[flashrom] Re: Code of Conduct process (was: Re: flashrom dev meeting notes 20.07.2023)

Am 24.07.23 um 15:23 schrieb Anastasia Klimchuk: I see. I think commit message to the patch gives an answer to your question, I will copy commit message here just in case you maybe missed it: For now link to coreboot's one, in the absence of our own. Thanks for quoting the commit message. I

[flashrom] Adding old Code of Conduct equivalent to the new website (was: Re: flashrom dev meeting notes 20.07.2023)

Hi Anastasia, as promised, another email with answers. Am 23.07.23 um 03:05 schrieb Anastasia Klimchuk: [...] You are very welcome to send a patch to convert the Friendliness wiki page to our new sphinx docs, so that it can be added to the new website. Thanks, I'll do that. Few things I

[flashrom] Code of Conduct process (was: Re: flashrom dev meeting notes 20.07.2023)

Hi Anastasia, thank you for your response. Since there are a few issues orthogonal to each other, I'll split my response into multiple mails to avoid polluting different sub-threads. Am 23.07.23 um 03:05 schrieb Anastasia Klimchuk: About Code of Conduct: this is established and standard

[flashrom] Re: New flashrom website

Hi, thanks for working on the website. I noticed that the old URLs do not work anymore. Any external or internal documentation referring to old URLs currrently gets a 404 not found error. It also will result in non flashrom.org websites ranking higher than our own documentation in search

[flashrom] Re: flashrom dev meeting notes 20.07.2023

Hi, we do have the equivalent of a code of conduct. No need to create a new one. https://wiki.flashrom.org/Friendliness If there is anything that needs fixing, we can fix it. The document above was created with feedback from quite a few people in the neurodivergent community and tries to

[flashrom] FOSDEM 2023 stand for coreboot/flashrom

Hi everyone, I'm happy to tell you that we'll have a combined coreboot/flashrom stand at FOSDEM. When? Feb 4-5 2023 Where? ULB, Brussels, Belgium Exact location? Building Aw, Level 1, Université libre de Bruxelles, Campus du Solbosch, Avenue Franklin D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium

[flashrom] Re: Release preparations

Hi Richard, Am 23.03.22 um 10:20 schrieb Richard Hughes: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 12:07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > wrote: >> AFAIR there were three arguments for meson: >> - Meson build integrates nicely with other packages built by meson > This means we can build libfla

[flashrom] Re: Release preparations

Am 22.03.22 um 07:01 schrieb David Hendricks: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:48 PM Thomas Heijligen wrote: > > Beside from the documentation, the meson file currently only works > for Linux and was never announced as official way to build flashrom. > > > The original reason for adding Meson

[flashrom] Re: Call for Mentors for GSoC 2022

Hi Anastasia, Am 03.02.22 um 04:55 schrieb Anastasia Klimchuk: > Thomas, Simon, > > Thank you so much!! We will be updating project ideas document at the > end of this week (or maybe beginning next week), so I will add names > there. > > And I want to confirm on this thread that I also will be a

[flashrom] Re: Why not use usleep() instead of clock_gettime() loop for delay ?

Hi, Am 12.07.21 um 13:14 schrieb Patrick Star: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:53 PM Daniel Thompson > mailto:daniel.thomp...@linaro.org>> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 11:45:19AM +0800, Patrick Star wrote: > > I saw flashrom process use too many cpu time when I use it to write > >

[flashrom] Re: [coreboot] Re: What should we do about freenode IRC services?

Am 27.05.21 um 11:22 schrieb Urja Rannikko: >>> Currently, on libera there are 46 people and on OFTC 2 people (me included). >>> >>> So I would say let's move to libera. >> Agreed. Let’s do what most members in #coreboot users already did. > +1 > > I know I'm not a regular contributor or anything,

[flashrom] Re: [Bug 1912371] Re: [MIR] flashrom

[Adding flashrom mailing list to CC. Context: The Ubuntu bug is about moving flashrom from universe to main. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371/ for details.] If anyone is interested, I can dig up my test scripts which I used to test flashrom, but I do not have

[flashrom] Re: adding support for PCIe SPI flash? VL805 USB

Hi John Paul, Am 02.02.21 um 20:12 schrieb John Paul Morrison: > I'm just starting to look at fashrom to see how to read/update SPI > flash on a PCIe card > > lspci -d 1106:3483 > 01:00.0 USB controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VL805 USB 3.0 Host > Controller (rev 01) > > There isn't much from Via

[flashrom] Re: Write protect: would this be accepted?

