I promised I would not respond. Oh well...
The difference between 6/4 and 3/2 is precisely the same difference between
6/8 and 3/4.
You can argue all night on what the difference is between using a quarter
note and a half note as the beat results in, but what it all comes down to
is that there
Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord built on
it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant
Really? I only know the term as referring to the chord built on the 4th
of the scale.
It's
Well placed Neal.
But I know my eyes won't let me follow.
I just can't see it in a passage that mixes time sig.
So
4/4 5/4 3/4 6/4 3/2 7/4
Often times I find my 5/4 and 7/4 alternating like 3+2/5 then 2+3/5
Throwing a 3/2 into the mix (to me) indicates a sort of half time feel
(that is )
On Jun 30, 2005, at 1:07 AM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Christopher Smith / 2005/06/29 / 06:00 PM wrote:
Just to thoroughly discredit my own argument, though, here are two
exceptions. There are two pieces of common repertoire which are
ordinarily written in 6/8 (divided 3+3) with swing SIXTEENTHS
Gerald Berg wrote:
Anyone ever read Paul Creston's Rational Metric Notation?
He advocates replaces 6/8 with 6/12.
Jerry
I haven't read it - but it sounds like this theory would conflict with
the more common(!) use of x/10, x/12 etc. in Ferneyhough and the like.
Regarding
"...Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord built on it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant (though it doesn't invariably have to)...etc." From: Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was under the impression that Subdominant was a chord at the same
Darcy James Argue / 2005/06/30 / 01:38 AM wrote:
and neither you nor George raised any objections.
Are you saying we have met before?!!
Oh, this is embarrassing.
How come you never mentioned it?!
--
- Hiro
Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com
Good morning, no, not angels, but ladies and gentlemen of the agora,
does anyone know how to completely uninstall QuickTime,on Mac.
The reason I need to do this is because I need to install the new 7.0
professional version and when trying to do so so I get a warning stating
that it can not be
Chuck Israels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 6:45 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
(the I want to live in America effect
I don't remember how Bernstein wrote this, but I'd write it with one
combined time signature 6/8 and 3/4 and think that that was pretty
clear.
I've actually
On Jun 30, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Godofredo Romero wrote:
Good morning, no, not angels, but ladies and gentlemen of the agora,
does anyone know how to completely uninstall QuickTime,on Mac.
The reason I need to do this is because I need to install the new 7.0
professional version and when trying
On Jun 30, 2005, at 9:31 AM, dr.a.s. weinstangel wrote:
Regarding
...Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord built on it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant (though it doesn't invariably have to)...etc. From: Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was under the
Well, if you think of it as a subdominant *function* it's not so very
wrong. In a similar way vii serves a dominant function.
Ken
At 09:54 PM 6/29/2005, you wrote:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord built on
Well it does have rational in the title... :)
Jerry
On 30-Jun-05, at 9:08 AM, Owain Sutton wrote:
Gerald Berg wrote:
Anyone ever read Paul Creston's Rational Metric Notation?
He advocates replaces 6/8 with 6/12.
Jerry
I haven't read it - but it sounds like this theory would conflict
Godofredo Romero / 2005/06/30 / 10:39 AM wrote:
does anyone know how to completely uninstall QuickTime,on Mac.
The reason I need to do this is because I need to install the new 7.0
professional version and when trying to do so so I get a warning stating
that it can not be installed because
On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Gerald Berg wrote:
Anyone ever read Paul Creston's Rational Metric Notation?
He advocates replaces 6/8 with 6/12.
I read another book of his on rhythm (I forget the name now) and liked
what he had to say on the subject. There is so little written on the
I am obviously stupid, but can someone explain to me what this means,
and in what way it is an example for 6/4 being 3x2/4? The poem seems
to be in 2x3/4.
Johannes
Sorry, I misread your post to mean the opposite of what it actually
said.
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
Yes, I realise that, just as there are many more dominants available
than the one built on the 5th degree (speaking of both dominant
function and dominant quality).
