RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu
Problem found...One user had a corrupt inbox. Every time this user launched outlook and clicked on inbox at his workstation he would get a network problem is preventing outlook to connect and then the IS would freak out. Deleted account exmerged data out first then recreated account and exmerged data back in. Solved problem. Is there a utility like exmerge that can export out the public folders. They have a ton of email with attachments and I would love to able to export out intact just in case. -Original Message- From: Matt Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Ca inoculate it v7. Supposedly no issues!! -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Matt, I'm curious as to what your anti-virus software was before you removed it. The only other few times I have seen this problem is with an older version of Sybari's Antigen (I think it was 7.0). They had a hotfix for me and I was back up and running normally in less than a day. -Steve > -Original Message- > From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > No other software. Just exchange. I did search tech net for store.exe > high cpu... Went thru all possibilities. Still no help > > -Original Message- > From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > Could be any number of things. > Search in Technet for an article called "Troubleshooting High CPU > Utilization By Store.exe" and see if that points to anything useful. > > > -Original Message- > From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > Hi all > > I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the > store.exe will consume 100 percent of cpu and evenually stop > responding. > > I can shut the services down manually and restart takes a looong > time. I have removed all antivirus products from server there is > pleanty of disk space. dir.edb and priv and pub reside a 80 gb mirror > drive. priv is 6.53 gb and pub is 1.53 they are not growing rapidly. > dir edb is 350 > meg > > I ran eseutil on both priv and pub and both report back state is > consistant. > > Where should I go from here. I reboot the server every 12 hours. These > are good reboots no dirty shutdowns > > Thanks for any info > > I have combed the MS articles checked with MS to make sure there were > no hotfixes I should have (I think I was Talking to somebody in India) > > Any Ideas before I call MS would be appreciated. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu
Ca inoculate it v7. Supposedly no issues!! -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Matt, I'm curious as to what your anti-virus software was before you removed it. The only other few times I have seen this problem is with an older version of Sybari's Antigen (I think it was 7.0). They had a hotfix for me and I was back up and running normally in less than a day. -Steve > -Original Message- > From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > No other software. Just exchange. I did search tech net for store.exe > high cpu... Went thru all possibilities. Still no help > > -Original Message- > From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > Could be any number of things. > Search in Technet for an article called "Troubleshooting High CPU > Utilization By Store.exe" and see if that points to anything useful. > > > -Original Message- > From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > Hi all > > I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the > store.exe will consume 100 percent of cpu and evenually stop > responding. > > I can shut the services down manually and restart takes a > looong time. > I have removed all antivirus products from server there is pleanty of > disk space. dir.edb and priv and pub reside a 80 gb mirror drive. priv > is 6.53 gb and pub is 1.53 they are not growing rapidly. dir > edb is 350 > meg > > I ran eseutil on both priv and pub and both report back state is > consistant. > > Where should I go from here. I reboot the server every 12 hours. These > are good reboots no dirty shutdowns > > Thanks for any info > > I have combed the MS articles checked with MS to make sure > there were no > hotfixes I should have (I think I was Talking to somebody in India) > > Any Ideas before I call MS would be appreciated. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu
Matt, I'm curious as to what your anti-virus software was before you removed it. The only other few times I have seen this problem is with an older version of Sybari's Antigen (I think it was 7.0). They had a hotfix for me and I was back up and running normally in less than a day. -Steve > -Original Message- > From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > No other software. Just exchange. I did search tech net for store.exe > high cpu... Went thru all possibilities. Still no help > > -Original Message- > From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > Could be any number of things. > Search in Technet for an article called "Troubleshooting High CPU > Utilization By Store.exe" and see if that points to anything useful. > > > -Original Message- > From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu > > > Hi all > > I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the > store.exe will consume 100 percent of cpu and evenually stop > responding. > > I can shut the services down manually and restart takes a > looong time. > I have removed all antivirus products from server there is pleanty of > disk space. dir.edb and priv and pub reside a 80 gb mirror drive. priv > is 6.53 gb and pub is 1.53 they are not growing rapidly. dir > edb is 350 > meg > > I ran eseutil on both priv and pub and both report back state is > consistant. > > Where should I go from here. I reboot the server every 12 hours. These > are good reboots no dirty shutdowns > > Thanks for any info > > I have combed the MS articles checked with MS to make sure > there were no > hotfixes I should have (I think I was Talking to somebody in India) > > Any Ideas before I call MS would be appreciated. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu
No other software. Just exchange. I did search tech net for store.exe high cpu... Went thru all possibilities. Still no help -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Could be any number of things. Search in Technet for an article called "Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization By Store.exe" and see if that points to anything useful. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Hi all I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the store.exe will consume 100 percent of cpu and evenually stop responding. I can shut the services down manually and restart takes a looong time. I have removed all antivirus products from server there is pleanty of disk space. dir.edb and priv and pub reside a 80 gb mirror drive. priv is 6.53 gb and pub is 1.53 they are not growing rapidly. dir edb is 350 meg I ran eseutil on both priv and pub and both report back state is consistant. Where should I go from here. I reboot the server every 12 hours. These are good reboots no dirty shutdowns Thanks for any info I have combed the MS articles checked with MS to make sure there were no hotfixes I should have (I think I was Talking to somebody in India) Any Ideas before I call MS would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu
Could be any number of things. Search in Technet for an article called "Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization By Store.exe" and see if that points to anything useful. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Hi all I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the store.exe will consume 100 percent of cpu and evenually stop responding. I can shut the services down manually and restart takes a looong time. I have removed all antivirus products from server there is pleanty of disk space. dir.edb and priv and pub reside a 80 gb mirror drive. priv is 6.53 gb and pub is 1.53 they are not growing rapidly. dir edb is 350 meg I ran eseutil on both priv and pub and both report back state is consistant. Where should I go from here. I reboot the server every 12 hours. These are good reboots no dirty shutdowns Thanks for any info I have combed the MS articles checked with MS to make sure there were no hotfixes I should have (I think I was Talking to somebody in India) Any Ideas before I call MS would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu
Do you have any additional softare on it besides Exchange? I read that you removed Antivirus, but is there anything else? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Subject: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Hi all I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the store.exe will consume 100 percent of cpu and evenually stop responding. I can shut the services down manually and restart takes a looong time. I have removed all antivirus products from server there is pleanty of disk space. dir.edb and priv and pub reside a 80 gb mirror drive. priv is 6.53 gb and pub is 1.53 they are not growing rapidly. dir edb is 350 meg I ran eseutil on both priv and pub and both report back state is consistant. Where should I go from here. I reboot the server every 12 hours. These are good reboots no dirty shutdowns Thanks for any info I have combed the MS articles checked with MS to make sure there were no hotfixes I should have (I think I was Talking to somebody in India) Any Ideas before I call MS would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
