Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well
say, I don't believe in abortion.
Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant,
which is better than either.
In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that Reincarnation is for
the ignorant was the only way he said it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
I have heard he said it many different ways.
(snip)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
as humans. So there must come a
time when it is no longer *necessary* to continue to come back here, or
anywhere else, though quite possibly a choice remains, even then, to take any
form at all, anywhere we choose to.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
In case anybody
is ignorant [of his basic
nature] will continue, by necessity, to reincarnate, after which the ignorance
is dispelled, incarnation may possibly continue to be an option. Is that what
you meant??
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
I think by ignorant he meant not enlightened
Jews do NOT have to register in the Ukraine. I already told you that. Why are
you repeating it?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
and you are ignoring the violence inthe Ukraine, the fact that Jews now have
to register and all that???
Comments below...
The flipside, of course, is why you care?
I met you online what, 15-20 years ago? You weren't as anti-TM as you appear
to be now, even though you made clear that you no longer practiced it.
What changed?
Nothing changed, because I wasn't anti-TM then, and am not
Weird, I was just having the same kinds of thoughts a few minutes ago while
reading a piece in the NYTimes titled Cosmic Connections in the Deep Sea
about the author's experience diving. It mentions the issue only in passing,
but it triggered a Wait a minnit sort of response.
It occurred to
And others, of course, own their own computers and set their own work
schedules. I don't recall ever having seen you mention them.
For a very select few, all they have to do is get up early in the morning,
brew some coffee in the kitchen, and then walk down the hall to their home
office
Of course, as far as Barry is concerned, all those who don't agree with him
that human beings are insignificant have been and always will be fanatics whom
history will remember as tyrants and killers.
From: Share Long sharelong60@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Maybe so, but that wasn't my point and has nothing to do with my point.
The point is, these fanatics are also lunatics.
Most of these god-men are also mad-men.
--- authfriend@... wrote :
Of course, as far as Barry is concerned, all those who don't agree with him
that human beings
GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't spam; and you
know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and
that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimidate would-be
posters who don't know any better into thinking they can only
If it says Spring Water or Artesian Water on the label, then it's required
to be spring or artesian water, not tap water. There are many reasons to avoid
bottled water, but not being able to tell whether it's tap water isn't one of
them (assuming you can read).
I love, love, love, love
Sounds like Buck might condone censorship of some kind.
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 10:55 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't spam; and you
know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and
that most
,
-Buck
authfriend writes:
GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't spam; and you
know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and
that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimidate would-be
posters who don't know any better
authfriend writes:
GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't spam; and you
know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and
that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimidate would-be
posters who don't know any better
Jason, don't try to teach your grandmother to suck eggs.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jedi_spock@... wrote :
--- authfriend@... wrote :
I still think you're painting with too broad a brush when you use the
term society. Some elements of society take
:
--- authfriend@... wrote :
Jason, don't try to teach your grandmother to suck eggs.
Listen Grandma, I always felt all these years, that Barry is
the only person who is rude, cantankerous, to pull people
into argument loops.
You seem to be guilty of the same.
Everytime I try to reach out
Click Show message history, dumbass. That's what it's for.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 5/5/2014 7:19 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Jason, don't try to teach your grandmother to suck eggs.
Would it be too much of a problem to indicate
Comments below...
Because the thing is, humans, at a fundamental level, cannot prefer or value
more highly, what they even unconsciously hold as detrimental.
Nonsense. People do this all the time, continue behaviors that they consciously
*know* are detrimental to them. Their position within
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
My guess is that having preferences or hierarchies is hard wired into us for
survival value.
I disagree. I see nothing wrong with preference or believing
To demean points of view he disagrees with is high on Barry's list of personal
values.
Er, I mean, preferences...
Rhetorical question. No need to reply. I was just amused that neither you nor
Share can conceive of having a preference without the presence of some kind of
hierarchy.
Comments below...
Bingo. One of the things that I don't think a number of theists or
quasi-theists or theists-in-denial-that-they're-theists
Oh, you forgot to list the nontheists, like moi.
don't get on this forum is that what they call atheists barging into an
otherwise pleasant
The Jewish registration story turns out to have been what amounts to a hoax,
Michael. A flyer with the announcement that Jews must register was distributed
in one town in the Ukraine by three masked gunmen, but nobody has been able to
determine where it originated--certainly not from Putin. In
And Barry, of course, is Oh-So-Superior to us poor benighted less-than-human
losers who missed it.
