[FairfieldLife] The two models

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Barry writes snipped:
  And again, you are assuming the unenlightened 
  model, which believes that progress *has* to be made
  towards enlightenment. If you shift to another 
  equally accurate model and description of the process -- 
  that everyone is always already enlightened and that the
  *only* thing that marks enlightenment is a realization
  of what has always already been going on -- then there
  is no progress possible. 
 
 TomT:
 The reason it is called ignorance is that one actually is able 
 to ignore that which they always have been and will always be. 
 It is not called stupid or smart or arrogant or gratuitous or 
 a lie it is called IGNORANCE. Name and form.

For those who have had a realization experience,
whether it be temporary or permanent, the always
already enlightened model is just so much more
*accurate*. 

It's *obvious* when it happens that there was never 
anywhere to go, nothing to become, no stress 
to get rid of, no moment at which you were ever
unenlightened. Enlightenment is, has always been, 
and will always be; the only thing lacking up til 
now has been the realization of what should have
been obvious. As Tom suggests, the being who has
considered himself unenlightened has just been
being IGNORANT of what's been right in his face
since the day he was born.

So I've always wondered WHY spiritual teachers
went for that *other* model, the *inaccurate* one.
You know the one -- the one that says that there
are things you have to do to become enlight-
ened, that there are obstacles like stress that 
can prevent enlightenment, that one can ever be
unenlightened. Why not do what Ramana Maharshi
and a few other teachers did and just TELL THE
TRUTH from Day One: You're enlightened. Right
here, right now. GET OVER all this 'unenlightened'
stuff already.  :-)

As far as I can tell, the entire TM model for the
enlightenment process is a LIE. Worse, it is a 
*known* lie, because Maharishi has at times written
eloquently about the other model, the always 
already enlightened model. So he *chose* to tell
people that they were unenlightened, and would 
remain unenlightened until certain undefined 
conditions were met. He chose to *reinforce* 
the ignorance rather than dispel it. WHY, one 
wonders?





[FairfieldLife] Washoe County of Nevada observes Sanskrit Day.

2008-01-31 Thread Rama Krishna
The Washoe County of Nevada observed Jan 12 as  Sanskrit Day  .Here is the
 report : 

http://tinyurl.com/ypx5vd


http://in.news.yahoo.com/ani/20080110/r_t_ani_wl_intl/twl-american-county-proclaims-january-12-7da97d8.html

Washoe County of Nevada has proclaimed January 12 as Sanskrit Day.A 
proclamation signed by Robert M. Larkin, Chairman of Washoe County Commission, 
under the Seal of Washoe County, says,  PROCLAIMED, That Washoe County 
recognizes the importance of the Sanskrit language and January 12, 2008 as 
Sanskrit Day.
This proclamation is to coincide with two-day Sanskrit language 
seminar-cum-class, first of its type in the state, organized by prominent Hindu 
chaplain and Indo-American leader, Rajan Zed, here on January 12-13 next, in 
which about 50 people are expected to participate.
This Washoe County proclamation quotes Mahatma Gandhi as saying Without the 
study of Sanskrit, one cannot become a true learned man.
It further says, As Hinduism expands in the West, it is important that to 
understand Hinduism, one should have a working knowledge of Sanskrit.
The Vedas, written in Sanskrit, are dated by different scholars from 6500 BCE 
to 1500 BCE. Sanskrit language must have evolved to its expressive capability 
prior to that. Besides Hindu scriptures, a vast amount of Buddhist and Jain 
scriptures were also written in Sanskrit. According to tradition, self-born God 
created Sanskrit, which is everlasting and divine. First scripture of the 
world, Rig-Veda, was written in Sanskrit. Many Sanskrit works are still to be 
translated. Sanskrit has a close relationship with other classical languages 
like Latin, Greek, French, German, etc.
Famed German philologist Max Muller once said, Sanskrit is the greatest 
language of the world. In America, scholar William D. Whitney wrote the 
Sanskrit Grammar in 1879. Sanskrit is also known as the language of the gods.


   
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Check out my Facebook profile

2008-01-31 Thread Zoran Krneta
I know Nenad, he is ok guy, I think he send his profile because most of the
people on this forum are hiding... it is not comfortable to talk with
someone who doesn't want to show up his face. I think that is the reason why
people allow themselves to say something what usually would not.


Re: [FairfieldLife] The two models

2008-01-31 Thread Vaj


On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:38 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Barry writes snipped:
  And again, you are assuming the unenlightened
  model, which believes that progress *has* to be made
  towards enlightenment. If you shift to another
  equally accurate model and description of the process --
  that everyone is always already enlightened and that the
  *only* thing that marks enlightenment is a realization
  of what has always already been going on -- then there
  is no progress possible.

 TomT:
 The reason it is called ignorance is that one actually is able
 to ignore that which they always have been and will always be.
 It is not called stupid or smart or arrogant or gratuitous or
 a lie it is called IGNORANCE. Name and form.

For those who have had a realization experience,
whether it be temporary or permanent, the always
already enlightened model is just so much more
*accurate*.


Yes, but even in sudden paths to E, relative obscurations will  
remain. That's not to say that an individual cannot go from total  
ignorance to complete enlightenment in a flash, but it is extremely  
rare and has happened to maybe a handful of people in history. And  
also, the world is filled with people (esp. nowadays it would seem)  
who claim to be enlightened or had some total awakening but may  
actually be in something else. Unless you have a person, a standard  
really, who can verify that experience, it actually has little  
meaning. More often than not students will mistake any number of well  
known sidetracks as the Big E.


Even when one does authentically have a non-conventional experience  
of our Natural State, on still is on a path, just one where it is a  
pathless path, as obscurations do still remain.




It's *obvious* when it happens that there was never
anywhere to go, nothing to become, no stress
to get rid of, no moment at which you were ever
unenlightened. Enlightenment is, has always been,
and will always be; the only thing lacking up til
now has been the realization of what should have
been obvious. As Tom suggests, the being who has
considered himself unenlightened has just been
being IGNORANT of what's been right in his face
since the day he was born.

So I've always wondered WHY spiritual teachers
went for that *other* model, the *inaccurate* one.


Because different people have different propensities and different  
dispositions. Most people need some sort of support or training  
wheels to begin to let go of their identifications.



You know the one -- the one that says that there
are things you have to do to become enlight-
ened, that there are obstacles like stress that
can prevent enlightenment, that one can ever be
unenlightened. Why not do what Ramana Maharshi
and a few other teachers did and just TELL THE
TRUTH from Day One: You're enlightened. Right
here, right now. GET OVER all this 'unenlightened'
stuff already. :-)


Ramana actually himself spent years in all sorts of absorptions  
before he had his sudden realization (same with Nisargadatta, a  
Nath who has mastered kundalini and yoga first). He also taught his  
students based on where they're at, not a one size fits' all approach.




As far as I can tell, the entire TM model for the
enlightenment process is a LIE. Worse, it is a
*known* lie, because Maharishi has at times written
eloquently about the other model, the always
already enlightened model. So he *chose* to tell
people that they were unenlightened, and would
remain unenlightened until certain undefined
conditions were met. He chose to *reinforce*
the ignorance rather than dispel it. WHY, one
wonders?


Ignorance sells? :-)



[FairfieldLife] Re: Veterans of Life

2008-01-31 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, that's told very special.  Thanks, is a great story.  I showed 
 it around my household and everyone was blown away in turn.
 
 What life does bring.  What a great story of courage. That was only 
 60 years ago all that happened.
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0HVg1kCpxU
 

I `ve, always liked good real stories.  Good real moral character 
type stories.  Stories where stands gets made on moral grounds of 
virtue.  Stories that show a virtuous presence of mind that has 
resolute a nature in life.  In human life often we are not called on 
to make hard or extraordinary choices and often the good stories of 
life are those where people stand out or stand in front of something 
by moral force.  By something of moral human character inside.

Good stories often turn on a presence of mind that has someone stand 
resolved.  Well told stories do tell what someone was thinking or 
doing `walking in those shoes' and sometimes a good story just helps 
you stand where someone stood for a moment.

I liked the story about your parents as it is told.  It is a good 
story.  

Different than just animal fight or flight, people can have their 
character of a soul to account for.  How that gets accounted for 
often makes story.  Your parents story is a great modern one.  

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/162641

Jai,
-Doug in FF


Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks, Doug, it's been lucky for me and my brother and sister that 
 our folks have shared their memories as thoroughly as they have, 
and 
 that they're still available to resource despite their age.  It's 
 impossible to imagine the hardships and violence that so many 
people 
 in the 20th C. endured; I can't, at least.
 
 The folks you mention below, and my folks, are incredibly resistant 
 individuals, people of true character.  We've been lucky to know 
 them.
 
 Marek




 
Doug writing: 
 I remember an obituary last year published in the FF Ledger for 
 Harriet Berman's mother here.
 It was written in a common way, that she was fun and a great game 
 player and active in her later life and such.  The un-expanded part 
 of the obituary was that she grew up Jewish, in 1930's occupied 
 Poland.  I wondered then if the family had her story as she saw 
it.  
 Her MSAE grandson from FF then has now become a professional 
 journalist elsewhere, I wondered then if he had collected it or if 
it 
 had come to be too late.  There seemed to be an untold character 
 story in the obituary.  Certainly some veterans of those times only 
 wish to go on in life putting it behind them in their privacy.  
 
 That generation is passing fast now.
 My wife's dad was with the first army medical unit to arrive at 
 Dachau as US troops arrived and found it.  He has a scrap book with 
 photos and articles about it from then.  But now his own memory is 
 rickety and about all gone.
 
 At Revelations used bookstore here a while back I bought a used 
book 
 about all the concentration and work camps of Nazi Germany, in real 
 nice shape that had clippings from the war carefully folded in to 
the 
 book.  Evidently from someone's (from around here?) estate or 
 collection who seems to have been there.
 
 In town here we have a kind old guy who as a skilled handy-man 
takes 
 care of appliances.  As a boy he was displaced with his mother and 
 brother from East Prussian farming districts that were emptied of 
all 
 civilians as the Russian army came in that way against the Germans 
 during the war.  They traveled about as displaced civilians trying 
to 
 connect with their family's father who had been conscripted in to 
the 
 German army and sent down to Austria.  As the war narrowed down, 
like 
 with this other story they were separated by the lines of 
occupation 
 and it was quick heads-up thinking in hand-changing destinations on 
 travel documents that got them from the Russian occupied side over 
to 
 the American occupied side where the dad was later in the war.
 I am telling his story to you in writing this but even in doing 
that 
 I have left out a lot of viseral texture to the way he told it to 
me 
 directly.
 
 My dad had his stories from then too.  He is gone now and the 
 liveliness of those stories with him.  I remember some of them but 
 not the way he told them.
 
 -Doug in FF  
 
 
 
 
 
  Marek Reavis reavismarek@ wrote:
 
  Yeah, Curtis, my folks; the back stories are equally 
interesting.  
  And as you can see, the red wine (and the vodka) apparently 
haven't 
  diminished their capacities too much.  It's just a life and every 
  life is a story that each one of us has the opportunity to enrich 
  every day.  I always appreciate the stories shared on this forum 
 with 
  a community I feel so lucky to be a member of.
  
  Marek
  
  **
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   --- In 

[FairfieldLife] Lovely ABC News article: Maharishi Retreats Into Silence

2008-01-31 Thread Dick Mays

http://abcnews.go.com/


The Beatles, from left to right: John Lennon, 
Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr and George Harrison, 
join the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, center, as they 
arrive by train at Bangor, Wales, United Kingdom, 
to participate in a weekend of meditation, on 
this Aug. 26, 1967 file photo. After more than 50 
years at the helm of his Transcendental 
Meditation movement, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the 
ageing Indian guru to stars like the Beatles, has 
retreated into near silence and turned over the 
day-to-day running of his global network to 
senior aides, a close adviser said Tuesday, Jan. 
29, 2008.