Some of these concepts have grown so much that they deserve their own
terms. Like the bVII dominant7 chord resolving to I in
(the I want to live in America effect
The actual line is I like to be in America.
I don't remember how Bernstein wrote this, but I'd write it with one combined time signature 6/8 and 3/4 and think that that was pretty clear. It seems cluttered to change time signatures every measure for
Some of my colleagues have replaced this term with Predominant to
be more clear.
Christopher
Is that the predominant opinion?
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On Jun 30, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Some of my colleagues have replaced this term with Predominant to
be more clear.
Christopher
Is that the predominant opinion?
Ooh, TWO puns aimed my way in less than twelve hours! I love it!
Christopher (hoping to convert the
Andrew Stiller wrote:
The beaming of the hemiolated (3/4)
measures is inconsistent.
Well, that's consistent with the utter mess of the hand-scrawled parts
that I've played off!
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Godoredo,
If the installer is telling you you have a newer version installed,
then in all likelihood you do in fact have a newer version installed!
(Probably 7.0.1)
Also, QuickTime and QuickTime Pro are exactly the same code. If you
purchased QuickTime Pro, all you need to do is enter
On 30 Jun 2005, at 12:14 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Also, QuickTime and QuickTime Pro are exactly the same code. If you
purchased QuickTime Pro, all you need to do is enter your registration
code (in Preferences) to unlock the Pro features. You don't need to
uninstall or reinstall
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord built
on it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant
Really? I only know the term as referring to the chord built on the
4th of the scale.
So you're telling me that
Andrew Stiller wrote:
The beaming of the hemiolated (3/4)
measures is inconsistent.
Just conducted WSS last fall. It is 6/8 (3/4).
Yes, it is irregular in spots but it plays itself. Only a few spots where it
isn't one then the other, and those are easily pointed out in rehearsal. I
conducted
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord built
on it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant
If this is true, then do you call the 7th a sub-tonic ?
Call me aa A-retentive tradionalist, but I believe that by
On Jun 30, 2005, at 1:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord built
on it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant
If this is true, then do you call the 7th a sub-tonic ?
On 30 Jun 2005 at 0:14, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 11:34 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 29 Jun 2005, at 9:28 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:
The work in question is most definitely in two groups of 3 beats
each (although it often hemiolas into 3/2 temporarily).
That's
On 30 Jun 2005 at 2:09, Neal Schermerhorn wrote:
NOW - 3/2 could be felt in one but who would do such a thing? 3/4 or
3/8 would more meaningfully carry the sense of in one to the
musician. 3/2 is almost always felt in 3.
Well, depends on what you're talking about.
If you're talking about
On 30 Jun 2005 at 9:20, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 12:54 AM, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord built
on it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant
Really?
On 30 Jun 2005 at 10:30, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 9:31 AM, dr.a.s. weinstangel wrote:
...Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord
built on it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant (though
it doesn't invariably have to)...etc. From:
David W. Fenton wrote:
If you're talking about choosing a meter for a composition of your
own, you'd make the choice depending on what the musicians you're
composing for would expect. If I'm writing for viol consort, I'd
choose 3/2, since viols are more accustomed to reading small
This is what happened, this is what I did.
I was running QuickTime pro version 6.5 and downloaded the latest
version, 7.0, of QuickTime Player and when I runned the installer I
received the message that it can not be installed because there is a
newer version running in my machine, in view of
Godofredo Romero / 2005/06/30 / 06:44 PM wrote:
pleeese... help me...
Did you repair permission?
