Mark D Lew schrieb:
I do those as an articulation. Mass Mover's Apply Articulation function
gives enough flexibility to do it fairly efficiently en masse.
Of course as articulation. With a metatool you can apply it to a whole
screenful at once.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
Neal Schermerhorn schrieb:
Maybe one of the many so preoddupied with the non-Finale threads would care
to coment?
Is this your first post to the list? I can't remember your name somehow.
You must be one of the owners then? Or what other rights do you have to
complain?
Johannes
--
Richard Smith wrote:
These explanations are very wordy but if you play with it, I think you
will find Sibelius easy to use without a midi. I work quickly on both my
desktop and my laptop without midi. Just give yourself a little time to
get adjusted to Sibelius before making a judgment.
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:30 PM, Lee Actor wrote:
I want to extend 16th note beams over rests in one particular measure
without setting it that way for the entire file. Does anyone have a
simple/clever workaround for this? (And wouldn't it be nice if this
option
could be turned on and
At 07:20 PM 7/12/05 -0700, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jul 10, 2005, at 7:17 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
And another one -- the bass-clef first-note speedy-entry bug. Type
along
from the computer keyboard and at random the first note of some
measures
will be way up high, as if it were
http://www.makemusic.com/press_releases.aspx?pid=53
Does MakeMusic! really need *another* intermediate-level notation product?
I just wish they'd update Printmusic from 2004 so I can replace
NotepadFree with something cheap that recognizes a USB MIDI keyboard.
--
Rocky Road - in Oz
I've been away for a few days, receiving e-mails but not really
reading any. Today I looked to see 457 messages in my Finale List
folder. 243 of them are about Sibelius. It's no skin off my nose,
since I'll delete 'em without further ado, but if finale@shsu.edu
is going to be spending so
I believe, as has been pointed out before, that to Mailman the
words private list mean something different from how you mean it.
As the list page says, This is a private list, which means that
the list of members is not available to non-members. That's *all*
it means to Mailman. It does not
Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:18 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
These explanations are very wordy but if you play with it, I think you
will find Sibelius easy to use without a midi.
And without a mouse, too, I hope.
I work quickly on both my desktop and my laptop without midi. Just
At 7/12/2005 03:49 PM, Simon Troup wrote:
Apologies for my earlier message, I misunderstood what this was
showing
No problem.
Still, I maintain that if you don't want your email address to be
widely-publicised, using a mailing list to which anyone can subscribe
is a silly thing to do
Why
Neal Schermerhorn wrote:
Hey, I know the FINALE list is all so busy discussing everything but FINALE,
but his guy had a question.
I am pretty bad in understanding how midi works, having been always
interested in music typesetting, but I have a problem here and I
don't know what to do.
The
At 7/12/2005 03:49 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Consider the difference between posting to any unmoderated Usenet
group and posting to the Finale list.
It's a *huge* difference.
I guess you need to explain why there is ANY difference, other than having
to subscribe ahead of time.
Since ANYONE
Phil Daley schrieb:
Here you go:
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 13:06:43 EST
From: MX mailing list processor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE AND RETAIN IT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
You have been added to mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phil,
you may not have noticed, but the
Cool down, Man! I have as much right to voice my opinion as any other member
of the list. I have been very active in other forums for the past several
years, taking part in discussions and helping novices with their problems.
Just because I'm new to this list serve does not classify me as a
At 03:52 AM 7/13/2005, you wrote:
Sibelius asks that you
define these properties of a note before you enter the
note itself.
Not true. I use Sibelius (as well as Finale) regularly, and I never input
in this manner. I always enter the notes first and then everything else
afterwards. Just
Ronald,
As someone who is new to this list, did it ever occur to you that maybe
you shouldn't begin your involvement with this list by lecturing
everyone else on how it ought to be run?
This is not a moderated list, and people are free to discuss whatever
they deem appropriate. And LOTS of
Okay, I seem to have started a tempest in a teapot here. I joined this list
serve a week ago. There were days when all I saw where lists of Sibelius
this and Sibelius that. As a newcomer I was beginning to believe this was a
Sibelius list and that I had joined the wrong one. I thought, okay, this
ronan schrieb:
Cool down, Man! I have as much right to voice my opinion as any other member
of the list. I have been very active in other forums for the past several
years, taking part in discussions and helping novices with their problems.