It will use as much as it needs. You can't force it to use more - it would be pointless. When it needs more, it grabs more. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:28 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Store.exe in Task Manager Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager So if store.exe is not using more memory (only 512K out of 2GB): A) Does that guarrentee it does not need more? B) Is there a way to force or encourage it to use more? I know, I know. I'm asking for someone else, OK? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
So if store.exe is not using more memory (only 512K out of 2GB): A) Does that guarrentee it does not need more? B) Is there a way to force or encourage it to use more? I know, I know. I'm asking for someone else, OK? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
My old friend Martin knows I was kidding him. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager I understand perfectly, although I think it's 'a correct line' not 'the correct line'. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 17:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager It's a saying that Ed is known for. It quite correctly applies though. If you buy 2gb of memory for your Exchange server, what good is it doing if only 512mb gets used. Does it make you feel better if there is lots of memory available in reserve "just in case"? Memory is much faster to use than using pagefile, ergo Exchange wants to use memory if it is available. Now do you understand why we always use that line? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:44 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Store.exe in Task Manager Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager Why is that correct? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 16:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager The correct line is, "You didn't buy all that memory just to have it go unused, now did you?" Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager This is normal behavior for Exchange. It will grab every bit of memory it can. It will also release memory if another program needs some. You bought all that memory, do you really want to waste it just doing nothing? -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resourc
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
I understand perfectly, although I think it's 'a correct line' not 'the correct line'. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 17:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager It's a saying that Ed is known for. It quite correctly applies though. If you buy 2gb of memory for your Exchange server, what good is it doing if only 512mb gets used. Does it make you feel better if there is lots of memory available in reserve "just in case"? Memory is much faster to use than using pagefile, ergo Exchange wants to use memory if it is available. Now do you understand why we always use that line? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:44 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Store.exe in Task Manager Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager Why is that correct? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 16:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager The correct line is, "You didn't buy all that memory just to have it go unused, now did you?" Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager This is normal behavior for Exchange. It will grab every bit of memory it can. It will also release memory if another program needs some. You bought all that memory, do you really want to waste it just doing nothing? -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
Because he made it up. I was going to quote him with credit, but I knew I would wreck it just like I did. -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager Why is that correct? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 16:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager The correct line is, "You didn't buy all that memory just to have it go unused, now did you?" Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager This is normal behavior for Exchange. It will grab every bit of memory it can. It will also release memory if another program needs some. You bought all that memory, do you really want to waste it just doing nothing? -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
It's a saying that Ed is known for. It quite correctly applies though. If you buy 2gb of memory for your Exchange server, what good is it doing if only 512mb gets used. Does it make you feel better if there is lots of memory available in reserve "just in case"? Memory is much faster to use than using pagefile, ergo Exchange wants to use memory if it is available. Now do you understand why we always use that line? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:44 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Store.exe in Task Manager Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager Why is that correct? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 16:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager The correct line is, "You didn't buy all that memory just to have it go unused, now did you?" Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager This is normal behavior for Exchange. It will grab every bit of memory it can. It will also release memory if another program needs some. You bought all that memory, do you really want to waste it just doing nothing? -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
Why is that correct? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 16:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager The correct line is, "You didn't buy all that memory just to have it go unused, now did you?" Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager This is normal behavior for Exchange. It will grab every bit of memory it can. It will also release memory if another program needs some. You bought all that memory, do you really want to waste it just doing nothing? -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
The correct line is, "You didn't buy all that memory just to have it go unused, now did you?" Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager This is normal behavior for Exchange. It will grab every bit of memory it can. It will also release memory if another program needs some. You bought all that memory, do you really want to waste it just doing nothing? -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
Check out the "JET Database Engine" section in this document: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;271987. Ignore that it is talking about 5.5, same concepts apply to E2K or E2K3 in this case. Specifically, the phrase "dynamic buffer allocation" is what will help explain how the store does what it does. M -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
This is normal behavior for Exchange. It will grab every bit of memory it can. It will also release memory if another program needs some. You bought all that memory, do you really want to waste it just doing nothing? -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
Not really. Why? Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
You got lots of free time on your hands? -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
Kurt, This is totally normal. Store.exe grabs all the memory it needs, but is well behaved about giving it back as the system requires it. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 12:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
I got the same problem on one server. Nt4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. Server runs fine for 2 days then store.exe pegs at 100%. Server is not at my location So I don't know if I want to turn maint off -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor Try downloading the Process Explorer from the http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/procexp.shtml and see if you can find more information about Store.exe process. I am not sure if it will or not, but you never know. Also, there's security fix, Exchange Server 5.5 Post-SP4 RPC Fixes which will replace many files including the Store.exe on your Exchange server. You can look at the Q304062 article for more info. Or you can run the Security Analyzer to see what you need. After applying SP, it's good idea to re-optimze your Exchange server again. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Haines Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
Try downloading the Process Explorer from the http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/procexp.shtml and see if you can find more information about Store.exe process. I am not sure if it will or not, but you never know. Also, there's security fix, Exchange Server 5.5 Post-SP4 RPC Fixes which will replace many files including the Store.exe on your Exchange server. You can look at the Q304062 article for more info. Or you can run the Security Analyzer to see what you need. After applying SP, it's good idea to re-optimze your Exchange server again. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Haines Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
