-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello all.
After waiting for quite some time, I have received several mails. This
is the first, not yet cleaned list of packages I will try to move to
stable. Either by urging the maintainers to do it, or after waiting an
appropriate amount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Donnerstag, Jänner 9, 2003, at 10:46 Uhr, Christian Schaffner wrote:
Hi David
On Donnerstag, Januar 9, 2003, at 09:46 Uhr, David wrote:
mysql 3.23.54a-1Christian Schaffner
mysql-dev 3.23.54a-1
Did you read the FAQ:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#not-found
?
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
Not sure if I've got the right mailing-list, or if this issue is
already known about, but here goes :)
I've just tried to install the openh323 pwlib packages, and both
failed, as the files required don't exist on the website
(http://www.openh323.org/bin) they're being retrieved from - the
Thanks for all of your efforts in generating feedback, and your long list
of packages which you believe are suitable to move to the stable tree.
However, you may *not* move my gmp-4.1.1-1 package to the stable tree.
Although it compiles OK, it has problems when running and is definitely not
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 23:18, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Where's the one that launches only quartz-wm and a single xterm?
Hidden inside the app bundle perhaps? But since having your personal
~/.xinitrc overrides it, there is not much problem I suppose..
Sorry can't be more helpful, still waiting
Giulio Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if I've got the right mailing-list, or if this issue is
already known about, but here goes :)
I've just tried to install the openh323 pwlib packages, and both
failed, as the files required don't exist on the website
Thanks for the pointer - didn't read the FAQ properly the first time...
apologies for the redundant question!
Cheers,
Giulio Harding
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 01:23 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Giulio Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if I've got the right mailing-list, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I've no problem in moving gnuplot-py to stable, but, as pointed out by
David Morrison, I've not CVS access commit. So you should do it for me.
Alright, here is how I shall handle this.
If YOU want your package to be in stable, have o
On Jan 9,2003 15:01:16 +0100, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I've no problem in moving gnuplot-py to stable, but, as pointed out by
David Morrison, I've not CVS access commit. So you should do it for me.
Alright, here is how I shall
There are some packages that are out of sync between stable and
unstable, that is, they have the same revision but different
dependencies etc.:
libnessus-1.2.6-1.info
libnessus-ssl-1.2.6-1.info
libnasl-1.2.6-1.info
afni-2.51e-2.info
r-base-1.6.1-2.info
If you are maintainer of these packages,
At 14:32 Uhr -0500 08.01.2003, John Clements wrote:
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 02:18 PM, Max Horn wrote:
snip
Interesting; DrScheme falls somewhere in between these two poles, in
the following sense: DrScheme began and continues as an X11
package. It depends on being able to
At 6:38 Uhr -0800 09.01.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
I think we didn't have those source-MD5s on the base packages becaue
they broke the bootstrap. (no md5sum command yet)
Hm, they did? I thought we only left them out in the fink/ CVS module
for this reason? But I am not sure anymore, it's been a
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 06:46 AM, Max Horn wrote:
At 6:38 Uhr -0800 09.01.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
I think we didn't have those source-MD5s on the base packages becaue
they broke the bootstrap. (no md5sum command yet)
Hm, they did? I thought we only left them out in the fink/ CVS
cant seem to install
--
Package manager version: 0.11.1
Distribution version: 0.5.0a
Mac OS X version: 10.2.3
July 2002 Developer Tools
gcc version: 3.1
make version: 3.79
Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored
OK, here's what you need... I've been using it since yesterday,
and everything feels right.
my ~/.Xmodmap:
keycode 59 = Delete
my ~/.Xresources:
xterm*.deleteIsDEL: true
xterm*.backarrowKey: false
xterm*.ttyModes: erase ^?
my ~/.xinitrc:
xrdb -load $HOME/.Xresources
xmodmap
David :
This is the first, not yet cleaned list of packages I will try to move to
stable.
For the one I'm maintaining for now :
- net/hlfl-0.60.0-1 can be moved to stable, in fact this is actually a
release.
I plan to track the author's cvs to submit a most current version in
unstable.
