Title: FinMac2k6 mass edit measure smart
shapes
I'm experiencing lots of flaky behaviour
re Mass Edit and copying/pasting and I know some of this has been
covered in the last month or two but could someone bring me up to date
please.
I'm using a PPCG4 1.25GHz DP Mirror Door OSX 10.3.9 and a
On Sep 2, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
No. I believe the only way to slash beamed grace notes is to create a
slash as a graphic expression and then apply that expression to the
various instances of beamed grace notes.
It is far easier to use the Smart Shape line tool for this,
A big thank you to all who responded to my questions. I agree that Finale should provide for slashed beamed grace notes.
While I have used bothgraphic _expression_ and Smart Shape Tool versions, as suggested, for most occasions _expression_ Toolright or left slash (TNR 36 - 48 points) seemed to
At 9:13 PM -0500 9/2/05, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
When, in response to Johannes' comment;
Just out of curiosity, I am currently wondering whether a printed
edition from 1978 in the US is still under copyright (for the
printed edtion, not for the piece itself, which is from the 19th
century)?
It seems to be limited to the PC, as I haven't heard of any Mac users
reporting it. But it looks like this is a serious and widespread problem on
the PC version of F2006. It's great to be able to play back 128 channels,
but if you try to save audio or midi output, you only get 16--each instance
John Howell wrote:
At 9:13 PM -0500 9/2/05, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
When, in response to Johannes' comment;
Just out of curiosity, I am currently wondering whether a printed
edition from 1978 in the US is still under copyright (for the printed
edtion, not for the piece itself, which is
I did find that when I use the Mass Mover and copy and drag, that
everything gets moved, including hairpins. When I copy and paste, as
is dictated by the size of my score, hairpins don't paste. Not sure
why.
Dean
On Sep 2, 2005, at 10:36 PM, Claudio Pompili wrote:
I'm experiencing
At 03:16 PM 09/03/2005, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
I did find that when I use the Mass Mover and copy and drag, that
everything gets moved, including hairpins. When I copy and paste, as
is dictated by the size of my score, hairpins don't paste.
I believe this has been noted as a bug -- or at
On 3 Sep 2005 at 14:20, dhbailey wrote:
As for those editions with the yellow covers (and green ink?) I recall
looking at many of them and seeing no copyright notice at all. Not
being much of a pianist I don't have a very large library of piano
music, but I have never liked the layout of
Has anyone run across this? I'm working along in a score, everything
is cool, then I create a new measure of music, which suddenly plays
back at about half the dynamic level it's been previously set for.
All up to there is normal. I made no changes in dynamics. Weird ... yes?
Dean
Ah, I'll investigate ... thanks,
Dean
On Sep 3, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 03:16 PM 09/03/2005, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
I did find that when I use the Mass Mover and copy and drag, that
everything gets moved, including hairpins. When I copy and paste, as
is dictated by the
On 2 Sep 2005 at 0:19, John Howell wrote:
At 6:34 PM +0200 9/1/05, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote:
Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)12=(2/1)7.
Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning,
which is
hidden on the title page of the
Thanks to David for bringing in the name Schirmer. I assumed, but
wasn't sure. Yellow I got, but the green threw me. (more later)
David W. Fenton wrote:
...
And many of those Schirmer editions, ...
Now, if you want a publisher who is dishonest, try the one with the
PINK covers. . .
On 3 Sep 2005 at 17:44, Raymond Horton wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
...
And many of those Schirmer editions, ...
Now, if you want a publisher who is dishonest, try the one with the
PINK covers. . .
Now, for the benefit of anyone besides myself on the list who is
color-blind, does a
David W. Fenton wrote:
That would be Kalmus, of course.
Ray adds:
Thanks for the first part of that sentence, David. The of course was
not appropriate in this instance, of course!
I have played as many or more bad Kalmus editions as any one else on
this list. Take a look at the
On 3 Sep 2005 at 20:58, Raymond Horton wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
That would be Kalmus, of course.
Ray adds:
Thanks for the first part of that sentence, David. The of course
was not appropriate in this instance, of course!
I have played as many or more bad Kalmus editions as any
Raymond Horton wrote:
... it gives me tremendous satisfaction to see those signs there with
all the different shades of green and brown on them, but with GREEN
and BROWN spelled out in the middle for the 20 or 25% percent of males
who are color-deficient.
I meant to check that figure
At 5:30 PM -0400 9/3/05, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 2 Sep 2005 at 0:19, John Howell wrote:
You don't really believe that the BG
scholars gave serious consideration to non-equal temperaments, do you?
As far as they were concerned, Wohltemiert meant equal temperament
and that was the end of
David W. Fenton wrote:
The quality of some Kalmus editions is quite high, because until the
last decade or so, they were all reprints of someone else's edition,
most public domain, but sometimes including foreign editions that are
arguably still copyrighted. ...
Kalmus never did that kind
Aaron Sherber / 2005/09/03 / 03:46 PM wrote:
(I don't know what the Mac equivalent of ctrl-click is.)
Probably Cmd+Click, but I am a Opt+Shift+Click guy :-)
--
- Hiro
Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com
On 3 Sep 2005 at 22:43, John Howell wrote:
At 5:30 PM -0400 9/3/05, David W. Fenton wrote:
So, there are two choices:
1. everyone plays in Temperament ordinaire (not necessarily
appropriate for the repertory of the other group, though probably
better than modern ET), OR
2. we play in
On 3 Sep 2005 at 22:57, Raymond Horton wrote:
I confuse pink with some other colors, but not green, and brown,
which
are some of the Kalmus scores I have in my possesion. I think that,
and the fact that I already stated that two out of two musician
members of my family said they have no
At 10:57 PM -0400 9/3/05, Raymond Horton wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
The quality of some Kalmus editions is quite
high, because until the last decade or so, they
were all reprints of someone else's edition,
most public domain, but sometimes including
foreign editions that are arguably
On 3 Sep 2005 at 23:34, John Howell wrote:
At 10:57 PM -0400 9/3/05, Raymond Horton wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
The quality of some Kalmus editions is quite
high, because until the last decade or so, they
were all reprints of someone else's edition,
most public domain, but sometimes
24 matches
Mail list logo