Anything else running on the server? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Haines Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Store.exe pegging the processor yes. and it did happen again. thanks!!! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor After unhooking Antigen did you wait to see if the problem reoccurred? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Haines Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
Taskmanager shows the cpu at 100% also after online main is set to stop, and I'm unable to stop the store service using service manager. After this happens a reboot within 12-24 hr is recommended, otherwise I get weird behaviour of Exchange. If I leave online maint off, all is well for several weeks. Alberto -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor How do you know online maint is not releasing the store.exe? -Original Message- From: Alberto Faccioli . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor I have a similar problem, but not a solution I'm afraid! Online maintenance does't release the store that is left at 100%. Backups are completed fine (with verify) so I have decided to disable the daily online maintenance, and I just run it for a full weekend once a month with a reboot to clear the store that is left at 100% Sorry this is not a solution, but you might try to disable online maintenance and see how it goes... Alberto (MSX 5.5 SP4, waiting for SBS 2003) -Original Message- From: Joe Haines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor I have a backup for an emergency just not one with recent enough information to just do a restore to attempt to resolve this particular issue. My full backups are completing every night successfully as well and are not overlapping with maintenance. maintenance runs every morning at 4 am thanks!! -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe pegging the processor I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full backup, and wait to see what happens. What's your online maintenance schedule look like? - Original Message - From: "Joe Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message is
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
How do you know online maint is not releasing the store.exe? -Original Message- From: Alberto Faccioli . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor I have a similar problem, but not a solution I'm afraid! Online maintenance does't release the store that is left at 100%. Backups are completed fine (with verify) so I have decided to disable the daily online maintenance, and I just run it for a full weekend once a month with a reboot to clear the store that is left at 100% Sorry this is not a solution, but you might try to disable online maintenance and see how it goes... Alberto (MSX 5.5 SP4, waiting for SBS 2003) -Original Message- From: Joe Haines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor I have a backup for an emergency just not one with recent enough information to just do a restore to attempt to resolve this particular issue. My full backups are completing every night successfully as well and are not overlapping with maintenance. maintenance runs every morning at 4 am thanks!! -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe pegging the processor I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full backup, and wait to see what happens. What's your online maintenance schedule look like? - Original Message - From: "Joe Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. S
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
I have a similar problem, but not a solution I'm afraid! Online maintenance does't release the store that is left at 100%. Backups are completed fine (with verify) so I have decided to disable the daily online maintenance, and I just run it for a full weekend once a month with a reboot to clear the store that is left at 100% Sorry this is not a solution, but you might try to disable online maintenance and see how it goes... Alberto (MSX 5.5 SP4, waiting for SBS 2003) -Original Message- From: Joe Haines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor I have a backup for an emergency just not one with recent enough information to just do a restore to attempt to resolve this particular issue. My full backups are completing every night successfully as well and are not overlapping with maintenance. maintenance runs every morning at 4 am thanks!! -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe pegging the processor I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full backup, and wait to see what happens. What's your online maintenance schedule look like? - Original Message - From: "Joe Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List postin
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
After unhooking Antigen did you wait to see if the problem reoccurred? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Haines Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
I have a backup for an emergency just not one with recent enough information to just do a restore to attempt to resolve this particular issue. My full backups are completing every night successfully as well and are not overlapping with maintenance. maintenance runs every morning at 4 am thanks!! -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe pegging the processor I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full backup, and wait to see what happens. What's your online maintenance schedule look like? - Original Message - From: "Joe Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Store.exe pegging the processor
I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full backup, and wait to see what happens. What's your online maintenance schedule look like? - Original Message - From: "Joe Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe Service grows in memory size.
Did the reboots just start since you installed W2KSP4? I've seen that in a couple of articles and the only thing people said they did to fix it was to uninstall SP4. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe Service grows in memory size. I have been experiencing a weird problem over the last couple of weeks. The Information Store Service grows at a pretty decent pace and eventually gets over a Gig in size. I have never seen this happen on my server before. The problem is that once it gets so big the whole server shuts down and reboots. Any ideas? Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange 2000 SP3 with Rollup Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe memory leak
I had similar problem and found out it was the antivirus software (trendmicro), installed patch and everything is just peachyor strawberries john -Original Message- From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 1:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe memory leak I had a machine with a similar problem and similar load, no matter what I tried I still had this problem (Though I gave up early, given our impending ex2k upgrade), it would happen every few days. I took the easy way out, and set up a nightly stop and start of the IMS in the scheduler. probably bad form, but it did the job, especially since we had an smtp server to queue the email externally in the event that our IMS was unavailable. Jim -Original Message- From: Mark Pouncey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe memory leak Help, I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with 2 gigs of memory for 500 users on a NT Domain . The Store.exe has a memory leak which Consumes all available memory and stops the Internet Mail Connector. I have run the Optimizer to limit the Store which did not help. Thanks for the help... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe memory leak
I had a machine with a similar problem and similar load, no matter what I tried I still had this problem (Though I gave up early, given our impending ex2k upgrade), it would happen every few days. I took the easy way out, and set up a nightly stop and start of the IMS in the scheduler. probably bad form, but it did the job, especially since we had an smtp server to queue the email externally in the event that our IMS was unavailable. Jim -Original Message- From: Mark Pouncey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe memory leak Help, I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with 2 gigs of memory for 500 users on a NT Domain . The Store.exe has a memory leak which Consumes all available memory and stops the Internet Mail Connector. I have run the Optimizer to limit the Store which did not help. Thanks for the help... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Store.exe memory leak
The store is designed to use DBA, which will consume all of the memory available. What's in your event logs when the IMS shuts down? - Original Message - From: "Mark Pouncey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 2:32 PM Subject: Store.exe memory leak Help, I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with 2 gigs of memory for 500 users on a NT Domain . The Store.exe has a memory leak which Consumes all available memory and stops the Internet Mail Connector. I have run the Optimizer to limit the Store which did not help. Thanks for the help... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe Service grows in memory size.
