Re: [Fink-devel] buildconflicts, buildlock

Actually, Justin, buildconflicts *had* been working recently. But as Martin points out, the buildlock system has now broken it. -- Dave --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Produc

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Package.pm,1.93,1.94 ChangeLog,1.881,1.882

Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv29536 > > Modified Files: > Package.pm ChangeLog > Log Message: > perl-5.6 compatibiility fix for open() syntax. > I'm thinking of back-porting this

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Validation change

I like this idea. -- Dave > To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > From: "Daniel E. Macks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Fink-devel] Re: Validation change > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:42:51 + (UTC) > > How about having 'fink validate' by default always display all > warnings (regardless o

Re: [Fink-devel] sdl

> From: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Fink-devel] sdl > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:23:29 -0800 > > I moved sdl from 10.3/unstable/main into my local directory, to get > 1.2.8 over 1.2.7 but when I install this I get: > > /sw/build/sdl-1.2.8-1/SDL-1

Re: [Fink-devel] Volunteering to maintain some of the orphaned fink packages

> From: "Bradshaw, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'" > Subject: [Fink-devel] Volunteering to maintain some of the orphaned fink > packages > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:53:39 -0600 > > Hello, > > I'd be interested in picking up a handful of packages that lack

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS Unstable Access Request

Ashley Yakeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone give me access to the unstable part of the > tree? You now have CVS access. -- Dave --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of

Re: [Fink-devel] Pybliographer

Sorry to be so slow to respond here: I've only just begun to track down what's happening. When I compile this, I have no problem because the python setup script does not find a value for DISPLAY in the environment, and so reports "cannot test gtk [no DISPLAY]". My first guess was that this

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

> From: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 02:46:42 -0800 > > Ok, now I have a new error. I installed a fresh copy of XDarwin, > figuring that it was something I did to that directory, now the package > build

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

On Feb 19, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Michael wrote: [snip] Then before that, I get: /.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libintl.dylib -install_name /sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib -compatibility_version 601 -current_version 601.2 ld: warning -dylib_install_name /sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib not fo

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

I've added these to the 10.2-gcc3.3/unstable tree, except for libxml2 and gdbm3, which were already at the versions you requested. -- Dave On Feb 19, 2005, at 1:58 PM, Michael wrote: David R. Morrison wrote: Mike, If you will post a list of the precise packages (with version and rev

[Fink-devel] policy question

Folks, Here's a policy question. The libjpeg package, like many packages, uses a number of header files during compilation which are considered "internal," and only installs the "external" ones at install time. The external header files end up in the libjpeg package, but the internal ones don't.

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

Mike, If you will post a list of the precise packages (with version and revision number) which you have "brought over" from 10.3 and tested under 10.2-gcc3.3, I will add them to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. The main issue here is that most maintainers are only keeping up with the 10.3 tree now, and prob

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 2.6.2

Dear Mike, I think its great that you're interested in getting more modern versions of the gnome packages working on 10.2. Most of the fink developers are now working on 10.3 or beyond, but I'm hoping you'll get some help from the readers of this list in your quest. Yours, Dave On Feb 16,

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl variants -- problem and proposed solution

Hi Chris. You've raised an important issue which I've been meaning to address. There are a couple of different philosophies about the choice of perl Types, and I think we need to discuss this and settle on a common policy. Let me break this into two questions: what Types should be used, and shoul

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci singular.info,NONE,1.1

> From: "Daniel Henninger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Martin Costabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci > singular.info,NONE,1.1 > Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:11:35 -0500 (EST) > > > Also

Re: [Fink-devel] Querying user from package scripts

> Also, would such a package (freeware without source code and with > restrictions on redistribution) be allowed in Fink? Our general policy has been not to allow this -- we insist on source code which can be compiled by the user (even when there are redistribution restrictions). If this softwa

Re: [Fink-devel] what's up with perl modules

No, you should make a fink package called date-calc-pm. If you look in libs/perlmods/ you will see lots of these that you can follow as examples. -- Dave On Jan 19, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Manuel Hendel wrote: Shell I just add a line to the description which says that you have to install Date::Cal

