hi,
i realised that ocaml just went into stable. very nice, but
unfortunately, i can't reach the web site since yesterday:
wget --verbose --passive-ftp http://caml.inria.fr/distrib/ocaml-3.04.tar.gz
--14:59:20-- http://caml.inria.fr/distrib/ocaml-3.04.tar.gz
=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
if anyone has time, please take a look at the tracker. i have 12
packages in there.
gnu shell utilities
ckermit-8.0.201-1
autoconf 2.5.3
Dialog
ckermit
giFT **very cool**
giFTcurs **also**
gkermit
minicom -3
new mad lib. works
musicbrainz client
Since it turned out I can't even SSH from here (and can't convince
the local admin to open the SSH port for me, since it's not really
necessary for my job here :-), I think it might be a good idea to
postpone the relase schedule. And anyway I have the feeling that not
everybody has noticed we
Eric Dufour wrote:
while attempting to install docbook dependencies I had this error
message :
head -n 4 /sw/src/root-sgml-entities-
iso8879-1986-2/sw/share/sgml/entities/iso8879/iso-amsa.gml
/sw/src/root-sgml-entities-
iso8879-1986-2/sw/share/doc/sgml-entities-iso8879/COPYRIGHT
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Sasha Zucker wrote:
I suspect that this error is the result of a system configuration issue.
The head utility that occurs in the package simply displays the first
lines of a file (opposite of the tail utility which displays the end of
a file). I am not familiar with the
At 11:04 AM -0400 4/9/02, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
normalize, newest version.
oookay.
You maintain it then. :)
I don't remember it depending on glib, though..
-Ben
--
http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:31 AM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Sasha Zucker wrote:
I suspect that this error is the result of a system configuration issue.
It's LWP's head, which gets header [meta-] info from a given URL, and
...
Thus, hard-wiring /usr/bin/head won't
Sasha Zucker wrote:
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:31 AM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Sasha Zucker wrote:
I suspect that this error is the result of a system configuration issue.
It's LWP's head, which gets header [meta-] info from a given URL, and
...
Thus,
I have been seeing some disturbing articles lately, and based on
previous relations with OpenOSX.com, they may be getting publicity
that's rightfully ours. Today I recieved a MacWorld magazine. The
macbeat article talked about OpenOSX Office, a CD from OpenOSX with
Abiword, gnumeric, The
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
Additionally, they fail to provide the source code for any of the
packages they distribute, and some, including the ones listed above,
they fail to provide any mention at all.
Wouldn't that be a pretty obvious GPL violation? Nevermind giving credit
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 07:56 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
Additionally, they fail to provide the source code for any of the
packages they distribute, and some, including the ones listed above,
they fail to provide any mention at all.
Wouldn't
Let's back up for just a moment here.
If I sell a CD with GPL'd software, I am only required to provide the source
to my customers. So I can meet the requirement of the GPL by putting the
source on the CD. (Have you seen the CD's in question? I haven't, so maybe
they are doing this.)
I wouldn't mind trying to make it but we would once again be back to
needing a logo:P Sorry trying to look at the bright side :P Thought for
a fink cd we would just need the binary installer since it's web updatable
and since there is no software on the cd execpt the installer ther eis no
need
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 08:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Let's back up for just a moment here.
If I sell a CD with GPL'd software, I am only required to provide the
source
to my customers. So I can meet the requirement of the GPL by putting
the
source on the CD. (Have you seen
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 07:45 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
I have been seeing some disturbing articles lately, and based on
previous relations with OpenOSX.com, they may be getting publicity
that's rightfully ours. Today I recieved a MacWorld magazine. The
macbeat article talked about
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 08:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The real solution, it seems to me, is a fink CD. We could put the
installer, and the complete binary distribution (including sourcefiles
as
always) on a CD, and we could even throw in the source for all unstable
packages
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 08:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The real solution, it seems to me, is a fink CD.
Part of me really likes that idea, and has liked it for a while now.
Part of me thinks it's way more time, effort cash than we probably want
to be dealing with here. Who's going
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 09:40 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
All we have to do is make it better than OpenOSX's CD and give a free
copy to MacWorld :)
That I like!
Kyle Moffett
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 09:55 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 08:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The real solution, it seems to me, is a fink CD.
Part of me really likes that idea, and has liked it for a while now.
Part of me thinks it's way more time, effort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ummm.about the cd-rom issue: debian has apt-cdrom, which will read
files off of the cd, but will get newer ones online automagically. Just
FYI.
randum mumblings
As for a logo, I like using Hexly, and maybe we can have a finch on his
shoulder
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 09:55 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
Maybe something could be packaged as a throw-in disc for Yellow Dog
Linux. [snip snip snip]
Does this sound feasible/appealing/worth pursuing?
This is possible, but I think YDL would
David R. Morrison wrote:
If I sell a CD with GPL'd software, I am only required to provide the
source
to my customers. So I can meet the requirement of the GPL by putting
the
source on the CD. (Have you seen the CD's in question? I haven't, so
maybe
they are doing this.)
Exactly. If
or we put a cd iso online and email the link to macworld no cost, execpt
time and bandwidth.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not a bad collection for sixty bucks, but then on the other hand you can
get it all for free. But on the gripping hand, they admit this. Sorta:
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:54 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
I don't read Macworld, so I wouldn't know, but have they ever done a
feature or even a small article on open source software
There was a backpage column about Darwin.
They also had entire issue devoted to freebies, but that was
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:50 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
or we put a cd iso online and email the link to macworld no cost, execpt
time and bandwidth.
Maybe we can co-host with linuxiso.org?
I was thinking more of mailing them a burned CD.
--
Alexander Strange | Resident Geek
[EMAIL
but that costs money to an open source project but we can get free
bandwidth hell maybe even off of apple's site. I'd be willing to make the
dmg or iso.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe we can co-host with linuxiso.org?
I was thinking more of mailing them a burned CD.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
David R. Morrison wrote:
The issue with these folks in the past was whether they were using our
work without giving credit. They did add a comment on their website,
but it wasn't enough to satisfy reasonable people, IMHO. But that is
in the
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Alexander Strange wrote:
I looked at the webpage for the Gimp 1.2.3 CD, and noticed that it comes
with GTK+ 1.2.8. Fink has 1.2.10. So they probably aren't using Fink :)
Old version?
In any event, Fink or no Fink, source availability is an issue. As near
as I can tell,
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 11:44 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
There's no defense, because there's no violation. Failure to give
credit isn't nice, but it isn't a violation of the GPL either.
Speaking of GPL violations, OpenOSX *does* distribute an update
package for PHP at this page
29 matches
Mail list logo