Just because I'm new to this list serve does not
At 06:51 AM 7/13/05 -0400, dhbailey wrote:
I think that speedy entry in Finale, where you can work along without a
mouse once you have clicked to enter the editing frame, and you use only
the computer keyboard without the numeric keypad, isn't quite possible
in Sibelius.
I see. This is the
At 7/13/2005 08:09 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Phil Daley schrieb:
Here you go:
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 13:06:43 EST
From: MX mailing list processor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE AND RETAIN IT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
You have been added to mailing list
Anyhow, let's drop the whole thing.
Ron
Sounds good, but stick around. The tides of topics come and go. Some here
will remember the (it seems like) hundreds of messages over the question of
when the 20th Century actually ended. Ultimately, though, you will find that
this list is a tremendous
Missing from this list is:
70. Note spacing cannot be set to avoid collisions with expressions. This,
combined with the inability to move articulations horizontally, was the key
deficiency in my deciding not to buy Sibelius.
Richard Yates
I was looking through my archives.
I guess Sib must
On Jul 12, 2005, at 4:16 PM, Simon Troup wrote:
... apart from the fact that when you join it says ...
This is a private list, which means that the list of members is
not available to non-members.
... which I would have thought covered _not_ having my email
address readily available on
Yes.. This List has always been a valuable resource when I
needed an
answer about Finale.
Ron should be forgiven for not knowing that it is futile to suggest that a
topic be dropped on the Finale List...I have been wearing out my delete
key recently too, and I don't recall hearing such anger
OK, here's the current list info when you subscribe:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:41:52 -0500
Welcome to the Finale@shsu.edu mailing list!
To post to this list, send your email to:
finale@shsu.edu
General information about the mailing list is at:
Richard Yates wrote:
Anyhow, let's drop the whole thing.
Ron
Sounds good, but stick around. The tides of topics come and go. Some here
will remember the (it seems like) hundreds of messages over the question of
when the 20th Century actually ended.
It's over? Yikes! Why wasn't I
I don't have time to go over this point by point, but this list looks like
it was from version 1.4. I'm really not sure what relevance it has at this
point. But at a glance I see things that have been fixed, things that
haven't and things that display an ignorance of how Sibelius works. Did
Dan Carno wrote:
Not true. I use Sibelius (as well as Finale) regularly, and I never
input in this manner. I always enter the notes first and then
everything else afterwards. Just as in Finale, it is a simple matter to
do mass entry of articulations, mass copying of expressions, etc.
At 7/13/2005 09:49 AM, Ken Durling wrote:
I don't have time to go over this point by point, but this list looks like
it was from version 1.4. I'm really not sure what relevance it has at this
point. But at a glance I see things that have been fixed, things that
haven't and things that display
At 9:25 AM -0400 7/13/05, Eden - Lawrence D. wrote:
I have been wearing out my delete
key recently too,
This is a handy tip for some email programs:
In Eudora, for example, you can option-click on a subject line in the
mail box and it will quickly select and group all of the same subject
Hope nobody unsubscribes you *grin*
On 7/13/05 8:40 AM, Phil Daley [EMAIL PROTECTED] said this:
You must know your password to change your options (including changing
the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. It is:
--
Allen
___
Finale mailing
Hi Eric,
If you've got each instrument on a separate channel, make sure you choose
Channels become Staves in the import MIDI file dialog.
HTH,
Allen
--
Allen J. Fisher
Quality Assurance Developer
MakeMusic! Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.makemusic.com
On 7/12/05 3:27 PM, Eric Dussault
I own Finale 2004 (about to be 2006) and it supports 64 channels. Check the
midi option settings.
Ron
Ronald J Brown
-Original Message-
From: Neal Schermerhorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 13, 2005 12:38 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] midi chanels assignment
Hey,
Dear All,
Can someone please help?
How can I change instruments after creating a file.
