--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost1uk@ wrote:
Let's call the Turq docrine about opinion TD.
TD seems to be something
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
. . .
As it turns out, my challenge is an old
and famous one, one that actually had an
answer. It was proposed (at different times,
obviously) by the Biblical King Solomon and
by Abraham Lincoln, who challenged someone
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
snip
As it turns out, my challenge is an old
and famous one, one that actually had an
answer. It was proposed (at different times,
obviously) by the Biblical King Solomon and
by Abraham Lincoln, who challenged someone
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost1uk@ wrote:
Let's
Empty, while I am even more underwhelmed by you
spouting dogma than by you acting out your jeal-
ousy of Vaj and myself, I perceive the possibility
for fun here, so I'm gonna go for it.
So I issue you a challenge -- describe for me
(and our studio audience) something NON-relative,
some truth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
Empty, while I am even more underwhelmed by you
spouting dogma than by you acting out your jeal-
ousy of Vaj and myself, I perceive the possibility
for fun here, so I'm gonna go for it.
So I issue you a challenge --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Empty, while I am even more underwhelmed by you
spouting dogma than by you acting out your jeal-
ousy of Vaj and myself, I perceive the possibility
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
snip
I *understand* that some people (and
especially some people on this forum) get their
buttons pushed when someone challenges an assump-
tion that they have taken for granted for so
long that it has for them become
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
Empty, while I am even more underwhelmed by you
spouting dogma than by you acting out your jeal-
ousy of Vaj and myself, I perceive the possibility
for fun here, so I'm gonna go for it.
While cleverly evading the actual
What part of the Mindfulness Posting Technique did Judy
not understand? I guess I'll have to use visual aids.
[http://www.timw.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/dumped_lge.gif]
[http://www.jak-systems.ca/sites/Joker/Shared%20Documents/dumped-you--.j\
pg]
The thing is, we all know that she
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
Relativism sets out to reduce every element of absoluteness
to a relativity, while making a quite illogical exception
in favor of this reduction itself.
Do you even *understand* the issue? Can you state
it in your
On Jul 2, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
Relativism sets out to reduce every element of absoluteness
to a relativity, while making a quite illogical exception
in favor of this reduction itself.
Do you even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Jul 2, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
[quoting emptybill quoting Frithjof Schuon's Logic
and Transcendence]
Relativism sets out to reduce every element
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
What part of the Mindfulness Posting Technique did Judy
not understand? I guess I'll have to use visual aids.
[http://www.timw.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/dumped_lge.gif]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
snip
The thing is, we all know that she *still* won't get
it, even with the visual aids, and will *continue* to
try to suck me and other victims into her never-ending
arguments.
You jes' keep right on telling yourself that
Silly silly Turq.
What a childish approach to debating ultimate truth. As if. As if! As if a
logical rearranging of concepts could be a spiritual process that was anything
but a cul de sac.
One of the methods for approaching the Absolute: neti, neti, neti.
Egoic attachment is a projection
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
The thing is, we all know that she *still* won't get
it, even with the visual aids, and will *continue* to
try to suck me and other victims into her
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost1uk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Empty, while I am even more underwhelmed by you
spouting dogma than by you acting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost...@... wrote:
Let's call the Turq docrine about opinion TD.
TD seems to be something like Truth is relative to your
point of view and there is no Truth (capital 'T').
Not at all. You are making the same reading error
that the rest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost1uk@ wrote:
Let's call the Turq docrine about opinion TD.
TD seems to be something like Truth is relative to your
point of view and there is no Truth (capital
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost1uk@ wrote:
Let's call the Turq docrine about opinion TD.
TD seems to be something like Truth is relative to your
point of view and there is no Truth (capital
21 matches
Mail list logo
