--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Oh, I see. I thought you had quoted that exchange
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/3/05 11:06 AM, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we should start a beer company: Satsang Beer -- the beer
that
transmits the true non-dual state.
How would we get it to stay in the bottle?
HA!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Perhaps we should start a beer company: Satsang Beer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/3/05 12:12 PM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Papaji shows contempt for his students, and that's
a virtue;
He's merely saying 'listen, just because I gave you the taste of
the
non-dual state doesn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So I have concluded from this that there is nothing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
snip
People can get enlightened without these inner structures. Then
they
tend to think they are fully perfect as they are and also superior
beings. They desperately need their enlightenment to be seen, and
themselves to be seen as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paula Youmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello - I am very new on this list, but wanted to respond to this
last bit.
I am one of those people who somehow managed to experience things
in reverse
order. Strangely, it had the opposite effect on my ego...to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When I read this, I kept hearing it in the voice of Gangaji, and I
know nothing of her, so I believe it is genuine. The one she is
speaking to, Rasa, is also a woman, with a very unusual website to
say the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 12, 2005, at 12:21 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
What if we began our own accounting of such deaths? My start is
the
attached table. If you think it makes sense you might solicit
names
on FFL.
I'm part of an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Regarding your comments below - I would think that your perspective
would be that everyone is actually blazing Brahman already, and just
have to realize it. In that case, what special status would you give
to those
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Great question, and one I was thinking about some after writing
this
post. All I can really say is that while technically all are
blazing
Brahman already, some appear to blaze a lot brighter than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Energy (ananda, bliss, laughter, Shiva) = Mass (sat, love, Vishnu)
times the speed of light (chit, consciousness, Brahma) squared
(aware of itself). Mass resisted (denied the light of self-
knowledge) becomes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It would *appear* anyhow that the Brahma-point at the center of the
Hiranyagarbha (poised between the mountain-cone of Vishnu and the
upside down cone of Shiva) becomes aware of itself via a very
quick churning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps to impress new members?
*lol* I hadn't thought of that, Judy! You think it might work?
Wow!
What would the benefit be to me, I wonder, if new members are
impressed?
And what do you mean by impressed, anyhow?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And it would appear that when one's Brahma or creative consciousness
withholds approval or Self-knowledge from a given mind-matter
impulse,
then that impulse separates/is separated from the Whole and holds
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Perhaps to impress new members?
*lol* I hadn't thought of that, Judy! You think it might work?
Wow!
What would the benefit be to me, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And all of this (four last posts) is your direct experience? Or
imaginative speculation.
Yes, yes.
And its useful, how?
Helps me understand myself. Many thanks for asking :-)
Yahoo!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BC really stands for Borg Consciousnness. You
will be assimilated. :-)
Resistance is indeed futile :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, first, it isn't real clear why you believe you
know what kinds of experiences I've had.
And second, it's interesting that you think my comment
was a function of being pissed off, for whatever
reason. I thought
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, first, it isn't real clear why you believe you
know
Rory:
If I entertain addictions to adulation, flirtation, and so on, as
a
substitute for genuine intimacy and appreciation of
Self/Other/Self, those will indeed be wrong or demonic --
i.e.,
diseased, based around pain, an attempt to mask or compensate for
primal fear, guilt and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Energy (ananda, bliss, laughter, Shiva) = Mass (sat, love,
Vishnu)
times the speed of light (chit, consciousness, Brahma) squared
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory:
If I entertain addictions to adulation, flirtation, and so
on,
as a substitute for genuine intimacy and appreciation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory:
If I entertain addictions to adulation, flirtation, and so
on,
as a substitute for genuine intimacy and appreciation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if posting to FFL is an addiction. I wonder if before
posting, we should all close our eyes and see if there is some
discomfort in the body. And If so, attentionize and breath through
it.
Then open our eyes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
genuine physical immortality is not physical existence any
longer, at least in the sense it is commonly understood. It
would
appear
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wonder if posting to FFL is an addiction. I wonder
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Energy (ananda, bliss, laughter, Shiva) = Mass (sat, love, Vishnu)
times the speed of light (chit, consciousness, Brahma) squared
(aware of itself). Mass resisted (denied the light of self-
knowledge) becomes painful
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
...with Vishnu as Love, Sat/Being, Sattva; Brahma as Light,
Chit/Consciousness, Rajas; and Shiva as Laughter, Ananda/Bliss, Tamas.
Again, the two poles of the Hiranyagarbha or horned-torus are at
either end of its
A few interpolations and some expansions interleaved below:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
From here we move across a gap into the lighter side of
Transcendence-II as the densest form of Light or Consciousness in
the 9th state (Brahma-Vishnu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oops - below should be Complement of Transcendence-*II* (Brahma-Shiva-
Shiva) and ...incorporating the Bliss-complements of Transcendence-
*I* (Shiva-Vishnu-Vishnu), just in case anyone actually is reading any
of this. My
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, purushaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Thanks, Rory, interesting!. Question: Where does YHVH (YAHWEH)
fit into all of this? Thanks again.