I have created a piece for clarinet, piano and double bass.
I would like to change the bass to another bass inst. Or perhaps tuba.
Many Thanks,
George Galway Manchester UK
attachment:
Hi Finale gurus;
I'm trying to understand better how to manipulate staff systems, or line
grouping of measures. Suppose I encounter a situation where 4 measures (let's
say 33-36) are on a linethat istoo crowded. I see that I can reduce
crowding by forcing measure 36 to be on a line with the
Not a problem. I already unsubscribed. It was just a test address so I
could see what the message was.
I guess I should have read it more carefully ;-)
At 7/13/2005 10:39 AM, Allen Fisher wrote:
Hope nobody unsubscribes you *grin*
On 7/13/05 8:40 AM, Phil Daley [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
Go into staff tool, click on the stave you wish to change - change the name
of the stave in the "staff attributes" box.
To change the midi sound, go into "window" - "instrument list" and
change the relevant instrument there.
All the best,
Lawrence - Manchester
"þaes
ofereode - þisses
At 11:01 AM 07/13/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to understand better how to manipulate staff systems, or
line grouping of measures. Suppose I encounter a situation where 4
measures (let's say 33-36) are on a line that is too crowded. I see
that I can reduce crowding by forcing measure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to understand better how to manipulate staff systems, or line
grouping of measures. Suppose I encounter a situation where 4 measures
(let's say 33-36) are on a line that is too crowded. I see that I can
reduce crowding by forcing measure 36 to be on a line
Hi Lawrence,
Many thanks for your
rapid reply! I owe you a pint of best bitter if I ever bump into
you.
George
G.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 13 July 2005 16:11To:
finale@shsu.eduSubject: Re: [Finale] Changing
Instruments
Go
On 13/07/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to understand better how to manipulate staff systems, or line
grouping of measures. Suppose I encounter a situation where 4 measures
(let's say 33-36) are on a line that is too crowded. I see that I can
reduce crowding by
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Is this your first post to the list? I can't remember your name somehow.
You must be one of the owners then? Or what other rights do you have to
complain?
1) No it is not. I've been a member and lightly posting since early 04. Not
that it would be relevant, as probably
I haven't used Finale for several years, and I'm getting
ready to start up again. Has the copy protection changed
since Finale 2003? I don't want to upgrade to a version
that e.g. requires me to mount the CD or whatever.
Thanks,
Phil Shaw
___
Hi Randolph,
I am interested in your Eudora tip. Thanks for sharing. What is the
equivalent on a Windows keyboard of the Mac option key?
Ken Fowler
At 09:25 AM 7/13/2005 -0500, you wrote:
At 9:25 AM -0400 7/13/05, Eden - Lawrence D. wrote:
I have been wearing out my delete
key recently
Phil Daley schrieb:
OK, here's the current list info when you subscribe:
I hvae sort of lost the point of it, though. What was it you were trying
to say?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Finale
Phew, man, reading that many posts in English is almost torturing to
me. I hope I didn't miss anything so my following question won't look
stoopid. And no, I don't have time to download Sib demo since reading
Finale list takes all day long on my end :-)
Ever since Finale v1.0, my biggest gripe
But i still have to make sure that my Finale is configured so that
each 16 midi port is connected to a device if I don't want it to
screw my channels when importing midi. Do I?
Éric Dussault
Le 05-07-13 à 10:43, Allen Fisher a écrit :
Hi Eric,
If you've got each instrument on a separate
I did this list years back, at v1.4 and then again after v2. Many of the points as you mention are fixed, some still there, and there are always new ones to moan about.But I don't think these things are a bash at anything. There are 2 good notation applications out there, Finale and Sibelius. They
At 12:13 PM 7/13/05 -0400, Neal Schermerhorn wrote:
So please save your big-fish-little-pond ego for someone else. I don't care
to stroke it.
Please do not stroke *any* fish on this list!
Requisite emoticons: :-) :-O =:O
Dennis
___
Finale mailing
Another wish I have had for long time.
Almost all the chart I do, I have Code or TAG at the end, and I like so
the system spaced down and indented which will catch sight-reader's eye
(I also color-highlight, of course :-).
