On 2012-04-19 03:05, dershem wrote:
> For one thing, I could not upgrade on-line. I simply would NOT
> function, so even though I bought the upgrade on-line, I had to pay
> extra for a CD.
Windows with anti-virus program active?
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
On 4/18/2012 7:22 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed Apr 18, at WednesdayApr 18 9:05 PM, dershem wrote:
>
>> On 4/18/2012 12:03 AM, SN jef chippewa wrote:
>>>
>>> carl, i am about to upgrade a few things, including finale, and
>>> wonder if you could tell me what you found so disastrous moving
ortland, OR 97202
>
> land line: (503) 954-2107 cell phone: (360) 201-3434
>
>
>
> ___ Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, ve
A very interesting feature, this would be! I haven't got this need at the
moment but would like to see if there is a solution too.
Giovanni
Giovanni Andreani
www.giovanniandreani.eu
>Hi list,
>I prefer to have tuplet brackets on the stem side, except for vocal music
>where I prefer
Hi list,
I prefer to have tuplet brackets on the stem side, except for vocal music
where I prefer to have them always above the staff in order to avoid
lyrics. In the piano vocal score I'm working on now, is there a way to
define tuplets in the vocal staff to automatically be placed above the
staff
Just to iterate this further, I visited the IMSLP site and looked at the
horn and trumpet parts for Lohengrin. It calls for horns transposing in (at
various times in 4 horn parts) E, D, Eb, F, G, Ab, A, C, Bb and trumpet
transpositions in C, D, Eb, E, and F.
Entering that many transpositions for t
On Wed Apr 18, at WednesdayApr 18 9:05 PM, dershem wrote:
> On 4/18/2012 12:03 AM, SN jef chippewa wrote:
>>
>> carl, i am about to upgrade a few things, including finale, and
>> wonder if you could tell me what you found so disastrous moving from
>> 2010 to 2012 (which is what i would be doing
I agree that the instruments should be there in the default file, but my point
was that it is doable and not too hard. It isn't a dealbreaker for upgrading to
2012. Once you do it, it is very easy to select it the second time the same
instrument appears. It is no harder to create a horn in D tha
Carl,
I have been using 2012 for months without problems (except for an issue with
Lion compatibility for the paste multiple keyboard shortcut). I no longer
extract separate parts, so that may explain my ignorance of those problems.
Piano parts arrive by default with "Hide Normally" deselecte
Yes, but it gets complicated when you have a piece with horn in D and horn in E
and horn in F, and their bass clef counterparts, like so many 19th century
pieces.
If MakeMusic can preload the Vuvuzela in the instrument list, they should
certainly include standard horn and trumpet transpositions
Yes, the procedure I outlined is to do just that. It isn't preloaded, but it
isn't all that difficult. Make this change in your default document and you
shouldn't have to do it again.
Actually, I haven't checked to see if it saves to my default doc. But I'm
hoping it will work!
Christopher
O
On 4/18/2012 12:03 AM, SN jef chippewa wrote:
>
> carl, i am about to upgrade a few things, including finale, and
> wonder if you could tell me what you found so disastrous moving from
> 2010 to 2012 (which is what i would be doing soon).
For one thing, I could not upgrade on-line. I simply would
The issue is changing to an instrument that isn't already preloaded. For
example, Horn in D, Horn in E, etc.
On Apr 18, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Christopher Smith
wrote:
>
> On Wed Apr 18, at WednesdayApr 18 2:19 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
>
>> I am sure Carl can speak for himself, but my recolle
On Wed Apr 18, at WednesdayApr 18 2:19 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> I am sure Carl can speak for himself, but my recollection was that it was
> the transposition problem. If you are entering big 19th scores in Finale,
> 2012 is a non-starter because of this problem, esp. if an earlier version
>
Bonjour Raglan. Raglan is the name of a village which is en route to
Sydney, from Bathurst, where I live.
Wondering if you have ever transcribed The London Derrière?
And, slightly on topic, we used FinWin 2004b for many years, but upgraded
to FinWin2011 and enjoy its comparative simplicity, thoug
On Apr 16, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
> Does Finale have a Facebook page for discussion?
I have one but it was little used. If a shift to it was desired I would bring
it up to date and be an active moderator There a couple others besides mine, I
think.It was migrated by Fac
At 11:35 AM -0400 18/4/12, bill sinclair wrote:
>How can I make them go through?
I'd get rid of AOL tout de suite :-!
raglan
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
At 12:36 PM -0400 4/18/12, bill sinclair wrote:
>They have a really awkward feature that I wish would be fixed - - -
>
>When you request a key signature, it makes a distinction between a
>major key and a minor key with the exact same pattern of sharps and
>flats. For example, they call C minor a DI
Goood! +1
bien vu!
I think , you had the last word !
Le 18/04/2012 21:18, rglan a écrit :
> 18/04/2012 20:11, raglan a écrit :
>> "It's rarely used in France these days,
>> has gone out of fashion,"
> At 8:51 PM +0200 18/4/12, Claude Guéganno wrote:
>> not in Brittany !
> Bretagne n'est pas la Fra
18/04/2012 20:11, raglan a écrit :
>"It's rarely used in France these days,
>has gone out of fashion,"
At 8:51 PM +0200 18/4/12, Claude Guéganno wrote:
>not in Brittany !
Bretagne n'est pas la France ;-)
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://l
"It's rarely used in France these days,
has gone out of fashion,"
not in Brittany !
http://www.andouille-guemene.com/cadre.htm
(the most famous in the world)
I like this "Andouille mailing list"
kenavo !
claude
Le 18/04/2012 20:11, rglan a écrit :
> At 12:26 PM -0400 18/4/12, écri
At 2:24 PM -0400 18/4/12, David H. Bailey wrote:
>Nope, I didn't take offense.
:-)
raglan
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
At 6:36 PM + 18/4/12, Williams, Jim wrote:
>French equivalent of Haggis, is it then?
A slightly paler version, I think Haggis is probably closer to the
Greek Kokoretsi
raglan
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/lis
French equivalent of Haggis, is it then?
Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.
On Apr 18, 2012, at 2:34 PM, "David H. Bailey"
wrote:
> On 4/18/2012 2:11 PM, rglan wrote:
>> At 12:26 PM -0400 18/4/12, écrit:
>>> a kind of sausage
>>
>> Oui, porc flesh mixed with chopped tripe a
On 4/18/2012 2:11 PM, rglan wrote:
> At 12:26 PM -0400 18/4/12, écrit:
>> a kind of sausage
>
> Oui, porc flesh mixed with chopped tripe and
> herbs and put inside the intestine :-)
> In the 12th c. this word also denoted the male
> sexe ;-) And I hope David H. Bailey didn't take
> offense; unlik
Right - as I posted just a minute ago. I understand the difference, I
was surprised to see that it was not happening as I remembered. What
I believe has changed is what the "default" setting is, at least
leading up to WinFin 2011.
Raymond Horton
Bass Trombonist, Louisville Orchestra
Minister of
Hmm, I think the default may have been different between major and
minor in older versions, but in my WinFin 2011, input in major vs.
minor did not make any difference - until, a couple of minutes ago, I
went to the Edit/Enharmonic Spelling menu and checked "Use Spelling
Tables." The "default" set
BTW: Fin2012 does have some linked parts improvements with respect to how
it works with plugins. For expressions, page titles, and (I believe) smart
shapes, if you edit them in part view it unlinks them from the score. This
makes using existing plugins more palatable as well as opening up
opportuni
At 12:35 PM -0500 18/4/12, Robert Patterson wrote:
>Upgrading files from 1988 will be a challenge.
:-( Merci beaucoup for all the pointers.
>This may require you to have an antique Macinstosh
Plenty of those lying around :-) I have a Macinstash ;-)
>2002 did a much better job than later version
I am sure Carl can speak for himself, but my recollection was that it was
the transposition problem. If you are entering big 19th scores in Finale,
2012 is a non-starter because of this problem, esp. if an earlier version
is available.
The transposition problem is that Fin2012 forces you to change
At 12:26 PM -0400 18/4/12, écrit:
>a kind of sausage
Oui, porc flesh mixed with chopped tripe and
herbs and put inside the intestine :-)
In the 12th c. this word also denoted the male
sexe ;-) And I hope David H. Bailey didn't take
offense; unlike most French people I tend to use
this word
yeah all features robert mentioned are of interest to me and seem to
make the upgrade worth doing, was curious why carl reverted to 2010,
what problems he (or anyone else) found when upgrading from 2010 (or
even 2011, which i don't have) to 2012.
i plan to completely rebuild my template and pr
You must not have had "Use Spelling Tables" turned on.
Try turning that on, and then enter a G melodic minor scale with a key
signature of Bb major, then with a key signature of G minor. You'll see that in
Bb, it's spelled with a Gb, and in G minor, it's spelled with an F#.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
Bill,
I, too, have had a confusing time with the major and minor transpositions, etc.
until I encountered an instructor whose rule of thumb is to ignore the minor
key signatures and work with the major as though they are simply numbers of
sharps or numbers of flats which seems to avoid the awkw
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Lawrence Yates wrote:
> Aren't the major and minor keys treated differently when it comes to using
> the spelling tables for accidentals?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lawrence
Not really, but you are close. I thought what your description is so,
myself, but I just tried a co
I was listing differences from 2010 to 2012.
Many people like score manager because it is a modeless window and allows
quicker access to the instrument list. I will get used to it I am sure.
You correctly translated patootie.
Upgrading files from 1988 will be a challenge. To get useuful results
It also impacts chord symbol entry, especially from a MIDI keyboard.
J D Thomas
ThomaStudios
On Apr 18, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> The choice of a major vs. minor key affects the default enharmonic spelling
> when entering notes using a MIDI keyboard.
>
> For example, in G mi
Ha ha! I just learned that word "andouille"! I saw an episode of "The Family
Guy" where two of the characters are competing for the attentions of the same
lady (one is a dog, but no matter), so they take her to a fancy French
restaurant called "l'espèce d'andouille". That sounded a little off to
The choice of a major vs. minor key affects the default enharmonic spelling
when entering notes using a MIDI keyboard.
For example, in G minor, you'd generally want F#'s, whereas in Bb major, you'd
generally want Gb's.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On 18 Apr 201
Aren't the major and minor keys treated differently when it comes to using
the spelling tables for accidentals?
Cheers,
Lawrence
On 18 April 2012 17:36, bill sinclair wrote:
> They have a really awkward feature that I wish would be fixed - - -
>
> When you request a key signature, it makes a d
At 11:13 AM -0500 18/4/12, Robert Patterson wrote:
>the main differences you will notice are
Merci for the très compréhensif answer. Are all
these things you mention new to 2012 or did they
appear earlier?
I am not familiar with the Score Manager, is there anything good about it?
> the curren
They have a really awkward feature that I wish would be fixed - - -
When you request a key signature, it makes a distinction between a
major key and a minor key with the exact same pattern of sharps and
flats. For example, they call C minor a DIFFERENT key signature than E
flat major.
Why even gi
I can't speak to the specifics of Fin11, having barely used it. But if you
are already on Fin10, the main differences you will notice are
1. Score Manager. This could possibly be a step forward, but if you need to
have transpositions separate from instruments or if you need to upgrade
pre-Fin12 fi
At 11:30 AM -0400 18/4/12, David H. Bailey wrote:
>It comes in between 2010 and 2012.
Lol :-D I know that andouille ;-)
>Are you asking whether it's better
>than 2010 and/or worse/better than 2012?
Oui, yes, and how does it/they compare to other versions too in terms
of stability and lack of an
Up until recently, my AOL text messages went through OK.
Now I get "Ignoring non-mime" or it doesn't think they are straight text any
more.
It doesn't like "=20"
How can I make them go through?
bill sinclair
billsi...@aol.com
___
Finale mailing l
On 4/18/2012 10:39 AM, rglan wrote:
> At 4:20 PM +0200 18/4/12, Jari Williamsson wrote:
>> I would suggest to wait until 2012B
>
> How does 2011 figure in all this?
>
It comes in between 2010 and 2012. Are you asking whether it's better
than 2010 and/or worse/better than 2012?
--
David H. Bai
At 4:20 PM +0200 18/4/12, Jari Williamsson wrote:
>I would suggest to wait until 2012B
How does 2011 figure in all this?
raglan
ps. sorry if I'm throwing a spanner in the works
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listi
On 2012-04-18 09:03, SN jef chippewa wrote:
> carl, i am about to upgrade a few things, including finale, and
> wonder if you could tell me what you found so disastrous moving from
> 2010 to 2012 (which is what i would be doing soon).
If you're unsure, I would suggest to wait until 2012B. There m
Hi, Jef - I made the same upgrade from 2010 to 2012 without any problems. I
was on WinXP at the time, then migrated to a new box with Win7. The updater
caused no problems. I mostly do horn charts & transcriptions - no lyrics.
Giz
|-Original Message-
|From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:
carl, i am about to upgrade a few things, including finale, and
wonder if you could tell me what you found so disastrous moving from
2010 to 2012 (which is what i would be doing soon).
At 17:59 -0700 4/16/12, dershem wrote:
>I still get some good stuff from the list, even though I went back
>t
50 matches
Mail list logo
