--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
Different from our perception, but logically reasonable
and plausible. From that, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert babajii...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Sure, but isn't the intellect (the working mind, not
the abstraction) exactly what inhibits getting to the
reference-free state?
I don't believe it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert babajii_99@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Sure, but isn't the intellect (the working mind, not
the abstraction) exactly what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
Different from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert babajii_99@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Sure, but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
The intellect's function is to discriminate between
this and that, to make distinctions, to draw boundaries,
which is essential for life in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
I'll
just say what I say and allow those I say it
about to react the way that *they* see fit. I
feel no obligation to back up any of my opin-
ions (because that is, in fact, what they are),
I am perhaps hopelessly
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
There's a difference between discussing ideas for
the fun of springboarding off of another's thoughts
and arguing about those ideas. Curtis understands
the difference...discussions with him are almost
always really
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
Theorem: Anyone can say anything about you
that they want; that is out of your control.
What is *not* out of your control is how to
react, or whether to at all. It is my con-
tention that those who react defensively or
Barry the enlightened shows how he can have a conversation
that passes Grate Swan's test of is it a blog or a dialogue?
We should be so honored to be in Barry's ego-free presence.
Below we see that Barry amazingly holds back ego
so much that, he is able to only mention himself
36 TIMES.
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
snip
I'm avoiding the argument, and seeing whether you
really have any interest in discussing the idea. I
don't think you do. I told you earlier what I think
of your style, with the rule I added to your silly,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
snip
Please notice that in this rant you said *nothing*
about the idea contained in my post -- that a
tendency to defend oneself indicates a great
deal of self in the person who does it, and
also indicates a lack of Self.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
I still think this is a viable theory. I think
it accurately describes what's going on when
someone feels compelled *on a regular basis*
to defend
Question: What doesn't Barry understand about Frost's heart?
Discuss amongst yourselves.
A Time to Talk
by: Robert Frost
When a friend calls to me from the road
And slows his horse to a meaning walk,
I don't stand still and look around
On all the hills I haven't hoed,
And shout from where I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Question: What doesn't Barry understand about Frost's heart?
Discuss amongst yourselves.
A Time to Talk
by: Robert Frost
When a friend calls to me from the road
And slows his horse to a meaning walk,
I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
There's a difference between discussing ideas for
the fun of springboarding off of another's thoughts
and arguing about those ideas. Curtis understands
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Please notice that in this rant you said *nothing*
about the idea contained in my post -- that a
tendency to defend oneself indicates a great
deal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
There's a difference between discussing ideas for
the fun of springboarding off
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
There's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
There's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In
Grate Swan,
I do both here. I blog, and also, I comment with the hope
that I can get clearer about where I stand and where others
stand when our poems are distilled for concepts.
But the main reason I read the posts here -- virtually all
of them -- is to be daily astounded by the utter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Grate Swan,
I do both here. I blog, and also, I comment with the hope
that I can get clearer about where I stand and where others
stand when our poems are distilled for concepts.
But the main reason I read the posts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Fifty people can have fifty POVs.
All of them equal, none of them more
right or better than any other.
Or do you think that perhaps yours
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
snip
She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named and Curtis have interesting
discussions defending their POV. A disagreement with a
POV is a debate, not an ego
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
snip
She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named and Curtis have interesting
discussions
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
snip]
Different from our perception, but logically reasonable
and plausible. From that,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
snip]
Different
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
snip]
Different
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
Theorem: Anyone can say anything about you
that they want; that is out of your control.
What is *not* out of your control is how to
react, or whether to at all. It is my con-
tention that those who react defensively or
angrily to protect their self image have
the most self to protect, and the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
Theorem: Anyone can say anything about you
that they want; that is out of your control.
What is *not* out of your control is how to
react, or whether to at all. It is my con-
tention that those who react defensively or
one of the Turqy's silliest posts ever- what's the point? definitely a
masturbatory tirade of epic proportions...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Theorem: Anyone can say anything about
I'll
just say what I say and allow those I say it
about to react the way that *they* see fit. I
feel no obligation to back up any of my opin-
ions (because that is, in fact, what they are),
I am perhaps hopelessly naive, but I had assumed that posts are primarily about
sharing and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
I'll
just say what I say and allow those I say it
about to react the way that *they* see fit. I
feel no obligation to back up any of my opin-
ions (because that is, in fact, what they are),
I am perhaps
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_reply@ wrote:
I'll
just say what I say and allow those I say it
about to react the way that *they* see fit. I
feel no obligation to back up any of my opin-
38 matches
Mail list logo
