Shawn, how are you fighting false positives with that product?
we have it deployed and have since turned it off cause of that problem. We
are working on a in house app that will email users with hyperlinks to their
blocked email.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spam: False Positives
I'm curious how people on the list are address the issues of falso
positives. Our CIO under pressure actually came down and forced us to
turn off our spam filter
I'm curious how people on the list are address the issues of falso
positives. Our CIO under pressure actually came down and forced us to turn
off our spam filter cause of false positive complaints. Of course
perception and reality are two different things in these cases. Any
feedback is greatly
Exch 5.5 sp4 win2k sp4
Hello
I am lately seeing some emails from a crystal enterprise server that submits
email to the bridgehead server, but they sit in the que as host
unreachable. what gives? The bridgehead has dns server it can talk to,
should it be able to send email to itself and forward
Just to add my 2 bits
We moved our Exchange 5.5 running on win2k from direct attached disk raid 5
to a IBM ESS 2105 Shark, and we saw about 300 to 400% performance increase.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:19 AM
To:
Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4
I have some dumb question but cant seem to find direct answers
I currently have a maiblox server that dumps internet emails to another
exchange server for delivery, both behind firewall. I would like to deploy
a Win2k server in our DMZ running IIS 5.0 SMTP so and have
to the domain, and then
specify your Exchange bridgehead server as the smart
host.
Ed Crowley
--- Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4
I have some dumb question but cant seem to find
direct answers
I currently have a maiblox server that dumps
internet emails
Discussions
Subject: RE: WIN2k SMTP questions
Answers inline.
--- Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks ED!, so that raises a question for me. Do
you tell the Exchange
bridgehead to forward all messages to the win2k IIS?
If you want or need outbound mail routed through it,
yes
2nd thought is there way to make the IIS SMTP auth off the Exchange servers?
LDAP?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WIN2k SMTP questions
That last part is in the works
firewall!
Ed
--- Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2nd thought is there way to make the IIS SMTP auth
off the Exchange servers?
LDAP?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Several Times.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 6:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Relaying On when Set to Off?
Tried rebooting the box?
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4
1 smtp server, 1 mailbox server
Have checked the box for 'hosts and clients that sucsessfully authenticate',
but yet when I go to abuse.net/relay.html I fail every time. Server started
doing this yesterday and was wiped and completly reinstalled not 1 hour ago.
This
: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cant pass a relay test.
Which tests do you fail?
Are the test messages actually delivered?
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
specific online tests do they fail?
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test.
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html and telneting self testing
Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:46 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Cant pass a relay test.
Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test.
Maybe I dont understand your question. They fail the open relay test.
I
never get a 550, its alway 250 ok
an open relay. All
Exchange servers 'fail' test 6.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:46 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Cant pass a relay test.
Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test.
Maybe I dont understand your
Very very odd. Before today we could have relay test sites check our mail
server and they would always come back as not an open relay.
So today I get a developer that wont do authentication and needs me to relay
his stuff. I tell him no and show him how its bad, then we remove the
routing
Hi
This is more a informational question then anything. Yesterday our Exchange
Service account password was change and it was done incorrectly. It caused
a bunch of users not to get any inbound emails. When the password issue was
corrected all the emails delivered. However at the time I
: Inbound email hiding where?
So the IMS was unable to start because of the incorrect password? If so,
they werent hiding, they were queued on the remote servers.
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13
UNINSTALL? :p
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: backup exec best practices
any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec.
I have done few of the below
overwrite protection
Exch5.5 sp4/win 2k sp3
On a mailbox is there a way to tell admin that the mailbox can reviece but
not send? Other then setting the send limit to 0?
E-
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
going to run DiskPar tonight and see if that helps. I will
let you know.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SAN Recommendations
Ess 800? Or f30/20?
