Is it possible to use the folder in Exchange 5.5 to report on an ODBC
database? I'd like the user to be able to click on the public folder and
have it list all the info in an ODBC database. Am I crazy or is this
possible?
Arch Willingham
I have a bunch of items that are stacked up in the IMS queue. The site name
where they used to get delivered to has changed and has a new ip address. Is
there any way to change the existing items so that they will go to the new
address?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
mapping to the correct IP.
2. Set the IMS to accept messages for 1.2.3.4 and redirect to the correct
name or correct IP. Move those messages out of the \out folder and into the
\in folder.
- Original Message -
From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
We have three sites that sync together. When you open the global address
book, all of the names from each site show up together...I.E. If Arch is at
site A, Doug is at site B and Jimmy is at site c, when you click on the drop
down list for names in the GAL you see:
Arch
Doug
Jimmy
If you tell
FantasticI found it!
One more question - when I went where you told me to go and click add, I see
the address book for each site however there is also a possible selection
called Global Address Bookdo I pick that one too?
Arch Willingham
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
the GAL is all you want.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002
We need to append text to the bottom of every e-mail message leaving our
Exchange 5.5 site. I saw how to do it a long time ago but do not remember
where you set it in Exchange.
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
_
List
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 March 2002 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Where is global text set for outgoing messages?
We need to append text to the bottom of every e-mail message leaving our
Exchange 5.5 site. I saw how to do it a long
. The impression
I got was that it is almost like you have to buy the whole thing brand new
and you don't get any credit for already owning the product?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone
number have changed however we have not moved.
T. U. Parks
Subject: Re: Two questions on upgrade to 2k from 5.5
1. do you have site connections? if yes, then create site connection after
you have upgraded. that is how I did it.
2. Standard IS is maxed at 16GB.
- Original Message -
From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
it is a lot easier on the brain..I found...
I found it to be cheaper now then if I said..NO I will never upgrade and
then decided to laterfor approx +100 users.
2 cents
bill
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:17 PM
have
any machines that are just member servers.
Also, I tried doing that part where you change the LDAP port to 390 and it
causes tons of problems.
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone
number have changed however we have not moved.
T
to fix this?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone
number have changed however we have not moved.
T. U. Parks Construction Company
P.O. Box 3308
Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
Phone:423-648-3800
If you would like a list of direct dial
I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone bitch#s about
Microsoftthat guy could not have been nicer. He confirmed my problem and
is helping me get it fixed as I type this.
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
Arch
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
with your hardware vendor at the moment as
well, your -1018 error is a hardware related issue, and you'll need some
parts swapage to keep this from happening again. Oh and take good notes
from the PSS feller and tell him we all say hi.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto
Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last
night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of
our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?
Do we need it?
Thanks,
Arch
I just installed Exchange 2000 and am having difficulties finding things where there
used to be. I used to set Exchange 5.5 so that I could see (in the eventvwr) when
messages flowed in and out of our site (via IMS connector). Is there a way to do that
now?
Thanks,
Arch
is supposed to work (it
was easy in 5.5). The connector came over in the upgrade but I can't tell if
it works.
2. How do you make it where the users at the other site show up in the GAL
like they did in 5.5?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
of the existence of such a thing.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Drive m:
Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just
installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't
I was the bonehead that posted the original question. I liked the first answer I got
Don't worry about it G!
Arch Willingham
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m
I'm new to Exchange 2K and I'm having problems figuring out how to get my two servers
to connect and replicate directory info. I'm running 2 windows 2k servers in 2
different, untrusted domains and in 2 different locations connected via WAN link. I
had the same setup with Exchange 5.5 and it
That was not the answer I was hoping forG!
Arch
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
info?
Arch, just an FYI, it's absolutely impossible to make any sense of a message when the
prior history has all been deleted. We don't have time to look back down the list and
see what you're talking about!
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
: TRUCK
Description:
Register LDAP SSL protocol failed with error 10048. The LDAP SSL server is not
available. Make sure port number 44843 is not used by another application.
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
_
List posting FAQ: http
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: sábado, 25 de Maio de 2002 5:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Test
You passed now get out and enjoy the weekend
- Original Message -
From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Since I swapped over to Exchange 2000 from Exchange 5.5, I keep getting these messages
in my inbox. I assume they have something to do with the Exchange site/directory
replication?? What do I do to stop them?
The message is:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Agreements in order, especialy
your ConfigCA? Apparently the active directory doesn't see the address,
hence the 5.1.1 DSN. Also, most likely the reason you got this is because
the SMTP virtual server is set to send a copy of NDR's to you.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto
=Reagan;L=DOG-020605142840Z-115. It was originally destined for C=US;A=
;P=Reagan;O=Truck;DDA:FAX=Arch Willingham(a)+1 (800) 555-1212; (recipient number 1),
and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12)
Also, it sends me an NDR that says:
The following recipient(s) could
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird
messages
Is the mail flowing between the two sites OK. What did Optus say?
- Original Message -
From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird
messages
Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You can't really ask
, Q180547
- Original Message -
From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird
messages
Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
personalmail
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird
messages
Michael:
I hate to bother you but where
providing clients unlimited visibility
614.543.6405
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
personalmail
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird
messages
Michael:
I hate to bother you but where did you find the the
users
vaporized.