No hierarchy there, nope nope nope.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
...or human.
These are a few moments of one of the unsung heroes of the Grateful Dead
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
I still think you're painting with too broad a brush when you use the term
society. Some elements of society take the position you describe, but others
do
Curtis, you way overstate the case. In this country, at least, there's oodles
of criticism of biblical ideas, including ideas at the heart of Christian
belief. Ever heard of the Jesus Seminar? And a currently popular book, How
Jesus Became God, maintains that the idea of Jesus as God developed
Actually, this distinction is pretty elementary with regard to neuroscientific
studies; it really isn't something that has just never occurred to the
researchers. Libet's studies, for example, looked directly at the apparent time
lag between decisions made on the unconscious level and when they
I still think you're painting with too broad a brush when you use the term
society. Some elements of society take the position you describe, but others
do not.
And the negative reaction to criticism from atheists has a great deal to do
with its hostility quotient. Simple disagreement doesn't
Not to mention, we have no idea what the relative percentages are of TMers who
commit suicide versus those in the general population. For all we know, the
percentage of TMers could be smaller. Certainly suicidal TMers tend to draw
more attention because it's so contrary to what TM promises. But
I hope you're not alluding to me, Curtis, because if you are, this would be a
seriously misleading way of putting it. Verging on deceptive, in fact.
A previous poster was also a big fan of trying to hold me accountable for
Barry's perspective. What is with you guys? Can't keep yer eye on
Right. You just regularly barge into such discussions, announcing that there is
no God and that anyone who believes there is is worse than a fool.
Although I fully understand that some people get off on debating the existence
of God and things like that, *nothing bores me more* these
Nobody ever disputed this point with Barry, including those who believe in
determinism. He could never quite understand how someone could believe in
determinism and yet continue to act as if they had free will without serious
cognitive dissonance. He was unable to grasp that believers in
, mjackson74@... wrote :
Christopher Hitchens would agree with him if Barry were to say such a thing.
On Fri, 5/2/14, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Re-Facilitating
What happened here??
-
Harris:
Given the degree to which religion still inspires human conflict, and impedes
genuine inquiry, I believe that merely being a self-described “Buddhist” is to
be complicit in the world’s violence and ignorance to an unacceptable degree.
- See more at:
are you.
Sorta like the way you're trying to barge into a pleasant conversation that
doesn't concern you and trying to turn it into an argument of some kind? What a
pathetic old hag you are, Judy.
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May
discussion).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
I hope you're not alluding to me, Curtis, because if you are, this would be a
seriously misleading way of putting it. Verging on deceptive, in fact.
C: Sorry
FWIW, Maharishi said at one point, Bliss isn't blissful. By which he meant, I
assume, that to experience blissfulness required some degree of waking-state
consciousness. IOW, you wouldn't experience blissfullness in
transcendental-consciousness-by-itself--but you would be in a state of bliss by
bullshit when it had something to do with Robin. But this was
before my time here so I am conjecturing based on having read some old posts
just previous to my showing up here.
On Friday, May 2, 2014 8:20 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
I hope you're not alluding to me, Curtis
. But this was
before my time here so I am conjecturing based on having read some old posts
just previous to my showing up here.
On Friday, May 2, 2014 8:20 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
I hope you're not alluding to me, Curtis, because if you are, this would be
a seriously misleading way
Comments below...
From a sociological POV this question has vast implications, and always has,
in how we approach society's sense of justice in our legal system. It wasn't
long ago that we hanged an elephant for killing a man. Today we have people on
death row who were not mentally able
I'm happy to report that I have never seen your dick, Barry, but if you say
it's tiny, I'll take your word for it.
Hey Jude...if your panties are this twisted, you and Ann might want to switch
over to comments about how tiny my dick is. That would fit in better with you
gals'
Well, that would actually be all of your talk about such faces, Barry.
BTW, below is a photo of Hoskins in his late 30s.