My apologies, these mails were in the queue for too long. Regards, Carl-Daniel Am 28.01.21 um 21:47 schrieb ln2max--- via flashrom: > Well, I guess the moderators finally got around to checking the queue. > Sorry for all the duplicate messages everyone, I thought the problem > was on my end! > >

[flashrom] Re: Current state of meson

On 26.05.20 20:27, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2020 19:20:47 +0100 > Richard Hughes wrote: > >> Have you tried to build flashrom on Debian or Fedora using the >> built-in makefiles? They're fine for building the software locally on >> x86, but not much more. > The makefile is able to

[flashrom] Renesas USB3 uPD720201

Hi, just in case someone (could be me) needs an additional piece of information about the flash interface of Renesas USB3 uPD720201. https://git.linaro.org/people/john.stultz/android-dev.git/commit/?h=dev/db845c-mainline-WIP=5261fa2240655bd09be13dceda0f1195bf694b7f is "usb: renesas-xhci: Add ROM

[flashrom] Re: Stepping Down as Flashrom Maintainer/Developer

Dear Nico, thank you very much for your service. Being a maintainer is hard, and not always rewarding. On 30.01.20 03:16, Nico Huber wrote: > Dear flashrom community, > > I regret to tell you that I won't do any further upstream flashrom work > in the foreseeable future. Compared to the last few

[flashrom] Re: [PATCH] VIA VL805 support

On 15.01.20 13:29, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > VIA VL805 support, first draft. No idea if it actually works. > It is highly likely that SPI accesses with a readcnt not being a > multiple of 4 will return incorrect data due to the unknown encoding of > the register containing S

[flashrom] [PATCH] VIA VL805 support

brave, I also have a version which aborts early after the init sequence. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger diff -r 7bf17529e516 Makefile --- a/Makefile Tue Dec 31 18:22:02 2019 +0100 +++ b/Makefile Wed Jan 15 13:20:27 2020 +0100 @@ -696,6 +696,11 @@ # Disable J-Link for now

[flashrom] "pcidev.c: Factor out pcidev_validate() into pure fn" broke PCI programmers

Hi, commit e28d75ed7204d7fac2c0fac13978098530b0574e dropped some logic during refactoring. PCI-based programmers now fail to initialize IFF the desired PCI device not the last one enumerated by libpci. Given that this refactoring was done to make unit tests easier, I'd expect the unit tests to

[flashrom] Re: [coreboot] FOSDEM 2020 CfP

/002933.html FOSDEM 2010 Hardware Enablement Devroom https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/track/hardware_enablement/ Please submit a talk! Regards, Carl-Daniel On 29.09.19 00:45, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi, > > we want to participate again in FOSDEM 2020. Location: Brussels. Da

[flashrom] FOSDEM 2020 CfP

Hi, we want to participate again in FOSDEM 2020. Location: Brussels. Date: 1&2 February. Deadlines: Own developer room: Expired... Stand: 1 November Main track talk: first batch 11 October, second batch 8 November Lightning talk: 22 November Talk/Demo in foreign devroom: probably end of October

[flashrom] Re: Updating the e-flash on an ITE SuperIO chip

On 11.02.2019 18:00, Angel Pons wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019, 16:33 Richard Hughes > I've been looking at updating the EC for the IT8587 and IT8987 SuperIO >> controllers from userspace. > Hmm, I have the ITE IT8585 and IT8987 chips here. > >> I see that there are it87spi and ite85spi >> modules

[flashrom] FOSDEM 2019: Success!

Hello everyone, a huge THANK YOU to everyone who helped at the coreboot/LinuxBoot/flashrom booth and/or gave talks or helped in other ways at FOSDEM. The booth was busy the whole time, the rooms with the talks were over capacity and each of you has helped spread the word about our projects. There

[flashrom] Fwd: FOSDEM stand info

Hi everyone, TL;DR: - Our stand is in building Aw https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/buildings/#aw - Stand buildup has to be finished Saturday 10:00 - Stand duty on Saturday ends 19:00 - Stand duty on Sunday starts 9:00 - Stand teardown starts at Sunday 17:00 - If you bring something, please tell

[flashrom] Re: [coreboot] Re: [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

On 01.02.2019 08:48, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > On 24.01.19 01:05, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> Hey everyone, >> >> just 9 days until FOSDEM in Brussels (2+3 February)! >> There are a couple of talks about coreboot and LinuxBoot and we have a >> coreboot/Linu

[flashrom] Re: [coreboot] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

coreboot/LinuxBoot/flashrom banner which helps others find our stand? Please forward this email to those who you think are coming and might be willing to help out. Thank you. Regards, Carl-Daniel On 30.11.2018 09:59, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi, > > * FOSDEM 2-3 February 2019 &g

