Re: [Fink-devel] Mac OS 10.5 (Leopard) will have Garbage Collection for Objective-C!

2006-05-08 Thread Kyle Moffett
or your friend violating to provide that kind of information? Cheers, Kyle Moffett --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier

Re: [Fink-devel] RFC: Choosing mirror by DNS LOC.

2006-04-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
), then look up a list of adjacent/nearby states/countries, then run a traceroute and ping on that list of mirrors. Take some combination of most rapid response time and shortest route (which are going to be equivalent in 99% of the cases) and use that to select a mirror. Cheers, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] why is fink svn so slow?

2005-10-31 Thread Kyle Moffett
or on a local UFS partition makes it any faster. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- When you go into court you either want a very, very, very bright line or you want the stomach to outlast the other guy in trench warfare. If both sides are reasonable, you try to stay _out_ of court in the first place

[Fink-devel] Fink make 3.79.1 vs Apple make 3.80 (Released in 2002)

2005-10-08 Thread Kyle Moffett
messages but doesn't evaluate the $(eval) contents either). Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- Simple things should be simple and complex things should be possible -- Alan Kay --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource

Re: [Fink-devel] Treatment of virtual packages, Version 2

2005-07-30 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Jul 30, 2005, at 18:00:34, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Jul 30, 2005, at 5:35 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: Package: host Conflicts: bind9 Replaces: bind9 And I'd say here Provides: host-command Package: bind9 Provides: host (once again Provides: host-command) Conflicts: host Replaces: host

Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release, testing needed

2005-07-27 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Jul 27, 2005, at 16:50:15, Benjamin Reed wrote: Kyle Moffett wrote: Secondly, the configuration text redirection error comes from this part of the patch: - user_config-Dump(out); + user_config-Dump(); I can't see any reason for this change. You don't even change the argument list

Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release, testing needed

2005-07-26 Thread Kyle Moffett
it to just install packages, because it allows one to mark packages as installed only due to dependency and it will automatically remove them when the depending package goes away or is upgraded. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C$ UB/L/X

Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release, testing needed

2005-07-26 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Jul 26, 2005, at 19:52:44, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Jul 26, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: I think I remember that it used to create/update apt-get package lists for local filesystem repositories, so that when running dselect you can see what deb files are on the local filesystem

Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release, testing needed

2005-07-26 Thread Kyle Moffett
a package through aptitude, it also marks any automatically installed packages with the A flag. Oh, and aptitude has a built-in Minesweeper game ;-) Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- I lost interest in blade servers when I found they didn't throw knives at people who weren't supposed to be in your

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Compiling pwlib on 10.4 (Tiger)

2005-07-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
openh323 to compile, I noticed a few other bugs in the old pwlib packaging. I'll post when I've got more working. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+ ++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Compiling pwlib on 10.4 (Tiger)

2005-07-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
, although I'm a bit busy at the moment hacking on the Linux kernel and trying to get GnomeMeeting to work on OS X Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- Somone asked me why I work on this free (http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/) software stuff and not get a real job. Charles Shultz had the best answer: Why do

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Compiling pwlib on 10.4 (Tiger)

2005-07-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
On June 23, 2005 at 19:03:26 EDT, Kyle Moffett wrote: g++3 -o obj_Darwin_ppc_r/asnparser -I/sw/include -fno-common - dynamic -fno-common -dynamic -L/sw/lib -lresolv -L../../lib ./ obj_Darwin_ppc_r/asn_grammar.o ./obj_Darwin_ppc_r/asn_lex.o ./ obj_Darwin_ppc_r/main.o -lpt_Darwin_ppc_r

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Compiling pwlib on 10.4 (Tiger)

2005-07-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Jul 18, 2005, at 15:14:01, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Jul 18, 2005, at 10:42 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: virtual thunk to std::basic_istreamchar, std::char_traitschar ::~basic_istream() If you do a 'nm -m' on libstdc++, that symbol is in section (__TEXT,__textcoal_nt), which means it's

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Compiling pwlib on 10.4 (Tiger)

2005-07-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Jul 18, 2005, at 17:34:55, Kyle Moffett wrote: On Jul 18, 2005, at 15:14:01, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: I suspect that if you can get your package building with g++ 3.3 (or even 4.0!), that would make the problem go away. It appears that it BuildDepends on 3.1, wants 3.3, and tries to use

[Fink-devel] Fwd: Compiling pwlib on 10.4 (Tiger)

2005-07-15 Thread Kyle Moffett
Version 1.5.2-10). Begin forwarded message: From: Kyle Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: June 23, 2005 19:03:26 EDT To: Shawn Hsiao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Compiling pwlib on 10.4 (Tiger) While attempting to compile pwlib (which is required for GnomeMeeting), I get the following error: g++3

Re: [Fink-devel] any way around MMAP on OS X.3???