Not exactly RCW and such compliant, but it works.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Is there some brilliant way
set to on-hold. What ever it looks
like
when my e-mail gets bounced is what I would like to do for specific
addresses.
Does this make sense or am I barking up the wrong tree?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
_
List posting FAQ: http
Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Don't laugh but what's a DL?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
could you not know what a DL is? I just thought it was kind of weird
for an Exch Admin not to know that.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous
Now those are some answers that make sense!G
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
-Original Message-
1. Believe it or
.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not
only
Exch Admins
.
Per 3, bullshit.
Per 4, Not relevant to the conversation.
It pains me to defend Woodruff given his previous (lack of)
contributions,
but there you go.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02
To: Exchange Discussions
of all the emails you stick in there.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Now to get that Woodruff guy really pissed off at my
of)
contributions,
but there you go.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
1. Believe it or not, some of the people
Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at
100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything
like this lately?
I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything.
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
?
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8
in boot.ini?
XGEN: Exchange 2000 Requires /3GB Switch with More Than 1 Gigabyte of
Physical RAM (Q266096)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arch Willingham
Sent: 24 June 2002 20:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
I followed this advise and it has worked great.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees personalmail
Rather than set a mailbox and fill it
Administrative Delegation Wizard.
- Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory
- Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest.
I am logged in as the administrator of that machine...why won't it work?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
forest.
I am logged in as the administrator of that machine...why won't it work?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
to contact the schema master.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/24/2002 8:52 AM
Subject: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
I am trying to install SP3 on Exchange 2000 at a child site. When it
gets to the stage of doing the setup, I tried
-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
Permissions for Exchange are delegated in the Exchange System Manager.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham
Permissions for Exchange are delegated in the Exchange System Manager.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/24/2002 9:17 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
I sort of see where you are going with this but to ask a really dumb
Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
Also, I gave that particular user Schema Admin
You got it! It turns out that there was a wrong setting in AD and once I set it,
ka-pow...it all worked fine. Thanks for all y'all's help!
Arch Willingham
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Based on another posting I just saw, I looked in the Exch2k Mailroot\vs1 directory and
found that I have 9039 files in the Bad Mail directory (taking up 34 MB of space). Do
I need to kill them?
Thanks,
Arch
_
List posting FAQ:
Has anyone installed NT2000 SP3 on a machine using Exchange SP3? Any problems?
Arch Willingham
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Lets try againmy last post had a description that was not well received.
Has anyone installed WIN 2000 SP3 on a machine using Exchange SP3? Any problems?
Arch Willingham
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
=/servicedesks/webcasts/wc111902/wcblurb111902.asp
Do any of you know if that fix to unblock attachments using OutlookSecurity.oft and
Outlk9.adm will work with SP3?
Thanks,
Arch Willingham
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
None of our e-mail mail will go to any e-mail address that ends in msn.com. We
are able to receive mail from them but not vice versa. I did what it said in the
257265 XCON KB. It worked fine until about a week ago. Now, I get the following
entry in the event log:
Event Type: Warning
Event
have to re-install a ton of software.
Any ideas?
Arch Willingham
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Move Exchange server to new hard drive?
What's the best way to put a new disk in an exchange 2000 server? Right now, its
sitting in a N2000 server with one 17 MB SCSI disk broken into two
a day before the domain where the user leaves
tells the other domain it is gone. I.E. when I delete John Doe from the base domain
and create a John Doe in active directory in the child domain, the child domain
thinks there are two John Does for about a day.
Thanks!
Arch Willingham
amount of time to replicate.
On 07/14/03 10:14, Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an easier way to move users from the base domain to the child domain
then doing the exmerge thing? I have done exmerge numerous times but its a
pain in the bootie as there ends up being a conflict
and one 11gb). I'd like to put it on one big drive (say around 70
GB) but still broken into two partitions so that I don't have to
re-install a ton of software.
Any ideas?
Arch Willingham
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
(Messages pending submission)
2. WRGLE Routing (Routing Group Connector - Remote delivery)
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
Arch Willingham
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Conflicts
Event ID: 3067
Date: 10/09/2003
Time: 4:51:23 PM
User: N
: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (Exchange
2000 Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup)
You don't have a product called Outlook Helpdesk from www.kalmstrom.nu set
up in your PF's by chance, do you?
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October
The event log of the Exchange 2000 server keeps logging the message below.
The kicker is that the name shown is the name of an employee that worked for
us that died about two months ago. Any idea what causes it??
Arch
Event Type: Error
Event Source: MSExchangeIS
Event Category: Content Engine
I thought it was a good question.
Arch
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
I'm not asking how to administer my infrastructure. I've
weekly full, daily incremental,
and am now switching Backup Exec to daily full as I write this!
Tony, might I suggest a nap. ;)
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Oh yeah...I forgot to add that we do a full backup with Backup Exec each
night. Also, beer is good
, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Oh yeah...I forgot to add that we do a full backup with Backup Exec each
71 matches
Mail list logo
