[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are trying to justify that you are spreading rumours. Wether they are true or false, contentwise, are of no importance. At least to me. The stuff you are spreading about MMy could be true or not. It is of no importance for me if it is true, as I have stated before. It does not diminish his positive influence on my life or the influence he has had and continue to have on the life of this planet. I agree with you on that. All it does is make me take everything he says with a grain of salt. In other words, I don't think, as I once did, that everything he says must be true because he's enlightened. It also raises interesting questions regarding the correlation of ethics and higher states of consciousness. Are they as tightly correlated as Maharishi said they were? Apparently not. Is there any absolute value to ethical standards or are they just a matter of culture and personal preference? Values change. Enlightenment changes and grows also. Ethics and enlightenment are probably correlated, by why this hunt for perfection ? You won't find it, at least not for the time being. What you are seeking, the solution to interesting questions stems from an unsettled mind. I could use other words for it also, but Let It Be. No one is 100% in the relative, in Kali Yuga. Perhaps Maitreya and the Masters are, I don't know. The reason I labelled you white trash is because you are thriving in that gossip. Thriving is not a verb I would have chosen. You seem to enjoy it. Even though your ways and lack of principle and honour are subtly hurting your own guru, but not touching her as she is beyond that, by sowing doubt and division in the minds of her followers. It's not clear to me how I am doing that. Please explain. Everything is connected with everything else, right ? Thats why, when I think you are behaving unbelivebly stupid and eating up your deserving ability, I see I could have done the same. I could not have seen it if I also did not have the same tendency. Difference is that I do not act on it. One viscious gossip about one Master has a negative influence, first of all on yourself of course, but also on all other Masters. You are feeding the trait of trickery and treason inherent in all persons by your interest in this field. And thus subtly hurting your own guru. Different stories, same lack of honour and discipline lies at their foundation in the minds of characters like yourself. May you be able to live with that. Last time I checked my heart was still beating. To have a guru in KaliYuga is easy (for most people). They don't ask many questions now. But perhaps you will have a harder time next time around. Just a thought...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Because if the course of action is unfathomable--even to the enlightened--as Krishna declares in the Gita, There is a group of Beings called the Lipika or the Scribes of the Akasa who do know the course of action; also called the Lords of Karma. As MMY does not address this in his BG I think it would be wrong to conclude that the course of action is unfathomable to any and at all times. MMY's point was it was not *necessary* to know the total course of action in order to benefit from acting in accord with it. In Hinduism they are called the Chaturdevas and are great spiritual Intelligences who keep the karmic records and adjust the complicated workings of karmic law Annie Besant The Ancient Wisdom. how would anyone ever know what right was in any given situation? I would think Intuition, based on ...spontaneous right action (like you mentioned), in CC where one becomes capable of performing actions in complete accordance with the laws of nature... MMY Gita 3:8 Ask Jim Flanegin if he thinks that all his actions are beyond faults all of the time ! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of brontebaxter8 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 7:49 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger Rick wrote: Yeah, I posted that in the spirit of full disclosure, not because I thought it would strengthen my case. I'm not the blind loyalty type. Bronte writes: Archer, if you really hold the attitude you expressed in your long post to Nabloss today, and here, you won't be misled for long. Just as you saw through the illusions of TM eventually. Good for you for examining these things. The answers are out there. Check out the archives on that ex-amma website, and you will get reams of first-person accounts from long-term devotees, many of whom served in the Indian ashram for years and years before leaving. Don't be afraid of researching this, of finding out more truth. It can only lead you to still better things. I also know people much closer to Amma than these critics ever were. I've driven and chatted with the woman who is Amma's private attendant who sleeps in her room, etc., as well as her public attendant. These two are with her 24/7. I was very impressed with both of them. They are down-to-earth, unassuming, natural, good-humored, and not at all weird or secretive about Amma, the way their counterparts in the TM movement would probably be. They may be unaware of the things you bring up, but I doubt it because they are like her shadows, and hear everything. In fact, not only those two, but the swamis who have been with her for decades would impress just about anyone with their simplicity, humility, and genuineness. Maharishi used to say that you can judge the quality of a guru by the quality of the people around him, and if that is true, these folks are an impressive testimonial. I've met them too, very good people. Your problem is that you have no clue as to who Maharishi is or what he is doing. Never had, never will.