Re: [Fink-devel] need some help with packaging

One more thing: you are required to document the license arrangement in the directory %p/share/doc/%n . This could be as simple as mkdir -p %p/share/doc/%n cp COPYING %p/share/doc/%n (assuming that the standard GPL COPYING file is included in your package). -- Dave --

Re: [Fink-devel] Recent changes to packages (involving gcc 3.3)

On Jan 9, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Dear David, Le 9 janv. 2005, à 18:27, David R. Morrison a écrit : I can't explain why certain packages aren't compiling with a post gcc-3.3 compiler and other ones are. I'm only adding the flags when my beta testing reveals a pro

Re: [Fink-devel] Recent changes to packages (involving gcc 3.3)

Dear Michele, I can't explain why certain packages aren't compiling with a post gcc-3.3 compiler and other ones are. I'm only adding the flags when my beta testing reveals a problem. However, unlike the situation between gcc 3.1 and gcc 3.3, there is NO binary compatibility issue between gcc 3.3

[Fink-devel] Recent changes to packages (involving gcc 3.3)

Dear Fink developers, Several of you have noticed the recent changes which I've made to a number of packages. Most of these changes ensure that the package in question compiles using the gcc 3.3 compiler. (The changes involve adding gcc3.3 to BuildDepends, and then either modifying the CompileSc

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci ncl.info,1.3,1.4

Jeff, this seems to be missing a patch file (ncl.patch). -- Dave --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp:/

Re: [Fink-devel] Specifying a version-specific folder name in .info files

Presumably you are trying to build postgis using the postgresql74 source tree as well as the postgis tree. Unfortunately, after postgresql74 was built, its source tree was erased (unless the user took special action to prevent this). So what you'll need to do is to have Version: 0.9.1 Source: pa

Re: [Fink-devel] hx package

Thanks, Koen, well-spotted. I believe that the package was Restrictive because of some patent issue or something... we'll have to check it out. -- Dave On Dec 31, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Dec 31, 2004, at 2:02 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Well, it shouldn't be

Re: [Fink-devel] hx package

Well, it shouldn't be! (Unless the label of "Restrictive" is incorrect...) -- Dave On Dec 31, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: David R. Morrison wrote: We have a package called "hx". It is a restrictive package, so we don't store the sourc

[Fink-devel] hx package

We have a package called "hx". It is a restrictive package, so we don't store the source at distfiles. It no longer has a maintainer, the URL for the source does not resolve, and the URL for the homepage does not resolve. Unless someone has an idea for resurrecting this package, I plan to remove

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Bootstrap.pm,1.70,1.71 PkgVersion.pm,1.331,1.332 Services.pm,1.129,1.130

Thanks for catching this, Martin. Fixed now. -- Dave --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start readin

Re: [Fink-devel] octave question

On Dec 15, 2004, at 6:30 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Dec 15, 2004, at 12:47 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, The current version of octave installs a bunch of files in directories that are called powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 This makes it OS X version dependent, and thu

Re: [Fink-devel] Two issues about "UseBinaryDist"

- --source-run or --binary-off , just because I HATE typing long command line switches. Well, I'm hoping for a one-letter shortcut, whatever we choose. -- Dave --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews

Re: [Fink-devel] Mac OS X Server, Fink, and maybe perl.

Josh, To the best of my knowledge, none of the core fink developers are running OS X Server. We need your advice about changes or modifications that might be needed to help fink work better in that environment. -- Dave On Dec 16, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Josh wrote: I'm sending this to both the devel

[Fink-devel] Two issues about "UseBinaryDist"

1. I've made a modification to the new UseBinaryDist stuff, introducing a flag "--compile-from-source" in addition to the flag "--use-binary-dist". My new flag will disable the use of the binary distribution for that run only. There have been some objections about the name of my new flag. Some

[Fink-devel] GCC field

We introduced that GCC field into fink some time back due to the ABI incompatibilities between different versions of gcc, when the code in question was C++ code. The GCC field provided a mechanism for fink developers to track which packages had compiled code which was restricted to a particula