The RAM behavior is normal and intended. Exchange will use all available RAM and will relinquish it to another process if needed. I suspect the two things you report (RAM usage and spontaneous reboots) are unrelated. Are there anything in the Event Logs from before/after the reboot? Can you configure crash settings (Control Panel, System) to create a dump log and see if anything shows up there? Do you even observe a BSOD when the server reboots? > -Original Message- > From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 4:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Store.exe Service grows in memory size. > > > I have been experiencing a weird problem over the last couple > of weeks. > The Information Store Service grows at a pretty decent pace and > eventually gets over a Gig in size. I have never seen this > happen on my > server before. > > The problem is that once it gets so big the whole server > shuts down and > reboots. Any ideas? > > Windows 2000 SP4 > Exchange 2000 SP3 with Rollup > > Thanks, > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
Are you using Veritas NetBackup version 4.5? There is a known problem with the installation of Version 4.5 replacing the MS runtime DLLs with incompatible verions. Steve Smith Common IT Services Ministry of Management Services Province of British Columbia email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (250) 387-8698 -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
William, >PSS ID Number: Q172813 >XADM: Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization By Store.exe Hadn't thought to check the tracking log, unfortunately no sign of a looping message. >PSS ID Number: Q215924 >XADM: Store Process Is Causing 100 Percent CPU Utilization Fixed in SP3, I'm SP4. Also, single server so there should be no PF replication. >PSS ID Number: Q183633 >XADM: High CPU in Store.exe with Incorrectly Formatted Attachment Fixed in SP1. >PSS ID Number: Q192065 >XADM: High CPU Utilization in STORE Process Due to Categorized Views Can't tell if this is fixed in a SP or not. Resolution says "obtain latest service pack" which applies it's in a SP. But Status says "fix now available but hasn't been regression tested... Call PSS" which implies it's not in an SP. In any case I doubt my users know how to create a "categorized view" -- then again this is a new exchange box (~2 weeks) so maybe there is a default view that just got hit. Anyone know if this fix is in SP4 or not? At any rate, we'll be moving to E2K "soon" so maybe I'll just wait and hope it doesn't hit again before we move -- once we move I get a new set of bug to worry about -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Do a search for CPU and Exchange and STORE: PSS ID Number: Q172813 XADM: Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization By Store.exe PSS ID Number: Q215924 XADM: Store Process Is Causing 100 Percent CPU Utilization PSS ID Number: Q183633 XADM: High CPU in Store.exe with Incorrectly Formatted Attachment PSS ID Number: Q192065 XADM: High CPU Utilization in STORE Process Due to Categorized Views PSS ID Number: Q183633 XADM: High CPU in Store.exe with Incorrectly Formatted Attachment -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Try stopping it and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Ooops, should have mentioned. NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI mode. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 What Exchange AV product are you running? -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
I had this happen with McAfee GroupShield, especially after an AV update. The CPU would peg at 100%. A reboot would fix it as would stopping the AVUpdate service. There was a Microsoft patch that had to be applied and then McAfee fixed the problem with a patch and then an upgrade to GroupShield. John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Well, I'm back up now after a restart (as in shutdown/restart) but before I did that I tried to stop the store service (which wanted to bring down IMC and Event) but these two wouldn't stop (ended up in "stoping" status) so store didn't start to stop. Then I killed IMC and events.exe and then tried to stop store, no joy. Then I tried to stop NAV and it wouldn't end (service didn't respond in a timely manner) Then I said screw it and I did a shutdown/restart. Sorry for not including this earlier. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Try stopping it and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Ooops, should have mentioned. NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI mode. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 What Exchange AV product are you running? -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
Do a search for CPU and Exchange and STORE: PSS ID Number: Q172813 XADM: Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization By Store.exe PSS ID Number: Q215924 XADM: Store Process Is Causing 100 Percent CPU Utilization PSS ID Number: Q183633 XADM: High CPU in Store.exe with Incorrectly Formatted Attachment PSS ID Number: Q192065 XADM: High CPU Utilization in STORE Process Due to Categorized Views PSS ID Number: Q183633 XADM: High CPU in Store.exe with Incorrectly Formatted Attachment -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Try stopping it and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Ooops, should have mentioned. NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI mode. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 What Exchange AV product are you running? -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
Well, I'm back up now after a restart (as in shutdown/restart) but before I did that I tried to stop the store service (which wanted to bring down IMC and Event) but these two wouldn't stop (ended up in "stoping" status) so store didn't start to stop. Then I killed IMC and events.exe and then tried to stop store, no joy. Then I tried to stop NAV and it wouldn't end (service didn't respond in a timely manner) Then I said screw it and I did a shutdown/restart. Sorry for not including this earlier. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Try stopping it and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Ooops, should have mentioned. NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI mode. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 What Exchange AV product are you running? -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
Try stopping it and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 Ooops, should have mentioned. NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI mode. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 What Exchange AV product are you running? -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
Ooops, should have mentioned. NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI mode. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 What Exchange AV product are you running? -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
What Exchange AV product are you running? -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Need more input!! > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > A Johnny joke? > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Is this a Johnny joke? > > - Original Message - > From: "Johnny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:51 PM > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > Well, I just tried putting in to 512 sticks but my computer wouldn't > boot > > up. Right now it has 391MBS but I'll try to get it higher. WIll it > > eventually crap out the system? > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I have a nice single malt here. But I know you're not interested. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:53 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > And you forget to bring beer. > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Seems like I'm always late to the party. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:46 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > FWIW, I answered it within an hour if it being asked. The > following > > morning, Roger restated the same answer. > > > > William > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Andrea Coppini > > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 6:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, > I'll give it a > > try. > > > > Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is > > by design. > > STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM as > possible to cache > > mailboxes and speed up access. > > > > We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers > around 800mb. > > > > This is completely normal. > > > > Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory > > utilization when > > other applications start needing it (eg. Backup jobs, opening of > > software or large admin tools on the exchange server), so it > > won't force > > the system to use virtual memory. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > > > > It does matter in that he was responding to the level of > > > service pack Martin suggested. > > > If you must, at least jump all over him when he's > actually wrong. > > > > > > Not really addressed to you, Roger. > > > > > > William > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > > Roger Seielstad > > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. > > > > > > It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the > > > functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. > > > > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > > > Blackstone > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, N
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Andrea, I wasn't the one complaining about memory usage. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, I'll give it a try. Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is by design. STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM as possible to cache mailboxes and speed up access. We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers around 800mb. This is completely normal. Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory utilization when other applications start needing it (eg. Backup jobs, opening of software or large admin tools on the exchange server), so it won't force the system to use virtual memory. > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > It does matter in that he was responding to the level of > service pack Martin suggested. > If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. > > Not really addressed to you, Roger. > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Roger Seielstad > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. > > It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the > functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > Blackstone > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Hi everyone. > > > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > > process is > > slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I > > tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with > an excessive > > amount of threads and its still not under control. Is > there anything > > else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server > but I assume > > it will only eat that too! > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sit
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