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of brontebaxter8 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 7:49 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger Rick wrote: Yeah, I posted that in the spirit of full disclosure, not because I thought it would strengthen my case. I'm not the blind loyalty type. Bronte writes: Archer, if you really hold the attitude you expressed in your long post to Nabloss today, and here, you won't be misled for long. Just as you saw through the illusions of TM eventually. Good for you for examining these things. The answers are out there. Check out the archives on that ex-amma website, and you will get reams of first-person accounts from long-term devotees, many of whom served in the Indian ashram for years and years before leaving. Don't be afraid of researching this, of finding out more truth. It can only lead you to still better things. I also know people much closer to Amma than these critics ever were. I've driven and chatted with the woman who is Amma's private attendant who sleeps in her room, etc., as well as her public attendant. These two are with her 24/7. I was very impressed with both of them. They are down-to-earth, unassuming, natural, good-humored, and not at all weird or secretive about Amma, the way their counterparts in the TM movement would probably be. They may be unaware of the things you bring up, but I doubt it because they are like her shadows, and hear everything. In fact, not only those two, but the swamis who have been with her for decades would impress just about anyone with their simplicity, humility, and genuineness. Maharishi used to say that you can judge the quality of a guru by the quality of the people around him, and if that is true, these folks are an impressive testimonial. One other point reg. the amma group is that you are free to bring up any complaints you have directly to the head people. I've seen people argue with Amma over how things are done many times in front of a larger group and I've done it directly with Amma and with some of the swamis. I was largely though not completely satisfied with the responses, though the main point is that there is an atmosphere in the upper hierarchy that is open to complaints and wanting to know what the problems are. I think there's a growing emphasis on PR within the Amma group and her serious devotees see the guru as God and that is a dangerous combination in a fast growing organization, so I think it's good there are watchgroups out there to bring up issues and keep the fanatics in line. I'd also say about 10% of her full time devotees are not emotionally mature enough to handle the intense service that is required and should probably leave - something that I don't see encouraged in that group.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, brontebaxter8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick wrote: Yeah, I posted that in the spirit of full disclosure, not because I thought it would strengthen my case. I'm not the blind loyalty type. Bronte writes: Archer, if you really hold the attitude you expressed in your long post to Nabloss today, and here, you won't be misled for long. Just as you saw through the illusions of TM eventually. Good for you for examining these things. The answers are out there. Check out the archives on that ex-amma website, and you will get reams of first-person accounts from long-term devotees, many of whom served in the Indian ashram for years and years before leaving. Don't be afraid of researching this, of finding out more truth. It can only lead you to still better things. Well, I beg to differ about finding any truth on the ex-Amma website. I used to belong to that group, and it has nothing to do with free speech or free inquiry. Instead, it's all about bashing Amma, and anyone who disagrees, even with the most egregious errors, has that post deleted (by the moderator, I presume) and it never sees the light of day. I have a friend who is still a member, and she tells me it's still that way. Hardly a forum to learn truth. And instead of many long-term devotees, I believe there are only a very few, possibly only even one or two who post under different names to try to make it seem there are more. The only reason Bronte is allowed to vent on this board is because the moderator values free speech, unlike the ex-Amma list. Jyotsna
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