Since
What's the actual error that you're experiencing--what you've sent isn't
useful.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA 02139-4213
On Thu, 9 Jan
If you are using X11.app, you need to carefully follow the instructions at
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/inst-xfree86.php#apple-binary
-- Dave
On Jan 9,2003 12:29:47 -0500, Ahron Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
cant seem to install
--
Package manager version: 0.11.1
Distribution
For your information:
Today I received an email from the package maintainer Stefano Rodriguez
regarding the pwlib package, and he told me that he stopped being a
fink maintainer a long time ago. So he's definitely not the right
person to ask.
I searched the mail archives and found an entry by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Perhaps I've been doing something wrong, but environment variables
(specifically the problem has been PATH) set in .xinitrc don't seem to
get inherited by apps started by the Application menu in quartz-wm. Am
I alone here?
I assume that they're
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 03:46 US/Eastern, David wrote:
Hello all.
After waiting for quite some time, I have received several mails. This
is the first, not yet cleaned list of packages I will try to move to
stable. Either by urging the maintainers to do it, or after waiting an
appropriate
A: That choice is quite arbitrary. If you have a better suggestion, post
it
to the fink-devel mailing list. But you should be aware of the arguments
about /usr/local in the previous question.
*** How about /usr/local/fink?
Walt
OK, here's my problem with /usr/local/fink:
If you read the
excellent for the first time in those 2 years someone that did there
hoework. this is my 2 cents.
first as for /usr/local and /opt install it there, fink allows that.
but after you install into say ./usr/local, do a fink install sdl then
install OSXMplayercrap that just broke fink and you
At 18:56 Uhr -0500 09.01.2003, Jason Deraleau wrote:
[...]
My vote is for /opt/fink.
Just to clarify this, there is nothing to vote on here. There are no
serious reasons to abandon /sw, but many good reasons not to do it -
one of them being backward compatibility, we don't want to force
If the Fink community is not interested in abandoning /sw for the sake of
standards compliance (or any other reason) then perhaps the statement
regarding the choice of /sw If you have a better suggestion, post it to
the fink-devel mailing list should be removed from the FAQ.
At 01:11 AM
At 16:36 Uhr -0800 09.01.2003, Walt Bunch wrote:
If the Fink community is not interested in abandoning /sw for the
sake of standards compliance (or any other reason)
Err... I could say some things about this standard, but I'll
refrain from doing that, it's offtopic.
then perhaps the
My vote is for /opt/fink.
Just to clarify this, there is nothing to vote on here. There are no
serious reasons to abandon /sw, but many good reasons not to do it -
one of them being backward compatibility, we don't want to force 99%
of fink users to redo their complete fink installation.
I
A humble opinion from a list observer -- Really need to remove the FAQ?
Just some modification isn't enough? I guess the whole problem is that
the explanation given made readers that the issue is *still open*, but
actually it's not. Virtually, it's semi-closed.
So, I guess it will suffice to
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 08:19 PM, Kow K wrote:
A humble opinion from a list observer -- Really need to remove the
FAQ? Just some modification isn't enough? I guess the whole problem is
that the explanation given made readers that the issue is *still
open*, but actually it's not.
wow fink is a *nix dist now...cool
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
being a standard directory in any distribution of *nix I've ever
-=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett Systems Analyst
-=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc.
-=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This
Beat me to it, did you? :)
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote:
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 08:19 PM, Kow K wrote:
A humble opinion from a list observer -- Really need to remove the
FAQ? Just some modification isn't enough? I guess the whole problem is
that the explanation given
Justin Hallett wrote:
add -lX11 to the link line
How do I add this when running a fink update-all please ?
thanks,
Pejvan
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
From the FAQ:
Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw?
A: That choice is quite arbitrary. If you have a better suggestion, post it
to the fink-devel mailing list. But you should be aware of the arguments
about /usr/local in the previous question.
*** How about /usr/local/fink?
Walt
I have a better question since I've been reading this question for over 2
years now...
Wlat, Why /usr/local/fink and not /sw?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From the FAQ:
Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw?
A: That choice is quite arbitrary. If you have a better suggestion, post
it
to the
35 matches
Mail list logo