And you forget to bring beer. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Seems like I'm always late to the party. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > FWIW, I answered it within an hour if it being asked. The following > morning, Roger restated the same answer. > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Andrea Coppini > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 6:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, I'll give it a > try. > > Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is > by design. > STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM as possible to cache > mailboxes and speed up access. > > We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers around 800mb. > > This is completely normal. > > Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory > utilization when > other applications start needing it (eg. Backup jobs, opening of > software or large admin tools on the exchange server), so it > won't force > the system to use virtual memory. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > It does matter in that he was responding to the level of > > service pack Martin suggested. > > If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. > > > > Not really addressed to you, Roger. > > > > William > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Roger Seielstad > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. > > > > It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the > > functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. > > > > ---------- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > > Blackstone > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone. > > > > > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > > > process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this > machine and I > > > tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with > > an excessive > > > amount of threads and its still not under control. Is > > there anything > > > else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server > > but I assume > > > it will only eat that too! > > > > > >
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Seems like I'm always late to the party. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > FWIW, I answered it within an hour if it being asked. The following > morning, Roger restated the same answer. > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Andrea Coppini > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 6:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, I'll give it a > try. > > Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is > by design. > STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM as possible to cache > mailboxes and speed up access. > > We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers around 800mb. > > This is completely normal. > > Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory > utilization when > other applications start needing it (eg. Backup jobs, opening of > software or large admin tools on the exchange server), so it > won't force > the system to use virtual memory. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > It does matter in that he was responding to the level of > > service pack Martin suggested. > > If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. > > > > Not really addressed to you, Roger. > > > > William > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Roger Seielstad > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. > > > > It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the > > functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. > > > > ---------- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > > Blackstone > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone. > > > > > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > > > process is > > > slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this > machine and I > > > tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with > > an excessive > > > amount of threads and its still not under control. Is > > there anything > > > else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server > > but I assume > > > it will only eat that too! > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resou
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I meant Johnny, not Andrey.. > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Coppini > Sent: 17 November 2002 3:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, I'll > give it a try. > > Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is > by design. STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM > as possible to cache mailboxes and speed up access. > > We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers around 800mb. > > This is completely normal. > > Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory > utilization when other applications start needing it (eg. > Backup jobs, opening of software or large admin tools on the > exchange server), so it won't force the system to use virtual memory. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > It does matter in that he was responding to the level of > > service pack Martin suggested. > > If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. > > > > Not really addressed to you, Roger. > > > > William > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Roger Seielstad > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. > > > > It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the > > functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > > Blackstone > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone. > > > > > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > > > process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this > > > machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests > that deals > > > with > > an excessive > > > amount of threads and its still not under control. Is > > there anything > > > else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server > > but I assume > > > it will only eat that too! > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
FWIW, I answered it within an hour if it being asked. The following morning, Roger restated the same answer. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 6:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, I'll give it a try. Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is by design. STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM as possible to cache mailboxes and speed up access. We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers around 800mb. This is completely normal. Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory utilization when other applications start needing it (eg. Backup jobs, opening of software or large admin tools on the exchange server), so it won't force the system to use virtual memory. > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > It does matter in that he was responding to the level of > service pack Martin suggested. > If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. > > Not really addressed to you, Roger. > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Roger Seielstad > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. > > It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the > functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > > > -----Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > Blackstone > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Hi everyone. > > > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > > process is > > slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I > > tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with > an excessive > > amount of threads and its still not under control. Is > there anything > > else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server > but I assume > > it will only eat that too! > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Arch
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, I'll give it a try. Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is by design. STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM as possible to cache mailboxes and speed up access. We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers around 800mb. This is completely normal. Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory utilization when other applications start needing it (eg. Backup jobs, opening of software or large admin tools on the exchange server), so it won't force the system to use virtual memory. > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > It does matter in that he was responding to the level of > service pack Martin suggested. > If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. > > Not really addressed to you, Roger. > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Roger Seielstad > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. > > It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the > functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > > > -----Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > Blackstone > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > > > > Hi everyone. > > > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > > process is > > slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I > > tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with > an excessive > > amount of threads and its still not under control. Is > there anything > > else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server > but I assume > > it will only eat that too! > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ:
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I actually meant 3GB, not SP3. According to http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2KSP2_Cluster.asp Exchange 2000 Server does not support instancing (the ability to run multiple instances of an application as separate processes on the same computer) or Physical Address Extension (PAE), which limits Exchange 2000 Server to about 3 GB of usable memory. Installing more than 3 GB of physical memory on a computer running only Exchange 2000 Server is not recommended because the additional memory does not result in a measurable improvement of server performance. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone@;superioraccess.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory I think it will stop after 3GB. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
It does matter in that he was responding to the level of service pack Martin suggested. If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. Not really addressed to you, Roger. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > -Original Message- > From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Hi everyone. > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > process is > slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I > tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive > amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything > else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume > it will only eat that too! > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > -Original Message- > From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Hi everyone. > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > process is > slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I > tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive > amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything > else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume > it will only eat that too! > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I don't think he mentioned the version at all, precht. Why not get your head out of your event ID'd ass and tell us what pearl of wisdom you would have used to solve the problem, you shining beacon of perfection, you. Robert Moir MSMVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps. Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench. > -Original Message- > From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] > Sent: 15 November 2002 00:20 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Martin Blackstone > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > I think it will stop after 3GB. > > -Original Message- > From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Hi everyone. > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on > this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests > that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still > not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm > putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will > only eat that too! > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