Nice question, many thanks, purushaz! Here's how I understand it at
the moment: Within the pivotal 13-state
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip although again, none of this will probably be viewable upon
first
conscious immersion in and as Brahman -- for one thing, when first
comprehending the speed of light, the light itself appears to
disappear (Dark
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So as we see it at this point anyhow, all of this is a part of
Brahma-
loka, specifically in what we might call Mahar-loka, corresponding
to
details of the Solar Plexus and the Full Moon Nakshatra and
Brahman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So as we see it at this point anyhow, all of this is a part of
Brahma-
loka, specifically in what we might call Mahar-loka, corresponding
to
details of the Solar Plexus and the Full Moon Nakshatra and Brahman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for posting that, Rory. It saves me the time and gasoline
to
drive to town tonight to get my fill of mind-numbing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I had a disscusion Regarding the word 'knowledge'
in a different group settings and we had issues in
resolving the true meaning of the word.
we are used to by now to see knowledge as constructed
in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'Gravity is the unifying value of Natural Law, which promotes the
progress and well-being of everyone and everything in the universe,'
Maharishi said. 'The force of gravity can be commanded by the mind
through Yogic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks again-
If I understand what you have written above, is it so that
those 'in' CC, GC, and UC are still working out earthly karma, and
hence still bound to the wheel of earthly life and death, impression-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for posting that, Rory. It saves me the time and gasoline to
drive to town tonight to get my fill of mind-numbing
Hiranyagarbledygook.
HA! Good one, Alex; a truly Vedic pronunciation if I ever saw one!
still,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks again-
If I understand what you have written above, is it so that
those 'in' CC, GC, and UC are still working out earthly karma
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Rory. As I am not at a point of seeing this directly, nor
do
I have such an interest currently, nonetheless it is a similar
experience in the mind, as listening to the Veda being chanted is
to
the body.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Without a doubt- otherwise what is there to do?
I give up; what? :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see what you mean, thank you for capturing the wave into words.
:)
My pleasure! :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---That's obvious. At any time before or after Enlightenment, take
the
Bodhisattva vow to help others, in any type of body appropriate for
the
task. Do this for a couple of trillion mayayugas for an evaluation;
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is consciousness independent of the physical body?
There are a couple of ways to define consciousness; my current
understanding of it is as not-Self, and merely one of the three gunas
(along with love and bliss, or matter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is consciousness independent of the physical body?
There are a couple of ways to define consciousness;
snip
A couple of ways -- what a laugh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is consciousness independent of the physical body
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
We are one, we are many; we are a countless multitude of ourselves,
showing ourselves ever-differing combinations of ourselves in the
permutations of love, consciousness and bliss -- like dipping our
fingers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ah, paradox twice again rears its mirrored head!
The true nature of Self is infinite, formless, undifferentiated.
Yet, to be aware of it requires consciousness of its Self.
Attention
on the Infinite is pure
A couple of ways -- what a laugh! There are
countless ways for
consciousness to define itself :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
17 at last count, I believe.
Seems more like googolplexes -- but perhaps we are defining defining
in different ways --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 10:56 AM, akasha_108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is typically a menu of ritual services with
prices and Hindus with money pay routinely for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Either that - or someone kept count on your enlightened
ramblings.. :-)
*LOL* And they only found 17? One of us is slipping :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
He,he,he, Hey Tom, someone's gonna be surprised,
aren't they?
Don't be foolish. Nobody is going to be surprised.
Online Etymology
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From these definitions it looks pretty clear that somebody is
indeed
going to be taken unawares, overtaken, grasped, and seized -- by
Nobody :-)
Whereupon since Nobody has Nothing better to do, Nobody decides
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
From these definitions it looks pretty clear that somebody is
indeed
going to be taken unawares, overtaken, grasped, and seized
sparaig wrote:
Or not. My interpretation of witnessing is rather different than
many people's here.
Rory Goff wrote:
I am talking about the *death* of witnessing; what about you?
:-)
sparaig wrote:
No idea...
You have no idea how your interpretation of witnessing differs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am thinking perhaps not exactly, unless by interpretation of
witnessing he means witnessing is irrelevant :-)
Or unless we use witnessing to mean a specific distancing technique
to separate ourselves quickly from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am thinking perhaps not exactly, unless by interpretation of
witnessing he means witnessing is irrelevant :-)
Or unless we use witnessing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. I got your joke. I was following up on it. It seems Rory is
the only one outside the humor loop.
I did see the obvious surface implications of no idea; I was just
trying to go a little deeper into Sparaig's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. I got your joke. I was following up on it. It seems Rory is
the only one outside the humor loop. Funny, I always figured Brahman
had a good sense of humor. I mean look at that maya thing.