With all of this talk recently of faces that show their age, it is sad to
bid farewell to one that never did.
Bob Hoskins was a journeyman actor, as
even state what the issue IS, your
misogynistic pea-brain has been so thoroughly fried from having your buttons
pushed umpty times in a row since you started this.
But no need to wait; the photo you want is the very one you've been stupidly
ragging on.
:-)
From: authfriend
Er, Salyavin, there are plenty of David Lynch fans who aren't TMers. (Not to
mention TMers who aren't David Lynch fans, like moi.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Share, Nabby is motivated here by the fact that Lynch does TM. Whether you are
on his
Thanks, Steve.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :
Based on that picture of her, I'd say it's pretty accurate.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Rather that admit the effects of all those years of cigarettes and seething
Fascinating, Michael, that you would see this comment as describing TMers
(presumably TB TMers).
TMers generally are fairly well educated, first of all. And if they didn't
question the world around them, they would be unlikely to become committed to
TM to start with, given that TM is
Actually, as you know, Richard, I did post a photo of my own face a few years
ago (along with Barry's Fantasy Image of Judy). It's in the Members section.
That's the one azgray is referring to. Apparently he believes he's the only one
who can see it, so he feels safe in describing it as what he
unaware of it. That implies either never
having looked in a mirror or being a vampire, and unable to see her own image
in it. :-)
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The World's Highest
On Tue, 4/29/14, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Nazi Cult Mentality
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2014, 6:02 PM
. It says far more
about them than it does about the object of their disapprobation.
On 4/29/2014 1:23 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Actually, as you know, Richard, I did post a photo of my own face a few
years ago (along with Barry's Fantasy Image of Judy).
Sorry
looks like exposes a certain, well, deficit in the ability to come
up with meaningful criticism of the person's participation. It says far more
about them than it does about the object of their disapprobation.
On 4/29/2014 1:23 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Actually, as you
I wouldn't call his answers enlightened wisdom, but a lot of them are clever
and funny. One would have to be a real sourpuss not to find them charming, even
if one were a True Unbeliever.
Barry hasn't had the chance to spill his bile for three whole days. Expect a
veritable flood in the week
What a crashingly stupid paragraph. There were, of course (as Barry knows),
umpty obits published after MMY died. As I recall, quite a few of them were
posted or linked to here. Some were biased negatively, some were biased
positively, some were nicely balanced. I probably did critique one of
He probably didn't know what snake oil was, but I wouldn't put it past him to
have been familiar with the term (he loved playing with idioms) and set the
reporter up. If the reporter had defined it differently--Snake oil is a fake
panacea--he'd have had a smart-ass response to that instead. One
Lenz may well have been interviewed by Hard Copy at some point, but the
reporter in the wheelchair was crack journalist John Hockenberry interviewing
Lenz on Dateline NBC. When I saw the tapes, I couldn't believe how phony Lenz
came across.
Just as an aside: If one isn't a terminal tightass,
Clever is not another word for perfect, dumbass.
In other words, it was perfect. I rest my case. :-) :-) :-)
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 6:03 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi interview excerpts
Except, of course, for the fact that Nabby is right. We've been hearing
complaints about Amma here on FFL for years. I believe there's even an
anti-Amma Yahoo Group. So it really is a little odd to see Rick saying
Tredwell's is a lone voice.
Maybe Rick didn't express himself clearly; perhaps
OK, looks like Rick was referring to Tredwell's specific claims, whatever they
are. Still, to point out that Amma has a lot of critics is hardly to cast
aspersions on her; it's just a matter of fact.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Except, of course, for the fact
You mean, this one?
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/photos/albums/408557067/lightbox/1672927237?orderBy=ordinalamp;sortOrder=asc
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/photos/albums/408557067/lightbox/1672927237?orderBy=ordinalamp;sortOrder=asc
---In
He knows that, Lawson. He's trolling.
The Raj is in the USA. We're talking about the Maharishi AYurveda facility in
India that the press says is worth $1.5 billion US.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/27/2014 4:29 AM, LEnglish5@... mailto:LEnglish5@...