No. In fact he didn't mention a version at all, which means that any reply I make will be in relation to the version that I have. When people give crappy info, chances are they will get a crappy answer. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory I think it will stop after 3GB. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory I think it will stop after 3GB. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory I think it will stop after 3GB. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I think it will stop after 3GB. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I grew up in a tropical locale, Merritt Island, Florida. It was a wonderful place to grow up. However, I now like the natural air conditioning here in the beautiful San Francisco Bay Area, thank you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Yeah - probably the South Bay area! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler@;boeing.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > My memory is both faulty and dimm. I don't recall how to divide any > standard DIMM or SIMM or other units into 391 and get and even result. > > Say Ed, when you do retire are you going to move someplace tropical? > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Don't use faulty memory. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Yeah - probably the South Bay area! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler@;boeing.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > My memory is both faulty and dimm. I don't recall how to divide any > standard DIMM or SIMM or other units into 391 and get and even result. > > Say Ed, when you do retire are you going to move someplace tropical? > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Don't use faulty memory. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE loves memory
This whole exchange rollout is becoming a Johnny joke! - (another Johnny joke..:) Thanks very much for the input about the memory - I thought something farily wonky was going on there _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
That's normal behavior. Its called Dynamic Buffer Allocation - basically a memory cache of the databases. Why have so much memory if its not going to get used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory > > > Hi everyone. > > I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe > process is > slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this > machine and I tried > the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an > excessive amount of > threads and its still not under control. Is there anything > else I can do. > I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it > will only eat > that too! > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I was referring to DIMMs. I'll leave it up to you whether to infer anything personal in this comment. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Some of us have no choice. Or are you referring to your server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Don't use faulty memory. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory 2000 just tried to upgrade the memory to a GB but the machine wouldn't boot so I'm back down to 400 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Some of us have no choice. Or are you referring to your server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Don't use faulty memory. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory 2000 just tried to upgrade the memory to a GB but the machine wouldn't boot so I'm back down to 400 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Yes, that's how it works. Does this present a problem? Or do you want the machine to have memory it's not using? -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Don't use faulty memory. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory 2000 just tried to upgrade the memory to a GB but the machine wouldn't boot so I'm back down to 400 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
You didn't buy all that memory to have it sit unused, now did you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
A Johnny joke? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Is this a Johnny joke? - Original Message - From: "Johnny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:51 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > Well, I just tried putting in to 512 sticks but my computer wouldn't boot > up. Right now it has 391MBS but I'll try to get it higher. WIll it > eventually crap out the system? > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
What is store.exe running at? If it is overusing virtual memory, it will be slow, but should not crap out. It is not likely a leak, but rather performance optimization. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Well, I just tried putting in to 512 sticks but my computer wouldn't boot up. Right now it has 391MBS but I'll try to get it higher. WIll it eventually crap out the system? _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE loves memory
Is this a Johnny joke? - Original Message - From: "Johnny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:51 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > Well, I just tried putting in to 512 sticks but my computer wouldn't boot > up. Right now it has 391MBS but I'll try to get it higher. WIll it > eventually crap out the system? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE loves memory
I think you have bigger issues if the server will not take a memory upgrade. Also do not cut threads short. - Original Message - From: "Johnny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:52 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory > 2000 just tried to upgrade the memory to a GB but the machine wouldn't > boot so I'm back down to 400 > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
2000 just tried to upgrade the memory to a GB but the machine wouldn't boot so I'm back down to 400 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Well, I just tried putting in to 512 sticks but my computer wouldn't boot up. Right now it has 391MBS but I'll try to get it higher. WIll it eventually crap out the system? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
dynamic buffet... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Isn't it great! All that memory sitting there doing nothing otherwise. At least some application is smart enough to take advantage of it. By the way, how much memory has your server? Exchange will utilize the lesser of: - all the RAM - all the memory it needs. It will concede memory to other applications as needed. Dynamic Buffer Allocation it's called. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
what version of exchange are you running 5.5 or 2000 ? -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2002 09:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Isn't it great! All that memory sitting there doing nothing otherwise. At least some application is smart enough to take advantage of it. By the way, how much memory has your server? Exchange will utilize the lesser of: - all the RAM - all the memory it needs. It will concede memory to other applications as needed. Dynamic Buffer Allocation it's called. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe is crashing on my system
It fails than comes back on the same node. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe is crashing on my system I cant answer your question, but just to clarify, is the server failing over, or just coming back up on the same node? -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe is crashing on my system My store.exe is crashing and causing an Dr. Watson, Event ID: 4097, in the application event log. The system is Windows 2000 Advanced SP2 and Exchange 2000 SP2. It crashes the cluster to lose the store for about 1 minutes then it does come back online. I have searched all resources that I had and found nothing. The description for the 2 event I had are the following: (1) The application, , generated an application error The error occurred on 07/15/2002 @ 08:16:08.110 The exception generated was c005 at address 77F877B5 (RtlDosSearchPath_U) (2)The application, , generated an application error The error occurred on 07/22/2002 @ 08:55:33.351 The exception generated was c005 at address 77FCB892 (RtlFreeHeap) Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe is crashing on my system
I cant answer your question, but just to clarify, is the server failing over, or just coming back up on the same node? -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe is crashing on my system My store.exe is crashing and causing an Dr. Watson, Event ID: 4097, in the application event log. The system is Windows 2000 Advanced SP2 and Exchange 2000 SP2. It crashes the cluster to lose the store for about 1 minutes then it does come back online. I have searched all resources that I had and found nothing. The description for the 2 event I had are the following: (1) The application, , generated an application error The error occurred on 07/15/2002 @ 08:16:08.110 The exception generated was c005 at address 77F877B5 (RtlDosSearchPath_U) (2)The application, , generated an application error The error occurred on 07/22/2002 @ 08:55:33.351 The exception generated was c005 at address 77FCB892 (RtlFreeHeap) Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
Correct. I haven't made any changes, run any utilities or added/deleted any programs. One morning, I tried to eject the tape after a backup and nothing would happen. I logged onto the server and the backup was still running. I thought that was odd because it about 12 hours after the backup had started. There was nothing in the event logs and nothing stood out of the ordinary. No one else has access to the server but myself. > And you havent made any changes or run any Exchange utilities on the > database recently? > This just started all of a sudden? > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > Haven't tried to disable them both yet - I can only imagine the crap my > users will open now! > > Nothing interesting in the event logs for NT backup and Exchange, but I > just did notice an error for the Jet database: > Event ID: 0 > Source: Jet > Type: error > Category: (4) > > The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( JET ) could not be found. > It contains the following insertion string(s): , (918) , Unexpected Win32 > error: 0x10B. > > but I looked on EventID and others but couldn't find anything on this. > > > > > What happens if you disable both of them? > > Also, Anything interesting in the event logs? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:37 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > Trend server protect - file-based with the all exchange directories being > > skipped. Mail Essentials is on the server also with it's > > anti-virus/content checking protection. Haven't any problems with that in > > the 3 years it's been on. > > > > > What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? > > > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > > Tech Consultant > > > hp Services > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > > > > I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt > > > (Q272570). > > > Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if > > > there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd > > > shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to > > > 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this > > > would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just > > > don't know. > > > > > > > Why would you want to do that? > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > > > > > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > > > > information store while the backup is running. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > > > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > > > > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the > > > > > backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > > > > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is > > > > > only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > > > > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > > > > The queues are not backing up. > > > > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > > > > directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed > > > > > > > > from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the > > > > > information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has > > > > > not "not responded". Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > > > > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > > > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > > > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > > > > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > > > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > > > > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no > > > > > body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > > > > > > > Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