Archer, YOU post this information to your Amma devotees' website if you find these allegations disturbing. YOU do the research and hash it out, since you are the one involved in this cult, not me. It's not my job to convince you. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These accusations are disturbing if true, but I'm not in a position to rebut them. As I said, I don't have first-hand experience of anything going on in India, and my experience with Amma in the US has been positive and uplifting. I suggest again that you post such things to HYPERLINK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zonehttp://group s.yahoo. com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone, where you might get some informed responses, pro and con. But of course, your forgone conclusion is that gurus and Indian spirituality in general are bad, so maybe it suits you better to post to sites where no one will challenge what you say. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1095 - Release Date: 10/26/2007 7:54 PM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, brontebaxter8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Archer, YOU post this information to your Amma devotees' website if you find these allegations disturbing. YOU do the research and hash it out, since you are the one involved in this cult, not me. It's not my job to convince you. But, you're the one obsessing over the allegations. Rick is not. My hunch, though, is that your sole interest in those allegations lies in the fact that Rick happens to be an Amma devotee. I think you're posting the allegations to FFL because you think it will upset Rick. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote: These accusations are disturbing if true, but I'm not in a position to rebut them. As I said, I don't have first-hand experience of anything going on in India, and my experience with Amma in the US has been positive and uplifting. I suggest again that you post such things to HYPERLINK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zonehttp://group s.yahoo. com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone, where you might get some informed responses, pro and con. But of course, your forgone conclusion is that gurus and Indian spirituality in general are bad, so maybe it suits you better to post to sites where no one will challenge what you say. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1095 - Release Date: 10/26/2007 7:54 PM
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
I also suspected the allegations U posted here re:Amma were to Up set Rick no more not much less Ur the one I-- we believe so obsessed. ** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
I forwarded Bronte’s post to a friend whom I thought might be in a position to respond to it, and here’s her response: Here's what I know about the charges. I'm in a bit of a unique situation as I'm sure I know the original poster. His name is Gary A., and we used to be friends when we were both SRF people who had just come to Amma. He's stayed at my house and I've stayed at his (former) house in the Bay area. His spiritual name (given by Amma) is Aniruddhan, a name he has posted under. I suspect that he himself is the consultant who went to India. The truth is that he was living with a nurse, Donna (also SRF), who was actually asked to go to the AIMS hospital as a consultant, and he thought he'd go there and snoop around, see what he could find out. (He told me that before he went there.) There my clarity disappears. I know he was not happy with what he found and actually confronted Amma Herself about it. My friend M. told me that. It was while they were on tour, by the side of the road outside her motorhome. Since he received no satisfaction, he apparently made it his mission to expose Amma. What I do know about Gary is that on a personal level he turned out (again according to M.) to be a real creep towards Donna. I can't recall all the details, but I know she caught him going online and soliciting dates with other women. Then when she broke up with him, he began making threatening phone calls to her--or something like that. Since he can't seem to maintain a relationship with a woman, if you know the right sites online, you could probably pretend to be a comely lass and mention your interest in Ammachi and he might even still be out there cruising. So on a personal level he's a troubled guy. I don't know what to think about the charges, which I have read before on other sites. I do know a former nun who also says that Amma has yelled You sons of bitches get on the bus! when she was on tour in India. That is factual, as far as I can tell. I know that when my friend Laurie was treated at the AIMS Hospital (for a staph infection) her surgery, medicines, and treatment for five days was about $14, which struck us as extremely reasonable. Since she would have been considered wealthy by Indian standards, they could have charged several times that and she would not have minded. But they didn't. I have no idea (other than offical Ammadom) where you could go to get the real scoop. If I go to India again, I'd like to go to the orphanage and check out Gary's charges. That should be pretty easy to verify. Previously when I've thought deeply about these charges, what I've come down to is that Amma is a genuine saint and Gary is a troubled soul. So I'm sticking with Amma. One thing's for sure: No poor people would have been treated at AIMS if Amma hadn't built it. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007 11:02 AM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These accusations are disturbing if true, but I'm not in a position to rebut them. As I said, I don't have first-hand experience of anything going on in India, and my experience with Amma in the US has been positive and uplifting. I suggest again that you post such things to HYPERLINK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zonehttp://grou ps.yahoo. com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone, where you might get some informed responses, pro and con. But of course, your forgone conclusion is that gurus and Indian spirituality in general are bad, so maybe it suits you better to post to sites where no one will challenge what you say. Much like yourself, I might add. Nobody can challenge your lies because you yourself operate with anonymous witnesess. It's ironic that the shit you are spreading here hits the fan and hits your own guru. I think she can handle it - I hope you can live with it.