Maharishi Retreats Into Silence

Indian Guru to the Beatles Retreats Into Silence, 
Gives Up Control of Meditation Movement


By MIKE CORDER

The Associated Press

THE HAGUE, Netherlands 
January 29, 2008
It was 1967 and the Indian meditation guru 
Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, dressed in white with long 
flowing black hair and a gray beard, beamed as he 
stood surrounded by four smiling young Beatles at 
the peak of their popularity.
George Harrison, clutching a sitar, John Lennon, 
Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr were on their way 
to a retreat in Wales led by the Maharishi, and 
the Hindu holy man was on his way to worldwide 
fame.
It has been more than 50 years since the 
Maharishi began teaching a technique known as 
Transcendental Meditation. He is now believed to 
be 91 and on Tuesday, a close adviser said he has 
retreated into near silence and turned over the 
day-to-day running of his global network to aides.
He is not as young as he once was, adviser John 
Hagelin, an American physicist, said by telephone 
from the Dutch village of Vlodrop where the TM 
movement is now headquartered. I think he 
probably has a more limited reserve of physical 
energy to draw upon. He was working ... 20 hours 
a day for years.
Transcendental Meditation, or TM, is a 20-minute 
twice daily routine in which the meditator 
silently focuses on a sound, or mantra, to induce 
relaxation and dive into a state of pure 
consciousness.
Most scientists agree TM can ease stress, high 
blood pressure, pain and insomnia. But some argue 
it is no more effective than many other mind-body 
relaxation techniques.

Movie director David Lynch once extolled the virtues of TM in a speech.
Anger, stress, tension, depression, sorrow, 
hate, fear these things start to retreat, said 
Lynch, a longtime practitioner. And for a 
filmmaker, having this negativity lift away is 
money in the bank. When you're suffering you 
can't create.
The Maharishi's movement claims some 6 million 
people have become practitioners.
But it was not until the Beatles visited his 
ashram in India in 1968 that the guru became an 
icon of the counterculture movement. John, Paul, 
George and Ringo came for spiritual instruction 
as they struggled to come to terms with the death 
of their manager Brian Epstein.
Other celebrities who followed the Maharishi's 
teachings included singer Donovan, actress Mia 
Farrow and the Beach Boys.
The attention his famous followers focused on the 
Maharishi's movement turned it into a global 
phenomenon with outposts in some 130 countries. 
For the last 17 years, he has run it from a 
former Franciscan monastery in a secluded forest 
near Vlodrop, an eastern Dutch village near the 
German border. He often spent hours on end 
speaking by video links to followers around the 
globe.
The Maharishi told senior aides at a Jan. 8 
meeting in the Netherlands of his plan to 
withdraw from administrative duties and spend his 
time absorbed in the ancient Indian texts that 
underpin his movement. The announcement caught 
many followers off guard.
He had been involved very dynamically 
administratively in his worldwide movement for 
over 50 years, so it's quite a significant change 
to see him dive back purely into knowledge and 
let other people take care of the 
administration, Hagelin said.
There is no one designated successor but many 
people have been trained for years to carry on 
the Maharishi's various tasks, Hagelin said.
The Maharishi a Hindi-language title for Great 
Seer now spends his days in silence contemplating 
and preparing a commentary on the Vedas, a vast 
Sanskrit canon compiled some 3,500 years ago, 
from which he evolves solutions for today's 
troubled world.
I think everybody's quietly feeling some sense 
of celebration that he's finally going to 
complete his commentary on the Vedas, which 
probably will have a longer-term impact, Hagelin 
said. It's a vitally important body of 
literature.
The Maharishi is believed to have been born Jan. 
12, 1917, in central India. He earned a physics 
degree from Allahabad University, was the 
longtime secretary to a leading Hindu sage, then 
went into silent retreat for two years in the 
northern Indian hills.
In 1955, he began teaching Transcendental 
Meditation and took his technique to the United 
States in 1959.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights 
reserved. This 

[FairfieldLife] From The Spoof.com -- Beatles guru, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, set to retire

2008-01-31 Thread hermandan0
There's hope for all the guru wannabe's yet!

Beatles guru, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, set to retire
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s4i29672



[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
   
   Barry writes snipped:
   And again, you are assuming the unenlightened 
   model, which believes that progress *has* to be made
   towards enlightenment. If you shift to another 
   equally accurate model and description of the process -- 
   that everyone is always already enlightened and that the
   *only* thing that marks enlightenment is a realization
   of what has always already been going on -- then there
   is no progress possible. 
  
  TomT:
  The reason it is called ignorance is that one actually is able 
  to ignore that which they always have been and will always be. 
  It is not called stupid or smart or arrogant or gratuitous or 
  a lie it is called IGNORANCE. Name and form.
 
 For those who have had a realization experience,
 whether it be temporary or permanent, the always
 already enlightened model is just so much more
 *accurate*.

Funny, above you called the progress model
equally accurate.

And as I've already pointed out, the model
per se isn't any different, it just uses
different words to express the same thing.

 It's *obvious* when it happens that there was never 
 anywhere to go, nothing to become, no stress 
 to get rid of, no moment at which you were ever
 unenlightened. Enlightenment is, has always been, 
 and will always be; the only thing lacking up til 
 now has been the realization of what should have
 been obvious.

Except that it's obvious only once you've had
that realization. What you describe as something
lacking is what the progress model calls ignorance
or unenlightenment. What's lacking is enlightenment.

And there's no reason to suppose there isn't any
progress involved in remedying that lack, whether
one recognizes it or not.

snip
 As far as I can tell, the entire TM model for the
 enlightenment process is a LIE. Worse, it is a 
 *known* lie, because Maharishi has at times written
 eloquently about the other model, the always 
 already enlightened model. So he *chose* to tell
 people that they were unenlightened,

I.e., lacking the realization that they were
always already enlightened.

 and would 
 remain unenlightened until certain undefined 
 conditions were met.

I.e., the condition of realization that they
were always already enlightened.

 He chose to *reinforce* 
 the ignorance rather than dispel it. WHY, one 
 wonders?

Perhaps because he knows it doesn't make any
damn difference.

Actually, it seems to me the you're already
enlightened model is the one that's a lie.
If you're still lacking the realization, you're
not enlightened.

This model is designed to make people feel stupid
if they're still lacking the realization, as if
there were something wrong with them for not
having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
the day he was born.

It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Awake to God's Allness, or asleep in despair

2008-01-31 Thread Peter
I posted that because i couldn't figure out what the
hell BillyG was doing with the Yogananda quote and
then the snide reference to you. Actually I saw my own
smiling face when I glanced at the poop of my basset
hound! Self folding back onto Self. I am shit, shit is
me!

--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Billy, I took my dog out for a walk and when he took
 a
 shit your smiling, sattvic face came to mind. Dude,
 WTF? What is this nonsense?
 
 
 My Dad has a good label for guys like you Pete.  He
 would say, That
 Peter is 'with it.'  He's really on the ball. 
 Nothing gets past you
 here brother.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  --- BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
   curtisdeltablues
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
 Don't be like Lot's wife who looked back
 (allowed
   her mind to be
 possessed by memories of past sexual
 behavior) 


Then how exactly do you masturbate?  Internet
   porn?  (If the answer  is
that you do not please include an address
 where I
   can send the 
 flowers
and condolences)
   
   Curtis-I read this recently and funnily enough
 your
   name popped into
   my head: 
   
   I quote, The influence of the force of avidya
 (the
   individuality of
   the ego) is such that no matter how irksome the
   illusion, deluded man
   is loath to part with it...The confirmed
   materialist, captive in his
   own realm of 'reality', is ignorant in, and of,
 his
   deluded state and
   therefore has no wish, nor will, to exchange it
 for
   the sole Reality,
   Spirit.
   
   He perceives the temporal world as reality,
 eternal
   substance-(insofar
   as he is able to grasp the concept of eternity).
 He
   imagines the
   grossness of sensory experience to be the pure
   essence of feeling and
   perception.  He fabricates his OWN standards of
   morality and behavior
   and calls them good, irrespective of their
 inharmony
   with eternal
   Divine Law. 
   
   And he thinks that his ego, his mortal sense of
   being, with its
   inflated self-importance as the almighty doer,
 is
   the image of his
   soul as created by God.  Swami Yogananda
  
  Billy, I took my dog out for a walk and when he
 took a
  shit your smiling, sattvic face came to mind.
 Dude,
  WTF? What is this nonsense?
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
   To subscribe, send a message to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   Or go to: 
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
   and click 'Join This Group!' 
   Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
  
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
   
  
  
  
   


  Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
  http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 



[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread Larry
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
   
   Barry writes snipped:
   And again, you are assuming the unenlightened 
   model, which believes that progress *has* to be made
   towards enlightenment. If you shift to another 
   equally accurate model and description of the process -- 
   that everyone is always already enlightened and that the
   *only* thing that marks enlightenment is a realization
   of what has always already been going on -- then there
   is no progress possible. 
  
  TomT:
  The reason it is called ignorance is that one actually is able 
  to ignore that which they always have been and will always be. 
  It is not called stupid or smart or arrogant or gratuitous or 
  a lie it is called IGNORANCE. Name and form.
 
 For those who have had a realization experience,
 whether it be temporary or permanent, the always
 already enlightened model is just so much more
 *accurate*. 
 
 It's *obvious* when it happens that there was never 
 anywhere to go, nothing to become, no stress 
 to get rid of, no moment at which you were ever
 unenlightened. Enlightenment is, has always been, 
 and will always be; the only thing lacking up til 
 now has been the realization of what should have
 been obvious. As Tom suggests, the being who has
 considered himself unenlightened has just been
 being IGNORANT of what's been right in his face
 since the day he was born.
 
 So I've always wondered WHY spiritual teachers
 went for that *other* model, the *inaccurate* one.
 You know the one -- the one that says that there
 are things you have to do to become enlight-
 ened, that there are obstacles like stress that 
 can prevent enlightenment, that one can ever be
 unenlightened. Why not do what Ramana Maharshi
 and a few other teachers did and just TELL THE
 TRUTH from Day One: You're enlightened. Right
 here, right now. GET OVER all this 'unenlightened'
 stuff already.  :-)
 
 As far as I can tell, the entire TM model for the
 enlightenment process is a LIE. Worse, it is a 
 *known* lie, because Maharishi has at times written
 eloquently about the other model, the always 
 already enlightened model. So he *chose* to tell
 people that they were unenlightened, and would 
 remain unenlightened until certain undefined 
 conditions were met. He chose to *reinforce* 
 the ignorance rather than dispel it. WHY, one 
 wonders?


My readings of vedic texts implies that acquiring enlightenment is
like becoming a doctor - - that is, after one has demonstrated
sufficient proficiency with the material, then the title is bestowed
upon you, (thru practice of yoga) one earns enlightenment the old
fashioned way.  This traditional 'model' takes a polite approach to
enlightenment -

as compared to the buccaneer approach where one can create
opportunities  of heightened eligibility (aka Grace) - - the thinking
being that all that is required is a familiarity with the transcendent
- - for example, if closing your eyes right now (or better yet with
eyes open); if the notion of I Am or the Transcendent resonates -
than you are eligible.  So, create your own moments of Grace, and try
on the idea of I AM That - - does it fit?   Hey remember this, 50%
of all doctors graduated in the bottom half of their class - likewise,
the Self is not exact till you are there, so the point where you leap
is up to you.

Keep in mind the naturalness of consciousness (as compared to an
experience) - we are not looking for something like Wow I've been
enlightened for 2 hours and 22 minutes and it is really a trip .. 

if any impression is present, it be more like this is how I have
always lived  or this is how human beings live . . not unlike 
waking state . . so be a pirate  AARGH



[FairfieldLife] Re: Awake to God's Allness, or asleep in despair

2008-01-31 Thread curtisdeltablues
 Actually I saw my own
 smiling face when I glanced at the poop of my basset
 hound! Self folding back onto Self. I am shit, shit is
 me!
 

I think this insight applies equally well to the humanistic
perspective.  It is when one monkey that I am not shit, but you are
that the trouble begins for me.

Shared humanity as physical beings.

Shared expressions of a unified Self behind all of life.

Lately I'm beginning to see these concepts as much closer in their end
perspective.  It seems to depend on what aspect you pay attention to most.




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I posted that because i couldn't figure out what the
 hell BillyG was doing with the Yogananda quote and
 then the snide reference to you. Actually I saw my own
 smiling face when I glanced at the poop of my basset
 hound! Self folding back onto Self. I am shit, shit is
 me!
 
 --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Billy, I took my dog out for a walk and when he took
  a
  shit your smiling, sattvic face came to mind. Dude,
  WTF? What is this nonsense?
  