2004-04-30 Thread Kyle Moffett
MMgt_MMap = 0; to be MMgt_MMap = -1; instead. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a17 C>$ UB/L/X/*(+)>$ P+++()>$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) D

Re: [Fink-devel] gimp-app

2004-03-31 Thread Kyle Moffett
, maybe not important at all in the case of gimp-app. As the FSF can explain better, there are other drawbacks of distributing binaries without the precise sources used for producing them. Ahh, ok, in my cursory examination of the site I missed that fact. Sorry for the confusion Cheers, Kyle

Re: [Fink-devel] gimp-app

2004-03-30 Thread Kyle Moffett
*was* ripped off: http://www.via.com.tw/en/padlock/padlock_sl.jsp Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a17 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b

Re: [Fink-devel] bad dependency?

2004-02-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
be running a different wget than /sw/bin/wget. Cheers, Kyle Moffett - -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a17 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h

Re: [Fink-devel] GPL interpretation

2004-01-17 Thread Kyle Moffett
problems with the GPL. Cheers, Kyle Moffett - -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h!*()++$ r !y?(-) - --END

[Fink-devel] Dependency engine updates

2004-01-06 Thread Kyle Moffett
assistance I can as soon as I have time. Cheers, Kyle Moffett - -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h!*()++$ r

[Fink-devel] Re: /sw/lib/libiberty.a

2004-01-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
that, that way you won't suffer from weird library inconsistencies. I did that for linux because the debian glibc is compiled with certain kernel headers, and I just decided not to risk it. Cheers, Kyle Moffett - -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a16 C$ UB/L/X

Re: [Fink-devel] Ethereal-ssl out of date?

2003-12-30 Thread Kyle Moffett
issues with gtk+, and in the process it was upgraded to the latest version. I had the time and needed ethereal-ssl, so I decided to save Max some work. Here are updated files, but Max should probably check them and commit them to CVS. I don't think I made any mistakes, but... :-) Cheers, Kyle

Re: [Fink-devel] Ethereal-ssl out of date?

2003-12-30 Thread Kyle Moffett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Dec 30, 2003, at 18:09, Kyle Moffett wrote: On Dec 29, 2003, at 11:30, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/ethereal lists there being a 0.9.16-11 ethereal but only 0.9.14-1 ethereal-ssl. Any reason

[Fink-devel] /sw/lib/libiberty.a

2003-12-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
but not install it or use the installed copy. What do you all think? Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQE/6bYrag7LSGnFq10RAn5IAJ4pgi5tC896xPd7ESz4CebVCob0PACgzL/T E5+l3Dj2t1yIHehkENFSC+o= =mYMo -END PGP SIGNATURE

[Fink-devel] Manual pages in /sw/man (code2html, shntool, gaim-ssl, jove, trackballs, snownews, shorten)

2003-12-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
: /sw/man/man3 trackballs: /sw/man/man6 snownews: /sw/man/nl gaim-ssl: /sw/man/man3/Gaim.3pm shntool: /sw/man/man1/shntool.1 snownews: /sw/man/fr snownews: /sw/man/man1/snownews.1 snownews: /sw/man/nl/man1/snownews.1 Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin

[Fink-devel] Fwd: tads on Panther

2003-12-22 Thread Kyle Moffett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've not received a response from Alexander, so I'm forwarding this on to the list. If you get this one Alexander, could you please fix it? Otherwise, could somebody else with CVS access make the change? Thanks. Cheers, Kyle Moffett Begin

libfinch (Was: Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field)

2003-12-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
of arbitrary Objective-C (and later Perl) objects to any subset of versions. P.S.: If somebody with CVS access could look at the packages for me, I'd really appreciate it, I posted updates several days ago but haven't had a response yet. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