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.771,1.772 Config.pm,1.36,1.37

Actually, it would be better to change the manpage. Verbosity=1 is a much better default for users other than package maintainers (which is why this change was made a while back). -- Dave On Dec 7, 2004, at 10:20 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink In directory

Re: [Fink-devel] (potentially stupid) Policy Question

On Dec 6, 2004, at 5:25 PM, Corey Halpin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm about to package monotone-viz, a tool that draws ancestry graphs of a monotone repository. (http://oandrieu.nerim.net/monotone-viz/ ) monotone-viz itself contains no crypto code. however, it dep

Re: [Fink-devel] A Variants Question

On Dec 4, 2004, at 11:46 PM, Corey Halpin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Using the variants system, is there a succinct way to say "This package conflicts with all other variants of this package?" I'd like to be able to say that, but I can't find in the packaging manual ho

dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics gd209-2.0.9-13.info,1.2,NONE gd209-2.0.9-13.patch,1.1,NONE

Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv27728 Removed Files: gd209-2.0.9-13.info gd209-2.0.9-13.patch Log Message: retiring this package, with thanks for a job well-done --- gd209-2.0.9-13.patch DELETED ---

dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics gd209.info,1.1,NONE gd209.patch,1.1,NONE

Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv27584 Removed Files: gd209.info gd209.patch Log Message: retiring this package, with thanks for a job well-done --- gd209.patch DELETED --- --- gd209.info DELETED --

dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics libpng3.info,1.10,1.11

Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv24830 Modified Files: libpng3.info Log Message: new upstream version Index: libpng3.info === RCS file:

dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics libpng3.info,1.7,1.8

Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv24744 Modified Files: libpng3.info Log Message: new upstream version Index: libpng3.info === RC

Re: [Fink-devel] Question about a licence classification

BSD-type licenses generally don't identify themselves as "BSD." The MIT X-license also counts as a BSD-type license, for example. -- Dave On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:57 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 22 Nov 2004, at 2:03, Benjamin Reed wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Redistribution and use in source and binary

Re: [Fink-devel] Question about a licence classification

BSD. On Nov 22, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: OK, thanks for the clarification. What do you suggest I list it as in the package description? Thanks! On 23 Nov 2004, at 13:35, David R. Morrison wrote: BSD-type licenses generally don't identify themselves as "BSD." The MIT

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink removed /etc

On Nov 16, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Andrea Riciputi wrote: Uhm... I see, so I'm supposed to have been very very lucky... Anyway, could you explain this a little further? You say "according to its database", but which database? Do you mean the .deb file or dpkg keeps track of all the files it has instal

[Fink-devel] Re: startperl with perl584

On Nov 9, 2004, at 3:18 AM, Ben Hines wrote: perl5.8.4-core does not install /sw/bin/perl, but its Config.pm has: startperl='#!/sw/bin/perl'. This messes up my help2man package. I tell it PERL is /sw/bin/perl5.8.4 but then it asks for $Config{startperl} and perl says /sw/bin/perl. So it no work.

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Proposed new policy on essential dependencies

On Nov 3, 2004, at 5:58 AM, D. Höhn wrote: I think that this is the way to go. However, to handle this gracefully and to make sure that the users are notified of what is going on I would like to porpose the following steps. a) Notify the common user base that we are planning to make significant t

[Fink-devel] Proposed new policy on essential dependencies

Dear Fink developers, In the course of working to update several of fink's "essential" packages, some of us have come to realize that we need a policy change: we need packages to explicitly declare their dependencies on essential packages. The contrary policy -- that packages should *not* decla

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome gnucash-1.8.9-14.info,NONE,1.1 gnucash-1.8.9-14.patch,NONE,1.1 gnucash.info,1.12,1.13

On Oct 20, 2004, at 9:28 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv28500/unstable/main/finkinfo/ gnome Modified Files: gnucash.info Added Files: gnucash-1.8.9-14.info gnucash-1.8.9-14.patch