As you can specify Start New System, I love to have indent option and
a
By the way thank you Allen (and the others who dared to answer)!
Éric Dussault
Le 05-07-13 à 10:43, Allen Fisher a écrit :
Hi Eric,
If you've got each instrument on a separate channel, make sure you
choose
Channels become Staves in the import MIDI file dialog.
At 12:19 PM 07/13/2005, D. Keneth Fowler wrote:
I am interested in your Eudora tip. Thanks for sharing. What is the
equivalent on a Windows keyboard of the Mac option key?
Alt-click for Win Eudora. You can also Alt-click on a sender's name
to quickly group and select all email in the mailbox
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
Regardless, your comments are totally out of line in what a list is
supposed to be. Is there something wrong with people who subscribe to a
list, but don't post? I'm on a number of
Neal Schermerhorn schrieb:
That said, what right do I have to complain? As much right as you have to
complain - which you have been doing lately with aplomb.
Ay?
See, we're members of an email list. Some members are really knowledgeable
and have a lot to offer. Others are less so, but pipe
At 7/13/2005 12:15 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Phil Daley schrieb:
OK, here's the current list info when you subscribe:
I hvae sort of lost the point of it, though. What was it you were trying
to say?
D Fenton said he didn't know what the current subscriber info had to say on
privacy, ie.
Just clicking on the header works fine in V5.
At 7/13/2005 12:47 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 12:19 PM 07/13/2005, D. Keneth Fowler wrote:
I am interested in your Eudora tip. Thanks for sharing. What is the
equivalent on a Windows keyboard of the Mac option key?
Alt-click for Win Eudora. You
At 7/13/2005 12:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
The Sib stuff was neither OT nor TAN.
Get a life.
Phil Daley AutoDesk
http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 06:51 AM 7/13/05 -0400, dhbailey wrote:
I think that speedy entry in Finale, where you can work along without a
mouse once you have clicked to enter the editing frame, and you use only
the computer keyboard without the numeric keypad, isn't
At 01:09 PM 07/13/2005, Phil Daley wrote:
Just click the header, no option key required. It's just Windows ;-)
Phil, that sorts the whole mailbox by whatever column you click on.
In recent versions of Eudora, if you Alt-click on a *particular*
subject or sender, Eudora will quickly group and
At 7/13/2005 01:17 PM, Phil Daley wrote:
Just clicking on the header works fine in V5.
I just did a test.
click, CTRL-click, or ALT-click sorts the list forwards.
SHIFT-click sorts the list backwards.
Phil Daley AutoDesk
http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley
Phil Shaw wrote:
I haven't used Finale for several years, and I'm getting
ready to start up again. Has the copy protection changed
since Finale 2003? I don't want to upgrade to a version
that e.g. requires me to mount the CD or whatever.
Thanks,
Phil Shaw
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
Regardless, your comments are totally out of line in what a list is
supposed to be. Is there something wrong with people who subscribe to a
list, but don't
In a message dated 13/07/2005 18:38:26 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
they give you a responding number
to enter in the appropriate blank and all is well until you change
enough different hardware aspects of your computer that Finale thinks
it's on a different machine
Does
On Jul 13, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Ken Durling wrote:
I don't have time to go over this point by point, but this list looks
like it was from version 1.4. I'm really not sure what relevance it
has at this point. But at a glance I see things that have been fixed,
things that haven't and things
On 13 Jul 2005, at 1:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean, then, that so long as you don't go on the internet (or
if
you delete the relevant cookie) you can input the security number onto
any
machine and it will work?
No. Like David said, the code itself is based on your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 13/07/2005 18:38:26 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
they give you a responding number
to enter in the appropriate blank and all is well until you change
enough different hardware aspects of your computer that Finale thinks
it's on
Thanks David,
The reason I was asking was related not to Finale but, since you mention
it, to Windows XP which seems to operate a similar system.
I bought the professional version for one of mymachines and stupidly
installed it on the wrong one (too small memory). I then installed it on
On Jul 13, 2005, at 1:52 AM, Lee Actor wrote:
I don't think that works in the case of four 16ths where the first and
last
are rests. Or maybe I don't understand your method?