Those sure are some gorgeous Jerseys they've got. They make the huge hulking
Holsteins that supply supermarket milk look like ungainly monsters. (Not the
Holsteins' fault; they were bred that way to give as much milk as possible. But
it isn't anywhere as good as milk from Jerseys.)
Not quite true, Alex. One of the males is featured here:
http://www.universalfields.org/tala_ram.html
http://www.universalfields.org/tala_ram.html
Doesn't sound like he's going to end up as veal chops, but perhaps he's the
exception. At any rate, the text sounds very respectful and
a
bull's balls and enslaving it as a draft animal truly be considered ahimsa?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Not quite true, Alex. One of the males is featured here:
http://www.universalfields.org/tala_ram.html
http://www.universalfields.org/tala_ram.html
Not clear whether Richard is just trolling, but of course Anglicanism is not
subject to the pope. That's kind of its raison d'etre, in fact.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/26/2014 10:09 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
You do realize
Also, Episcopalianism in the U.S. is the same as Anglicanism in the U.K.,
except it isn't subject to the British monarch.
Not clear whether Richard is just trolling, but of course Anglicanism is not
subject to the pope. That's kind of its raison d'etre, in fact.
You do realize
Actually, Episcopalianism (Anglicanism) is Protestant. But it looks too
Catholic for some fundamentalists and other Protestants to be comfortable with
it.
My parents both came from long lines of Presbyterians. Although they weren't
at all religious, they were scandalized when my father's
@... wrote :
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The World's Highest Ranking Alien Believer
Ooops. Looks like I pushed a few more of Barry's buttons.
It makes him absolutely crazy
Good one, Share!
Wow! thanks, salyavin
PS I'd say this is one way that balls can be used to prove the existence of God
(-:
On Friday, April 25, 2014 5:53 AM, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
Pendulum Waves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVkdfJ9PkRQ
Sorry, but Edg's right:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naSZBdJoEbM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naSZBdJoEbM
Courtesy snopes.com:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/airplane/onewing.asp
http://www.snopes.com/photos/airplane/onewing.asp
(Actually, the Snopes.com cite is courtesy one
Oh, OK, thought you were being sarcastic.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Sorry, but Edg's right:
I know, that's why I said yeah...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naSZBdJoEbM
Most likely possibility: She isn't pregnant. This is a story from the National
Enquirer. It's almost certainly just a dumb rumor, tabloid B.S.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Anything is possible in any marriage these days. Gay or straight.
?
Only time will tell. If Ellen files for a divorce, then we can be certain
something is wrong with their marriage.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Most likely possibility: She isn't pregnant. This is a story from the National
Enquirer. It's almost certainly
.
It's haunted his dreams ever since.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The World's Highest Ranking Alien Believer
Willytex
Barry's linked to that Barry's fantasy image of Judy photo at least a dozen
times since I posted it (and at one point he did a Photoshop job making it
appear to be a huge crop circle). Talk about obsession!
Admittedly, the photo was an afterthought. If anybody wants to see what I look
like
Ooops. Looks like I pushed a few more of Barry's buttons.
It makes him absolutely crazy that I'm actually a fairly nice-looking dame
rather than the hideous hag of his nightmares.
In many cases what people say about your face is more devastating than turning
it into a caricature. We see
For once I completely agree with Barry: the guy is positively icky.
But then, that's what I thought about Fred Lenz too. (Maybe even ickier given
that he was better looking.)
Run away! Run away!
When it comes to Girish Varma, IMO anyone who couldn't just look at photos of
Better is death in one's own dharma; the dharma of another brings
danger.--3:35, Maharishi's translation
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Buck, it isn't everyone's dharma to be meditating more and as it says in the
Gita, the dharma of another, though higher,
Oh, for crying out loud, Michael. This is just as extreme, and just as
laughably unrealistic, as the effusions of the blissninniest TM TB.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
Nope this WAS the plan all along - to use the idea of enlightenment and
whatever else
Share, were you in the Reply window when you tried to do the edit?
What's File Edit?
I have no trouble editing in Neo.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Richard, I just attempted to edit your post in Neo. I highlighted what i
wanted to edit. When I hit
Willytex is only pretending, but I certainly am an ET. Just ask Barry. Why do
you think I freak him out so badly?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
I am perfectly willing to believe that WillyTex and possbily Judy are indeed
ET's.
