On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:11:32PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
> Jack,
>
> this is ridiculous. First off, nobody holds you hostage to anything. And that
> you call JF's well thought and politely formulated questions, suggestions and
> objections "whims" is simply inflammatory and insulting. Let's try
Jack,
this is ridiculous. First off, nobody holds you hostage to anything. And that
you call JF's well thought and politely formulated questions, suggestions and
objections "whims" is simply inflammatory and insulting. Let's try to scaled
down on the ad-hominem attacks, too, OK?
Discussion and
Benjamin,
I don't object to a review process but simply an
endless one (where I am treated as novice packager
without the recourse of calling "enough, commit"
when the package meets the basic requirements).
Otherwise, I am held hostage to the whims of whichever
reviewer I pull and am really no l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/3/10 8:02 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> ...you exempted yourself from that process.
Max's header on his info files exists because of people changing his
packages *in fink CVS* without his permission, and without notification,
which is what you did to
Max,
As to technical discussions, please review the
proposed refactoring of gcc4x...
-
One small additional comment, sorry ..
Going for such a structure, it helps a lot
(to speed up upgrading by users and other
pkgs) if the main pkg (the symlinks)
Max,
Considering that I was only accused of not notifying
other maintainers on commits rather than any error in
packaging, I find your demand that I go through a full
review process (satisfying all developers involved) to
be extremely high-handed. This weekend I wasted a complete
day on the foll
Am 03.05.2010 um 02:27 schrieb Jack Howarth:
[...]
> Max,
> Okay. I read them out of order then. At first I was uncertain from the
> message
> in the gcc44-4.4.4-1000 entry, but coupled with the interest in maintainership
> shown in the message in the gcc45-4.5.0-1000 and the impact of your te
Actually it appears that my last round of packaging on...
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2992713&group_id=17203&atid=414256
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2994489&group_id=17203&atid=414256
works as intended and the info files are avialable when the main
gcc
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:24:55AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jack, I am sure that Jean-Francois was trying to be helpful, and was doing a
> task that I basically asked him to do, as I did not feel that I had the time
> for it. I do however understand your reaction, you have good rea
Hi,
Jack, I am sure that Jean-Francois was trying to be helpful, and was doing a
task that I basically asked him to do, as I did not feel that I had the time
for it. I do however understand your reaction, you have good reason to be wary,
but he was only taking over ownership of the ticket, not
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 04:31:52PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Jack,
>
> If you read the *previous* comment, which JF made, you will see that he
> was talking about taking over as the fink committer who was helping to
> evaluate your package. Taking over from Peter O'Gorman, in fact, not
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:34:51AM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 03.05.2010 um 01:27 schrieb Jack Howarth:
>
> > Max,
> > How am I supported to interpret the sudden appearance
> > of...
> >
> > Taking over
> >
> > JF
> >
> > in
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2994489&gr
Am 03.05.2010 um 01:27 schrieb Jack Howarth:
> Max,
> How am I supported to interpret the sudden appearance
> of...
>
> Taking over
>
> JF
>
> in
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2994489&group_id=17203&atid=414256
> immediately after I make the wrong choice (in JF's eyes)
Jack,
If you read the *previous* comment, which JF made, you will see that
he was talking about taking over as the fink committer who was
helping to evaluate your package. Taking over from Peter O'Gorman,
in fact, not from you.
-- Dave
On May 2, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Max,
How am I supported to interpret the sudden appearance
of...
Taking over
JF
in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2994489&group_id=17203&atid=414256
immediately after I make the wrong choice (in JF's eyes) of the two alernatives
for packaging the info files that Daniel Mack
Hi Jack,
could you please elaborate what went wrong here, which package exactly was
modified when by whom in which way that you take offense?
Thanks for the clarification,
Max
Am 03.05.2010 um 00:42 schrieb Jack Howarth:
> Can someone explain to me at what point did it
> become acceptable b
16 matches
Mail list logo