You're right. I didn't realize you were asking for the rests to be at
the end of the beam.
In that case, I'd do
Yes, some of it was. When people start asking HOW to do stuff in
Sibelius, then it becomes not related.
Phil Daley wrote:
At 7/13/2005 12:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
The Sib
Wow, perhaps you need to label this OT or TAN? No no, that would be
getting a life. And that would be polite to the list...
Phil Daley wrote:
At 7/13/2005 01:17 PM, Phil Daley wrote:
Just clicking on the header works fine in V5.
I just did a test.
click, CTRL-click, or ALT-click sorts
Thank you! Someone who can respect the list. Woohoo.
On the Eudora thing, you could also set up a filter to highlight and
flag TAN or other subjects to make them stand out from the rest of the
messages.
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 01:09 PM 07/13/2005, Phil Daley wrote:
Just click the header,
On Jul 13, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Yes, some of it was. When people start asking HOW to do stuff in
Sibelius, then it becomes not related.
Phil Daley wrote:
At 7/13/2005 12:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though
Please excuse me for barging in with a Finale question, g but:
For a sucker, err, early adopter like myself, who just can't bear to
have a new version of Finale come out without exploring the new features
for himself (plus, I have an excuse in that Cimarron Music always
upgrades right away,
The only 'deal' I've seen offered is the $99
offer extended down from 2005 users to also include 2004 users; that requires
the use of code FIN6U4 when ordering and this offerexpires September 25,
2005.
And really -- I could have just waited for
someone else to offer this info, but I'm
On 13 Jul 2005 at 9:37, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Richard Smith wrote:
These explanations are very wordy but if you play with it, I think
you will find Sibelius easy to use without a midi. I work quickly on
both my desktop and my laptop without midi. Just give yourself a
little time to
Very much related, since the whole point was to point out the
differences and shortcomings of Finale. It is not only related, it is
one of the many things that this list is concerned with.
Johannes
Eric Dannewitz schrieb:
Yes, some of it was. When people start asking HOW to do stuff in
Eric Dannewitz schrieb:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
The Sibelius discussion was neither TAN nor OT, and it has Sibelius in
the subject header. It was spot on topic.
Regardless, your comments are totally out
Well, that's unfortunate.
Johannes
Jari Williamsson schrieb:
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
My patience is already stretched with this. If you don't like the way
this list works you are free to go.
I go.
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale
A-NO-NE Music schrieb:
Ever since Finale v1.0, my biggest gripe is the last system.
Why Finale doesn't intellectually resize last system according to given
measure(s) size, or there is such option that I can't find?
No, as far as I know there is no such feature. I myself would never use
On 13 Jul 2005, at 1:19 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
My patience is already stretched with this. If you don't like the way
this list works you are free to go.
I go.
Well, sorry to hear that. Why? (And why now?)
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 13 Jul 2005 at 7:00, Phil Daley wrote:
At 7/12/2005 03:49 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Consider the difference between posting to any unmoderated Usenet
group and posting to the Finale list. It's a *huge* difference.
I guess you need to explain why there is ANY difference, other than
On 13 Jul 2005 at 8:29, ronan wrote:
Is this how it works here? Only well-known names are allowed to
publish complaints? If anyone else does, they are lurkers and
thread cops?
You are being taken to task not because you've posted, but because
you're complaining about what other people are
Hi,
Boy am I going to make myself unpopular now.
I need help. I need to redesign my Ensemble's promotional material, and
I need to do it very soon. I wonder whether anyone on this list would be
happy to share some tips on how to design a (successful) folder/brochure
which can be sent to concert
On 13 Jul 2005 at 6:49, Ken Durling wrote:
I don't have time to go over this point by point, but this list looks
like it was from version 1.4. I'm really not sure what relevance it
has at this point. But at a glance I see things that have been fixed,
things that haven't and things that
Johannes Gebauer / 2005/07/13 / 03:16 PM wrote:
The reason for me is that any publication I have seen would not do it
this way. Instead the spacing throughout the piece will have to be
tweaked, so that the last system holds a proportional amount of music -
and not just a single measure.