Re: [Fink-devel] fink update failed dependency

On Oct 18, 2004, at 6:38 PM, Richard Rudolph wrote: fink info gcc3.1 fails with an error message stating it can't find the package for the specification gcc3.1 I'm on the current version of OS X. I thought this version of OS X upgraded GCC to a newer version. To resolve this dependency, do I hav

[Fink-devel] Re: Failure to include 'hostlogo.inc' on fink website

On Oct 13, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote: Hi Since a couple of days i often get the following warning on : Warning: Failed opening 'hostlogo.inc' for inclusion (include_path='') in /home/groups/f/fi/fink/htdocs/header.inc on l

[Fink-devel] warning users about broken g++-3.3

As we all know, g++-3.3 in XCode 1.5 is broken. I had expected a fix by now, but since it hasn't shown up, I believe we should warn users about this while they are running fink itself. I propose adding a check for the bad build, checking only the file /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.3/cc1plus wh

Re: [Fink-devel] License question

On Sep 24, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, I'm packing a small utility for checking symlinks. The only information concerning copyright is '(c) Mark Lord, freely distributable'. I'm not sure on which license type this maps best. I think I would put "OSI approved" (which really means: m

Re: [Fink-devel] A question about variants

On Sep 22, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I'm trying to update some of my packages to use variants, and one of these is pygtk. As it exists now, there is a -py22 version and a -py23 version, for the respective versions of Python. There's also a placeholder pygtk package that

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods uri-pm.info,1.5,1.6 uri-pm560.info,1.1,NONE uri-pm580.info,1.1,NONE uri-pm581.info,1.5,NONE

Please be sure to validate before you commit. This one gives an ERROR, due to missing Info2 declaration. (I'll fix it.) -- Dave On Sep 18, 2004, at 5:43 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/text texshop.info,NONE,1.1

On Sep 19, 2004, at 5:57 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Lars Rosengreen wrote: Maybe I'm missing the obvious, but shouldn't this depend on tetex-base or something similar? I don't think so. Neither for building nor for running does it need any TeX package. It should probably have "Recommends" or "Sug

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods test-simple-pm.info,NONE,1.1

On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:48 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv26193 Added Files: test-simple-pm.info Log Message: thesin said it was OK ;) --- NEW FILE: test-simple-pm.info --- Inf

Re: [Fink-devel] Abandoned cyrus-sasl2?

On Sep 9, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: It appears that the cyrus-sasl2 maintainer has been missing for some time. Yes, indeed. I want an updated version because I'm building a Postfix package that uses it, and was wondering if it would be OK to take it over. I have an updated package

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ettercap?

On Sep 7, 2004, at 3:49 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: I didn't see any reply on this... no comment? "Randal" == Randal L Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Randal> The most recent ettercap seems to be broken. Is it just me? Randal> Trying even the first example of the manpage: Randal> localh

Re: [Fink-devel] Using the built-in openssl

, 2004, at 4:53 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Dear Fink developers, A few of us were discussing the possibility of switching a number of fink packages from the fink-provided openssl to the built-in openssl. This would allow us to include ssl functionality even in the non-crypto tree, and could cut

[Fink-devel] Using the built-in openssl

Dear Fink developers, A few of us were discussing the possibility of switching a number of fink packages from the fink-provided openssl to the built-in openssl. This would allow us to include ssl functionality even in the non-crypto tree, and could cut down on potential errors from mixing and m

Re: [Fink-devel] Safari crashes on fink secure login?

On Sep 2, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Max Horn wrote: Am 30.08.2004 um 20:04 schrieb David R. Morrison: On Aug 29, 2004, at 12:59 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Aug 29, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: I wanted to check that I'm not the only one seeing this. Under MacOS X 10.3.5, I find that S

Re: [Fink-devel] Safari crashes on fink secure login?