  
  My Dad has a good label for guys like you Pete.  He
  would say, That
  Peter is 'with it.'  He's really on the ball. 
  Nothing gets past you
  here brother.
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
  drpetersutphen@ wrote:
  
   
   --- BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:

  Don't be like Lot's wife who looked back
  (allowed
her mind to be
  possessed by memories of past sexual
  behavior) 
 
 
 Then how exactly do you masturbate?  Internet
porn?  (If the answer  is
 that you do not please include an address
  where I
can send the 
  flowers
 and condolences)

Curtis-I read this recently and funnily enough
  your
name popped into
my head: 

I quote, The influence of the force of avidya
  (the
individuality of
the ego) is such that no matter how irksome the
illusion, deluded man
is loath to part with it...The confirmed
materialist, captive in his
own realm of 'reality', is ignorant in, and of,
  his
deluded state and
therefore has no wish, nor will, to exchange it
  for
the sole Reality,
Spirit.

He perceives the temporal world as reality,
  eternal
substance-(insofar
as he is able to grasp the concept of eternity).
  He
imagines the
grossness of sensory experience to be the pure
essence of feeling and
perception.  He fabricates his OWN standards of
morality and behavior
and calls them good, irrespective of their
  inharmony
with eternal
Divine Law. 

And he thinks that his ego, his mortal sense of
being, with its
inflated self-importance as the almighty doer,
  is
the image of his
soul as created by God.  Swami Yogananda
   
   Billy, I took my dog out for a walk and when he
  took a
   shit your smiling, sattvic face came to mind.
  Dude,
   WTF? What is this nonsense?
   
   
   
   
   
   



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links


   
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



   
   
   

 


   Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
   http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
  
  
  
  
  
  To subscribe, send a message to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Or go to: 
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
  and click 'Join This Group!' 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
 
 
 
  

 Be a better friend, newshound, and 
 know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ





[FairfieldLife] Re: Veterans of Life

2008-01-31 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Doug Hamilton writes snipped:
Good stories often turn on a presence of mind that has someone stand 
resolved.  Well told stories do tell what someone was thinking or 
doing `walking in those shoes' and sometimes a good story just helps 
you stand where someone stood for a moment.

TomT:
Susan Herzberger (a TMer in FF who has been awake since 85) explained
it as story has the ability to by pass all the alarms of the modern
and sophisticated mind and get directly to the reptilian mind where
the message is taken in whole hog. Seems great teachers use them to
change minds without the permission of those listening to the story. Tom




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread Vaj


On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:30 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:


This model is designed to make people feel stupid
if they're still lacking the realization, as if
there were something wrong with them for not
having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
the day he was born.

It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.


Quite the opposite, the actual intention (at least in Buddhadharma,  
but I suspect we see the same thing is seen in Hinduism's various  
darshanas or ways-of-seeing ) is that there's 'different strokes for  
different folks'.




When the movement came out with its mistake of the intellect phrase
it kinda struck me this same way. Unfortunate choice of words IMO.


It's a translation of a common word used in Ayurveda is all it is.  
The problem with the TMO, they seem to use it frequently outside it's  
intended context.




[FairfieldLife] The God of Little Girls and Dead Dog's White Teeth

2008-01-31 Thread hermandan0
Ben wrote:

From Message 62660 Awake to God

When we're quiet and listen to God, in no time we know clearly that
God is All, and all that there possibly can be.  There is nothing but
God.  So there can't be God and something besides.  You know that God
cannot be sick or poor or in pain.  So sickness, poverty and pain are
impossible and preposterous, since God is all, and All is God. 

From Message 162719 A Real Miracle

A few folks are saying this God is All business is just farfetched
 fantasy, without very much value. 

I write:

Ben, aside from the obvious question of whose god/which god --
Manitou? Odin? Zuess? Allah? Yaweh? Tara? Brahma/Vishnu/Shiva/?
Sharipova? -- the difficulty I have is with a god is all where all
is defined as only everything nice, comfortable, good and pleasant.
WTF? How is that ALL?

That would be the little girl god of sugar and spice and everything
nice, the dead-dog's-white-teeth god attached to the
non-existent,illusory,
rotting-in-the-gutter-on-the-untouchable-side-of-town dog corpse. You
can't have one without the other.

It seems to me that ALL-THAT-IS is all that is, and god is a concept.
In this case, it's a concept that conveniently cuts off a good portion
of what is. If you want to define god as all that is, then I think you
have to accept the whole shebang. Pig-tails and calico sun dresses are
real, but cluster bombs, Auschwitz, Darfur and famine are illusions?
Fresh powder snow on a sunlit mountainside and the Aurora Borealis are
god, but tantrics eating from skulls and some guy offering himself up
on the internet to be cannibalized are not? Preposterous they may be,
but it seems to me it must either be all real or all illusion, and
that in the end it may not matter which, because it's all that is.

I suspect it takes more courage and is more
small-self-ego-obliterating to face the totality of all that is than
to cut it up and pretend that parts of it do not belong or are somehow
outside of it (a truly bizarre concept, IMO, when talking about
all-that-is), because to accept IT ALL we must know it is what WE are too.

Yellow-matter custard dripping from a dead dog's eye

Corporation t-shirt, stupid bloody Tuesday man

You should have seen them kicking Edgar Allen Poe...

I am he as you are he and you are me and we are altogether... 

I think you are not alone in wanting only the nice and pretty and
ignoring the rest; pretty much everyone wants a better life, and I
don't think there's anything wrong with that. Nor do I pretend to know
what would happen in the world if everyone embraced themselves as the
totality of all-that-is, from sugar and spice to terrorists hitting
the twin towers, from fine wine to molatov cocktails, from the worst
bigot to the most compassionate soul. But perhaps, just perhaps, we'd
stop creating our own shadow demons that we end up fighting.

There are those who say the whole spiritual seeking/teaching game is
just another layer of delusion to keep our egos occupied so we don't
have to face all-that-is. The reason ignorance sells may be that
people would rather seek than find, that they want their sugar and
spice without the greasy grimy gopher guts.

Reminds me of a half-finished song:

All he really wanted was a nicer Maya/
twisting by the pool and sipping cocos on la playa/
sun's out, surf's up, there's mangoes and papaya/
everybody's happy in a nicer Maya

I bought into the nicer Maya, heaven-on-earth vision for a long time,
so I can't criticize. I have no complaints about my own life compared
to what goes on in the world, but heaven-on-earth as described by
promises of a world with no poverty, no war, no disease etc. just
isn't here. 

It's not that ALL-THAT-IS is a farfetched fantasy; it's the
HALF-IS-REALLY-ALL that's a farfetched fantasy.

YMMV



[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread curtisdeltablues
This model is designed to make people feel stupid
if they're still lacking the realization, as if
there were something wrong with them for not
having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
the day he was born.

It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.


When the movement came out with its mistake of the intellect phrase
it kinda struck me this same way.  Unfortunate choice of words IMO.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
  tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:

Barry writes snipped:
And again, you are assuming the unenlightened 
model, which believes that progress *has* to be made
towards enlightenment. If you shift to another 
equally accurate model and description of the process -- 
that everyone is always already enlightened and that the
*only* thing that marks enlightenment is a realization
of what has always already been going on -- then there
is no progress possible. 
   
   TomT:
   The reason it is called ignorance is that one actually is able 
   to ignore that which they always have been and will always be. 
   It is not called stupid or smart or arrogant or gratuitous or 
   a lie it is called IGNORANCE. Name and form.
  
  For those who have had a realization experience,
  whether it be temporary or permanent, the always
  already enlightened model is just so much more
  *accurate*.
 
 Funny, above you called the progress model
 equally accurate.
 
 And as I've already pointed out, the model
 per se isn't any different, it just uses
 different words to express the same thing.
 
  It's *obvious* when it happens that there was never 
  anywhere to go, nothing to become, no stress 
  to get rid of, no moment at which you were ever
  unenlightened. Enlightenment is, has always been, 
  and will always be; the only thing lacking up til 
  now has been the realization of what should have
  been obvious.
 
 Except that it's obvious only once you've had
 that realization. What you describe as something
 lacking is what the progress model calls ignorance
 or unenlightenment. What's lacking is enlightenment.
 
 And there's no reason to suppose there isn't any
 progress involved in remedying that lack, whether
 one recognizes it or not.
 
 snip
  As far as I can tell, the entire TM model for the
  enlightenment process is a LIE. Worse, it is a 
  *known* lie, because Maharishi has at times written
  eloquently about the other model, the always 
  already enlightened model. So he *chose* to tell
  people that they were unenlightened,
 
 I.e., lacking the realization that they were
 always already enlightened.
 
  and would 
  remain unenlightened until certain undefined 
  conditions were met.
 
 I.e., the condition of realization that they
 were always already enlightened.
 
  He chose to *reinforce* 
  the ignorance rather than dispel it. WHY, one 
  wonders?
 
 Perhaps because he knows it doesn't make any
 damn difference.
 
 Actually, it seems to me the you're already
 enlightened model is the one that's a lie.
 If you're still lacking the realization, you're
 not enlightened.
 
 This model is designed to make people feel stupid
 if they're still lacking the realization, as if
 there were something wrong with them for not
 having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
 IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
 the day he was born.
 
 It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
 words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.





[FairfieldLife] Re: A Real Miracle

2008-01-31 Thread ruthsimplicity
Probably wasn't appendicitis. 



[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
  tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:

Barry writes snipped:
And again, you are assuming the unenlightened 
model, which believes that progress *has* to be made
towards enlightenment. If you shift to another 
equally accurate model and description of the process -- 
that everyone is always already enlightened and that the
*only* thing that marks enlightenment is a realization
of what has always already been going on -- then there
is no progress possible. 
   
   TomT:
   The reason it is called ignorance is that one actually is able 
   to ignore that which they always have been and will always be. 
   It is not called stupid or smart or arrogant or gratuitous or 
   a lie it is called IGNORANCE. Name and form.
  
  For those who have had a realization experience,
  whether it be temporary or permanent, the always
  already enlightened model is just so much more
  *accurate*.
 
 Funny, above you called the progress model
 equally accurate.
 
 And as I've already pointed out, the model
 per se isn't any different, it just uses
 different words to express the same thing.
 
  It's *obvious* when it happens that there was never 
  anywhere to go, nothing to become, no stress 
  to get rid of, no moment at which you were ever
  unenlightened. Enlightenment is, has always been, 
  and will always be; the only thing lacking up til 
  now has been the realization of what should have
  been obvious.
 
 Except that it's obvious only once you've had
 that realization. What you describe as something
 lacking is what the progress model calls ignorance
 or unenlightenment. What's lacking is enlightenment.
 
 And there's no reason to suppose there isn't any
 progress involved in remedying that lack, whether
 one recognizes it or not.
 
 snip
  As far as I can tell, the entire TM model for the
  enlightenment process is a LIE. Worse, it is a 
  *known* lie, because Maharishi has at times written
  eloquently about the other model, the always 
  already enlightened model. So he *chose* to tell
  people that they were unenlightened,
 
 I.e., lacking the realization that they were
 always already enlightened.
 
  and would 
  remain unenlightened until certain undefined 
  conditions were met.
 
 I.e., the condition of realization that they
 were always already enlightened.
 
  He chose to *reinforce* 
  the ignorance rather than dispel it. WHY, one 
  wonders?
 
 Perhaps because he knows it doesn't make any
 damn difference.
 
 Actually, it seems to me the you're already
 enlightened model is the one that's a lie.
 If you're still lacking the realization, you're
 not enlightened.
 
 This model is designed to make people feel stupid
 if they're still lacking the realization, as if
 there were something wrong with them for not
 having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
 IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
 the day he was born.

But it's the truth. THAT is what you're
pissed off about.

 It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
 words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.

Whatever.

If you feel stupid with this model, that's
because it places the *reason* for your belief
in your own unenlightenment squarely where
it belongs -- in your own lap. 

Just as you prefer to believe in bad guys in 
politics and here on Fairfield Life, and contin-
ually try to find people or things on which you
can place blame for the things you don't like,
you'd prefer to believe that there are reasons
that you don't perceive yourself to be enlightened.

There are. You've never made the CHOICE to
perceive the reality of the situation. You'd
prefer to cling to the notion that you're
unenlightened.  

Whatever. If you get off on that, I guess there
is nothing more to say.

Except that by my count, this compulsive post
of yours claiming that I'm an elitist puts you 
over the 50-post limit for this week. 

Rick's count is the official one, of course, but 
if his count agrees with mine, I guess I'll see 
you Saturday the 9th, not Saturday the 2nd.