[Fink-devel] Packages the and regina in Fink

2003-11-26 Thread Kyle Moffett
out why it crashed on one machine and not another. The answer was that I was trying to use a library in /usr/local, but the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH variable caused the linker to always use the one it found in /sw/lib, despite the fact that my program was linked to the one in /usr/local. Cheers, Kyle

Re: [Fink-devel] make test failure report (run on CVS HEAD, just now)

2003-11-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
the later (stat 'foo')[9] that you do should fail, because AFAIK you cannot stat a file that you do not have access to. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQE/vk4eag7LSGnFq10RApn5AJ96URMjhJeXhJHZnypYblQqJevvVACg3w0d CpoGQB79nisVbu6Mw71CkzI= =UmpL

[Fink-devel] libfinch release 0.0.1

2003-11-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
=detailaid=843416group_id=17203atid=414256 Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQE/uCAPag7LSGnFq10RAm7sAJ0d1pWSdtMD4EgaR41WN008VyqIOQCeJe7D eFklXIZrMYT38fMEev2XkpE= =4Min -END PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Fink-devel] fileutils / gettext problem - need your help

2003-11-15 Thread Kyle Moffett
to the new fileutils, and ls worked properly all the time. I am using self-compiled debs for everything, so I suspect that bindist gettext works with bindist fileutils, and self-compiled gettext works with self-compiled fileutils, but that they are not interchangeable. Cheers, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] package manager release

2003-11-12 Thread Kyle Moffett
it and possibly include it? Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQE/src1ag7LSGnFq10RAk2KAKCHM79ViNrk+G0tM0UWObUIxkk0igCeMKmN MtO4ichMqcBt+hkgEEKX5Ng= =fVT1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.Net

Re: [Fink-devel] Getting source

2003-11-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
to something like crafty-local. Then you can even let the package live under Fink's control, with all the associated advantages. You can twiddle the configured settings in the info file and recompile easily. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQE

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink module documentation, tests and all that icky stuff.

2003-10-30 Thread Kyle Moffett
), with the end goal of creating a drop in replacement dependency engine, perhaps even something we could patch into dpkg. If anyone is interested in helping, please email me off-list and I will describe the architecture more. Cheers, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] Dependence on Perl--How to Specify?

2003-09-27 Thread Kyle Moffett
should make a my-mod-pm5XX package for each version. HTH, Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposal new Fink engine (Finch?)

2003-08-14 Thread Kyle Moffett
) they then go on to write poor Perl. It's not Perl's fault. It's coder's fault. Yay simple one-liners that completely reorganize my home-directory based on the contents of a file! Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposal new Fink engine (Finch?)

2003-08-08 Thread Kyle Moffett
am working on it :-) Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h!*()++$ r !y?(-) --END

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposal new Fink engine (Finch?)

2003-07-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
it in Objective-C, bridging it to other languages is simple, whereas the other way around requires much more effort. Thank you, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposal new Fink engine (Finch?)

2003-07-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
sorts of edge cases. Thanks for your comments, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h!*()++$ r

[Fink-devel] Proposal new Fink engine (Finch?)

2003-07-19 Thread Kyle Moffett
, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h!*()++$ r !y?(-) --END GEEK CODE BLOCK

Re: [Fink-devel] Spam on this list...

2003-06-11 Thread Kyle Moffett
have not seen one junk mail actually in the fink list. It seems that as soon as we start talking about spam we get 4 spam mails to the list ;-) What a coincidence Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W

Re: [Fink-devel] MacAddict did an article on Fink

2003-04-06 Thread Kyle Moffett
;-) Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w---(-) O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h! !r-- !y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK

Re: [Fink-devel] MacAddict did an article on Fink

2003-04-05 Thread Kyle Moffett
, but that is to be expected. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w---(-) O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h! !r-- !y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK

[Fink-devel] MacAddict did an article on Fink

2003-04-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
. This could be a good thing, or not... David, what is your take on this? Max? Anybody else see anything good or bad about this article? Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w

Re: [Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

2003-04-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w---(-) O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h! !r-- !y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK

Re: [Fink-devel] fixing up libpng

2003-03-11 Thread Kyle Moffett
on March 10 or later (to make sure that the libpng - libpng3 updates are present on your system). Does this mean that we can now remove the libpng package from CVS? Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W