I
On 13 Jul 2005 at 12:13, Neal Schermerhorn wrote:
Again - of COURSE I understand why the Sibelius thread is on-topic. I
also know the discussion of off-SHSU archiving is (sorta) on-topic. I
have no problem with that. But jeez, even if I was complaining, don't
you think it's less annoying to
I would guess that if you viewed the document in HTML the source of the
graphic would be shown.
BF
shirling neueweise wrote:
does anyone know of a way to find out the file name of a graphic which
has been inserted into a word doc? i can find all the info on its
placement, adjustments
--- Dan Carno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Snip
At 03:52 AM 7/13/2005, you wrote:
Sibelius asks that you
define these properties of a note before you enter
the
note itself.
Not true. I use Sibelius (as well as Finale)
regularly, and I never input
in this manner. I always enter the notes
Darcy James Argue / 2005/07/07 / 07:14 PM wrote:
I agree, USB 1.1 is inadequate for MIDI + everything else, but that's
why the pros get a FireWire or USB 2 MIDI interface.
Boy, takes long time to go through all the list traffic :-)
Just for the record, USB 1.1 was fine in my MIDI setup. My
David W. Fenton schrieb:
2. cautionary accidentals
I thought they were locked in versions since about Fin2k. You can tell
by a * appearing in the Speedy frame when the cursor is on that note
(and pitch). This is pretty stable. In earlier versions you had to
manually invoke this condition
Can anyone who is currently using GPO with Finale 2005 tell me how useful
from a practical standpoint the subset of GPO that is shipping with Finale
2006 is compared to the full version? In other words, how much do you
depend on the patches not included with the partial version for decent
On 13 Jul 2005 at 9:50, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though
to label OT and TAN in the subject header?
Yes, for OT or TAN posts. Neither the Sibelius or the archiving
threads are either OT or TAN. The Sibelius thread was about the
future
On 13 Jul 2005 at 14:04, dhbailey wrote:
The number you provide MakeMusic is specifically generated for your
machine somehow (maybe even to the point of being placed in the
registry) and needs the specific MakeMusic generated answering number
in order to let the software work.
My guess is
At 04:01 PM 7/13/2005, you wrote:
Sibelius
DOES ask you to specify the accidentals and
augmentation dots before entering the notes. This is
not optional unless you backtrack to the note, a
method which is obviously not efficient.
Hello Tyler,
Well, this brings us right back to the point I
On 13 Jul 2005 at 11:27, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Phil Daley wrote:
At 7/13/2005 12:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy
though to label OT and TAN in the subject header?
The Sib stuff was neither OT nor TAN.
Get a life.
Yes,
On 13 Jul 2005 at 22:27, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
David W. Fenton schrieb:
2. cautionary accidentals
I thought they were locked in versions since about Fin2k. You can tell
by a * appearing in the Speedy frame when the cursor is on that note
(and pitch). This is pretty stable. In earlier
David W. Fenton schrieb:
2. cautionary accidentals
I thought they were locked in versions since about Fin2k. You can tell
by a * appearing in the Speedy frame when the cursor is on that note
(and pitch). This is pretty stable. In earlier versions you had to
manually invoke this condition by
--- Lee Actor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone who is currently using GPO with Finale
2005 tell me how useful
from a practical standpoint the subset of GPO that
is shipping with Finale
2006 is compared to the full version? In other
words, how much do you
depend on the patches not
Now that is a good idea.
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Another one I have been asking for last 17 years.
I am a Shift+Opt(alt)+Click guy since Cmd(Ctrl)+C/V was no available in
early Finale ages. I have always wanted to have one more key combi to
Shift+Opt(alt)+Click so you get the what items to
Hi Lee,
I am currently using the full GPO with Finale 2004--and I can't wait for
Finale 2006. As I understand it, about 100 GPO instruments are included with
F2006--and that means, to me, that they can be loaded directly from Finale.
It seems that the GPO instruments missing from the cut down
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
