiston
Apologies, misread the question, yes we run IS maintenance in the early hours every morning. Use whichever view you are comfortable with. G -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chad Gibson Sent: 15 January 2002 17:19 To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Domain Controller?

2002-01-15 Thread Gary Aiston
Q1 - http://www.swynk.com/friends/janssen/Articles/Install_DS_or_MS.asp#InstallOn DSOrMS Q2 - a GC is a Domain controller, but it also holds a replica of selected attributes from all objects in the forest. Have a look at the Microsoft site - Exchange section. Jam packed with answers to this

RE: GWART

2002-01-11 Thread Gary Aiston
Are both your IMC's inbound and outbound or is 1 in and 1 out? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: 11 January 2002 21:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GWART I've read them, but could I explain how to in general.

RE: Steps toward Exchange Server 2000

2002-01-11 Thread Gary Aiston
Here is what you do my friend. 1) forget about your weekend 2) browse to http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/default.asp 3) Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read,Read. There is no easy way (other than to pay someone). Good luck. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Backup

2002-01-10 Thread Gary Aiston
it sounds like you are backing up individual mailboxes, this is not a good idea, see the archives for why, is it also true that if you select the brick backup then you are unable to make incremental backups.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On