Re: [Fink-devel] fixing up libpng

2003-03-11 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, Mar 11, 2003, at 16:53 US/Eastern, David R. Morrison wrote: Does this mean that we can now remove the libpng package from CVS? I don't plan to remove libpng any time soon. -- Dave Is there any particular reason why? Just curious ;-) Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK

Re: [Fink-devel] fixing up libpng

2003-03-11 Thread Kyle Moffett
have things installed that needs it. So can libpng at least be converted to a shlibs-only package without upping the revision? That way at least people won't be tempted to build anything new against it. Just a thought. Kyle Moffett -- Dave -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS

Re: [Fink-devel] Epoch

2003-03-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
Then when final comes out, it becomes 5.0-1. Here is something I have seen done with Debian. It makes less sense than your proposal, but it is useful to know about. foo-4..rc6 foo-4..rc7 foo-5.0 Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C

Re: [Fink-devel] Epoch

2003-03-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
it is, instead of complainging why don't you have a package for 5.0-rc7. I am well aware that it is abusive, and should be banned. I was just stating that it would be useful to know in case some past Debian user came around wondering about RC versions. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK

Re: [Fink-devel] Epoch

2003-03-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, Mar 4, 2003, at 19:37 US/Eastern, Max Horn wrote: At 17:58 Uhr -0500 04.03.2003, Kyle Moffett wrote: On Tuesday, Mar 4, 2003, at 17:35 US/Eastern, Justin Hallett wrote: I'm about to release proftpd 1.2.8 final and RC2 is in unstable ATM and this is what I'm gonna do, unless someone

Re: [Fink-devel] More on dependencies...

2003-02-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
: Relatively easy to implement; could be implemented atop pkg-order; also allows to detect hidden dependencies Con: Takes up additional disk space CPU time; might have unforseen problems So add this as an option to everything else, for the maintainers, on top of a new dependency engine. Cheers, Kyle

Re: [Fink-devel] More on dependencies...

2003-02-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, Feb 25, 2003, at 17:33 US/Eastern, Max Horn wrote: At 17:13 Uhr -0500 25.02.2003, Kyle Moffett wrote: On Tuesday, Feb 25, 2003, at 11:15 US/Eastern, Max Horn wrote: Hm I wonder why your email client misreads my time zone like that =) That IS odd! I just use Mail.app, so I have no clue

Re: [Fink-devel] Latest gd+Apple X11 + apple SDK fails to build.-- Please ignore my X.h got somehow screwed

2003-02-10 Thread Kyle Moffett
is very prone to this kind of disk corruption. Try rebooting in single user mode and thoroughly fscking your disks. That may help a little, but you probably need to reinstall those packages. HTH, Kyle Moffett BTW, you are not Philip Zimmerman!!! \/ ;-) - -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Virex ships/overwrites fink libraries

2003-02-08 Thread Kyle Moffett
(libdl.0.dylib). In addition, they used Fink packaged software without telling the Fink Developers about it or placing a notice in the software! As for the installation damage, it is obvious what would happen were Virex to overwrite certain libraries with older/newer versions. Cheers, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Virex ships/overwrites fink libraries

2003-02-08 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 10:43 US/Eastern, David wrote: On Samstag, Februar 8, 2003, at 04:18 Uhr, Kyle Moffett wrote: There are two major problems with this: 1) Licensing violations. This seems to be a rather iffy case of license violation. I will have to check back with the lawyers

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Virex ships/overwrites fink libraries

2003-02-08 Thread Kyle Moffett
. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w---(-) O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h! !r-- !y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86-4.3 and /etc/fonts

2003-02-07 Thread Kyle Moffett
condition. Something could happen that requires something in /etc during the short time that it's not there. Cheers, Kyle Moffett On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 10:59 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Folks: I have come across a potential problem while putting together the xfree86-4.2.99.901

Re: [Fink-devel] dyld: test Undefined symbols:

2003-01-31 Thread Kyle Moffett
. There are plenty of people there who can answer questions like this. HTH, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C>$ UB/L/X/*(+)>$ P+++()>$ L+++(++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w---(-) O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R?

Re: [Fink-devel] status of imlib/gnome?

2003-01-27 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Monday, Jan 27, 2003, at 06:37 US/Eastern, David R. Morrison wrote: 2. All windows appeared in the upper left corner over the gnome menu bar, so that the title-bar doesn't get drawn and the window can't be dragged. Well, it appears that problem 2 still exists. Since the most recent round of

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU getopt: use Fink's or package's own?

