I'm confused...are some using two scores one with linked parts and another
(copy/diferent named) without?
Terry
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On 27.07.2009 Robert Patterson wrote:
It really is too bad, because this is
pretty close to being really good.
Personally, I think it is already really good. (I am talking about
having parts in one file and score in another.) Compared to the old
extracted parts it is light years better. It
On 27.07.2009 terry cano wrote:
I'm confused...are some using two scores one with linked parts and another (copy/diferent named) without?
Terry
Actually, there is no reason why you cannot have linked parts in the
score file, so what I do is this: I often start working on the parts
while I
terry cano wrote:
I'm confused...are some using two scores one with linked parts and another (copy/diferent named) without?
Terry
Essentially, yes. One of the copies of the file is used to
create a perfect layout for the score, which often results
in ugly parts. The other copy is used
I hope Finale really is amazing 100 years from now! :-)
On 27/07/2009, at 12:58 AM , Ray Horton wrote:
I was having some problems with Finale Windows 2110 and playback.
Right now I have none, either from Garritan or midi, and have
returned to 2009b until I get some time to mess with 2110
I'd be happy if they were still in business 5 years from now...
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:30 AM, David
Stonestreetda...@stonestreet.com.au wrote:
I hope Finale really is amazing 100 years from now! :-)
On 27/07/2009, at 12:58 AM , Ray Horton wrote:
I was having some problems with
I figure there's a lot of epxerienced strong players and orchestrators out
there, and I've read some very good advice here before, so here goes:
Can anyone tell me (as much as it is possible to describe something like this)
on an orchestral string instrument what effect applying the mute has
In my experience, neither conductors nor string players like the
combination very much. It makes the harmonic sound very tentative, and
I think it is harder to produce. I called for this combination once,
and the conductor asked me to let them remove the mutes. But I liked
the effect and asked
Yes, many players will react with distaste at the possibility - but then
again, many pretty much avoid ever playing a true sul pont, too.
For an example, I'm fairly sure the end of the Nocturne from the Britten
op. 6 suite, featuring both natural and artificial harmonics, is muted.
(My music
Just to clarify, this would be in the context of a string quartet, not an
orchestral context. Thanks for the responses thus far.
C.
--
Colin Broom
--
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:24:57 +0100
From: owainsut...@gmail.com
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: con sord + harmonics
Also to clarify, if I've been misunderstood, that Britten piece is for
violin piano
Colin Broom wrote:
Just to clarify, this would be in the context of a string quartet, not an
orchestral context. Thanks for the responses thus far.
C.
--
Colin Broom
--
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009
This happens all the time, and I could never figured out what is wrong. I have
a score for 4 instruments: cavaquinho, guitar, bass and piano, in that order. I
want the S (segno) and coda signs to appear only at the top instrument and top
piano staff, in the score, and in all parts. So I mark,
At 3:54 PM +0100 7/27/09, Colin Broom wrote:
I figure there's a lot of epxerienced strong players and
orchestrators out there, and I've read some very good advice here
before, so here goes:
Can anyone tell me (as much as it is possible to describe something
like this) on an orchestral string
Colin,
Take a listen to Webern's Op. 5 String Quartet, 4th movement.
Here is a pdf of the score at the IMSLP:
http://imslp.info/files/imglnks/usimg/a/a8/IMSLP00370-Webern_-_Five_movements_for_String_Quartet_Op5.pdf
The whole movement is mit Dämpfer four all four. There is a harmonic
in the
Greetings, list. I've been out of the Finale world for awhile, but now that
I'm upgrading my ChordSymbol font, I'm wondering what the status of
Unicode support is. I see that it is not supported in Finale 2010. Will it be
added for Finale 2011?
If a support rep or product manager wishes to
Hi John,
1) Nobody from MakeMusic monitors this list. You will have to send
your message to them directly.
2) Speaking on behalf of commercial music arrangers, I hope you
won't be offended if I offer you some unsolicited advice: if your
chord symbol fonts are set in a serif font like
At 11:31 AM +0200 7/27/09, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Likewise. I actually think it will never be perfect, and there will
probably be one or two reasons to use separate part files even if
they fix the ones you listed. Personally I don't want much time
invested into these problems any more. What
Not to mention those string players who wouldn't play pizzicato for
Monteverdi since they considered it a bastardization of the instrument!
ajr
At 3:54 PM +0100 7/27/09, Colin Broom wrote:
I figure there's a lot of epxerienced strong players and
orchestrators out there, and I've read some very
Isn't it strange the way the mind (at least, mine) works. Until I
read this post, at age 69, my brain had never connected Sul Pont
with say, Ponte Vecchio. Oh, duh ... I says, I was in Venice
decades ago, and never processed the Italian word for Bridge until
today. So, thanks to you guys
What do you know that the ROW doesn't?
On Jul 27, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
I'd be happy if they were still in business 5 years from
now...
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:30 AM, David
Stonestreetda...@stonestreet.com.au wrote:
I hope Finale really is amazing 100 years from
20 matches
Mail list logo