-Original Message-
From
Hi
Exch 5.5 sp4
On win2k sp3
I have a problem with custom recepients get relay prohibited. I have a user
that has their mailbox setup to forward to a internet email address via
custom recipient. When a user is connected via pop3/smtp to the system and
send to that person's email account it
Ess 800? Or f30/20?
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SAN Recommendations
We are using IBM Shark with Exchange 5.5 without any issues.
Elizabeth Thompson
Service and
Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US
@ 7:00 am it was 45 degrees, didn't even bother warming
the car up.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
:42 PM
Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US
12 degrees in NC last night... 9 the night before...
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Icy grip on the US
Whats this crap about
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Icy grip on the US
-9 this morning at 5:30 am when I came in. Indianapolis, IN.
Don't know what the wind chill was, didn't care.
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Whats this crap about a icy grip in the US that I see in the news?
Its 50 degrees outside, I think this is the first January in Utah history
that is hasn't snowed. I was at the park in shorts.
e-
_
List posting FAQ:
.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox permission problems
I'm having problems assigning rights to individual mailboxes so 3rd parties
can access those mail boxes
in the FAQ.
On 1/22/03 10:51, Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I haven't waited 120 minutes, its only been about 90. By doesn't work I
mean when I go to another machine logged in as someone else who I have given
right in exchange admin/my mailbox/permission tab it says unable to
expand
permission problems
Yeah, there is a KB article that describes how to reduce the delay down to a
couple of minutes.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox permission problems
was just throwing a bunch of stuff out there.
If you give the correct perms to the Outlook Today folder and the Inbox, the
user should be able to open the other inbox up without issue.
Sometimes however you have to close Outlook first and re-open.
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric
give access to individual
mailboxes (as described above).
Oh - and be prepared to wait up to 120 minutes for the changes to take
effect. You can shorten that time via a reghack. There's a Q-article
somewhere in the KB that explains how.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto
Also, does the view only admin permission give rights to get into and view
mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: permission problems |part 2
Ok so I appologise
Bla nevermind, Q21
Sometimes I get excited trying to figure stuff out and I don't dig deep
enough. Its just so easy to ask the list before you exhaust all your
options.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:03 AM
Is that Exchange 2k? When I hover I don't get squat.
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird OWA issue
Very minor issue, but perplexing nonetheless.
I have a user with multiple
We upgraded to the Foundry BigIron and FastIron last summer for our layer 3
switching, we are so happy with it that we are doing away with all layer 2
switching and hubs and going to foundry. We have the FastIron 1500 running
rapid spanning tree, soon to convert to foundry's VSRP, the switches
Don't buy interasys either, they have been downsizing like crazy.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anyone recomend a good networking list
The two others worth looking at
Very easy setup.
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
Yes looks good. Was this difficult to setup?
-Original Message-
From:
Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
Everyone?
-Original Message-
From:
, January 17, 2003 7:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
So am I.
Doesn't mean he's not wrong, just that he's got a title.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
deployments of
operating systems are. Which would be the job of oh, say, a security guy.
Tell him to quit waving his magic wand, take off the pointy hat, and do his
job.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:06 AM
Posted
I don't have any SEC requirements, here its all HIPPA. And their big thing
so far is separation of duties and checks and balances. Pretty soon if
I need to create a mailbox I'm going to need permission from the security
group. :(
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL
hair greyer than it already is.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
I don't have any SEC requirements, here
I know I know I know, this questions has been asked a million times. My
question has a small but important twist.
We don't content filter our email here. Now they want to, even though we
are less then 6 months away from a Exchange 2000 and/or Exchange .Net
migration, but they want to do it
: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: the spam product question
I know I know I know, this questions has been asked a million times. My
question has a small but important twist.
We don't content filter our email
.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: the spam product question
I know I know I know, this questions has been asked a million times. My
question has a small but important twist.
We
?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
Because some people want that I guess...