2003-01-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
autoconf does Checking for gnugetopt..., I have seen it somewhere before on my OS X machine. HTH, Kyle Moffett -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W++( +) N+++(++) o? K? w---(-) O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X

Re: [Fink-devel] Concerning the Copyright notice...

2003-01-13 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Monday, Jan 13, 2003, at 08:56 US/Eastern, David R. Morrison wrote: Oh, I see, maybe you are talking about the lower left hand corner? I just tried changing it to 2001-2003, but it messes up the width of the left hand column... Try 2001-03 -- Dave HTH, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] .apps in fink

2003-01-12 Thread Kyle Moffett
: 1) Don't install stuff outside of /sw 2) Keep the user from accidentally deleting stuff (owned by root) 3) Don't let dpkg get confused (Users cannot move stuff accidentally) Cheers, Kyle Moffett --- This SF.NET email is sponsored

Re: [Fink-devel] Trying to move the following packages to stable... maintainers.. heads up!

2003-01-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
amount of time, moving them myself. I have thoroughly tested a few of my packages that I believe are currently only in unstable: freezethaw-pm mldbm-pm mldbm-sync-pm Thanks, Kyle Moffett --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Kyle Moffett
with (Additional Quartz speedups, Better mouse support, etc.) Thanks, Kyle Moffett --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems with net-snmp and netinet headers in 10.2.3

2003-01-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
. Thanks! You're welcome, Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https

Re: [Fink-devel] A note to the perl module maintainers

2003-01-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
frequently and they seem to work fine, I haven't had any errors. Thanks, Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Idea for Fink architecture modification

2002-12-14 Thread Kyle Moffett
, whatever. What do you all think? Cheers, Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org

Re: [Fink-devel] Parallel builds

2002-12-08 Thread Kyle Moffett
such that the install of one of the packages won't abort if the other already has the lock Yea, this pops up occasionally. b.bum Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

[Fink-devel] cvs-proxy fails to compile

2002-12-01 Thread Kyle Moffett
known make[3]: *** [client.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling cvs-proxy-1.11.2-2 failed Full log available... Kyle Moffett

[Fink-devel] Problems with OpenLDAP Compiling

2002-11-17 Thread Kyle Moffett
(Continuous updates from 10.2) pkg fink version 0.11.0.cvs-20021116.2137 pkg openldap-ssl version 2.0.23-5 Thank you, Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here

[Fink-devel] Gimp compile fails

2002-11-17 Thread Kyle Moffett
failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling gimp-1.2.3-10 failed I am using the latest fink-cvs and pkgs-cvs Please help, Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: CVS: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.216,1.217 PkgVersion.pm,1.92,1.93

2002-11-13 Thread Kyle Moffett
is listed as %p/bin/install-info, which does not exist and causes packages to fail installing Also, wouldn't this make texinfo an essential package? Or wouldn't more packages depend on it? Thanks, Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: CVS: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.216,1.217 PkgVersion.pm,1.92,1.93

2002-11-13 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Wednesday, Nov 13, 2002, at 07:10 US/Eastern, Max Horn wrote: At 6:36 Uhr -0500 13.11.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: Max, in one of the scripts this works, but in the other, install-info is listed as %p/bin/install-info, which does not exist and causes packages to fail installing Also, wouldn't

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: CVS: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.216,1.217 PkgVersion.pm,1.92,1.93

2002-11-13 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Wednesday, Nov 13, 2002, at 18:04 US/Eastern, Ben Hines wrote: It was fixed yesterday. Thanks, Sorry, Due to issuing the wrong cvs command (Stupid me :-) I did not get the file. Kyle Moffett -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.5.0 timetable

2002-11-05 Thread Kyle Moffett
at 0) of font path is bad or has a bad font: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/ X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID,/usr/X11R6/lib/ X11/fonts/75dpi,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi Abort [server:~] root# Thanks, Kyle Moffett

[Fink-devel] Bochs does not run

2002-11-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
/X11/fonts/CID,/usr/X11R6/lib/ X11/fonts/75dpi,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi Abort Please help, Kyle Moffett --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully

[Fink-devel] Package Source Problems

2002-10-27 Thread Kyle Moffett
: oroborus-1.14.0-4 Thank you, Kyle Moffett --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com

Re: [Fink-devel] Rolling back xemacs?