[flashrom] Re: [coreboot] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

On 17.12.2018 15:28, Arthur Heymans wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger writes: >> * FOSDEM 2-3 February 2019 >> * We have a coreboot/LinuxBoot/flashrom stand! Need people for the stand >> (2 days, 1 table). > I Live in Antwerp, so reasonably close by, so I will certainly

[flashrom] Re: Using Meson to build flashrom

Hi Hugh, On 03.01.2019 12:23, Richard Hughes wrote: > First, happy new year and I hope you all had a great break. Thanks, you too. > As some of > you know, I've been working with 3mdeb for the last few months, with > the aim of using libflashrom in fwupd to be able to flash firmware > using

[flashrom] Testing new mailing list

Test ___ flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org

Re: [flashrom] [coreboot] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

Kocialkowski wrote: > Le vendredi 02 novembre 2018 à 22:59 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger a > écrit : >> In that case, I'd also like to point you to the deadline for submitting >> main track talks which is tomorrow(!). >> https://fosdem.org/2019/news/2018-08-10-call-for-participati

Re: [flashrom] [coreboot] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

, David Hendricks wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:15 AM 'Ron Minnich' via linuxboot > mailto:linuxb...@googlegroups.com>> wrote: > > I"m leaning to yes, by which I mean if you do it, I'll show up. > > I can't believe I said that. > On Fri, Nov 2,

[flashrom] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

Hi! FOSDEM next year will be on 2 & 3 February 2019. The deadline for applying for a stand is today. Do we want a coreboot/flashrom/LinuxBoot stand/booth? There will be a hardware enablement devroom as well, and we might be able to participate there, but that's not necessarily giving us a chance

Re: [flashrom] [coreboot] flashrom and 256 MiB S256FL256S

On 27.09.2018 22:34, Nico Huber wrote: > On 9/27/18 10:11 PM, ron minnich wrote: >> yeah, also is there a programmer you recommend for 32MiB parts? > Any programmer that can handle arbitrary SPI commands, e.g. single- > board computers with native SPI interface (RPi, BeagleBone Black etc.), >

Re: [flashrom] What's the intended license for flashrom?

Hi Nico, On 27.01.2018 15:49, Nico Huber wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On 26.01.2018 23:43, Stefan Tauner wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:51:46 +0100 >> Nico Huber wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I've just noticed that most of flashrom is licensed under GPLv2 + any >>> later version,

[flashrom] FOSDEM 2018, Feb. 3+4

Hello everyone, who's up for organizing a booth and maybe a devroom at FOSDEM 2018? https://fosdem.org/2018/news/2017-08-21-dates-fosdem-2018/ Regards, Carl-Daniel ___ flashrom mailing list flashrom@flashrom.org

Re: [flashrom] Flashrom wiki: what license is the content under?

Hi Sam, welcome to the flashrom mailing list. Starting almost identical discussions on two different mailing lists is not productive. It _might_ make sense to revisit this after the discussion on the coreboot mailing list has come to a conclusion. On 18.03.2017 17:50, Sam Kuper wrote: > I have

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Fix undefined behavior in some preprocessor define checks

nder if we should add a comment before the IS_ and USE_ #defines to tell people to always use them with #if and never with if defined() or #ifdef. Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Regards, Carl-Daniel On 02.12.2016 01:49, Stefan Tauner wrote: > The m

Re: [flashrom] Development flashrom

On 14.10.2016 21:24, David Hendricks wrote: > What exactly are you trying to do? How do you plan to use the CC3200? > How is the flash memory connected / accessed? > > TI has some information about flashing it > here: http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/CC31xx_%26_CC32xx_FTDI_Flashing > > If

[flashrom] FOSDEM 2017

Hi, FOSDEM 2017 deadlines are soon. Do we want to have a full developer room, a talk or just a stand? Unfortunately I won't be able to attend, so someone else will have to be the formal contact for organizing our stand/devroom/talk. I will help with submitting proposals if this is desired by

Re: [flashrom] Release numbering and branches

Hi Nico, On 10.08.2016 23:48, Nico Huber wrote: > Hi folks, > > now that we have a git repository [1] ready (thanks Stefan!), I've > visited again the flashrom development guidelines [2]. I stumbled > there over a very long, exemplary version number: "0.9.10.1". IMHO, > two things are wrong here:

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for reading the current flash contents from a file

Hi Paul, we're currently trying to transition to git, and thus we're still working out the best workflow to continue development. Admittedly this is a larger resource drain than anticipated. I wish to apologize for the delayed review. Please find a few thoughts of mine below. On 19.04.2016

[flashrom] [Security Announcement] fscanf format string security bug in flashrom layout code

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message An internal security audit of the flashrom project by Carl-Daniel Hailfinger found a buffer overflow bug present in all flashrom versions since the year 2005. This bug was independently found

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Shutdown serial port in pony_spi

On 13.03.2016 17:22, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Implement serial port shutdown both for regular termination and error > condition in pony_spi. > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> On IRC: Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tau..