And, *whenever* you next appear, I'd be willing 
to bet you'll still be clinging to your model
of I'm unenlightened no matter what *anyone*
tells me. And the fact that I'm unenlightened is
somebody/something else's fault, not mine! 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[I wrote:]
  This model is designed to make people feel stupid
  if they're still lacking the realization, as if
  there were something wrong with them for not
  having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
  IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
  the day he was born.
 
  It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
  words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.
 
 When the movement came out with its mistake of the
 intellect phrase it kinda struck me this same way.
 Unfortunate choice of words IMO.

Even though the intellect is still mistaken in
enlightenment?

Even though we couldn't function in the relative
without that mistake?

Even though every word out of MMY's mouth is in
the language of the mistaken intellect?

Seems to me it should have exactly the opposite
effect--it explains why we don't automatically
realize we're always already enlightened, why
it isn't our fault that we don't realize it.

The intellect's mistake is that it's too smart
for its own good.

That's why we transcend, so that the intellect
shuts up and quits misleading us, so we can
experience Self-referral without getting hung up
in paradox and infinite regress, which is what
Self-referral looks like to the intellect.

(My last post for the week, gang.)




[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  This model is designed to make people feel stupid
  if they're still lacking the realization, as if
  there were something wrong with them for not
  having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
  IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
  the day he was born.
  
  It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
  words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.
 
 When the movement came out with its mistake of the intellect 
 phrase it kinda struck me this same way.  Unfortunate choice of 
 words IMO.

The difference is that if it's the mistake of 
the intellect it's somebody ELSE's fault. It's
like the people who believe in it are whining,
It's the universe's fault, or God's fault, or
the laws of nature's fault, or somebody's...it's
certainly not MINE.

In the it's somebody/something ELSE's fault that
I'm not enlightened model, there is something 
*outside* of one's self to blame it on. And there
is something *outside* of one's self that prevents
you from realizing your enlightenment. You don't
have to take any responsibility for not being 
enlightened, and you can't really do all that much
to change the situation, because it's controlled
by that mysterious something outside of one's
self.

In the always already enlightened model, the fact
that you don't perceive yourself to be enlightened
is always *your* fault. You just haven't made that
choice. BUT, at any moment you *could* make that
choice, and change things, and realize what has
always already been present.

Me, I like the always already enlightened model 
and find the not enlightened and its somebody/
something ELSE's fault model insulting. Others 
obviously swing the other way. Go figure.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
   tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
   tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
 
 Barry writes snipped:
 And again, you are assuming the unenlightened 
 model, which believes that progress *has* to be made
 towards enlightenment. If you shift to another 
 equally accurate model and description of the process -- 
 that everyone is always already enlightened and that the
 *only* thing that marks enlightenment is a realization
 of what has always already been going on -- then there
 is no progress possible. 

TomT:
The reason it is called ignorance is that one actually is able 
to ignore that which they always have been and will always be. 
It is not called stupid or smart or arrogant or gratuitous or 
a lie it is called IGNORANCE. Name and form.
   
   For those who have had a realization experience,
   whether it be temporary or permanent, the always
   already enlightened model is just so much more
   *accurate*.
  
  Funny, above you called the progress model
  equally accurate.
  
  And as I've already pointed out, the model
  per se isn't any different, it just uses
  different words to express the same thing.
  
   It's *obvious* when it happens that there was never 
   anywhere to go, nothing to become, no stress 
   to get rid of, no moment at which you were ever
   unenlightened. Enlightenment is, has always been, 
   and will always be; the only thing lacking up til 
   now has been the realization of what should have
   been obvious.
  
  Except that it's obvious only once you've had
  that realization. What you describe as something
  lacking is what the progress model calls ignorance
  or unenlightenment. What's lacking is enlightenment.
  
  And there's no reason to suppose there isn't any
  progress involved in remedying that lack, whether
  one recognizes it or not.
  
  snip
   As far as I can tell, the entire TM model for the
   enlightenment process is a LIE. Worse, it is a 
   *known* lie, because Maharishi has at times written
   eloquently about the other model, the always 
   already enlightened model. So he *chose* to tell
   people that they were unenlightened,
  
  I.e., lacking the realization that they were
  always already enlightened.
  
   and would 
   remain unenlightened until certain undefined 
   conditions were met.
  
  I.e., the condition of realization that they
  were always already enlightened.
  
   He chose to *reinforce* 
   the ignorance rather than dispel it. WHY, one 
   wonders?
  
  Perhaps because he knows it doesn't make any
  damn difference.
  
  Actually, it seems to me the you're already
  enlightened model is the one that's a lie.
  If you're still lacking the realization, you're
  not enlightened.
  
  This model is designed to make people feel stupid
  if they're still lacking the realization, as if
  there were something wrong with them for not
  having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
  IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
  the day he was born.
  
  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Veterans of Life

2008-01-31 Thread Duveyoung

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Doug Hamilton writes snipped:
 Good stories often turn on a presence of mind that has someone stand
 resolved.  Well told stories do tell what someone was thinking or
 doing `walking in those shoes' and sometimes a good story just helps
 you stand where someone stood for a moment.

Edg: Cute quip I came across:  Before you criticize someone, you should
walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a
mile away and you have their shoes.

 TomT:
 Susan Herzberger (a TMer in FF who has been awake since 85) explained
 it as story has the ability to by pass all the alarms of the modern
 and sophisticated mind and get directly to the reptilian mind where
 the message is taken in whole hog. Seems great teachers use them to
 change minds without the permission of those listening to the story.
Tom

Edg:  Whew!  That's a new concept for me!  Shudder!  Talk about
controlling the masses.  All we need is a spiritually sensitive George
Bush to control the world!  That said, I hope that Susan's insomnia will
someday be cured!



[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 damn difference.
 
 Actually, it seems to me the you're already
 enlightened model is the one that's a lie.
 If you're still lacking the realization, you're
 not enlightened.
 
 This model is designed to make people feel stupid
 if they're still lacking the realization, as if
 there were something wrong with them for not
 having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
 IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
 the day he was born.
 
 It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
 words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.

Agreed. The you're already enlightened model fires up one thing 
only: the ego. The model fits perfectly for the lazy lovers of vino 
here on FFL. ;-)




[FairfieldLife] Carnaval

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
Hey John (do.rflex),

How long does Carnaval last in Brazil? Here in 
Sitges it's about to start tonight and continue
through February 6th. I'm probably not going to
get a lot of sleep for the next week, because
this is what my town's going to look like 24/7:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1Jstos5rO0

http://www.whatsonwhen.com/sisp/index.htm?fx=videovideo_id=18

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44PaD0Makrc





[FairfieldLife] Overposting

2008-01-31 Thread Rick Archer
Judy and Shemp are both over by 2. Turq intentionally went over by one last
week and I didn’t suspend him, so in fairness to them, I’ll cut them some
slack. But if either of them posts again before Friday night, I’ll have to
suspend them. Judy for one week, Shemp for 3.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.17/1252 - Release Date: 1/30/2008
8:51 PM
 


RE: [FairfieldLife] Check out my Facebook profile

2008-01-31 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zoran Krneta
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 5:11 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Check out my Facebook profile

 

I know Nenad, he is ok guy, I think he send his profile because most of the
people on this forum are hiding... it is not comfortable to talk with
someone who doesn't want to show up his face. I think that is the reason why
people allow themselves to say something what usually would not. 

Thanks. Posting Facebook profiles isn’t a bad idea. Here’s mine:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=672990734


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.17/1252 - Release Date: 1/30/2008
8:51 PM
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Judy writes: snipped
This model is designed to make people feel stupid
if they're still lacking the realization, as if
there were something wrong with them for not
having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
the day he was born.

It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.

TomT:
I did not use the word IGNORANT. I was very careful to use the root
word of this sequence which is the word to IGNORE. If one is willing
to consider that the basic human condition is the ability to IGNORE
then there is no blame, no shame and no reason to IGNORE the
opportunity to do a small amount of self inquiry. Just considering
that this might be a way out of the quandary of being a seeker and not
a finder has some possibility of moving out of a frozen position of
the last 25 to 35 years. we learned to transcend in order to know IT
when IT found us. Self inquiry might allow us to find the way our
tricky minds work. I am only suggesting that we look at the
possibility that the ability to IGNORE is just bad software and that
there may be a way out through allowing us to see no bad guys, no
blame, no shame and just a statement to be explored to see if it has
any value to whomever. This is the true value of the intellect. As
Patanjali put it chapter 3 last verse. When the translucent intellect
is as clear as the SELF, there is Enlightenment.
Tom 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Angela Mailander
Edg, what's got into you?  I never thought you capable of heaping humiliation 
upon anyone's noggin.  That's other people's job in this list. Your job is 
infinite compassion.

- Original Message 
From: Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:08:44 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!









  



Shemp,



Oh boy!



I just met this person who knows you personally!



What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!



Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.



You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're

about to have heaped upon your noggin!



Edg






  







!--

#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom:10px;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding:0 0;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{
color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
--



!--

#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
font-family:Arial;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
--



!--

#ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
#ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica, clean, 
sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
#ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
#ygrp-text{
font-family:Georgia;
}
#ygrp-text p{
margin:0 0 1em 0;}
#ygrp-tpmsgs{
font-family:Arial;
clear:both;}
#ygrp-vitnav{
padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
#ygrp-vitnav a{
padding:0 1px;}
#ygrp-actbar{
clear:both;margin:25px 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
#ygrp-actbar .left{
float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
.bld{font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-grft{
font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;}
#ygrp-ft{
font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666;
padding:5px 0;
}
#ygrp-mlmsg #logo{
padding-bottom:10px;}

#ygrp-vital{
background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}
#ygrp-vital #vithd{
font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:uppercase;}
#ygrp-vital ul{
padding:0;margin:2px 0;}
#ygrp-vital ul li{
list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee;
}
#ygrp-vital ul li .ct{
font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-right:.5em;}
#ygrp-vital ul li .cat{
font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-vital a{
text-decoration:none;}

#ygrp-vital a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}

#ygrp-sponsor #hd{
color:#999;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov{
padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{
padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li{
list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{
text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #nc{
background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad{
padding:8px 0;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{
font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a{
text-decoration:none;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad p{
margin:0;}
o{font-size:0;}
.MsoNormal{
margin:0 0 0 0;}
#ygrp-text tt{
font-size:120%;}
blockquote{margin:0 0 0 4px;}
.replbq{margin:4;}
--







Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Carnaval

2008-01-31 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hey John (do.rflex),
 
 How long does Carnaval last in Brazil? 


It starts tomorrow and lasts 'till next Wed. The Brazilians love it,
they love their holidays and party hearty. [Interestingly, the
government widely distributes condoms during the events.] 

It's actually best to watch Carnaval on TV, you see whole lot more. I
went with my wife to the official one in Rio in 2002 and we had 2
attempted muggings within 5 minutes of each other in a huge crowd.
Luckily we escaped unharmed each time. I'm a pink 'gringo' and I kind
of stand out in a crowd of Brazilians. Seems the bad guys think
'gringos' are good targets.

Check this out for info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_Carnival




Here in 
 Sitges it's about to start tonight and continue
 through February 6th. I'm probably not going to
 get a lot of sleep for the next week, because
 this is what my town's going to look like 24/7:
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1Jstos5rO0
 
 http://www.whatsonwhen.com/sisp/index.htm?fx=videovideo_id=18
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44PaD0Makrc





[FairfieldLife] the two models

2008-01-31 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Another old posting from Tom T

From Jean Klein Transmission of the Flame page 65 first para:
...We have very often repeated that the seeker is the sought. An
object is a fraction; it appears in your wholeness, in your globality.
When you really come to the understanding that the seeker is the
sought, there is a natural giving-up of all energy to find something.
It is an instantaneous apperception. I don't say perception, because
in perception there is a perceiver and something perceived. An
apperception is an instantaneous perceiving of what is perceiving. So
it can never be in relation of subject-object, just as an eye can
never see its own seeing. ...you will find a glimpse of
non-subject-object relationship. This glimpse is seen with your whole
intelligence, which is there in the absence of the person, the
thinker, the doer. Understanding, being the understanding, is
enlightenment.




[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread sandiego108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip you'd prefer to believe that there are reasons
 that you don't perceive yourself to be enlightened.
 
snip And, *whenever* you next appear, I'd be willing 
 to bet you'll still be clinging to your model
 of I'm unenlightened no matter what *anyone*
 tells me. And the fact that I'm unenlightened is
 somebody/something else's fault, not mine!