2002-10-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
this warning even when I haven't used that modification on the info file. I think this is normal Kyle Moffett -- Martin --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM

Re: [Fink-devel] ATTN: Broken source links

2002-10-12 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Saturday, October 12, 2002, at 08:37 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: unknown_package: Error No mirror site list file found for mirror 'GNU'. is reported Just figured out which package this is: xfonts-intl Thanks, Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net

Re: [Fink-devel] Dependency/provides question

2002-10-08 Thread Kyle Moffett
a variant to a single Splitoff, or something like that. Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Fink-devel] Dependency/provides question

2002-10-07 Thread Kyle Moffett
-format as soon as I get it worked up. Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https

Re: [Fink-devel] cleaner Fink environment?

2002-06-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
from it. Then, right before a compile, in the same shell that the compile will take place in, run 'env -i' and 'source /se/fink/cleanenv.csh' or whatever it is for sh, depending on the shell. Just a few thoughts, Kyle Moffett --- Sponsored

Re: [Fink-devel] Badly behaved packages

2002-06-05 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 04:49 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: These need to be fixed: pil windowmaker-shlibs Both depend on libpng instead of libpng-shlibs or libpng3-shlibs Thanks, Kyle Moffett Also xemacs

Re: [Fink-devel] KDE-Base-SSL Compile Error

2002-06-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
I think that it is the presence of gcc as well as cc that is causing the problem. Perhaps the cc portions were patched, but for gcc some additional flag gets passed, etc. Thanks, Kyle Moffett On Sunday, June 2, 2002, at 07:42 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On Sunday, June 2, 2002, at 03

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiled libraries for fink

2002-05-29 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, at 08:14 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 18:26 Uhr -0400 28.05.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: I have been extensively looking at the Fink coding and Perl scripts/libraries, and I think I have an idea. I believe that much of the Fink code needs an overhaul. The whole dependancy

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiled libraries for fink

2002-05-29 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 05:42 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 16:47 Uhr -0400 29.05.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: The most frequently occurring problem is the lack of Fink implementation of the Conflicts field. It is currently only implemented by dpkg. Here is an example of a problem: I

[Fink-devel] Compiled libraries for fink

2002-05-28 Thread Kyle Moffett
I have been extensively looking at the Fink coding and Perl scripts/libraries, and I think I have an idea. I believe that much of the Fink code needs an overhaul. The whole dependancy system is starting to break down. (See recent threads involving splitoff/shared libs problems) Also, a

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiled libraries for fink

2002-05-28 Thread Kyle Moffett
before school starts) Sorry for the confusion, Kyle Moffett

[Fink-devel] XFree86-Rootless is borked

2002-05-23 Thread Kyle Moffett
that is created is the binary. Has anyone else had this problem? Thanks in advance, Kyle Moffett ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86-Rootless is borked

2002-05-23 Thread Kyle Moffett
Darn, that should be fixed. Does anybody know exactly what fails? I'm gonna use the binary, but I'd like to fix the source too (For Jaguar, since it uses an updated version of the April dev tools). Thanks anyway, Kyle Moffett On Thursday, May 23, 2002, at 07:38 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote

Re: [Fink-devel] http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/index.php update?

2002-05-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
monospaced type Run File-Save As... and replace the older file. This will also cause it to open properly in the future. HTH, Kyle Moffett ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas

Re: [Fink-devel] Hmm. I wonder what this means?

2002-04-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
/Software/Darwin/usr/bin/dpkg-split -- Martin Thanks, I just wasn't sure what that was. Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Hmm. I wonder what this means?

2002-04-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
-cmds I wonder if Apple is using/planning to use dpkg? Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: At 10:32 PM -0400 4/15/02, Kyle Moffett wrote: I have a proposal to make: Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package manager newer than the latest bindist should include a FinkVersion tag that would be checked

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote: At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could update itself to the latest cvs would be helpful fink selfupdate-cvs It's already there. All essential packages

[Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
in advance, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 17:54 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote: At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could update

[Fink-devel] Problems with the Fink expat package

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
was building expat, and that directory (root-expat-1.95.1-1) does not exist, I can only assume that something still points to it somewhere, and that is a problem with the expat package. Thanks in advance, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL

  1   2   >