And you havent made any changes or run any Exchange utilities on the database recently? This just started all of a sudden? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup Haven't tried to disable them both yet - I can only imagine the crap my users will open now! Nothing interesting in the event logs for NT backup and Exchange, but I just did notice an error for the Jet database: Event ID: 0 Source: Jet Type: error Category: (4) The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( JET ) could not be found. It contains the following insertion string(s): , (918) , Unexpected Win32 error: 0x10B. but I looked on EventID and others but couldn't find anything on this. > What happens if you disable both of them? > Also, Anything interesting in the event logs? > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > Trend server protect - file-based with the all exchange directories being > skipped. Mail Essentials is on the server also with it's > anti-virus/content checking protection. Haven't any problems with that in > the 3 years it's been on. > > > What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > Tech Consultant > > hp Services > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt > > (Q272570). > > Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if > > there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd > > shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to > > 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this > > would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just > > don't know. > > > > > Why would you want to do that? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > > > information store while the backup is running. > > > > > > > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the > > > > backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is > > > > only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > > > The queues are not backing up. > > > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > > > directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed > > > > > > from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the > > > > information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has > > > > not "not responded". Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no > > > > body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
Haven't tried to disable them both yet - I can only imagine the crap my users will open now! Nothing interesting in the event logs for NT backup and Exchange, but I just did notice an error for the Jet database: Event ID: 0 Source: Jet Type: error Category: (4) The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( JET ) could not be found. It contains the following insertion string(s): , (918) , Unexpected Win32 error: 0x10B. but I looked on EventID and others but couldn't find anything on this. > What happens if you disable both of them? > Also, Anything interesting in the event logs? > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > Trend server protect - file-based with the all exchange directories being > skipped. Mail Essentials is on the server also with it's > anti-virus/content checking protection. Haven't any problems with that in > the 3 years it's been on. > > > What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > Tech Consultant > > hp Services > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt > > (Q272570). > > Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if > > there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd > > shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to > > 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this > > would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just > > don't know. > > > > > Why would you want to do that? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > > > information store while the backup is running. > > > > > > > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the > > > > backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is > > > > only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > > > The queues are not backing up. > > > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > > > directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed > > > > > > from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the > > > > information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has > > > > not "not responded". Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no > > > > body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > > > > > T
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
What happens if you disable both of them? Also, Anything interesting in the event logs? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup Trend server protect - file-based with the all exchange directories being skipped. Mail Essentials is on the server also with it's anti-virus/content checking protection. Haven't any problems with that in the 3 years it's been on. > What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt > (Q272570). > Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if > there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd > shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to > 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this > would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just > don't know. > > > Why would you want to do that? > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > > information store while the backup is running. > > > > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the > > > backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is > > > only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > > The queues are not backing up. > > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > > directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed > > > > from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the > > > information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has > > > not "not responded". Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no > > > body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > > > Mike > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange Lis
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
(a) On the Task Manager - CPU is 100%. (b) The physical memory is as follows: Total 392Mb Avail 110-112Mb File Cache 26Mb (c) Stopping and starting helps, but then it creeps right back up to 100% (d) Exchange 5.5 sp3 and post 6a security rollup. > a) STORE.EXE at 100% CPU is not normal. Typical values for a well used > system would be 30 to 50% CPU. > b) STORE.EXE can take close to 100% of memory without a worry - but NOT CPU. > c) Stop and start the Information Store if you like - it sounds as though it > wouldn't do any harm and may do some good. But NOT when the backups are > running. > d) What version of Exchange, what Service Packs and what hot fixes are you > running? > > Cheers, Chris > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 July 2002 14:58 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt (Q272570). > Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if > there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd > shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to 2:00 > if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this would be > too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just don't know. > > > Why would you want to do that? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > > information store while the backup is running. > > > > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup > of > > > the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only > > > backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > > The queues are not backing up. > > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > > directories are being skipped. > > > Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. > > > There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. > > > No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not "not responded". > > > Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body > and > > > no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > > > Mike > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > == > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
Trend server protect - file-based with the all exchange directories being skipped. Mail Essentials is on the server also with it's anti-virus/content checking protection. Haven't any problems with that in the 3 years it's been on. > What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup > > > I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt > (Q272570). > Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if > there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd > shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to > 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this > would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just > don't know. > > > Why would you want to do that? > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > > information store while the backup is running. > > > > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the > > > backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is > > > only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > > The queues are not backing up. > > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > > directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed > > > > from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the > > > information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has > > > not "not responded". Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no > > > body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > > > Mike > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