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
. More a matter of preference. I prefer to
get my mail and virus's cleaned up before it hits the server. I also like
the fact that the gateway will hold my mail in the event my Exchange box
goes down.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16
Is anyone trying the new gateway one?
Seems like a lot of these so called tablets are just laptops with reversible
screens. Imo, that's not a tablet, that's a laptop.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:06 AM
To:
Do they make writerights for those things?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Anyone tried a tablet?
I have seen the last two models from Compaq and Toshiba as well.
I liked it
Did you play tribes ed?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server
http://www.planettribes.com/allyourbase/AYB2.swf
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech
Hi
Exch 5.5 sp4 on Win2k sp3
I've got free/busy problems. Some people are coming up with the grey lines
as of late, people that normally come up fine. Then all of a sudden all my
public folder instances so there were no folders in my primary store. I put
them back, including the free/busy.
Last time I checked the faq I had a larger list.
AttachmentNames0=*.vbs
AttachmentNames1=*.vcf
AttachmentNames2=*.exe
AttachmentNames3=*.wav
AttachmentNames4=*.lnk
AttachmentNames5=*.shs
AttachmentNames6=*.hta
AttachmentNames7=*.vbxx
AttachmentNames8=*.scr
AttachmentNames9=*.eml
We here will probably also for go 2k and wait for .Net
-Original Message-
From: Clarke Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
loving this thing, now how long till it is retail?
So I'm guessing you need .Net RC2 to install Titanium B2???
I cant get the install to believe that I have ASP.Net 1.1 for IIS installed.
:(
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re:
. Is that what your trying to load
it on.
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
So I'm guessing you need .Net RC2 to install Titanium
I'm not able to download it, I also get a user/pass prompt.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
I thought they wouldn't make it publicly
That works, thank you kindly.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/f/9/ef9652f0-f824-413b-a50a-99f797f
Does it have a spell checker? They really need to add that since hotmail
has it but 5.5 and 2000 server don't. Do I need .Net RC2 to install it?
I'm only on one.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange
**Eric Passes Out**
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Yes!!
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
nt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
., we preferred their software to HDS's, and we
already had a lot of HP hardware in our shop.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
They came in under the 9900v series
.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 6:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
for their money and be cheaper.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2002 1:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
Other technologies being what?, cause the only other one I have seen
in the backstore
environment
-- it's almost half the price of comparable storage on the
Shark, and
much much faster. Since we're an all-Compaq shop for our
Win32 systems,
that's what we're moving to now.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
2nd verse, same as the first... :p
Anyone running a Hitachi 9900 V Series SAN? Or maybe just the 9900 series?
Normally I wouldn't ask such things of an exchange group, but the diversity
and technical expertise here is very good.
e-
We use a VPN/terminal services combo, works good.
-Original Message-
From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
I do not believe that many of our users would opt for OWA via VPN if
in these options.
Brent
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:42 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange List
Conversation: the IBM Shark
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
Hehe
That would be me. :|
We'll see how it goes
your reliability and up-time. But, if you're own of those Admins without
family or interest in vacations there could be merit in these options.
Brent
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:42 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange List
Win32 systems,
that's what we're moving to now.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:29 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: the IBM Shark
Subject: OT: the IBM Shark
Is anyone here happen to be running
Is anyone here happen to be running a IBM shark or possibly a Hitachi 9900
series SAN? We are looking at both of these and I have heard rumors that
the shark has a performance boundary of 3.36 TB. Just curious.
e-
_
List posting
? snicker
Good luck.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
We plan on using it for our 17 critical servers and to cut the prices of
all the disk we have. Mostly
with critcal servers
running high intensive databases?
snicker
Good luck.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
We plan on using it for our 17 critical servers and to cut
in the storage system to accommodate its predictable, read
IO operations. You'll find that the typical answer to any issue you have
with a large SAN is to throw more hardware at it.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange
Is there a way to dump a Personal Address Book's contents into notepad?