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:21 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger Much like yourself, I might add. Nobody can challenge your lies because you yourself operate with anonymous witnesess. It's ironic that the shit you are spreading here hits the fan and hits your own guru. I think she can handle it - I hope you can live with it. Nabsters, I want to point out what I perceive as a difference in the way you and I respond to this kind of stuff. My response to the Amma stuff was to say “I can’t refute these points because I haven’t witnessed any of it first hand or spoken to anyone who has. I suggest you post it to such-and-such site where more experienced people may respond. My experience so far has been positive.” I also emailed a friend who might know more and posted her response, which corroborated some of the accusations and cast doubt on others. Your response to the Maharishi stuff, as well as Amma, Sai Baba, Muktananda, etc. stuff is to say “It’s all lies. I don’t believe any of it.” The fact is, you don’t know with certainty if it’s all lies, or some of it, or none of it. All you know, perhaps unconsciously, is that it considering that it might be true makes you uncomfortable because it clashes with what you believe, or want to believe. It’s like a Christian saying “I believe Christ was born of a virgin and rose from the dead.” Believing that is fine, but there’s a difference between believing and knowing. The Christian really thinks those things happened, because it shakes his world if he questions them. He therefore dismisses anyone who asks him to question them as doomed to hell, or otherwise faithless and deluded. In other words, he trashes the messenger because it’s too uncomfortable to contemplate the message. It would require too much change in his life and beliefs if the message were true, even partially. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007 11:02 AM
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
Some other tidbits from my friend. In case you’re losing track of the relevance of this, Aniruddhan is the fellow who wrote the thing Bronte posted. Dear MH, Thanks for the great reply. Mind if I share it without revealing your identity? Yes, I, too, thought that Aniruddhan is creating future hell for himself. My heart tells me not to buy into the stuff he's saying. Much love, J --- MHC wrote: J--Well I did find it mildly interesting in the same way I find gosip mildy interesting--it passes the time. Perhaps all the dirt is true, I don't know. Many people look for things to be logical and make sense and I don't do that around Mother anymore if I ever did. I''ve cast my lot with her and If she turns out to be a false Messiah or whatever, well, I guess I'll go down with the ship. And if she turns out to be the real thing as I am convinced beyond any shodow of a doubt that she is, well, she'd better take me with her in that case too. I'm stuck on Master's words: Loyatly is the highest virtue. Poor Anniruddin. J wrote:Dear MH, I'm forwarding this to you because the post in question (the SRF walrus site is actually an anti-SRF board, no doubt handled by Ananda.) concerns our old friend Aniruddhan. In fact, from the flawless prose, the use of a pseudonym, etc. I think the poster is probably none other than he, representing himself as only knowing the guy who was doing consulting. (I thought it was Donna doing the actual consulting.) I know Aniruddhan always loved peudonyms and often used them on e-mails he sent me. Love, J No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007 11:02 AM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
MHC wrote: J--Well I did find it mildly interesting in the same way I find gosip mildy interesting--it passes the time. Perhaps all the dirt is true, I don't know. Many people look for things to be logical and make sense and I don't do that around Mother anymore if I ever did. I''ve cast my lot with her and If she turns out to be a false Messiah or whatever, well, I guess I'll go down with the ship. And if she turns out to be the real thing as I am convinced beyond any shodow of a doubt that she is, well, she'd better take me with her in that case too. I'm stuck on Master's words: Loyatly is the highest virtue. Poor Anniruddin. Lurk: Yowzer. I'm tryin to think if this was me 25 years ago. I hope not. Kinda sums up cult mentality.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 4:38 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger MHC wrote: J--Well I did find it mildly interesting in the same way I find gosip mildy interesting--it passes the time. Perhaps all the dirt is true, I don't know. Many people look for things to be logical and make sense and I don't do that around Mother anymore if I ever did. I''ve cast my lot with her and If she turns out to be a false Messiah or whatever, well, I guess I'll go down with the ship. And if she turns out to be the real thing as I am convinced beyond any shodow of a doubt that she is, well, she'd better take me with her in that case too. I'm stuck on Master's words: Loyatly is the highest virtue. Poor Anniruddin. Lurk: Yowzer. I'm tryin to think if this was me 25 years ago. I hope not. Kinda sums up cult mentality. Yeah, I posted that in the spirit of full disclosure, not because I thought it would strengthen my case. I’m not the blind loyalty type. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007 11:02 AM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:21 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger Much like yourself, I might add. Nobody can challenge your lies because you yourself operate with anonymous witnesess. It's ironic that the shit you are spreading here hits the fan and hits your own guru. I think she can handle it - I hope you can live with it. Nabsters, I want to point out what I perceive as a difference in the way you and I respond to this kind of stuff. My response to the Amma stuff was to say I can't refute these points because I haven't witnessed any of it first hand or spoken to anyone who has. I suggest you post it to such- and-such site where more experienced people may respond. My experience so far has been positive. I also emailed a friend who might know more and posted her response, which corroborated some of the accusations and cast doubt on others. Your response to the Maharishi stuff, as well as Amma, Sai Baba, Muktananda, etc. stuff is to say It's all lies. I don't believe any of it. The fact is, you don't know with certainty if it's all lies, or some of it, or none of it. All you know, perhaps unconsciously, is that it considering that it might be true makes you uncomfortable because it clashes with what you believe, or want to believe. It's like a Christian saying I believe Christ was born of a virgin and rose from the dead. Believing that is fine, but there's a difference between believing and knowing. The Christian really thinks those things happened, because it shakes his world if he questions them. He therefore dismisses anyone who asks him to question them as doomed to hell, or otherwise faithless and deluded. In other words, he trashes the messenger because it's too uncomfortable to contemplate the message. It would require too much change in his life and beliefs if the message were true, even partially. You are trying to justify that you are spreading rumours. Wether they are true or false, contentwise, are of no importance. At least to me. The stuff you are spreading about MMy could be true or not. It is of no importance for me if it is true, as I have stated before. It does not diminish his positive influence on my life or the influence he has had and continue to have on the life of this planet. The reason I labelled you white trash is because you are thriving in that gossip. Gossip without substance because your source does not want to talk. But you will continue without doubt. Even though your ways and lack of principle and honour are subtly hurting your own guru, but not touching her as she is beyond that, by sowing doubt and division in the minds of her followers. Different stories, same lack of honour and discipline lies at their foundation in the minds of characters like yourself. May you be able to live with that.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 4:56 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger You are trying to justify that you are spreading rumours. Wether they are true or false, contentwise, are of no importance. At least to me. The stuff you are spreading about MMy could be true or not. It is of no importance for me if it is true, as I have stated before. It does not diminish his positive influence on my life or the influence he has had and continue to have on the life of this planet. I agree with you on that. All it does is make me take everything he says with a grain of salt. In other words, I don’t think, as I once did, that “everything he says must be true because he’s enlightened.” It also raises interesting questions regarding the correlation of ethics and higher states of consciousness. Are they as tightly correlated as Maharishi said they were? Apparently not. Is there any absolute value to ethical standards or are they just a matter of culture and personal preference? The reason I labelled you white trash is because you are thriving in that gossip. “Thriving” is not a verb I would have chosen. Gossip without substance because your source does not want to talk. But they’ve talked to me, so for me it has substance and is more than gossip. But you will continue without doubt. You bring it up more often than I do. Even though your ways and lack of principle and honour are subtly hurting your own guru, but not touching her as she is beyond that, by sowing doubt and division in the minds of her followers. It’s not clear to me how I am doing that. Please explain. Different stories, same lack of honour and discipline lies at their foundation in the minds of characters like yourself. May you be able to live with that. Last time I checked my heart was still beating. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007 11:02 AM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It also raises interesting questions regarding the correlation of ethics and higher states of consciousness. Are they as tightly correlated as Maharishi said they were? Is that what he said, Rick? Or did he talk about something more like spontaneous right action and not making mistakes? Because if the course of action is unfathomable--even to the enlightened--as Krishna declares in the Gita, how would anyone ever know what right was in any given situation?