SO clue us in please, dude-- you rant and rave when others on this 
board have stated unequivocally that they are enlightened (you know 
who they are), because you judge their expression to be 
unenlightened.

And now you say that we are all enlightened?? wtf?

The conclusion seems to be that everyone is enlightened, but only 
when you, TB, say they are. Right? 

That's just wrong...smells of your own private religion, with your 
ego as God.



[FairfieldLife] the two models

2008-01-31 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Something I posted here a few years ago that seems revelant to this
discussion. TOm

Ignorance is nothing more that our ability to ignore that which we
already are.  A great many spiritual people have some pretty
outstanding experiences, which cause them to move to deeper
understandings. The key here is that all experiences are in, of, by,
and about the relative.  Those experiences do make a difference and
move people to some relative understanding of who we are. When Self
knows Self, this happens on the other side of the line. It is the
absolute knowing itself.  When that happens understanding gets
imprinted on this small self physiology of the magnitude of what has
happened, thus making it impossible to ignore who and what we have
always been.  The key is that if there is any doubt then the relative
side of who we are has not yet had the clear understanding to make it
unmistakable, undeniable and self-validating.  Awakening is not an
experience but an understanding brought about through clarity.  
A quote from Jean Klein from his book I AM page 85.
In an experience there is still an experiencer who is stuck in the
pattern of going in and out of states.  Global understanding is the
sudden awareness that the perceiver of these states is unaffected by
them, that they appear in the perceiver. This insight occurs in a
flash when all the fragments preventing us from understanding, yet
which point towards it, unfold in the uninvolved witness. 
Awareness is the essential element allowing non-understanding to
become understanding. It does not result from accumulation as when we
learn something, a language or an instrument, for example.  It is
instantaneous like a flash of lightning where the various elements
preceding it are suddenly seen simultaneously and are re-orchestrated,
just as the particles drawn by a magnet fall into a pattern when they
become attached to it. This sudden vision can eliminate all previous
problems without leaving the slightest shadow of non-understanding.
This resorption into total understanding releases all the energies
usually molded into set patterns and opens the way towards ultimate
truth, oneness. (Tom comments, we could also use Wholeness or
Fullness in lieu of Oneness.)
Patanjali via Alistair Shearer verse 55 and last of Chapter 3,
Expansion. Which is where all the sidhis are enumerated and is of
course the prescribed result of practicing them which is why it is the
last verse of this chapter.
And when the translucent intellect is as pure as the Self, there is
Enlightenment




[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Duveyoung
Angela,

I know.  I know!

It's madness that overtakes me.

I am resisting, but it is futile -- thanks for the chiding, but all is
lost.

Shemp is going down.

Edg


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Edg, what's got into you?  I never thought you capable of heaping
humiliation upon anyone's noggin.  That's other people's job in this
list. Your job is infinite compassion.
 
 - Original Message 
 From: Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:08:44 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Shemp,
 
 
 
 Oh boy!
 
 
 
 I just met this person who knows you personally!
 
 
 
 What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!
 
 
 
 Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.
 
 
 
 You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're
 
 about to have heaped upon your noggin!
 
 
 
 Edg
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 !--
 
 #ygrp-mkp{
 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px
0px;padding:0px 14px;}
 #ygrp-mkp hr{
 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
 #ygrp-mkp #hd{

color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px
0px;}
 #ygrp-mkp #ads{
 margin-bottom:10px;}
 #ygrp-mkp .ad{
 padding:0 0;}
 #ygrp-mkp .ad a{
 color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
 --
 
 
 
 !--
 
 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
 font-family:Arial;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
 margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
 margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
 --
 
 
 
 !--
 
 #ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean,
sans-serif;}
 #ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
 #ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica,
clean, sans-serif;}
 #ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
 #ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
 #ygrp-text{
 font-family:Georgia;
 }
 #ygrp-text p{
 margin:0 0 1em 0;}
 #ygrp-tpmsgs{
 font-family:Arial;
 clear:both;}
 #ygrp-vitnav{
 padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
 #ygrp-vitnav a{
 padding:0 1px;}
 #ygrp-actbar{
 clear:both;margin:25px
0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
 #ygrp-actbar .left{
 float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
 .bld{font-weight:bold;}
 #ygrp-grft{
 font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;}
 #ygrp-ft{
 font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666;
 padding:5px 0;
 }
 #ygrp-mlmsg #logo{
 padding-bottom:10px;}
 
 #ygrp-vital{
 background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}
 #ygrp-vital #vithd{

font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:uppercase;}
 #ygrp-vital ul{
 padding:0;margin:2px 0;}
 #ygrp-vital ul li{
 list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee;
 }
 #ygrp-vital ul li .ct{

font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-right:.5em;}
 #ygrp-vital ul li .cat{
 font-weight:bold;}
 #ygrp-vital a{
 text-decoration:none;}
 
 #ygrp-vital a:hover{
 text-decoration:underline;}
 
 #ygrp-sponsor #hd{
 color:#999;font-size:77%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ov{
 padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{
 padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ov li{
 list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{
 text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #nc{
 background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;}
 #ygrp-sponsor .ad{
 padding:8px 0;}
 #ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{

font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor .ad a{
 text-decoration:none;}
 #ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{
 text-decoration:underline;}
 #ygrp-sponsor .ad p{
 margin:0;}
 o{font-size:0;}
 .MsoNormal{
 margin:0 0 0 0;}
 #ygrp-text tt{
 font-size:120%;}
 blockquote{margin:0 0 0 4px;}
 .replbq{margin:4;}
 --
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com





[FairfieldLife] Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Duveyoung
Shemp,

Oh boy!

I just met this person who knows you personally!

What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!

Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.

You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're
about to have heaped upon your noggin!

Edg



[FairfieldLife] the two models

2008-01-31 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
One other thing to add to the stew from one of my long lost posts.Tom

Enlightenment is not an experience it is an understanding that comes
when the intellect makes the final discrimination.  The understanding
does not happen in any mind. Self knows Self. The knowing of Self is
so strong as to leave no doubt about what has transpired.  That
knowing imprints on the small self what is known to be beyond the
ability of any mind to know.  It is the expression of the lively
absolute playing out in a physiology.  Brahmin looks out through these
eyes, talks through this mouth and animates this body.  The cosmic
Self comes to the forefront and the small self is content to run the
relative life.  Nothing in your life changes and yet everything in
your life changes. It is the ultimate Paradox, which is the clue as to
the profundity of what has just transpired.



[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  damn difference.
  
  Actually, it seems to me the you're already
  enlightened model is the one that's a lie.
  If you're still lacking the realization, you're
  not enlightened.
  
  This model is designed to make people feel stupid
  if they're still lacking the realization, as if
  there were something wrong with them for not
  having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
  IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
  the day he was born.
  
  It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
  words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.
 
 Agreed. The you're already enlightened model fires up one thing 
 only: the ego. The model fits perfectly for the lazy lovers of vino 
 here on FFL. ;-)

The ego is no less fired up in the person chained to a treadmill to
enlightenment.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Carnaval

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Hey John (do.rflex),
  
  How long does Carnaval last in Brazil? 
 
 It starts tomorrow and lasts 'till next Wed. The Brazilians love it,
 they love their holidays and party hearty. [Interestingly, the
 government widely distributes condoms during the events.] 
 
 It's actually best to watch Carnaval on TV, you see whole lot more. 
 I went with my wife to the official one in Rio in 2002 and we had 2
 attempted muggings within 5 minutes of each other in a huge crowd.
 Luckily we escaped unharmed each time. I'm a pink 'gringo' and I 
 kind of stand out in a crowd of Brazilians. Seems the bad guys think
 'gringos' are good targets.

Fortunately, that really isn't an issue here in Spain.
Sitges is *remarkably* crime-free, for a party-down
beach town. So here it's more party consciousness,
not party-but-keep-one-hand-on-your-wallet conscious-
ness. Very sweet and innocent in its way, really, for
a beach town. More like the late 60s, the hippie era.
Even with the large gay scene it's a very sweet and 
innocent scene, not at all debauched and cynical the 
way some prudes would portray a big party-down event 
like Carnaval.

The fireworks are starting outside, so I'm about to
go outside and join the festivities. I wish you the
best possible Carnaval, John. May you and your wife
enjoy to the full limits of enjoyment.

Me, I'm pretty much like a pig in shit. If you think
Edg is drooling thinking of dishin' dirt on Shemp, 
just *imagine* what he's going to think of me after
this week of serious party-down consciousness in 
Spain. A whole town full of half-naked Catholic girls
letting their hair and their libidos down before they
have to put them on the shelf for Lent.

My kinda holiday...  :-)





[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 snip you'd prefer to believe that there are reasons
  that you don't perceive yourself to be enlightened.
  
 snip And, *whenever* you next appear, I'd be willing 
  to bet you'll still be clinging to your model
  of I'm unenlightened no matter what *anyone*
  tells me. And the fact that I'm unenlightened is
  somebody/something else's fault, not mine!
 
 SO clue us in please, dude-- you rant and rave when others on this 
 board have stated unequivocally that they are enlightened (you know 
 who they are), because you judge their expression to be 
 unenlightened.
 
 And now you say that we are all enlightened?? wtf?

Well OF COURSE you're all enlightened. 

In the sense that all of us are, even the
ones who don't think they are, even the ones
like Judy who are ready to die fighting for 
their right to say they're not enlightened.

But that only makes you LIKE EVERYONE ELSE
ON THE PLANET.

Your problem is that you want to be considered
special for being LIKE EVERYONE ELSE ON 
THE PLANET.

:-)





Re: [FairfieldLife] Check out my Facebook profile

2008-01-31 Thread Zoran Krneta
Thanks!
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1017027930



2008/1/31, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 *From:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Zoran Krneta
 *Sent:* Thursday, January 31, 2008 5:11 AM
 *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Check out my Facebook profile



 I know Nenad, he is ok guy, I think he send his profile because most of
 the people on this forum are hiding... it is not comfortable to talk with
 someone who doesn't want to show up his face. I think that is the reason why
 people allow themselves to say something what usually would not.

 Thanks. Posting Facebook profiles isn't a bad idea. Here's mine:
 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=672990734

 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.17/1252 - Release Date:
 1/30/2008 8:51 PM

 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Shemp,
 
 Oh boy!
 
 I just met this person who knows you personally!
 
 What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!
 
 Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.
 
 You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're
 about to have heaped upon your noggin!
 
 Edg

I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but I like
the guy and I feel kinda creeped  out by an agenda for revealing
personal information in order to shame someone here.  Please reference
that big hear of yours before you let something hurtful fly.  Perhaps
if you wait till he can post again to defend himself on Sat you can
think over what you are really trying to accomplish.

This post smacks of advice giving which is pretty odious in principle,
so I apoligize for that. But I felt too strongly to stay silent.










RE: [FairfieldLife] Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Rick Archer
Shemp can’t respond until Friday midnight, because he has overposted, so you
might want to hold off until he can post to defend himself. Also, be sure to
get the dirt on the other Three Stooges. Shemp is always an also-ran.

 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:09 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

 

Shemp,

Oh boy!

I just met this person who knows you personally!

What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!

Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.

You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're
about to have heaped upon your noggin!

Edg

 


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.17/1252 - Release Date: 1/30/2008
8:51 PM
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Duveyoung
Curtis,

Thank you for trying to save me, but the die is cast.

The details are just too juicy to not publish.

I'm thinking if I publish before Shemp can post again, he'll have to
twist in the wind until Saturday before he can do his usual When in
Rome, destroy Edg thingie.  

I'll trikke on it, and see if something pure changes my mind.

Stay tuned.

Edg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Shemp,
  
  Oh boy!
  
  I just met this person who knows you personally!
  
  What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!
  
  Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.
  
  You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're
  about to have heaped upon your noggin!
  
  Edg
 
 I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
 unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but I like
 the guy and I feel kinda creeped  out by an agenda for revealing
 personal information in order to shame someone here.  Please reference
 that big hear of yours before you let something hurtful fly.  Perhaps
 if you wait till he can post again to defend himself on Sat you can
 think over what you are really trying to accomplish.
 
 This post smacks of advice giving which is pretty odious in principle,
 so I apoligize for that. But I felt too strongly to stay silent.
 
 
 
 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread feste37
Edg, Don't. Unwise, unfair. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Angela,
 
 I know.  I know!
 
 It's madness that overtakes me.
 