a) STORE.EXE at 100% CPU is not normal. Typical values for a well used system would be 30 to 50% CPU. b) STORE.EXE can take close to 100% of memory without a worry - but NOT CPU. c) Stop and start the Information Store if you like - it sounds as though it wouldn't do any harm and may do some good. But NOT when the backups are running. d) What version of Exchange, what Service Packs and what hot fixes are you running? Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 July 2002 14:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt (Q272570). Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just don't know. > Why would you want to do that? > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > information store while the backup is running. > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of > > the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only > > backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > The queues are not backing up. > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > directories are being skipped. > > Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. > > There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. > > No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not "not responded". > > Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and > > no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > Mike > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt (Q272570). Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just don't know. > Why would you want to do that? > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > information store while the backup is running. > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the > > backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is > > only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > The queues are not backing up. > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed > > from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the > > information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has > > not "not responded". Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no > > body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > Mike > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt (Q272570). Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just don't know. > Why would you want to do that? > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup > > > Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the > information store while the backup is running. > > > > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of > > the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only > > backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > > The queues are not backing up. > > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > > directories are being skipped. > > Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. > > There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. > > No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not "not responded". > > Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and > > no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > > > Mike > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential >information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is >addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are >hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is >strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately >notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or >email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
Why would you want to do that? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the information store while the backup is running. > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of > the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only > backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > The queues are not backing up. > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > directories are being skipped. > Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. > There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. > No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not "not responded". > Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and > no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
Running at 100% is not normal. Any hardware/software changes made recently ? I would disable the AV completely and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe and NT backup Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. The queues are not backing up. Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not "not responded". Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs Nt server 4.0 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Store.exe and NT backup
Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the information store while the backup is running. > Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is > supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. > > But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of > the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. > > The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only > backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). > > Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. > The queues are not backing up. > Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange > directories are being skipped. > Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. > There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. > No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not "not responded". > Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs > > Nt server 4.0 sp6a > Exchange 5.5 sp3 > NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: > > ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l > "c:\backup\backup.log" /hc:on /t normal > > I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and > no subject starting at the time the backup starts > > Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Server and virus protection - WAS RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMI NG TOO MUCH MEMORY
I remember my days with using McAfee products as hellish! Two years ago I dropped McAfee in favour of the Sophos Antivirus suite. It certainly isn't nearly as polished (pretty) as McAfee but it sure is stable and requires less memory overhead than most or all other alternatives. After running tests on a dummy server, I'm now ready to deploy their latest product called MailMonitor for SMTP. It's sort of a light version of MIMESWEEPER, dedicated to eradicating viruses BEFORE they enter your server. Is anyone using MailMonitor yet? Shawn --- Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer. Dipix Technologies Inc. ------ Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY From: Chris Scharff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:30:41 -0500 X-Message-Number: 40 Suggesting the removal of McAfee products from a server is among the most helpful responses I could possibly think of. It's solved pesky problems for thousands of administrators over the years. > -Original Message- > From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:23 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY > > What a helpful response... > > This might be more helpful. > > What versions of Virusscan & Groupshield? > > If GS 4.5, is hotfix 7 applied? > > I'd recommend upgrading to GS 5.0 if you're stuck with McAfee (we are :-( > ) > > Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
I have had a similar experience but not with Exchange 2K. I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and it seems that around a week ago we had a number of users that had emails stuck in their outbox. We could not open the email or delete it. We had to export the mailbox to a PST open the PST, delete the message, then delete the Exchange mailbox, recreate the mailbox and reimport the PST and the problem stopped. Unfortunately the problem keeps occurring and evertime it causes the CPU to go to 100% utilized. I am not sure what to do, anybody have any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Arch, yes I have seen this happen twice. Once was due to Antivirus scanning mailboxes and the M: drive. (Exclude M: drive) Once was due to Public Folder replication to another site. One public folder was set to replicate with a site which was Exchange 5.0 . Just after starting the Information store Store.exe used 100%CPU and stayed there. After applying recommended patches and updates the problem continued to happen. As soon as I stopped replication on the recently changed public folder the CPU returned to normal. Danny Mills "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" Sent by:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bounce-exchange-48804@ls cc: .swynk.com Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU 25/06/2002 04:43 AM Please respond to "Exchange Discussions" Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Any messages in the queue ? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:21 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Nope...I only have 512k in it. -Original Message- From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Are you running win2k adv srvr with >= 1Gb RAM? Are you using /3GB switch in boot.ini? XGEN: Exchange 2000 Requires /3GB Switch with More Than 1 Gigabyte of Physical RAM (Q266096) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: 24 June 2002 20:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Are you running win2k adv srvr with >= 1Gb RAM? Are you using /3GB switch in boot.ini? XGEN: Exchange 2000 Requires /3GB Switch with More Than 1 Gigabyte of Physical RAM (Q266096) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: 24 June 2002 20:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
Oooh. There's a thought; 'cept you'd have to call it molassis mail then, right? --Gary -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I wonder if you can use Compact Flash cards to run the Store.exe on .. I have a few left over. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? > You didn't buy all that RAM to have it sit unused, now did you? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Barnett > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? > > > > I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a > result of reading this fine list :-) > > Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in > their network. > > Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of > ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. > > Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV > vendor. > > Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point > should I be worried about the process failing? > > 600M - day before yesterday > 650M - yesterday > 471M - a few minutes ago > > I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all > available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give > away to other processes. > > Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, > > Gary Barnett > Network Administrator > Wells St. John P.S. > > > > > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
I wonder if you can use Compact Flash cards to run the Store.exe on .. I have a few left over. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? > You didn't buy all that RAM to have it sit unused, now did you? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Barnett > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? > > > > I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a > result of reading this fine list :-) > > Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in > their network. > > Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of > ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. > > Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV > vendor. > > Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should > I be worried about the process failing? > > 600M - day before yesterday > 650M - yesterday > 471M - a few minutes ago > > I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all > available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give > away to other processes. > > Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, > > Gary Barnett > Network Administrator > Wells St. John P.S. > > > > > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
You didn't buy all that RAM to have it sit unused, now did you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Barnett Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Gary Barnett Network Administrator Wells St. John P.S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