Hey, Salyavin, you and I were talking about paranormal research in this
exchange, remember? You brought God into it, not me.
BTW, the light green type you're using now is so faint it's really hard to
read. Please pick something darker.
Again, speaking just for myself, I have no
Barry has always been...uh...metaphysically challlenged. ;-)
Hey, Bar, metaphysical ultimacy isn't an argument, unprovable or otherwise.
It's just a technical term. Relax.
You mean unprovable arguments like metaphysical ultimacy? I'm sorry, but
that strikes me as a made-up phrase
Me in blue...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Hey, Salyavin, you and I were talking about paranormal research in this
exchange, remember? You brought God into it, not me.
I think God
Barry was taking a shot at me because he assumed I'd started the God argument
in this exchange (not having read the whole thing, as usual).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Hey, Salyavin
Bar, you have NO IDEA how transparent your mind is.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What are the *benefits* of believing
Just out of curiosity, Barry, when have I tried to appear technical without
having a clue? Let's have an example.
You're pulling a Judy, Share, and trying to appear technical while having
nary a clue.
Actually, the fire hydrant analogy is a perfect one for Barry's near-total
ignorance of metaphyics. (As well as of Robin.)
Discussions of God and theology make Barry very nervous; that's why he's
especially irritable and gratuitously nasty this morning.
But what do you think of the
: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Is Classical Theism Really the Strongest Version
of the God Idea?
Actually, the fire hydrant analogy is a perfect one for Barry's near-total
ignorance
Projection, as I just pointed out.
This is a person who actually believed Robin Carlsen was bright and
charismatic and worth following as a spiritual teacher.
As opposed to Barry who actually believed Fred Lenz was bright enough to turn
huge halls golden and worth following as a spiritual
This sounds like one of Barry's paranoid fantasies--that Steve, by his own
admission, wants to force atheists to be uncomfortable. There's zero
indication of that in what Steve wrote. He lists some possible future
scientific developments that he speculates might make an atheist uncomfortable
Summary!
my own summery
More comments below (in blue).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Comments below...
One reason I don't rule paranormal stuff out is that I'm not convinced
science knows how to test
Xenosophistry: you can't beat it.
Metaphysical ultimacy = divine simplicity. Being Itself. Doesn't get much
simpler than that.
Quantum mechanics, most successful theory in the history of science. And the
simple formula that everyone can understand is...?
“Do not keep saying to
In the minds of a few on FFL, the only reason to defend a person (or group, or
idea) that is being treated unfairly is that one fully supports that person (or
group, or idea). Therefore, if one defends Maharishi or the TMO, one is ipso
facto a cultist. If one defends theism, one is ipso facto a
Um, that would be ...on a Sunday morning. (But you can think about it on
Monday morning too if you choose. ;-) )
Just something to think about on a Monday morning...
From a New York Times obituary this morning:
Gene Estess worked on Wall Street for two decades and came to feel that
he never had really good days. “I didn’t come home with stories to tell or
satisfaction or a feeling I’d done anything to help anybody except myself
and my family,” he said in
Excellent post, Salyavin.
FWIW, this is what I mean when I say I don't rule something out:
Can minds affect and influence each other at a distance? I still actually keep
an open mind to it, but I don't believe it.
Also:
Regarding proof, I think it doesn't matter whether everyone
One workaround is if you find a message you want to read on the list of search
hits, instead of left-clicking on the link to the message to open it directly,
right-click on it, then click Open in New Tab (this is in Windows 7 using
Chrome; not sure if there's a Mac equivalent, but as I recall
I once read about a study in which a large number of subjects (at least a
thousand) were hypnotically regressed to past lives. Only a handful,
apparently, remembered lives in identifiably historical times. The great
majority recalled lives as brown-skinned people working in the fields. (A
General Mills Reverses Itself on Consumers’
Right to Sue
By STEPHANIE STROM APRIL 20, 2014
General Mills, one of the country’s largest food companies, on Saturday
night announced in a stunning about-face that it was withdrawing its
controversial plans to make consumers give up their right
1 - 100 of 25156 matches
Mail list logo