 I am resisting, but it is futile -- thanks for the chiding, but all is
 lost.
 
 Shemp is going down.
 
 Edg
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
 mailander111@ wrote:
 
  Edg, what's got into you?  I never thought you capable of heaping
 humiliation upon anyone's noggin.  That's other people's job in this
 list. Your job is infinite compassion.
  
  - Original Message 
  From: Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:08:44 PM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  
  Shemp,
  
  
  
  Oh boy!
  
  
  
  I just met this person who knows you personally!
  
  
  
  What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!
  
  
  
  Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.
  
  
  
  You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're
  
  about to have heaped upon your noggin!
  
  
  
  Edg
  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  !--
  
  #ygrp-mkp{
  border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px
 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
  #ygrp-mkp hr{
  border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
  #ygrp-mkp #hd{
 

color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px
 0px;}
  #ygrp-mkp #ads{
  margin-bottom:10px;}
  #ygrp-mkp .ad{
  padding:0 0;}
  #ygrp-mkp .ad a{
  color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
  --
  
  
  
  !--
  
  #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
  font-family:Arial;}
  #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
  margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
  #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
  margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
  --
  
  
  
  !--
  
  #ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean,
 sans-serif;}
  #ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
  #ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica,
 clean, sans-serif;}
  #ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
  #ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
  #ygrp-text{
  font-family:Georgia;
  }
  #ygrp-text p{
  margin:0 0 1em 0;}
  #ygrp-tpmsgs{
  font-family:Arial;
  clear:both;}
  #ygrp-vitnav{
  padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
  #ygrp-vitnav a{
  padding:0 1px;}
  #ygrp-actbar{
  clear:both;margin:25px
 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
  #ygrp-actbar .left{
  float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
  .bld{font-weight:bold;}
  #ygrp-grft{
  font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;}
  #ygrp-ft{
  font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666;
  padding:5px 0;
  }
  #ygrp-mlmsg #logo{
  padding-bottom:10px;}
  
  #ygrp-vital{
  background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}
  #ygrp-vital #vithd{
 

font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:uppercase;}
  #ygrp-vital ul{
  padding:0;margin:2px 0;}
  #ygrp-vital ul li{
  list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee;
  }
  #ygrp-vital ul li .ct{
 

font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-right:.5em;}
  #ygrp-vital ul li .cat{
  font-weight:bold;}
  #ygrp-vital a{
  text-decoration:none;}
  
  #ygrp-vital a:hover{
  text-decoration:underline;}
  
  #ygrp-sponsor #hd{
  color:#999;font-size:77%;}
  #ygrp-sponsor #ov{
  padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;}
  #ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{
  padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;}
  #ygrp-sponsor #ov li{
  list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;}
  #ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{
  text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;}
  #ygrp-sponsor #nc{
  background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;}
  #ygrp-sponsor .ad{
  padding:8px 0;}
  #ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{
 

font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%;}
  #ygrp-sponsor .ad a{
  text-decoration:none;}
  #ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{
  text-decoration:underline;}
  #ygrp-sponsor .ad p{
  margin:0;}
  o{font-size:0;}
  .MsoNormal{
  margin:0 0 0 0;}
  #ygrp-text tt{
  font-size:120%;}
  blockquote{margin:0 0 0 4px;}
  .replbq{margin:4;}
  --
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Send instant messages to your online friends
 http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
   damn difference.
   
   Actually, it seems to me the you're already
   enlightened model is the one that's a lie.
   If you're still lacking the realization, you're
   not enlightened.
   
   This model is designed to make people feel stupid
   if they're still lacking the realization, as if
   there were something wrong with them for not
   having it--e.g., what should have been obvious,
   IGNORANT of what's been right in his face since
   the day he was born.
   
   It's the very worst kind of elitism, playing with
   words to exalt oneself and denigrate others.
  
  Agreed. The you're already enlightened model fires up one 
  thing only: the ego. The model fits perfectly for the lazy 
  lovers of vino here on FFL. ;-)
 
 The ego is no less fired up in the person chained to a 
 treadmill to enlightenment.

God, I love it when Alex posts. He really cuts
to the chase...






[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread sandiego108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Your problem is that you want to be considered
 special for being LIKE EVERYONE ELSE ON 
 THE PLANET.
 
 :-)

this sounds like a fantasy on your part- an ego trip. 

And it still doesn't explain your insistence that people in your 
estimation aren't enlightened because they don't *act* enlightened...

do you try to *act* enlightened?



[FairfieldLife] The latest from Dome Announcments

2008-01-31 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Dome Announcements wrote:


1. Maharishi School 2008 Spring Fundraiser

THIRD ANNUAL MAHARISHI YAGYA SPRING FUNDRAISER FOR MAHARISHI SCHOOL  
OF THE

AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT

Participate by donating $100 or more to Maharishi School and  
contribute to

the glorious benefits of Maharishi Yagya(R) performances for Maharishi
School. Ten percent of what you donate goes directly to the  
performances and
90% covers the needs of Maharishi School. All donations are tax  
deductible.

To donate online, go to: http://www.donation.msae.us.

Anyone who donates to these Yagya performances may write notes of
appreciation to Maharishi,


Maybe it's just me, but it shouldn't it really be the other way around?

Sal




Re: [FairfieldLife] Overposting

2008-01-31 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Rick Archer wrote:

Judy and Shemp are both over by 2. Turq intentionally went over by  
one last week and I didn’t suspend him, so in fairness to them,  
I’ll cut them some slack. But if either of them posts again before  
Friday night, I’ll have to suspend them. Judy for one week, Shemp  
for 3.


Rick, with such a liberal policy, Shemp just might have to reconsider  
his opinion that you're the next coming of Mussolini. :)


Sal




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:39 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:


I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but I like
the guy and I feel kinda creeped  out by an agenda for revealing
personal information in order to shame someone here.


Curtis,
I could be wrong, but I think he's kidding.

Sal




[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread curtisdeltablues
 I'll trikke on it, and see if something pure changes my mind.

Thanks for thinking about it.  It will ratchet up the nasty factor by
the power of 10 IMO.  It blends the safe persona online with a
person's real life.  I put myself out there to F with.  I am public
and I a easy to find in the real world.  My online face is my real
face. Google is so far up my ass I will never be anonymous again.  And
that suits me because I present myself as I am by choice.   

But this is not the case for everyone here and they may have really
good reasons for this.  Their real life may be very different from
their FFL persona. You may vehemently disagree with the face a person
shows here on any topic, but crossing over to hurt their real life
seems shitty to me.  And I would feel that way if I hated the guy's
personality online. 

I appreciate your being open to other points of view. Of course none
of this may really apply to what you want to post, but once it is out
it is over, so I'm speaking my peace now. (is that peace or piece? 
They both seem to apply and I've seen it written both ways!)

Happy trikking and I hope it gets your heart pumping.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Curtis,
 
 Thank you for trying to save me, but the die is cast.
 
 The details are just too juicy to not publish.
 
 I'm thinking if I publish before Shemp can post again, he'll have to
 twist in the wind until Saturday before he can do his usual When in
 Rome, destroy Edg thingie.  
 
 I'll trikke on it, and see if something pure changes my mind.
 
 Stay tuned.
 
 Edg
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
  
   Shemp,
   
   Oh boy!
   
   I just met this person who knows you personally!
   
   What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!
   
   Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.
   
   You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're
   about to have heaped upon your noggin!
   
   Edg
  
  I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
  unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but I like
  the guy and I feel kinda creeped  out by an agenda for revealing
  personal information in order to shame someone here.  Please reference
  that big hear of yours before you let something hurtful fly.  Perhaps
  if you wait till he can post again to defend himself on Sat you can
  think over what you are really trying to accomplish.
  
  This post smacks of advice giving which is pretty odious in principle,
  so I apoligize for that. But I felt too strongly to stay silent.
  
  
  
  
  
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:39 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
 
  I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
  unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but I like
  the guy and I feel kinda creeped  out by an agenda for revealing
  personal information in order to shame someone here.
 
 Curtis,
 I could be wrong, but I think he's kidding.
 
 Sal

If he is, it is totally working on me!  He pushed my earnest button
pretty good.  I hope you are right.









[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Shemp,
  
  Oh boy!
  
  I just met this person who knows you personally!
  
  What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!
  
  Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.
  
  You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're
  about to have heaped upon your noggin!
  
  Edg
 
 I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
 unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but I 
 like the guy and I feel kinda creeped out by an agenda for 
 revealing personal information in order to shame someone here. 

Gotta agree. Think this one through, Edg.

I mean...Dude...think how you'd feel if someone
found out about that weekend you spent shacked
up with the nun and the badger and the dwarf, 
and posted all the lurid details here on FFL,
including the bit with butt plug the size of 
Apollo space capsule. Need I go further?

:-)

We've all got our baggage. Shemp has effectively
hidden his for many years on the Internet. Hiding
things has a value for him. Allow him his little
pleasures, eh?





[FairfieldLife] Confession -------- Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Duveyoung
Geeze!

Cripes almighty!

Sheesh!

Talk about getting my karma instantly.

Okay, I was just plain old lying.  I don't know zip about Shemp.

I thought maybe I could lure him into overposting, and then I'd see if
Rick would allow it cuz of my having tantalized him so.  So, hey, it
was a test of Rick's backbone!

But all you good hearted folks have tried to save me from myself here,
and I'm just twisting in the wind like I wanted Shemp to endure. 
Can't stand it that you guys are uncomfortable.

So I confess -- can't have it on my soul that I concerned the good
'uns so much.

I'm sorry, and I think Rick should ban me for at least a week and
maybe even three or more.

Congrats to Shemp -- if he ever saw the post -- for resisting.

Shemp the winner!

GAWD -- I'll tell ya, eating crow here, and it doesn't taste like chicken.

Big points to Sal for having intuitive radar.  

I'll be picking bits of tar and feathers off me for a week.

Edg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
 wrote:
 
  On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:39 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
  
   I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
   unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but
I like
   the guy and I feel kinda creeped  out by an agenda for revealing
   personal information in order to shame someone here.
  
  Curtis,
  I could be wrong, but I think he's kidding.
  
  Sal
 
 If he is, it is totally working on me!  He pushed my earnest button
 pretty good.  I hope you are right.
 
 
 
 
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Jan 31, 2008, at 1:24 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:


On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:39 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:


I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but I  
like

the guy and I feel kinda creeped  out by an agenda for revealing
personal information in order to shame someone here.


Curtis,
I could be wrong, but I think he's kidding.

Sal


If he is, it is totally working on me!  He pushed my earnest  
button pretty good.  I hope you are right.


So do I.

Sal




[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I'll trikke on it, and see if something pure changes my mind.
 
 Thanks for thinking about it.  It will ratchet up the nasty factor 
 by the power of 10 IMO.  It blends the safe persona online with a
 person's real life.  I put myself out there to F with.  I am public
 and I a easy to find in the real world.  

My kinda topic! 

I'm pretty out on the Net as well. Google me
under pretty much *any* of my many pen names on 
the Net and you get *far* more than you ever 
wanted to kno.

 My online face is my real face. 

That's it. That's the part that, IMO, a lot of 
folks here miss. 

WYSIWYG

What You See Is What You Get

Some folks project 'phoniness' onto those who 
have no need of it.

 Google is so far up my ass I will never be anonymous again.  

That could be a best-selling T-shirt.

 And that suits me because I present myself as I am by choice.   

And by your *own* choice, not anyone else's.

 But this is not the case for everyone here and they may have 
 really good reasons for this.  

Absolutely.

 Happy trikking and I hope it gets your heart pumping.

Has there EVER been a more compassionate, 
loving, and above all SUBTLE line ever
written on Fairfield Life?





RE: [FairfieldLife] Confession -------- Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 1:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Confession  Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must
read!

 

I'm sorry, and I think Rick should ban me for at least a week and
maybe even three or more.

A whipping with birch branches and a naked roll in the snow should suffice.
Send us photos.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.17/1252 - Release Date: 1/30/2008
8:51 PM
 


[FairfieldLife] Confession -------- Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
  I'm sorry, and I think Rick should ban me for at least a week 
  and maybe even three or more.
 
 A whipping with birch branches and a naked roll in the snow 
 should suffice. Send us photos.

This one gets my vote as, Post that best
'gets' what the community that is Fairfield
Life really IS.

We all take turns being the village idiot.

Rick smiles upon whoever is wearing the hat
this week.

So it goes...





