Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> No actual explanation then. So I suppose what you mean is that different
> rules apply to you and everyone else.
No. I have said what I mean, I will not let you distort it to suit your
needs.
> I will, the overhead code required is trivial compared to the code
Quoting Nicolas George (2023-04-24 21:24:20)
> Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> > I have no idea what you mean by this.
>
> Try a little harder.
No actual explanation then. So I suppose what you mean is that different
rules apply to you and everyone else.
> > The only fact here is that the
Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> I have no idea what you mean by this.
Try a little harder.
> You keep using these words. I don't think they mean what you think they
> mean.
Yeah, Princess Bride references are a real boost to weak arguments.
> The only fact here is that the quoted
Quoting Nicolas George (2023-04-24 20:31:49)
> Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> > So when I wanted to make changes to libavfilter recently, you claimed
> > your familiarity with the code makes you more qualified to judge
> > readability. Now my familiarity with the code makes me LESS qualified.
> >
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:37 PM James Almer wrote:
> On 4/24/2023 3:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:32 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> >
> >> Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> >>> So when I wanted to make changes to libavfilter recently, you claimed
> >>> your familiarity with
On 4/24/2023 3:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:32 PM Nicolas George wrote:
Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
So when I wanted to make changes to libavfilter recently, you claimed
your familiarity with the code makes you more qualified to judge
readability. Now my familiarity
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:32 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> > So when I wanted to make changes to libavfilter recently, you claimed
> > your familiarity with the code makes you more qualified to judge
> > readability. Now my familiarity with the code makes me LESS
Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> So when I wanted to make changes to libavfilter recently, you claimed
> your familiarity with the code makes you more qualified to judge
> readability. Now my familiarity with the code makes me LESS qualified.
> Curious.
There is a difference between long-term
Quoting Nicolas George (2023-04-24 14:13:45)
> Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> > What exactly is less readable? One variable gets its scope reduced, that
> > is a win in my book.
>
> Having to remember if a field is in structure x or structure y s a net
> loss that you do not see only because you
Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> What exactly is less readable? One variable gets its scope reduced, that
> is a win in my book.
Having to remember if a field is in structure x or structure y s a net
loss that you do not see only because you just wrote the code and have
everything freshly in mind.
Quoting Nicolas George (2023-04-24 13:59:43)
> Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> > We'll have to disagree about this then. I belive lack of proper
> > structure is currently the biggest problem in ffmpeg CLI.
>
> I do not disagree on this. But this patch does not help, it just makes
> the code
Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> We'll have to disagree about this then. I belive lack of proper
> structure is currently the biggest problem in ffmpeg CLI.
I do not disagree on this. But this patch does not help, it just makes
the code locally less readable. If it is to be useful at all, it is at
Quoting Nicolas George (2023-04-24 13:19:49)
> Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> > Separating internal state from public interfaces is a fundamental notion
> > of object-oriented programming and is completely orthogonal to that
> > object being a part of a library or not.
>
> Using object-oriented
Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24):
> Separating internal state from public interfaces is a fundamental notion
> of object-oriented programming and is completely orthogonal to that
> object being a part of a library or not.
Using object-oriented programming to its fullest when it is not needed
is a
Quoting Nicolas George (2023-04-24 12:20:00)
> Anton Khirnov (12023-04-19):
> > Start by moving OutputStream.filtered_frame to it, which really belong
> > to the filtergraph rather than the output stream.
>
> What is the point of this? fftools/ffmpeg_filter: is not part of a
> library, concepts
Anton Khirnov (12023-04-19):
> Start by moving OutputStream.filtered_frame to it, which really belong
> to the filtergraph rather than the output stream.
What is the point of this? fftools/ffmpeg_filter: is not part of a
library, concepts of public/private do not apply, just put everything
you
Start by moving OutputStream.filtered_frame to it, which really belong
to the filtergraph rather than the output stream.
---
fftools/ffmpeg.h | 1 -
fftools/ffmpeg_filter.c | 31 ++-
fftools/ffmpeg_mux.c | 1 -
fftools/ffmpeg_mux_init.c | 4
4
17 matches
Mail list logo