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote: It also raises interesting questions regarding the correlation of ethics and higher states of consciousness. Are they as tightly correlated as Maharishi said they were? Is that what he said, Rick? Or did he talk about something more like spontaneous right action and not making mistakes? Because if the course of action is unfathomable--even to the enlightened--as Krishna declares in the Gita, how would anyone ever know what right was in any given situation? P.S.: This is *not* to excuse any of MMY's behavior that may have been untoward. I'm making a different point altogether.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
Lurk: Yowzer. I'm tryin to think if this was me 25 years ago. I hope not. Kinda sums up cult mentality. Rick: Yeah, I posted that in the spirit of full disclosure, not because I thought it would strengthen my case. I'm not the blind loyalty type. Lurk: Rick, I knew that had to be the case. Really neat IMO that you laid it on the line Thanks!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some other tidbits from my friend. In case you're losing track of the relevance of this, Aniruddhan is the fellow who wrote the thing Bronte posted. Rick, I AM losing track. I posted a number of things, not just one, so which piece are you referring to? Who was the Joint Secretary in charge of accounts -- are you saying now that guy was only a consultant, never Amma's joint secretary as claimed? Or are we talking about two different people? It would be helpful, in referencing an item, if your friends and you would quote from it so the readers can identify which article they're referring to. There is more material coming in from the website about Amma's AIMS hospital. I'll forward one of the pieces. Dear MH, Thanks for the great reply. Mind if I share it without revealing your identity? Yes, I, too, thought that Aniruddhan is creating future hell for himself. My heart tells me not to buy into the stuff he's saying. Much love, J --- MHC wrote: J--Well I did find it mildly interesting in the same way I find gosip mildy interesting--it passes the time. Perhaps all the dirt is true, I don't know. Many people look for things to be logical and make sense and I don't do that around Mother anymore if I ever did. I''ve cast my lot with her and If she turns out to be a false Messiah or whatever, well, I guess I'll go down with the ship. And if she turns out to be the real thing as I am convinced beyond any shodow of a doubt that she is, well, she'd better take me with her in that case too. I'm stuck on Master's words: Loyatly is the highest virtue. Poor Anniruddin. J wrote:Dear MH, I'm forwarding this to you because the post in question (the SRF walrus site is actually an anti-SRF board, no doubt handled by Ananda.) concerns our old friend Aniruddhan. In fact, from the flawless prose, the use of a pseudonym, etc. I think the poster is probably none other than he, representing himself as only knowing the guy who was doing consulting. (I thought it was Donna doing the actual consulting.) I know Aniruddhan always loved peudonyms and often used them on e-mails he sent me. Love, J No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007 11:02 AM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
Rick wrote: Yeah, I posted that in the spirit of full disclosure, not because I thought it would strengthen my case. I'm not the blind loyalty type. Bronte writes: Archer, if you really hold the attitude you expressed in your long post to Nabloss today, and here, you won't be misled for long. Just as you saw through the illusions of TM eventually. Good for you for examining these things. The answers are out there. Check out the archives on that ex-amma website, and you will get reams of first-person accounts from long-term devotees, many of whom served in the Indian ashram for years and years before leaving. Don't be afraid of researching this, of finding out more truth. It can only lead you to still better things.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because if the course of action is unfathomable--even to the enlightened--as Krishna declares in the Gita, There is a group of Beings called the Lipika or the Scribes of the Akasa who do know the course of action; also called the Lords of Karma. As MMY does not address this in his BG I think it would be wrong to conclude that the course of action is unfathomable to any and at all times. MMY's point was it was not *necessary* to know the total course of action in order to benefit from acting in accord with it. In Hinduism they are called the Chaturdevas and are great spiritual Intelligences who keep the karmic records and adjust the complicated workings of karmic law Annie Besant The Ancient Wisdom. how would anyone ever know what right was in any given situation? I would think Intuition, based on ...spontaneous right action (like you mentioned), in CC where one becomes capable of performing actions in complete accordance with the laws of nature... MMY Gita 3:8