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Angela Mailander
I shall pray for you, sweet Bro.  and maybe a little bit for Shemp as well.

- Original Message 
From: Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:31:30 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!









  



Angela,



I know.  I know!



It's madness that overtakes me.



I am resisting, but it is futile -- thanks for the chiding, but all is

lost.



Shemp is going down.



Edg



--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Angela Mailander

mailander111@ ... wrote:



 Edg, what's got into you?  I never thought you capable of heaping

humiliation upon anyone's noggin.  That's other people's job in this

list. Your job is infinite compassion.

 

 - Original Message 

 From: Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] s.com

 To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com

 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:08:44 PM

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Shemp,

 

 

 

 Oh boy!

 

 

 

 I just met this person who knows you personally!

 

 

 

 What a bucket full of dirt I'm getting!

 

 

 

 Can't wait to write it all up and post it here.

 

 

 

 You'll never come here again lest you face the humiliation you're

 

 about to have heaped upon your noggin!

 

 

 

 Edg

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 !--

 

 #ygrp-mkp{

 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font- family:Arial; margin:14px

0px;padding: 0px 14px;}

 #ygrp-mkp hr{

 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}

 #ygrp-mkp #hd{



color:#628c2a; font-size: 85%;font- weight:bold; line-height: 122%;margin: 10px

0px;}

 #ygrp-mkp #ads{

 margin-bottom: 10px;}

 #ygrp-mkp .ad{

 padding:0 0;}

 #ygrp-mkp .ad a{

 color:#ff; text-decoration: none;}

 --

 

 

 

 !--

 

 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{

 font-family: Arial;}

 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{

 margin:10px 0px;font-weight: bold;font- size:78%; line-height: 122%;}

 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{

 margin-bottom: 10px;padding: 0 0;}

 --

 

 

 

 !--

 

 #ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean,

sans-serif;}

 #ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit; font:100% ;}

 #ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica,

clean, sans-serif;}

 #ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}

 #ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height: 1.22em;}

 #ygrp-text{

 font-family: Georgia;

 }

 #ygrp-text p{

 margin:0 0 1em 0;}

 #ygrp-tpmsgs{

 font-family: Arial;

 clear:both;}

 #ygrp-vitnav{

 padding-top: 10px;font- family:Verdana; font-size: 77%;margin: 0;}

 #ygrp-vitnav a{

 padding:0 1px;}

 #ygrp-actbar{

 clear:both;margin: 25px

0;white-space: nowrap;color: #666;text- align:right; }

 #ygrp-actbar .left{

 float:left;white- space:nowrap; }

 .bld{font-weight: bold;}

 #ygrp-grft{

 font-family: Verdana;font- size:77%; padding:15px 0;}

 #ygrp-ft{

 font-family: verdana;font- size:77%; border-top: 1px solid #666;

 padding:5px 0;

 }

 #ygrp-mlmsg #logo{

 padding-bottom: 10px;}

 

 #ygrp-vital{

 background-color: #e0ecee;margin- bottom:20px; padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}

 #ygrp-vital #vithd{



font-size:77% ;font-family: Verdana;font- weight:bold; color:#333; 
text-transform: uppercase; }

 #ygrp-vital ul{

 padding:0;margin: 2px 0;}

 #ygrp-vital ul li{

 list-style-type: none;clear: both;border: 1px solid #e0ecee;

 }

 #ygrp-vital ul li .ct{



font-weight: bold;color: #ff7900;float: right;width: 2em;text- align:right; 
padding-right: .5em;}

 #ygrp-vital ul li .cat{

 font-weight: bold;}

 #ygrp-vital a{

 text-decoration: none;}

 

 #ygrp-vital a:hover{

 text-decoration: underline; }

 

 #ygrp-sponsor #hd{

 color:#999;font- size:77%; }

 #ygrp-sponsor #ov{

 padding:6px 13px;background- color:#e0ecee; margin-bottom: 20px;}

 #ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{

 padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0; }

 #ygrp-sponsor #ov li{

 list-style-type: square;padding: 6px 0;font-size: 77%;}

 #ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{

 text-decoration: none;font- size:130% ;}

 #ygrp-sponsor #nc{

 background-color: #eee;margin- bottom:20px; padding:0 8px;}

 #ygrp-sponsor .ad{

 padding:8px 0;}

 #ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{



font-family: Arial;font- weight:bold; color:#628c2a; font-size: 100%;line- 
height:122% ;}

 #ygrp-sponsor .ad a{

 text-decoration: none;}

 #ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{

 text-decoration: underline; }

 #ygrp-sponsor .ad p{

 margin:0;}

 o{font-size: 0;}

 .MsoNormal{

 margin:0 0 0 0;}

 #ygrp-text tt{

 font-size:120% ;}

 blockquote{margin: 0 0 0 4px;}

 .replbq{margin: 4;}

 --

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Send instant messages to your online friends

http://uk.messenger .yahoo.com








  







!--

#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom:10px;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding:0 0;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{

Re: [FairfieldLife] Confession -------- Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Vaj


On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:42 PM, Duveyoung wrote:


Geeze!

Cripes almighty!

Sheesh!

Talk about getting my karma instantly.

Okay, I was just plain old lying. I don't know zip about Shemp.

I thought maybe I could lure him into overposting, and then I'd see if
Rick would allow it cuz of my having tantalized him so. So, hey, it
was a test of Rick's backbone!

But all you good hearted folks have tried to save me from myself here,
and I'm just twisting in the wind like I wanted Shemp to endure.
Can't stand it that you guys are uncomfortable.

So I confess -- can't have it on my soul that I concerned the good
'uns so much.

I'm sorry, and I think Rick should ban me for at least a week and
maybe even three or more.

Congrats to Shemp -- if he ever saw the post -- for resisting.

Shemp the winner!

GAWD -- I'll tell ya, eating crow here, and it doesn't taste like  
chicken.


Big points to Sal for having intuitive radar.

I'll be picking bits of tar and feathers off me for a week.



You must be stoned on garlic.

[FairfieldLife] 'On Day One...'

2008-01-31 Thread Robert
We keep hearing:’ Day One, Day One...'  Perhaps so much was left in disarray,
  When the Clintons left office,
  Osama bin Laden plotting, 
  Democrats weakened, Bush Elected...
  'Day One, Day One...
  The Clintons want a Redux...real bad.
   
   
   
   
   

-
  Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

   
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Stress Reducer

2008-01-31 Thread ruthsimplicity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 http://www.mensvogue.com/design/articles/2008/02/stresseraser

 

Cool.  But there is something wrong with a magazine called Men's Vogue.



[FairfieldLife] Maharishi Mahesh Yogi steps down as head of meditation empire

2008-01-31 Thread michael
http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-31636820080128?pageNumber=2virtualBrandChannel=0sp=true
   

   
-
  Lesen Sie Ihre E-Mails auf dem Handy.. 

[FairfieldLife] 100 meg internet now in FF

2008-01-31 Thread bob_brigante
http://tinyurl.com/28mcm9



[FairfieldLife] Stress Reducer

2008-01-31 Thread suziezuzie
http://www.mensvogue.com/design/articles/2008/02/stresseraser



[FairfieldLife] Re: CBS News report on Maharish's retirement

2008-01-31 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 No mention of Nader Ram as successor..hhh. I'm not 
surprised.
 
 
 
  CBS News report on Maharish's retirement
 
 The Maharishi's movement claims some 6 million people have become
  practitioners.
  
  
  Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 


6 million practitioners.  That number seems to migrate up in the re-
telling.  Anyone know how that number is broken down?  Used to be 
there were about 900K N. Americans.  



[FairfieldLife] 1000 Pundits to San Diego

2008-01-31 Thread bob_brigante
http://tinyurl.com/yqopzd

http://www.globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?
art=120178947321082366

Thanks to the generous support of well-wishers of our nation, 
already there are more than 500 Vedic Pandits at Maharishi University 
of Management and Maharishi Vedic City, Iowa. Now, to generate an 
irresistible momentum for an Invincible America—a nation that is 
safe, prosperous, and free from fear and all negative influences—
Maharishi has announced his plans to bring an additional 1,500 
Pandits from India to America for a total of 1,000 Pandits in 
Maharishi Vedic City, and 1,000 in San Diego, California. 

*

Vedic Pandits and Vedic Experts in America - Part I
by Raja Dr John Konhaus*

Global Country of World PeaceTranslate This Article
31 January 2008

For 25 years, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi has been training and supporting 
the traditional Vedic families of India—families who have been the 
custodians of the Vedic knowledge from time immemorial. Thanks to 
Maharishi, the knowledge of the Veda—the fundamental reverberations 
of Natural Law, the 'Constitution of the Universe'—is being preserved 
and re-enlivened for the benefit of mankind. 

Maharishi has trained his Pandits to a new level of proficiency and 
effectiveness in their Vedic recitation by re-establishing a high 
level of purity in their physiology and consciousness as the basis of 
their Vedic knowledge and its expression. From this level of purity 
and integrity, these traditional practices become effective tools in 
removing negative influences and in bringing peace, balance, and 
prosperity to individuals, families and nations. The United Nations 
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO, has called 
the revived and restored oral tradition of Vedic chanting 
an 'intangible heritage of all humanity.' 

In India, Maharishi has gathered 10,000 Vedic Pandits in one place in 
the Brahmasthan, or central point of the country, to perform these 
profoundly harmonizing, deeply enlivening Vedic Yagyas or recitations 
for the benefit of each nation. And now, as one of his greatest gifts 
to our nation of America, Maharishi is bringing an historically 
unprecedented 2,000 traditional, trained Vedic Pandits from India to 
American soil to perform these Vedic Yagyas, Graha Shanti (enhancing 
the influence of the planets in our lives as recommended by Maharishi 
Jyotish), and Rudra Abhishek (enlivening the creative silence and 
peace in our lives). 

Thanks to the generous support of well-wishers of our nation, already 
there are more than 500 Vedic Pandits at Maharishi University of 
Management and Maharishi Vedic City, Iowa. Now, to generate an 
irresistible momentum for an Invincible America—a nation that is 
safe, prosperous, and free from fear and all negative influences—
Maharishi has announced his plans to bring an additional 1,500 
Pandits from India to America for a total of 1,000 Pandits in 
Maharishi Vedic City, and 1,000 in San Diego, California. 

The effect produced by these two large groups of traditional Pandits 
engaging in their Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi programmes, 
including Yogic Flying, followed throughout the day by powerful Vedic 
practices, results in an indomitable upsurge of prosperity, harmony, 
peace, and all life-supporting qualities. This will create an 
unstoppable, completely life-supporting quality of life, true 
Invincibility not only for India and the US but for all nations. This 
effect from thousands of Pandits performing together has not been 
seen since the Golden Age of India thousands of years ago. 

Copyright © 2007 Global Country of World Peace. 





[FairfieldLife] Confession -------- Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Geeze!
 
 Cripes almighty!
 
 Sheesh!
 
 Talk about getting my karma instantly.
 
 Okay, I was just plain old lying.  I don't know zip about Shemp.

I am sooo taking my Bullshit meter back to the store for a refund
and buying whatever model Sal is using!  High five for that Sal!

Reminds me of practical jokes gone wrong, like the time we secretly
filmed an MIU professor having sex with a student and played the tape
in LC1 right before class started...

Sorry, just testing the new meter.  It totally redlined, excellent.






 
 I thought maybe I could lure him into overposting, and then I'd see if
 Rick would allow it cuz of my having tantalized him so.  So, hey, it
 was a test of Rick's backbone!
 
 But all you good hearted folks have tried to save me from myself here,
 and I'm just twisting in the wind like I wanted Shemp to endure. 
 Can't stand it that you guys are uncomfortable.
 
 So I confess -- can't have it on my soul that I concerned the good
 'uns so much.
 
 I'm sorry, and I think Rick should ban me for at least a week and
 maybe even three or more.
 
 Congrats to Shemp -- if he ever saw the post -- for resisting.
 
 Shemp the winner!
 
 GAWD -- I'll tell ya, eating crow here, and it doesn't taste like
chicken.
 
 Big points to Sal for having intuitive radar.  
 
 I'll be picking bits of tar and feathers off me for a week.
 
 Edg
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
  wrote:
  
   On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:39 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
   
I hope you will respect his desire for anonymity Edg. And for my
unsolicited 2 cents: I know you disagree with his politics, but
 I like
the guy and I feel kinda creeped  out by an agenda for revealing
personal information in order to shame someone here.
   