On Aug 29, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: I wanted to check that I'm not the only one seeing this. Under MacOS X 10.3.5, I find that Safari crashes whenever I try to login to the secure web pages. For example if I click on the hyperlink for "Request a feature that's not in fink (the progr

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics mpeg2vidcodec.info,NONE,1.1

On Aug 27, 2004, at 7:16 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv20027 Added Files: mpeg2vidcodec.info Log Message: Add the mpeg2vidcodec package which contains the mpeg2encode and mpeg2d

[Fink-devel] Re: libpng-1.2.6 is buggy

On Aug 27, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: It appears to screw up colors on some types of PNG images. Before (libpng-1.2.5-4): http://ranger.befunk.com/misc/libpng-1.2.5-4.jpg After (libpng-1.2.6-6): http://ranger.befunk.com/misc/libpng-1.2.6-6.jpg Can I get you to report this directly t

Re: [Fink-devel] fink gcc?

On Aug 26, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: [snip] This is not a discussion about philosophy or policy, but about how to deal with buggy software. Absolutely correct. Thanks for the detailed response. 3. The recent versions of gcc seem to be sufficiently binary compatible so that you can

[Fink-devel] fink gcc?

The troubles with g++ under XCode 1.5 and the lack of any quick response from Apple, combined with earlier incidents of an analogous nature, lead me to ask: would we be better off with a fink gcc package in place of the Developer Tools? As I understand it, the Apple compiler team has been good

Re: [Fink-devel] fink and conditional provides

On Aug 24, 2004, at 10:14 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Daniel, You might want to take a look at how fink currently handles Provides. As I mentioned before, I had to create a new revision of fftw (2.1.5-6) because the addition of "Provides: fftw" to both the fftw and fftw-mpi as well as "Provides:

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl | openssl097

On Aug 23, 2004, at 6:21 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: I see several packages have constructs like: Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev I apologize; I completely misread this message the first

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl | openssl097

On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: I see several packages have constructs like: Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev This is not correct--if, for example, one has openssl097-dev installed at build-time, then one *must* have openss

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Unstable Octave compile fails

(B (BOn Aug 21, 2004, at 7:08 PM, jfm wrote: (B (B (B(B (BOn Aug 21, 2004, at 9:35 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: (B (B (BMartin Costabel wrote: (B (B (B$B%]!<%k(b (B$B%U%)%s%9(B (Bwrote: (B (B[] (B (Bld: Undefined symbols: (B (BArray::transpose() const (B (B[] (B (BFailed

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDepends question

On Aug 21, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev, because it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those packages are marked Buil

[Fink-devel] Re: Error in fink-0.22.0

On Aug 21, 2004, at 12:15 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: and then from within the fink-0.22.1 directory, run the command ./inject.pl Sorry, typo, this should just be ./inject.pl --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on

[Fink-devel] Error in fink-0.22.0

The fink-0.22.0 package manager, which was available briefly in the unstable tree this past week, had a bug which prevents further updating via rsync. If you installed this version of fink, you can recover by running the command fink install fink-0.21.2-1 which will downgrade fink to the ver

Re: [Fink-devel] Rsync not being updated

On Aug 19, 2004, at 8:12 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:55:02AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Yes, I think it is a bug in the new fink. In SelfUpdate.pm, the line next unless ($tree =~ /stable/); was changed to next unless ($tree eq "stable" or $tree e

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods wakeonlan-pm.info,1.2,1.3

7;t be -pm.. should keep the one in the other dir which was not -pm. (belongs in 'net', not libs/perlmods) -Ben On Aug 18, 2004, at 7:29 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs

Re: [Fink-devel] fink and 10.4

On Aug 17, 2004, at 8:14 PM, Yarden Livnat wrote: Hi, Is there a place were we can talk about issues with fink and 10.4 ? I have one particular package which behave strangely and I'm kind of at lost. I don't think it's a fink issue though. Thanks, Yarden Sorry, we don't have a place to talk abo

Re: [Fink-devel] gperf to 10.3/stable?