Your Wholeness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The pairs Purna Phalguni (former red one (?), delta Leonis) and
Uttara Phalguni (latter red one (?), beta Leonis, Denebola) now
align with the two halves of Transcendence (Transcendence-I, Purna
Phalguni, state
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The pairs Purna Phalguni (former red one (?), delta Leonis)
and
Uttara Phalguni (latter red one (?), beta Leonis, Denebola)
now
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The pairs Purna Phalguni (former red one (?), delta
.
[718,2] ; N. of a place of pilgrimage BhP.
On Oct 22, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Rory Goff wrote:
The traditional translation of
Phalguni as red one does not make a lot of sense to me. I am
tempted
to see Phal- as fruit and -Guni as guna, action
Yahoo! Groups
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Many thanks, Vaj. I also really like the definition below
of weak,
etc., as I have just now been playing with the possibilities that
the 3 Vishnu-Vishnu subgunas (Conception, pre-natal sleep, pre-
natal
dream
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always equated Shiva with Jesus
As in
Jehesua
Jehovasha
shivoham
Pass the butter.
You ever read Alain Danielou's book, Gods of Ecstasy? Very nice
correlates between Shiva and Dionysos, whom many others equate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I always equated Shiva with Jesus
As in
Jehesua
Jehovasha
shivoham
Pass the butter.
You ever read Alain Danielou's book
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Therefore, it would appear to be a
phenomenon that is not entirely physical, and takes place
at least to some extent on subtle physical levels. If you're
asking whether it was ever recorded on film, I don't think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
You know, MMY loves to oversee all the little details of everything
and he loves to micro-manage organisations...perhaps he wouldn't be
able to pass up the opportunity to micro-manage an organisation that
Ex-TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unc, I am going to snip out what I believe to be the irrelevant
parts of your response and leave in the parts I want to address.
You wrote:
Did you experience it only once?
Nope. Many times. As did most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
You know, MMY loves to oversee all the little details
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Of course it doesn't. All you appear to be interested in is playing
head games with the readers of your posts in order to feed your ego:
Look at me, I've experienced the ultimate cool spiritual power and
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's entirely possible he can be a decent, genuine
human being in person.
Jim's right; I think you both are truly great -- as is Jim himself!
Let's raise a glass to all three of you -- if not tonight in a cafe in
Paris
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I second that. I am leaving this group because there is so much
stupid threads going on and on and on about nothing.
Get a fvcking job guys. Go help old ladies, travel the world. Get a
life.
Have a good one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory, I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts on these
phenomena if you care to share them. Many of us have had these
experiences which are experienced as real, yet not quite physical.
You've spoken before
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Someone asked an honest question, I gave an hones answer.
That's all.
All the pissy stuff isince has been from people who didn't like
Hey Jim! Many thanks. A few responses interleaved below:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory wrote:
Indeed there is a clear sense of the quickening or raising of
the
vibration of the physical body before these fluid-state
phenomena
occur,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's the attachment to there being some trick
or something else that has to happen before we
realize our enlightenment that seems to prevent the
realization of enlightenment.
I completely agree. Subtle (or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip Thanks for responding Rory. Your Nowness is always much
appreciated!
Thanks for sharing these, Jim! Your boundless appreciation is always
much appreciated! :-)
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I think my inner dialogues had moulded the ground for this
transition.
Can definitely relate, Irmeli -- after getting fed up with the carrot-
on-a-stick and deciding to accept/insist on Perfection NOW, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nyah.
The enlightened remember what its like NOT to be enlightened,
snip
Gotta say it's more like a memory of a memory of a memory -- not a lot
of juice there. Rather, am continually surprised by people's
steadfast
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think it's the attachment to there being some trick
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting! I am on the first few chapters of the new Harry Potter
book myself :-)
How very very interesting, my wife is reading it, and I will be
reading it after. Wow.
I take your point; how very unusual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It would be for you, assuming you're realized.
No, I am not realized; *au contraire* I am falsified, slain,
dismembered, scattered to the winds of Love by remembering Reality
IS :-)
That doesn't mean that's what it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, was going to say obscure? My irony meter wasn't working very
well for a moment...
:-D
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
It worries me a little to think what might happen
if a significant number of people become realized.
If they all behave like this--with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
It appears to me to be more like waking up
doesn't mean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Yes, I think I understand what you are saying here -- you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Sorry, I keep having further thoughts on this:
The mind can certainly get into making
distinctions that go way beyond what's
needed for survival, to the point where
it becomes actually *harmful* to the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
And, IMO, it doesn't, and never has. What the world needs
is a book or set of books that does for enlightenment what
the Harry Potter books have done for magic -- make it ordinary,
everyday. Because it is. It
201 - 300 of 1443 matches
Mail list logo