--
- Hiro
Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Godofredo,
Running Software Update should get you the latest version of all
QuickTime components. But are you sure you don't already have
QuickTime Player 7.0.1 on your computer somewhere? Go to System
Preferences - QuickTime - Register. It should tell you there which
version is
Oh, I forgot, you can also try System Preferences - QuickTime -
Update instead of/in addition to Software Update.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
For some time I have used the term pre-dominant (I think the hyphen
is helpful) for a number of harmonies that can precede the dominant -
N6, A6, V/V, vi, ii, Vo7/V, bVII, etc. (including the addition of
7ths). The term subdominant really should be restricted to the
harmony built on the 4th
Hello folks.
Has anyone mentioned the term sesquialtera? One source i have says
IIn Hispanic Music, it may refer to the mixture of duple and triple
time within groups of six quavers (eighth notes).
Hal Owen
--
Harold Owen
2830 Emerald St., Eugene, OR 97403
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit my
Hello all,
Is there some way to clear out the Open Recent... list in the File menu of
Finale 2005 (Mac) without trashing all of the global preference settings?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Brian
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Brian Williams wrote:
Is there some way to clear out the Open Recent... list in the File menu of
Finale 2005 (Mac) without trashing all of the global preference settings?
Try selecting options program options advanced, and setting the
value to zero. After clicking OK, shut down the
On 30 Jun 2005 at 11:35, Andrew Stiller wrote:
(the I want to live in America effect
The actual line is I like to be in America.
That was my memory misfire.
I don't remember how Bernstein wrote this, but I'd write it with one
combined time signature 6/8 and 3/4 and think that that was
On 30 Jun 2005 at 13:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Subdominant (used to mean the 4th of the scale, or the chord
built on it. Now means ANY chord that can lead to a dominant
If this is true, then do you call the 7th a sub-tonic ?
In
On 30 Jun 2005 at 10:46, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Gerald Berg wrote:
Anyone ever read Paul Creston's Rational Metric Notation?
He advocates replaces 6/8 with 6/12.
I read another book of his on rhythm (I forget the name now) and liked
what he had to say
In Windows the list is stored in the Registry under:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER
Software
CodaMusic
Finale2005
FINALE
Recent File List
You may be able to simply delete the entries but I have heard so many
warnings about editing the Registry that I will leave it to you to try!
Richard Yates
-
Well, I got an education this afternoon trying to find a free WAV to
MP3 converter.
I downloaded about 6 different ones, some shareware, some freeware.
In the process, the installers put in place any amount of adware and
spyware. It was ridiculous.
Does anyone have recommendations on a
At 10:07 PM 6/30/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Does anyone have recommendations on a Windows WAV to MP3 converter
that has a decent interface, produces non-corrupt results with good
quality (they all seemed to use the LAME compression library, but the
sound of the result was not uniformly
Hi David-
I went through the same frustrating process of trying to find a free
converter. I finally gave up and tried something that was recommended by a
friend of mine--PolderbitS.
I love it. http://www.polderbits.com © 1998-2004 PolderbitS Software
I wish I owned that
yeh, I know- I forgot to say clearly that PolderbitS is not free.
sorry.
I just never found a free one that would do what I wanted and do it right.
Cecil Rigby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
www.harrockhall.com
___
Finale mailing list
On 30 Jun 2005 at 22:25, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 10:07 PM 6/30/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Does anyone have recommendations on a Windows WAV to MP3 converter
that has a decent interface, produces non-corrupt results with good
quality (they all seemed to use the LAME compression
MusicMatch JukeBox
Does anyone have recommendations on a Windows WAV to MP3 converter
that has a decent interface, produces non-corrupt results with good
quality
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
At 11:58 PM 6/30/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 30 Jun 2005 at 22:25, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
(And if you by any chance have Adobe Audition, it can save in mp3
format and includes the codec.)
I don't have that. I'm no fan of Adobe products in general.
I agree with you, and use them
On 30 Jun 2005 at 21:05, Richard Yates wrote:
Does anyone have recommendations on a Windows WAV to MP3 converter
that has a decent interface, produces non-corrupt results with good
quality
MusicMatch JukeBox
No way! That's a horrid program that I've seen pre-installed on a lot
of
52 matches
Mail list logo