Preferably in a somewhat clean fashion?
e-
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
, blah.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PAB: is there a way
Is there a way to dump a Personal Address Book's contents into notepad?
Preferably in a somewhat clean fashion?
e
up 50% of CPU usage when in fact it isn't doing
much at all.
Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
Speaking from past
by noting that I'd never heard of
commvault galaxy and spectra logic until now :) What features did you
find compelling over BE?
s
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas
Engine
You weren't by chance using the open file agent were you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
We updated allright, we
Speaking from past experience, yes.
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
Hi all,
Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no
Speaking from experience, if you happen to build a computer room, don't let
them build it on a wall with lots of windows. It gets hard to maintain 63
degrees in july. :(
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:14 AM
To:
Just curious, does exch 2k do protocol proxy for pop/smtp?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 on Exchange 5.5
Exchange 5.5 doesn't do protocol proxing for POP3/IMAP.
Exch 5.5 sp4
Win2k sp3
Hello
I'm wondering if there is a way to bypass the inherited rights on a mailbox
so I can assign specific rights to it that differ from other mailboxes in
the site.
Scenario: I am the exch admin but I have delegated rights for creating
mailboxes to another employee
Cisco pix? Smtp fixup protocol?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
Hello group.
I am using Exchange 5.5 server with service pack 4.
This
no
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
I disabled it. Should I enable it?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:ehansen
think 140MB mailbox is big?!?!
The exchange server is 3 years old
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 PM
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
I'd be more tempted to look at things like
Elaborate: I called McAfee about the product once for help with a problem,
they charged us for the help then transferred us. The next guy that came on
the phone said that the product was no longer supported. We had tons of
problems with it, service was always stopping, updates we slow coming
I'd be more tempted to look at things like storage limits. 500 users and
70gig, seriously who needs to save that much email? Your email shouldn't be
a file server.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:12 AM
To: Exchange
, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward with relay protection?
Works just fine on my server. I think this is described in the FAQ, how are
you setting this up?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:13 PM
Hi
I was wondering if there is a way to pull a email out of the IMS que? I
want to see who sent it and where its going, I think one of my own is using
our invisible relay for *ahem* non work related activities and they are
forging the headers.
e-
if you want to catch future events.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pulling email out of IMS
Hi
I was wondering if there is a way to pull a email out of the
IMS que? I
Do you have a backup of your PDC SAM file? I'm assuming your on a NT domain
and by your email that you delete the 'Exchange Service Account' from user
manager.
I'm not savy enough to know if you could just reassign the services to
another user or not, but I'd wager a NO on that one.
I'm hoping for a owa spellchecker. Freaking hotmail has it, hotmail owa.
:\
-Original Message-
From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?
I heard from an MS Exchange Tech that the next
Too small, ever since HIPPA started gearing up our blocking list has grown
to 78 items :o
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by
Hi
Have a bunch of remote users that use pop mail and they want a updated smtp
PAB/Contact list. Is there a fast way to export all the users in the gal to
a address book but to have that address book see them as internet email
addresses. When I have done it in the past they have always shown
Sorry to revisit this.
In light of my last post 'IMS Costs'(thanks for all the help btw) I setup a
Dev Exchange Server and put IMS on it and joined it to my site. I have told
the server to 'Accept Connections: Authenticated and gave it a cost of 100.
Then I plug in a machine outside my
Anyone seen anything of this nature yet??
http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99522.htm
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Although their tech sup is terrifically stupid(imo) that webshield appliance
is sweet.
We dumped our desktop NAI solution based on the lack of expertise of their
tech supp department, once they came back and told us once that they wern't
sure if they could support the Groupshield product anymore
Hi
Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp2
What would make internet email ignore( apparently )cost values of the IMS?
I have two IMS on separate machines, one is our registered mail server the
other is a invisible SMTP server. The cost of the registered is 1 and the
cost of the invisible is 100. But I'm
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo
