Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.9.13 schedule

2002-06-09 Thread Justin Hallett
Dave, it's in the patch tracker ATM, it was based on a discussion on the channel like a few weeks ago. I believe I submitted lftp with the new changelog field. for testing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Justin, I've never heard of this. What are you talking about? ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
I'm trying to build autogen now, and it looks pretty easy. By the way, are you aware that sourceforge has two Mac OS X boxes in their compile farm? :-) -- Dave ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference Au

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Ben Hines
To answer your original question, the libtool patch in question has apparently already been incorporated into libtool CVS. It is darwin-specific (if you look at what you are patching :) it is in a darwin-only section) so it definitely doesn't cause any problems. :) -Ben -- http://homepage.mac

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Bruce Korb
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > Viz., did you try to build it? > > Not game :-). Building stuff on OSX can involve a bit of pain and > I'm only willing to go through that for my own software :-). My problem is similar: I don't want to spend my own money buying OS/X to make products for Apple to

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Sun, 09 Jun 2002 16:38:08 -0700 Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > > I applied the patch to this: > > > > > > http://autogen.sf.net/data/autogen-5.3.8pre5.tar.gz > > > > Great program! It would be nice to have that on OS X. > > Thank you. Do we have

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.9.13 schedule

2002-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Justin, I've never heard of this. What are you talking about? -- Dave ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Bruce Korb
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > I applied the patch to this: > > > > http://autogen.sf.net/data/autogen-5.3.8pre5.tar.gz > > Great program! It would be nice to have that on OS X. Thank you. Do we have it yet? :-) Viz., did you try to build it? My G4 came with OS/9 and I threw it away for N

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.9.13 schedule

2002-06-09 Thread Justin Hallett
I thought the reason of adding assist in development for developers was kinda understood. There is no real impact for the end user, except maybe curiosity, but I know i use it all the time and it would be nice if i didn't have to keep adding it to fink after every inject.pl I run. And I'd like t

[Fink-devel] gcc3 and install_name

2002-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
All of you kind folks who are testing gcc3 and bash for fink compiles, or who have been seeded, should please update your fink installation to the latest pre-release version. I have updated fink's ltconfig file using Ben Hines' install_name patch, and this will immediately fix a number of fink pa

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.9.13 schedule

2002-06-09 Thread Max Horn
At 16:26 Uhr -0600 09.06.2002, Justin Hallett wrote: >I vote for adding the dev tool, devinfo. "Vote" ? Please read what I wrote again :-) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>If there is anyhting else you think that should be in this release, >>please say so, and clearly state why you think that this f

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.9.13 schedule

2002-06-09 Thread Justin Hallett
I vote for adding the dev tool, devinfo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >If there is anyhting else you think that should be in this release, >please say so, and clearly state why you think that this feature >should be in this particular release, and can't wait for a later date. ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Hi Bruce, On Sun, 09 Jun 2002 12:31:48 -0700 Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've recently heard about this "Dave" patch that is supposed > to make convenience libraries work on OS/X 10.1 & later. Worked for me on libsndfile. > Does this cause any known problems on other p

[Fink-devel] Perlmod descriptions

2002-06-09 Thread Max Horn
I think we should think about unifying the description of our perlmods. To give you an excerpt, these are all description fields of perlmods: Perl module for manipulating MIME data Database interface package File database module Perl mod for unicode strings Perl ext that adds new style to XML::

[Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi, I've recently heard about this "Dave" patch that is supposed to make convenience libraries work on OS/X 10.1 & later. Does this cause any known problems on other platforms? I read the patch, but picking apart "archive_cmds" was too obtuse for the time I had available. :-( I applied the p

Re: [Fink-devel] Hiding splitoffs in PDB ?

2002-06-09 Thread Max Horn
At 13:17 Uhr -0400 09.06.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >Sounds like a good idea to me. Done. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890

Re: [Fink-devel] mozilla crypto-only now?

2002-06-09 Thread Masanori Sekino
I'm intending to do so. There's no technical problem to have both crypto and non-crypto packages, but maintaining two mozilla packages costs very high for me and I believe there's no one who wants mozilla without ssl or S/MIME support. Regards, On 2002.06.06, at 03:19, Benjamin Reed wrote:

Re: [Fink-devel] Hiding splitoffs in PDB ?

2002-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Sounds like a good idea to me. -- Dave ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink

[Fink-devel] Bug in System Preferences is not a bug!!!

2002-06-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
Look at this PDF: http://www.apple.com/macosx/server/pdf/UnderstandingUsingNetInfo.pdf Page 38, To quote: • The maximum UID is 2,147,483,647 • UIDs below 100 are reserved for system use • Users created in the Users pane of System Preferences are automatically assigned UIDs starting wih 500.

[Fink-devel] Hiding splitoffs in PDB ?

2002-06-09 Thread Max Horn
What do you think, should I modify the PDB code so that splitoffs are not shown in the PDB ? I don't think it's very useful for anybody to list them there (though I will happily listen to reasons why it's useful after all). OTOH it makes it in my eyes somewhat harder to navigate the PDB, e.g.

Re: [Fink-devel] problem upgrading system-xfree86 + libgl

2002-06-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
Max Horn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > >No, it is not. I was under the impression a Conflicts:/Replaces: should > >automatically force removal of the old package... Max, how do we make it > >get replaced properly, then? Are we going to have to end up with a > >Provides: system-libgl to make it r

[Fink-devel] fink 0.9.13 schedule

2002-06-09 Thread Max Horn
I'd like to make a new release of the package manager soon, considering that quite some changes, bug fixes, new features have accumulated. IMHO the following things should be finished first: * finish the "fink cleanup" command, for which I checked in a first, incomplete version today * decide

Re: [Fink-devel] problem upgrading system-xfree86 + libgl

2002-06-09 Thread Max Horn
At 8:52 Uhr -0400 09.06.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: >Ben Hines [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: >> At 3:18 AM +0200 6/9/02, Max Horn wrote: >> >Replaces works just fine, you just misunderstood what it does. If >> >Pkg A "Replace: B", that s does *not* mean that the pkg A is a >> >successor of pkg B.

Re: [Fink-devel] problem upgrading system-xfree86 + libgl

2002-06-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
Ben Hines [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > At 3:18 AM +0200 6/9/02, Max Horn wrote: > >Replaces works just fine, you just misunderstood what it does. If > >Pkg A "Replace: B", that s does *not* mean that the pkg A is a > >successor of pkg B. it merely means that A and B have some files in > >common

Re: [Fink-devel] Update lesstif-dependent pkgs please

2002-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Everyone please note that the change which Ben has requested will require a bump in revision number, in order to force users to update to the new version. (He needs this so that he can put openmotif into fink.) -- Dave ___ Don't mis

Re: [Fink-devel] Update lesstif-dependent pkgs please

2002-06-09 Thread Damian Steer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > All lesstif-dependent packages need to be updated to look like: > > BuildDepends: lesstif > Depends: lesstif-shlibs > > > > The ones that need to be fixed are: > > > Maintainer: Damian Steer <[EMAIL PROT

[Fink-devel] kdebindings3-3.0.1-2 failed

2002-06-09 Thread Ben Hines
This looks ominously like the relinking bug, but it is not relinking. This is with the April dev tools, GCC2. (not 3) (cd .libs && rm -f libkdec.la && ln -s ../libkdec.la libkdec.la) /sw/src/kdebindings3-3.0.1-2/kdebindings-3.0.1/kdec/clib/kdec/.libs source='main.cpp' object='main.o' libtool=no