As with the FPS - but all the info is there - original to each swf, we just
can't get at it - seems silly when we can get all the System.capabilities that
we can't even get the most basic of info pertaining to the swf we're in.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's wrong with the new external interface api?
M
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
I missed the very first post - but is there a reaosn you're not using
bitmap data to achieve this? (ie. Not flash 8?)
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ian Thomas
Sent: 02 February 2006 13:16
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Be interesting to see the speed diff between rolling your own and
having a circle in the libray (100px diameter, centered on the reg
point) and simply attaching it and scaling to size.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ian Thomas
the opposite - that convolution is proving more cpu intensive
than blurfilter?
Mike Mountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my tests convolution filter was much faster than a blurfilter.
But it's an easy one to swap oout and test for yourself...
Andreas Rønning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Interesting, it runs like a dog with blur filter on mine, fast and sweet as pie
(a bit 'shaky' but not enough to be a problem) with convolution on my PC.
You PC or Mac?
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Cédric Muller
Sent: 31
in IE convo is still faster - not got firefox at work so can't test.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of franto
Sent: 31 January 2006 10:35
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter performance
in your
I notice between lines 29 33 of your convolution version
you have pushed a blurFilter into the filterArray
It's blurring the individual item - the second time around blurs the
entire canvas.
This still means
Blur + blur = slow on Pc/ fast on mac
blur + convo slow on mac/fast on PC
- if
In that test the convolution filter came out marginally faster than no
filters at all!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Duguid
Sent: 31 January 2006 13:05
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders]
Are these just the filters applied to a stright MC? It'd be interesting to see
the same thing done double buffered - with the filters being applied to the
bitmapdata before it is drawn back.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike
Yes - on my PC.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of franto
Sent: 31 January 2006 13:21
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter performance
but not on PC :))
On 1/31/06, Mike Mountain [EMAIL
so, please wrote the times, its really strange
Blur: 5622
Conv 3x3: 5625
Conv 5x5: 14453
None: 5640
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
In my tests convolution filter was much faster than a blurfilter.
But it's an easy one to swap oout and test for yourself...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Andreas Rønning
Sent: 30 January 2006 10:03
To: Flashcoders mailing list
I want to return an MC to it's original state What's the quickest
way - setting the filter array to null or an empty array doesn't seem to
reliably work.
M
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Easiest way to strip an MC of all
it's filters?
Mike Mountain wrote:
I want to return an MC to it's original state What's
the quickest
way - setting the filter array to null or an empty array
doesn't seem
to reliably work.
M
I think Adobe (still not happy writing that) are happy with the legal
ambiguity They don't come off as oppressing the little guy, but
equally not many large commercial projects will take the risk of going
down the amfphp route .
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, but subtle.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Britton
Sent: 26 January 2006 15:50
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Re: AMFPHP for commercial projects
If that is their approach, it inhibits AMFPHP
I get this with other fonts too...but it's more random - sometimes I get
block artefacts as well.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Joe Cutting
Sent: 20 January 2006 13:17
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject:
At least one of the sites did give credit (the french one if I recall) although
it was pretty much a cut and paste job...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John Grden
Sent: 19 January 2006 13:34
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Yup doesn't work for me anymore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Cedric Muller
Sent: 14 December 2005 09:53
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Embedded fonts vs. Html : Can
anybody enlighten me
broken
instances of
textboxes using the font.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Mountain
Sent: 14 December 2005 10:04
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Embedded fonts vs. Html : Can
anybody enlighten me
Yup
You can embed cue points in flash 8 flvs Then use these to trigger
your subtitles
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Derivative
Sent: 14 December 2005 16:26
To: Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] Displaying
Yeah - sorry what I meant was if you use the flash 8 video encoder tool
there's a whole section in the setting devoted to cue points, event
triggering etc. It's a bit easier to set up than the old MX04 way if I
recall.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I use Xray all the time - can only praise it, it saves me no end of
time.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John Grden
Sent: 13 December 2005 04:33
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] debug tool?
Hey Mike,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kerem Gülensoy
Sent: 13 December 2005 14:24
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: AW: [Flashcoders] Embedded fonts vs. Html : Can
anybody enlighten me
it still works fine for me...what
Strange that this should come up, the other day my colleague was working
on a file that used relative refferences loaded in from XML, it worked
fine, the next day when he open it up it had stopped working - the fix
we found was instead of:
mydir/myfile.xml
Was to use
/mydir/myfile.xml
The odd
can you import the flv into the flash timeline and just export as
quicktime?
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Brumm, Mike
Sent: 08 December 2005 23:09
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: [Flashcoders] Convert .FLV to
Our long-term plan is to develop a universal client by
combining PDF, Flash and HTML in a single, integrated
runtime.