On Aug 14, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: Does anyone have any objections to moving gperf to 10.3/stable? I have been using version 2.7.2-12 for a while to build iverilog packages, and it doesn't have any dependencies that would prevent it from building in a stable-only setup. Moved to s

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci roofitcore.info,1.3,1.4 roofitcore.patch,1.1,1.2 roofitmodels.info,1.3,1.4 roofitmodels.patch,1.1,1.2

On Aug 13, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv9005 Modified Files: roofitcore.info roofitcore.patch roofitmodels.info roofitmodels.patch Log Message: Promote to stabl

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.687,1.688 PkgVersion.pm,1.290,1.291

On Aug 9, 2004, at 2:45 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv29963 Modified Files: ChangeLog PkgVersion.pm Log Message: Disable caching for get_env if in bootstrapping mode. With this change, bootstrapping is

[Fink-devel] Re: base-files ChangeLog,1.28,1.29 init.csh.in,1.11,1.12 init.sh.in,1.12,1.13

On Aug 9, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/base-files In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv26056 Modified Files: ChangeLog init.csh.in init.sh.in Log Message: Include "." (default when unset) when explicitly setting CLASSPATH (Bugs #1005793) Should I

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink PkgVersion.pm,1.289,1.290 Engine.pm,1.189,1.190 ChangeLog,1.685,1.686

On Aug 9, 2004, at 12:15 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: [snip] So we could either have enable_bootstrap() and disable_bootstrap() clear the cache, or have get_env() only cache if the _bootstrap flag is not set. Either one sounds good to me: why don't you do it in the way you think would be easiest to re

[Fink-devel] bindist plans

I plan to start building the 0.7.1 bindist in about one week. If you have packages which should be moved to stable before the bindist, please move them this week. Thanks, Dave --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed t

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink PkgVersion.pm,1.289,1.290 Engine.pm,1.189,1.190 ChangeLog,1.685,1.686

On Aug 9, 2004, at 12:14 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv16066 Modified Files: PkgVersion.pm Engine.pm ChangeLog Log Message: Recompute %c value every time get_*script() is called. Rename PkgVersion::par

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext in bootstrap from cvs

Thanks, John. I have reproduced the bug and am trying to figure out which change in Fink's code is responsible for it. In the meantime, if you want an up-to-the-minute fink installation, you can download and unpack any recent fink tarball, run "./bootstrap.sh" from within in, and after the

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci ccp4.info,NONE,1.1 ccp4.patch,NONE,1.1

This fails validation: Validating package file ccp4.info... Warning: Field "patchscript" appears to contain %p/src. (ccp4.info) Warning: Field "installscript" appears to contain %p/src. (ccp4.info) Warning: Patch file appears to contain a hardcoded /sw. (ccp4.patch) On Aug 7, 2004, at 10:39 PM, Wil

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/base fink.info,1.10,1.11

On Aug 7, 2004, at 10:13 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: David R. Morrison wrote: [snip] CustomMirror: << - Primary: http://telia.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ +Primary: http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/ David, Is this the wrong URL? I was able to download the new Fink release fro

[Fink-devel] Re: libpng 1.2.5 has security issues

On Aug 4, 2004, at 5:05 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: Hi David, I just got an email warning for our RedHat Enterprise Linux 3 subscriptions that there's a security issue for libpng 1.2.5. Sure enough, there's a note at http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng.html Regards, Blair Thanks. We have the new v

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: web/xml postprocess.pl,1.8,1.9 finkdoc-website.i18n.xsl,1.16,1.17

Thanks a lot! -- Dave On Aug 4, 2004, at 6:56 AM, BABA Yoshihiko wrote: The simplest (yet ugly) solution is probably like this: #for docs and faq $text =~ s|.*(¥n)*(|?>|g; $text =~ s|{FINK_([^}]*)}||g; # for news $text =~ s||';¥n¥ninclude_once "header.inc";¥n?>¥n¥n|s; $text =~ s||¥n¥n|s; See also

[Fink-devel] Re: web/xml postprocess.pl,1.8,1.9 finkdoc-website.i18n.xsl,1.16,1.17

