Bhairitu, maybe pork from Iowa is tastier? Probably it's just cheaper...
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 11:51 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Do Iowa pigs speak Mandarin? (Sounds sorta like a Philip K Dick title).
On 09/11/2014
dear salyavin, now what heresy would that be?! When I said power, I meant a
political power. I still believe that life itself is the power that gives rise
to all events.
And no need to worry. We witches learned a lot about staying safe during the
last Inquisition (-:
On Thursday,
Bhairitu, what grabbed my attention was that bit about all the pigs in China.
Strange because I hear that CAFOs are so big in Iowa because there is a DEMAND
for Iowa pork in China! Go figger!
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:50 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
[FairfieldLife]
Do Iowa pigs speak Mandarin? (Sounds sorta like a Philip K Dick title).
On 09/11/2014 09:04 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Bhairitu, what grabbed my attention was that bit about all the pigs in
China. Strange because I hear that CAFOs are so big in Iowa because
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
dear Salyavin, now what heresy would that be?!
Just a little joke my dear, aimed mostly at Buck who gets upset about these
things. The idea that someone in his midst who thinks it hubris that people can
affect the world
On 9/9/2014 9:35 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
As mentioned by the US generals, the US cannot win the war against
ISIS by air power alone. It still needs military boots on the ground
to drive away the militants from Iraq. The military boots should not
be coming from American
On 9/9/2014 10:02 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
That's why we needed a residual force in Iraq. They, the Iraqis, were
developing the skills while we were there. We backed them up and gave
them the confidence they needed to get it done. The average Iraqi
soldier
Leadership comes with a price. Do we lead the world in our values or take a
back seat and let others do the leading? We see ISIS leading in the middle east
and Putin leading in Eastern Europe now. Obviously we have a president that
believes in leading from *behind* and we now see how well that
America does not need nor can afford empires.
On 09/09/2014 08:02 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
That's why we needed a residual force in Iraq. They, the Iraqis, were
developing the skills while we were there. We backed them up and gave
them the confidence they
Then prepare to be *empired* upon.
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 8:50 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
America does not need nor can afford empires.
On 09/09/2014 08:02 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
By whom? Aliens from another planet? :-D
On 09/10/2014 08:51 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Then prepare to be *empired* upon.
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 8:50 AM, Bhairitu
noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Bhairitu, are you saying we no longer have to keep up with our Mandarin
lessons?!
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:48 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
By whom? Aliens from another planet? :-D
On 09/10/2014 08:51 AM, Mike
On 9/10/2014 11:48 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
By whom? Aliens from another planet? :-D
Maybe you haven't been keeping up with the news - aliens from across the
border.
The southern border of the United States is less guarded than at
anytime since 9/11. For
Mike, most of what you say here makes sense. But the one idea I question is
when you say whoever is pushing the hardest will have the most influence. I'd
like to think that that way of operating is no longer most effective on the
world stage. How about: whoever can benefit humanity the most
The war on terror is a scam. It is to have endless war like
described in Orwell's 1984. It makes the evil old men you run the
military industrial complex lick their chops. And we can see that even
on FFL there are sheeple who buy the propaganda.
On 09/10/2014 09:59 AM, Share Long
On 09/10/2014 09:59 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Bhairitu, are you saying we no longer have to keep up with our
Mandarin lessons?!
http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-rise-and-fall-of-modern-empires-2014-9
Share, when I say push the hardest I'm meaning putting forth the most effort
to control global events. Doesn't have to be militarily, can be economic or
political. We don't need to be invaded, we can always be isolated and
marginalized economically. As of right now, anyone that controls events
Ah, Mike the hubris of us humans. To think we can control global events. For
proof to the contrary, I see the ebola tragedy. That is far from being over.
The world now is too complex and too interconnected to think with any validity
that a power can control the whole world by controlling one
That way of thinking may be dead in your mind. Try convincing all the
scoundrels in the world of that. They may never have absolute control over the
world but they'll sure raise enough hell trying to.
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 6:03 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife]
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Ah, Mike the hubris of us humans. To think we can control global events.
Shhh, don't tell Buck about your heresy!
For proof to the contrary, I see the ebola tragedy. That is far from being
over. The world now is too
On 9/8/2014 9:34 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
It's the formation of a new government in Iraq, according to Kerry.
IMO, this indeed is the most reasonable of all approaches, along with
the necessary support from world governments to defeat ISIS.
The way to defeat ISIS is
The US funded the Mujahideen to fight against the Russians in
Afghanistan. Why? Because greedy US businessmen wanted their hands on
the recently revealed to the public rich resources in the Afghanistan
(which was why Russians were there in the first place). Then the
Mujahideen because
Well, why did we abandon the Mujaheddin the first time if we wanted all those
minerals? Didn't we go into Iraq the second time for all that oil? No blood
for oil.Why did we leave that? Did the US actually support ISIS? As I recall,
there were several anti- Assad resistance groups, some *good*
Heard yesterday from SF Bay Area comedian Will Durst:
/Why's everyone blaming Obama? He hasn't done anything.
/On 09/09/2014 11:10 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Well, why did we abandon the Mujaheddin the first time if we wanted
all those minerals? Didn't we go
On 9/9/2014 11:11 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
The US funded the Mujahideen to fight against the Russians in
Afghanistan. Why? Because greedy US businessmen wanted their hands on
the recently revealed to the public rich resources in the Afghanistan
(which was
On 9/9/2014 1:42 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Heard yesterday from SF Bay Area comedian Will Durst:
/Why's everyone blaming Obama? He hasn't done anything.
/
/
/The key words here are the [U.S. Congress] hasn't done anything. Just
a few months ago Barack Obama
Richard,
As mentioned by the US generals, the US cannot win the war against ISIS by air
power alone. It still needs military boots on the ground to drive away the
militants from Iraq. The military boots should not be coming from American
soldiers. The military boots should be from the
That's why we needed a residual force in Iraq. They, the Iraqis, were
developing the skills while we were there. We backed them up and gave them the
confidence they needed to get it done. The average Iraqi soldier doesn't trust
or have faith in their own commanders unless there are American
28 matches
Mail list logo