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--Apart from ordinary tools of conscience, logic, etc; which everyone should use, the question targets those on the Spiritual path...how is their discernment different, adding certain practices, such as TM. Karma is ultimately unfathomable, but in addition to TM, chanting the Gayatri mantra helps one get into sync with Natural Law, along with certain Buddhist mantras. - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Because if the course of action is unfathomable--even to the enlightened--as Krishna declares in the Gita, There is a group of Beings called the Lipika or the Scribes of the Akasa who do know the course of action; also called the Lords of Karma. As MMY does not address this in his BG I think it would be wrong to conclude that the course of action is unfathomable to any and at all times. MMY's point was it was not *necessary* to know the total course of action in order to benefit from acting in accord with it. In Hinduism they are called the Chaturdevas and are great spiritual Intelligences who keep the karmic records and adjust the complicated workings of karmic law Annie Besant The Ancient Wisdom. how would anyone ever know what right was in any given situation? I would think Intuition, based on ...spontaneous right action (like you mentioned), in CC where one becomes capable of performing actions in complete accordance with the laws of nature... MMY Gita 3:8
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Because if the course of action is unfathomable--even to the enlightened--as Krishna declares in the Gita, There is a group of Beings called the Lipika or the Scribes of the Akasa who do know the course of action; also called the Lords of Karma. As MMY does not address this in his BG I think it would be wrong to conclude that the course of action is unfathomable to any and at all times. The context was what human beings can know, so this is irrelevant. MMY's point was it was not *necessary* to know the total course of action in order to benefit from acting in accord with it. Which is fortunate, since we *cannot* know it, according to Krishna. snip how would anyone ever know what right was in any given situation? I would think Intuition, based on ...spontaneous right action (like you mentioned), in CC where one becomes capable of performing actions in complete accordance with the laws of nature... MMY Gita 3:8 But my point was, that has nothing to do with ethics. One's intuition might tell one to do something that most people would view as unethical.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of brontebaxter8 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 7:32 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger --- In HYPERLINK mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some other tidbits from my friend. In case you're losing track of the relevance of this, Aniruddhan is the fellow who wrote the thing Bronte posted. Rick, I AM losing track. I posted a number of things, not just one, so which piece are you referring to? Who was the Joint Secretary in charge of accounts -- are you saying now that guy was only a consultant, never Amma's joint secretary as claimed? Or are we talking about two different people? It would be helpful, in referencing an item, if your friends and you would quote from it so the readers can identify which article they're referring to. I’m afraid I can’t keep it straight myself, but my friend whose response I posted has joined FFL. Perhaps she’ll clarify things. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release Date: 10/28/2007 1:58 PM
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of brontebaxter8 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 7:49 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Account of Financial Fraud and Danger Rick wrote: Yeah, I posted that in the spirit of full disclosure, not because I thought it would strengthen my case. I'm not the blind loyalty type. Bronte writes: Archer, if you really hold the attitude you expressed in your long post to Nabloss today, and here, you won't be misled for long. Just as you saw through the illusions of TM eventually. Good for you for examining these things. The answers are out there. Check out the archives on that ex-amma website, and you will get reams of first-person accounts from long-term devotees, many of whom served in the Indian ashram for years and years before leaving. Don't be afraid of researching this, of finding out more truth. It can only lead you to still better things. I also know people much closer to Amma than these critics ever were. I’ve driven and chatted with the woman who is Amma’s private attendant – who sleeps in her room, etc., as well as her public attendant. These two are with her 24/7. I was very impressed with both of them. They are down-to-earth, unassuming, natural, good-humored, and not at all weird or secretive about Amma, the way their counterparts in the TM movement would probably be. They may be unaware of the things you bring up, but I doubt it because they are like her shadows, and hear everything. In fact, not only those two, but the swamis who have been with her for decades would impress just about anyone with their simplicity, humility, and genuineness. Maharishi used to say that you can judge the quality of a guru by the quality of the people around him, and if that is true, these folks are an impressive testimonial. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release Date: 10/28/2007 1:58 PM