Sorry, I should have edited that better. The problem is caused by the changes to postprocess.pl, not to finkdoc-website.i18n.xsl. -- Dave On Aug 2, 2004, at 10:34 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Baba, This change has broken compilation in the "news" directory. (I had to fix index.php

[Fink-devel] Re: web/xml postprocess.pl,1.8,1.9 finkdoc-website.i18n.xsl,1.16,1.17

Baba, This change has broken compilation in the "news" directory. (I had to fix index.php by hand to add back the header and footer lines.) I don't understand well enough what you were doing, to see how I should modify news.xml to cope with this change. -- Dave On Jul 10, 2004, at 8:34 AM, BAB

Re: [Fink-devel] naming of shlibs

On Jul 31, 2004, at 3:01 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I am confused about the naming of shlibs. The docs say to use oTool -L to make sure the numbering is up-to-date. I checked some base packages shlibs to see where the numbers go, and this is the output: koen$ oTool -L /sw/lib/libbz2.1.0.2

Re: [Fink-devel] pathsetup script

On Aug 1, 2004, at 8:51 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: OK, no news is good news, I guess :-) Martin Costabel wrote: [] Such a CLI version of pathsetup.sh is now in my exp directory. Please test. Dave has now put this version into the latest fink from cvs, so I hope it will get some testing automatica

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [PATCH] compress-zlib-pm to use system zlib.dylib

On Jul 29, 2004, at 8:24 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: [snip] Some questions to base this work off of: 1) I'm looking at dbi-pm*.info and wondering why there's a dbi-pm.info (with Info2 format) and the dbi-pm5??.info files. Isn't just one needed? 2) Why does this module have these lines, particularly

Re: [Fink-devel] Implied Perl dependency tree following or what am I missing?

On Jul 24, 2004, at 1:19 PM, jfm wrote: On Jul 24, 2004, at 7:04 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Please consult the packaging manual. It is no longer permitted to have a "placeholder" -pm package which depends on versioned packages. The only exception is storable-pm, because of the hist

Re: [Fink-devel] Implied Perl dependency tree following or what am I missing?

Hisashi T Fujinaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Benjamin Reed wrote: > > > David H. wrote: > > > >> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual > >> dependency. The candidates: > >> > >> (1) io-stringy-pm560: Perl module for advanced I/O with filehandles > >>

[Fink-devel] system-tetex

There have been a number of problems reported on the lists recently with system-tetex, having to do with a missing libkpathsea.a file. Apparently, some parts of teTeX in Gerben Weirda's distribution (including this file) have been moved into a separate "developer extras" installation in his sy

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/net liferea.info,1.1,1.2

On Jul 19, 2004, at 7:20 PM, rayg wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/net In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv15114 Modified Files: liferea.info Log Message: updated dependencies (added orbit2, libgtkhtml2) When you change the Depends line, yo

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink PkgVersion.pm,1.287,1.288 ChangeLog,1.670,1.671

On Jul 20, 2004, at 1:07 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv28793 Modified Files: PkgVersion.pm ChangeLog Log Message: Remove restriction on use of %a...causes too much disruption at this point. Dan, Maybe we cou

[Fink-devel] Please help test

Dear Fink developers, As many of you know, I've been working on a revision in the way that fink interacts with various external things (like our website, our cvs repository, and our apt-get repository), trying to make sure that it will be easy to change the location of those things when that becom

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink SelfUpdate.pm,1.67.4.6,1.67.4.7

Darian Lanx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > any specific reason why this is all upper case ? No. -- Dave --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic

Re: [Fink-devel] Updates to Fink di

Blair, Chris Zubrzycki, a.k.a. beren12, is not available online these days. (He will hopefully return after some months.) Please feel free to update his packages. -- Dave --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. A

[Fink-devel] plans for a 10.4 tree

Dear Fink developers, Peter O'Gorman and I attended WWDC, and have experimented with Fink on the WWDC preview distributed there. Although we cannot comment on any specifics, it appears that the impact of the transition to 10.4 on Fink will be less severe than the previous transitions. It is, how

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >