On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:24:55AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Hi,
Jack, I am sure that Jean-Francois was trying to be helpful, and was doing a
task that I basically asked him to do, as I did not feel that I had the time
for it. I do however understand your reaction, you have good reason
Actually it appears that my last round of packaging on...
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2992713group_id=17203atid=414256
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2994489group_id=17203atid=414256
works as intended and the info files are avialable when the main
gcc4X
Am 03.05.2010 um 02:27 schrieb Jack Howarth:
[...]
Max,
Okay. I read them out of order then. At first I was uncertain from the
message
in the gcc44-4.4.4-1000 entry, but coupled with the interest in maintainership
shown in the message in the gcc45-4.5.0-1000 and the impact of your
Max,
Considering that I was only accused of not notifying
other maintainers on commits rather than any error in
packaging, I find your demand that I go through a full
review process (satisfying all developers involved) to
be extremely high-handed. This weekend I wasted a complete
day on the
Max,
As to technical discussions, please review the
proposed refactoring of gcc4x...
-
One small additional comment, sorry ..
Going for such a structure, it helps a lot
(to speed up upgrading by users and other
pkgs) if the main pkg (the symlinks)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/3/10 8:02 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
...you exempted yourself from that process.
Max's header on his info files exists because of people changing his
packages *in fink CVS* without his permission, and without notification,
which is what you did to
Benjamin,
I don't object to a review process but simply an
endless one (where I am treated as novice packager
without the recourse of calling enough, commit
when the package meets the basic requirements).
Otherwise, I am held hostage to the whims of whichever
reviewer I pull and am really no
Jack,
this is ridiculous. First off, nobody holds you hostage to anything. And that
you call JF's well thought and politely formulated questions, suggestions and
objections whims is simply inflammatory and insulting. Let's try to scaled
down on the ad-hominem attacks, too, OK?
Discussion and
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:11:32PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
Jack,
this is ridiculous. First off, nobody holds you hostage to anything. And that
you call JF's well thought and politely formulated questions, suggestions and
objections whims is simply inflammatory and insulting. Let's try to
Can someone explain to me at what point did it
become acceptable behavior here to make random
package grabs when another developer has a
disagreement over packaging. After spending
literally months upstream submitting patches
and testresults to keep the FSF gcc 4.5 release
in decent shape on
Hi Jack,
could you please elaborate what went wrong here, which package exactly was
modified when by whom in which way that you take offense?
Thanks for the clarification,
Max
Am 03.05.2010 um 00:42 schrieb Jack Howarth:
Can someone explain to me at what point did it
become acceptable
Max,
How am I supported to interpret the sudden appearance
of...
Taking over
JF
in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2994489group_id=17203atid=414256
immediately after I make the wrong choice (in JF's eyes) of the two alernatives
for packaging the info files that Daniel Macks
Jack,
If you read the *previous* comment, which JF made, you will see that
he was talking about taking over as the fink committer who was
helping to evaluate your package. Taking over from Peter O'Gorman,
in fact, not from you.
-- Dave
On May 2, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 um 01:27 schrieb Jack Howarth:
Max,
How am I supported to interpret the sudden appearance
of...
Taking over
JF
in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2994489group_id=17203atid=414256
immediately after I make the wrong choice (in JF's eyes) of the two
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:34:51AM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 um 01:27 schrieb Jack Howarth:
Max,
How am I supported to interpret the sudden appearance
of...
Taking over
JF
in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2994489group_id=17203atid=414256
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 04:31:52PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
Jack,
If you read the *previous* comment, which JF made, you will see that he
was talking about taking over as the fink committer who was helping to
evaluate your package. Taking over from Peter O'Gorman, in fact, not
Hi,
Jack, I am sure that Jean-Francois was trying to be helpful, and was doing a
task that I basically asked him to do, as I did not feel that I had the time
for it. I do however understand your reaction, you have good reason to be wary,
but he was only taking over ownership of the ticket, not
17 matches
Mail list logo