   Curtis,
   I could be wrong, but I think he's kidding.
   
   Sal
  
  If he is, it is totally working on me!  He pushed my earnest button
  pretty good.  I hope you are right.
  
  
  
  
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  Your problem is that you want to be considered
  special for being LIKE EVERYONE ELSE ON 
  THE PLANET.
  
  :-)
 
 this sounds like a fantasy on your part- an ego trip. 
 
 And it still doesn't explain your insistence that people in your 
 estimation aren't enlightened because they don't *act* enlightened...
 
 do you try to *act* enlightened?

I don't have to.






[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi Mahesh Yogi steps down as head of meditation em...

2008-01-31 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  In a message dated 1/28/08 1:05:52 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   writes:

  Feldman said the Maharishi's work would live on because he has  
  trained tens of thousands of teachers over the years (!).
 
  And only re-certified how many?
 
 Dunno. Maybe everyone will get reprieves from the maharaja? ;-)


Feldman said the Maharishi's work would live on because he has 
trained tens of thousands of teachers over the years.

If this AP wire gets re-printed enough times, it may become true.  Is 
hopeful anyway.  

 the percentage of teachers, who got de-certified in the recent 
re-cert? 90-95-97%   How much will the de-certs still work for his 
legacy, or not? 

Jai Guru Dev,

-Doug in FF



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi Mahesh Yogi steps down as head of meditation em...

2008-01-31 Thread coshlnx
---The best bet for the survival of TM and spreading it to new 
generations of people is through the existing renegade teachers who 
will charge a reasonable price consistent with market forces.
  MMY's plan: bad economics.



 In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  
  On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:32 PM, MDixon6569@ wrote:
  
   In a message dated 1/28/08 1:05:52 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
 vajranatha@ 
writes:
 
   Feldman said the Maharishi's work would live on because he has  
   trained tens of thousands of teachers over the years (!).
  
   And only re-certified how many?
  
  Dunno. Maybe everyone will get reprieves from the maharaja? ;-)
 
 
 Feldman said the Maharishi's work would live on because he has 
 trained tens of thousands of teachers over the years.
 
 If this AP wire gets re-printed enough times, it may become true.  
Is 
 hopeful anyway.  
 
  the percentage of teachers, who got de-certified in the recent 
 re-cert? 90-95-97%   How much will the de-certs still work for his 
 legacy, or not? 
 
 Jai Guru Dev,
 
 -Doug in FF





[FairfieldLife] Re: CBS News report on Maharish's retirement

2008-01-31 Thread Richard J. Williams
mainstream wrote:
 No mention of Nader Ram as successor...

He said Mahesh Yogi's successor, a Lebanese 
medical doctor known by his given name of Raja 
Nadar Ram, 'embodies that level of silence in 
which the whole activity is anchored.

Read more:

'Mahesh Yogi Reopens Meditation Centres In Britain'
News Post India, January 30, 2008
Wednesday 30th of January 2008



[FairfieldLife] Confession -------- Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Richard J. Williams
  Okay, I was just plain old lying.  I don't know 
  zip about Shemp.
 
Curtis wrote: 
 I am sooo taking my Bullshit meter back to 
 the store for a refund and buying whatever model 
 Sal is using!  

And they called me a nutcase! This takes the first 
prize. What a waste of time. Go figure.



[FairfieldLife] Before TM

2008-01-31 Thread Samadhi Is Much Closer Than You Think -- Really! -- It's A No-Brainer. Who'd've Thunk It?
Does anyone have a brief description and/or link of
MMY's experience with yoga/meditation before
establishing TM?  A bit more than having spent two
years in seclusion or as a longtime secretary to a
leading Hindu sage.  What other journeys and
explorations did he have before establishing TM?


 *When you assume a threshold of being that is expansive
enough to contain the universe, then the universe is
within you, accessible in whole along with all its
talents and charms.  Do not hesitate another moment to
acknowledge this loving magnanimity within you and
express this satyam through your service to humanity.*
**
*Now that you know this sublime truth,
the world awaits your advent, now.*


[FairfieldLife] Veterans of Life

2008-01-31 Thread dhamiltony2k5
 dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
 
  Yes, that's told very special.  Thanks, is a great story.  I 
  showed 
  it around my household and everyone was blown away in turn.
  
  What life does bring.  What a great story of courage. That was 
  only 
  60 years ago all that happened.
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0HVg1kCpxU
 

  The folks you mention below, and my folks, are incredibly 
  resistant 
  individuals, people of true character.  We've been lucky to know 
  them.
  
  Marek

 
 I `ve, always liked good real stories.  Good real moral character 
 type stories.  Stories where stands gets made on moral grounds of 
 virtue.  Stories that show a virtuous presence of mind that has 
 resolute a nature in life.  In human life often we are not called 
 on 
 to make hard or extraordinary choices and often the good stories of 
 life are those where people stand out or stand in front of 
 something 
 by moral force.  By something of moral human character inside.

Good stories of moral character; when i first was traveling and 
visiting around Fairfield about 30 years ago I did run across what i 
saw then as a likely good story.  I mentally filed it away then and 
came back to it in the last few years to really look  see what was 
there.  There's a pretty good character story that was happening all 
around here featuring regular people back in the early settlement 
years of Iowa.  A lot of character was shown then by some.  A lot of 
the stories from then were languishing in recent time as I was coming 
along to them again.  I think they are really pretty good in 
character.  

So in process as I was learning of and hearing them, I started to 
compile some of them and put their original voice out on the 
internet.  I now have a little page on the under ground rail road in 
Iowa with them.  People seem to recognize  like the stories too for 
what they are.  This simple web page seems to get a lot of hits 
without much of any promotion.  The material is what it is  as old 
stories they have taken on a new modern life as such.

You might like them too.  There evidently was a lot of spirituality, 
high thinking and moral character here long before, meditators did 
show up.


Just for fun diversion I'd share them with you, take a look at:

http://www.icelandichorse.info/salemfugitiveslaves.html

-Doug in FF

 
 Good stories often turn on a presence of mind that has someone 
 stand 
 resolved.  Well told stories do tell what someone was thinking or 
 doing `walking in those shoes' and sometimes a good story just 
helps 
 you stand where someone stood for a moment.
 
 I liked the story about your parents as it is told.  It is a good 
 story.  
 
 Different than just animal fight or flight, people can have their 
 character of a soul to account for.  How that gets accounted for 
 often makes story.  Your parents story is a great modern one.  
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/162641
 
 Jai,
 -Doug in FF
 
 
 Marek Reavis reavismarek@ wrote:
 
  Thanks, Doug, it's been lucky for me and my brother and sister 
that 
  our folks have shared their memories as thoroughly as they have, 
 and 
  that they're still available to resource despite their age.  It's 
  impossible to imagine the hardships and violence that so many 
 people 
  in the 20th C. endured; I can't, at least.
  
  The folks you mention below, and my folks, are incredibly 
resistant 
  individuals, people of true character.  We've been lucky to know 
  them.
  
  Marek
 
 
 
 
  
 Doug writing: 
  I remember an obituary last year published in the FF Ledger for 
  Harriet Berman's mother here.
  It was written in a common way, that she was fun and a great game 
  player and active in her later life and such.  The un-expanded 
part 
  of the obituary was that she grew up Jewish, in 1930's occupied 
  Poland.  I wondered then if the family had her story as she saw 
 it.  
  Her MSAE grandson from FF then has now become a professional 
  journalist elsewhere, I wondered then if he had collected it or 
if 
 it 
  had come to be too late.  There seemed to be an untold character 
  story in the obituary.  Certainly some veterans of those times 
only 
  wish to go on in life putting it behind them in their privacy.  
  
  That generation is passing fast now.
  My wife's dad was with the first army medical unit to arrive at 
  Dachau as US troops arrived and found it.  He has a scrap book 
with 
  photos and articles about it from then.  But now his own memory 
is 
  rickety and about all gone.
  
  At Revelations used bookstore here a while back I bought a used 
 book 
  about all the concentration and work camps of Nazi Germany, in 
real 
  nice shape that had clippings from the war carefully folded in to 
 the 
  book.  Evidently from someone's (from around here?) estate or 
  collection who seems to have been there.
  
  In town here we have a kind old guy who as a skilled handy-man 
 takes 
  care of appliances.  As a boy he was displaced with 

[FairfieldLife] Confession -------- Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Okay, I was just plain old lying.  I don't know 
   zip about Shemp.
  
 Curtis wrote: 
  I am sooo taking my Bullshit meter back to 
  the store for a refund and buying whatever model 
  Sal is using!  
 
 And they called me a nutcase! This takes the first 
 prize. What a waste of time. Go figure.


If I have learned one thing from posting here Richard, it is that the
useful distinction here isn't nutcase or not.  It is entertaining or
otherwise.  I'll put you down as a solid entertaining.





[FairfieldLife] Re: The two models

2008-01-31 Thread sandiego108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 sandiego108@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
   Your problem is that you want to be considered
   special for being LIKE EVERYONE ELSE ON 
   THE PLANET.
   
   :-)
  
  this sounds like a fantasy on your part- an ego trip. 
  
  And it still doesn't explain your insistence that people in your 
  estimation aren't enlightened because they don't *act* 
enlightened...
  
  do you try to *act* enlightened?
 
 I don't have to.

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit...



[FairfieldLife] Re: Before TM

2008-01-31 Thread matrixmonitor
---MMY was into Scientology before establishing TM, and had numerous 
secret meetings with L. Ron Hubbard in various places such as Tibet, 
Calcutta, and even China:

Hubbard sometimes displayed attitudes that were at odds with the 
picture his followers try to present of him. For instance, during his 
visit to China at the age of seventeen, he made diary entries such 
as: As a Chinaman can not live up to a thing, he always drags it 
down.[11] and They smell of all the baths they didnt [sic] take. The 
trouble with China is, there are too many chinks here.[11][21] 
Similarly, Hubbard described the Tibetan Buddhist temples as miserably 
cold and very shabby . . . The people worshiping have voices like bull-
frogs and beat a drum and play a brass horn to accompany their singing 
(?)[11] and called them very odd and heathenish.[22] He also wrote 
about colored people in Scientology: Fundamentals of Thought : Unlike 
the yellow and brown people, the white does not usually believe he can 
get attention from matter or objects. The yellow and brown believe for 
the most part ... that rocks, trees, walls, etc., can give them 
attention[23] and ...so we see the African tribesman, with his 
complete contempt for the truth, and his emphasis on brutality and 
savagery...[24] In the 2007 edition of the book, primitive is 
substituted for African in the passage just mentioned.

While such attitudes might not be especially surprising for a white 
teenager born in 1911, they are vastly at odds with the stories he 
would later tell and his followers would repeat:

Among other wonders, Ron told of watching monks meditate for weeks on 
end, contemplating higher truths ... he took advantage of this unique 
opportunity to study Far Eastern culture. ... he befriended and 
learned ... a thoroughly insightful Beijing magician who represented 
the last of the line of Chinese magicians from the court of Kublai 
Khan. ... Old Mayo was also well versed in China's ancient wisdom that 
had been handed down from generation to generation. Ron passed many 
evenings in the company of such wise men, eagerly absorbing their 
words ... he closely examined the surrounding culture. In addition to 
the local Tartar tribes, he spent time with nomadic bandits originally 
from Mongolia ... [t]hese sojourns in Asia and the Pacific islands had 
a profound effect, giving Ron a subjective understanding of Eastern 
philosophy ... the world itself was his classroom, and he studied in it 
voraciously, recording what he saw and learned in his ever-present 
diaries, which he carefully preserved for future reference.[25][26] 


 Does anyone have a brief description and/or link of
 MMY's experience with yoga/meditation before
 establishing TM?  A bit more than having spent two
 years in seclusion or as a longtime secretary to a
 leading Hindu sage.  What other journeys and
 explorations did he have before establishing TM?
 
 
  *When you assume a threshold of being that is expansive
 enough to contain the universe, then the universe is
 within you, accessible in whole along with all its
 talents and charms.  Do not hesitate another moment to
 acknowledge this loving magnanimity within you and
 express this satyam through your service to humanity.*
 **
 *Now that you know this sublime truth,
 the world awaits your advent, now.*





[FairfieldLife] Confession -------- Re: Shemp Shemp Shemp -- a must read!

2008-01-31 Thread Tom
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 And they called me a nutcase! 


 Only in a praire dog tacoish eating way.