How does this differ from a browser?
M
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
So is this to target the 'Konfabulator' widget style market - or will my
bank build me a custom app to do my online banking?
The security and sandbox issues will be interesting here - the browser
developers already have their hands full plugging holes - it'll be
interesting to see Adobe tackles
Hi Rishi
You've posted on this several times now with the same question and have
been given good advice - ie. Check out the displacement map filter
option.
Your only other option is to get the array of pixels for an offstage
text box and work out the transformations yourself and apply them to an
I may have been dreaming but I'm sure someone posted a link for a tool
to disable the sandbox for flash 8 swfs running in embedded apps.
Anyone repost?
I know about the activeX settings,
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/flash/articles/fplayer8_security_08.htm
l
but if we had a tool which
Andre Michelle has a beautiful example on his site -
http://lab.andre-michelle.com/
See 'rain' and 'wate'r - there's no source but it looks like he's just
using displacment maps You never know if you ask nicely he may send
you the fla.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have some LED dislays in the field that use very small res 16 colour
VGA graphics, all the hardware that runs them is quite old. Hence we use
old and bespoke software to create very small animation packages to run
on these systems. I'm looking for a solution to unify some of our
authoring
Not sure flashcoders is the place to post asking for reviews - but as
you asked..
I'd have preloader for all the apps - at the moment you can see them
'build' on screen - a place holder with a load bar would be a better way
to hide the fact the images are still loading in, and reassure the user
-
You've not got Auto kern turned on by any chance - I find it monkeys
with dynamic text boxes to the point that it's useless.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Judah Frangipane
Sent: 18 November 2005 20:14
To: Flashcoders mailing
,
Ian
On 11/21/05, Mike Mountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've not got Auto kern turned on by any chance - I find
it monkeys
with dynamic text boxes to the point that it's useless.
M
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders
I'm sure I used to know how to do this but it seems to be eluding me...
Say I have an MC (may be made up of text, vectors and bitmaps) on the
stage or in the library and I want to copy it as a bitmap into a holder
mc on the stage - how do I copy the MC's bitmap properties?
In pseudo code
Hi Stathi
Just out of interest are you using a preloader toload your content in?
That may explain the initial load followed by the error - try the
content without the preloader - if that works your problem is in there
somewhere.
Cheers
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prolly going to get shot down for this - but I don't see the point of
using Flash and Ajax together - flash can do everything Ajax can and
more, so if you're going to use flashthen 'use' flash.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Success won't be down to just ease of development or features, it will
depend on backing from early adopters. Most sites that you'd think would
benefit form an RIA (banking, shopping, auctions etc.) are still using
fairly old (read reliable) set ups. They are more IA's than RIA's - sure
we're
Correction
www.rac.co.uk
Best mapping tool going
-Original Message-
From: Mike Mountain
Sent: 07 November 2005 12:37
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Ajax and Flash
Success won't be down to just ease of development or
features, it will depend
Yep.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Marco Romeny
Sent: 07 November 2005 14:32
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Ajax and Flash
You mean map24.com (which powers rac.co.uk).
var lib = fl.getDocumentDOM().library;
if (lib.getItemProperty('linkageImportForRS') == true) {
lib.setItemProperty('linkageImportForRS', false);
}
lib.setItemProperty('linkageExportForAS', true);
lib.setItemProperty('linkageExportForRS', false);
lib.setItemProperty('linkageExportInFirstFrame',
Oh it does work, it just doesn't refresh the library view.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Mountain
Sent: 03 November 2005 15:04
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Batch linkage jsfl command
var
Enabling the Export for ActionScript option automatically
sets the linkage ID to the name (without path) of the symbol.
So setting the linkageIdentifier isn't really required.
Just a FYI :-)
As per my example, no looping required...wonder if there's a way to
refresh the library though
Not quite - if you try the script I posted it doesn't update the library
view with the linkage names until you click on them - even though it's
done it's mojo.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Muzak
Sent: 03 November 2005 16:19
To:
More info:
http://blog.fuelindustries.com/archives/000108.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Mountain
Sent: 25 October 2005 09:46
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] OT: Flash player keeps 'downgrading
OK I know for sure I'm not the only one this is happening to, but I
wanted to get a consensus of how common this is.
My Flash player keeps silently reverting to version 7, I don't know if
it's a website I visit forcing a silent 'downgrade', or something to do
with my PC (win XP).
Anyone else
Add some to that list:
As2 currently compiles down to As1, I assume this is NOT the case with
AS3, therefore to take advantage of the speed increases that player 8.5
offers, you have to develop in AS3?
Flash's USP as far as I'm concerned is it's very easy to pick and and
develop/design
201 - 249 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
