showing 99.98%
uptime.
Best wishes
Russell
PS - Friends don't let friends cluster exchange
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
OK, I know the majority
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
Hi there
There are some drawbacks to clusters:
1) They are more difficult to administer
2) Memory fragmentation
3) Extra
, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
OK, I know the majority of this list is against clustering Exchange. But
does anyone have some sound reasoning behind this argument that could be
used to convince someone at the executive level? I
PROTECTED]
Tel: 0208 223 2091 Mobile: 07711 198349
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 November 2003 22:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
OK, I know
Word 2003 clusters are a definite improvement.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
Word is that Exchange 2003 clusters better
OK, I know the majority of this list is against clustering Exchange. But
does anyone have some sound reasoning behind this argument that could be
used to convince someone at the executive level? I don't think many
executives are too compassionate for the it's harder to administer
argument. And I
What Exchange version?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
OK, I know the majority of this list is against
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
What Exchange version?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti
: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
Well I meant this as more of a general discussion as opposed to tied to
a specific version, but for the sake of argument lets says Exchange
2003
Word is that Exchange 2003 clusters better than ever.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
Well I meant
First answer the questions of why you would think you would want to cluster.e.g
avoiding flood/famine/911/virus/missing meeting embarrasment..etcetcetc
That is - what is the business trying to achieve by clustering?
Clusters will not protect you from the above (except if you have them in
11 matches
Mail list logo