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Shutdown serial port in pony_spi

Implement serial port shutdown both for regular termination and error condition in pony_spi. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-pony_close_fd/pony_spi.c === --- fl

[flashrom] [PATCH] Shutdown serial port in pony_spi

Implement serial port shutdown both for regular termination and error condition in pony_spi. [Yes, the existing code is not exactly beautiful, but a rewrite shortly before 0.9.9 is too risky.] Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: fl

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add a bunch of new/tested stuff and various small changes 25.

On 13.03.2016 14:44, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:30:19 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> On 05.03.2016 22:42, Stefan Tauner wrote: >>> Tested mainboards: >>> OK: >>> - ASRock Fat

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add a bunch of new/tested stuff and various small changes 25.

On 05.03.2016 22:42, Stefan Tauner wrote: > Tested mainboards: > OK: > - ASRock Fatal1ty 970 Performance and P4i65G >Reported by anonymous email message ID: >932677687262b1300eaf14260999d9262...@guerrillamail.com >The latter actually had a tested board enable already. > > Flash chips:

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Fix compilation on SunOS.

On 13.03.2016 00:57, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 00:26:41 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> On 13.03.2016 00:05, Stefan Tauner wrote: >>> This came up when I was testing if building on SunOS still works

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Fix compilation on SunOS.

On 13.03.2016 00:05, Stefan Tauner wrote: > This came up when I was testing if building on SunOS still works > on the buildbot's instance of OmniOS r151014 which is based on illumos. > > The fix is > - to link against libnsl > - a small C type fix in ich_descriptor_tool > > Signed-off-by: Stefan

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Rewrite and fix corner case in sb600spi

On 12.03.2016 20:46, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Specifying spispeed=reserved as programmer parameter resulted in > selecting the default SPI speed instead of aborting. Rewrite the logic > to be more readable. > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Rewrite and fix corner case in sb600spi

On 10.03.2016 22:07, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:34:27 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> New version, fix corner case found by Stefan Tauner during review. >> >> Specifying spispeed=reserved

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Rewrite and fix corner case in sb600spi

New version, fix corner case found by Stefan Tauner during review. Specifying spispeed=reserved as programmer parameter resulted in selecting the default SPI speed instead of aborting. Rewrite the logic to be more readable. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add support for GNU Hurd.

d this with the internal programmer within a VirtualBox > VM and it worked as expected (i.e. not really but it did not explode either). So forced read did turn up the vbox BIOS? If yes, this is Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@

Re: [flashrom] test

First test had broken headers. Next test... ___ flashrom mailing list flashrom@flashrom.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Don't build atapromise on libpayload

On 28.02.2016 22:48, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Reworded comment in response to Stefan's review on IRC. > > Allow mstarddc_spi and pony_spi on Android. > Allow mstarddc_spi and pony_spi on architectures with unsupported raw > access. > > Signed-off-by: Carl

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Don't build atapromise on libpayload

On 28.02.2016 03:38, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:41:33 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> Don't build atapromise on libpayload. >> libpayload struct pci_dev is missing a member named 'rom_size' needed

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Drop non-existing support for nicnatsemi.

On 27.02.2016 17:07, Stefan Tauner wrote: > This was meant to support National Semiconductor DP838* network cards > but was never tested successfully. The hardware does not seem to be > available on the market anymore and there was no development for > five years. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Don't build atapromise on libpayload

On 26.02.2016 14:41, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Don't build atapromise on libpayload. > libpayload struct pci_dev is missing a member named 'rom_size' needed by > atapromise. > Allow linux_spi and mstarddc_spi on Android. > Allow pony_spi on architectures with unsuppo

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] makefile: allow to disable all default-yes config variables with CONFIG_NOTHING=yes.

On 26.02.2016 22:54, Stefan Tauner wrote: > All credit for this should be given to Patrick Georgi (see r1869). > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tau...@student.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Thanks for your patch.

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] makefile: allow to disable all default-yes config variables with CONFIG_NOTHING=yes.

On 21.02.2016 15:47, Stefan Tauner wrote: > All credit for this should be given to Patrick Georgi (see r1869). > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner > --- > Makefile | 7 +++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index

[flashrom] [PATCH] Don't build atapromise on libpayload

Don't build atapromise on libpayload. libpayload struct pci_dev is missing a member named 'rom_size' needed by atapromise. Allow linux_spi and mstarddc_spi on Android. Allow pony_spi on architectures with unsupported raw access. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.deve

[flashrom] [PATCH] Don't build atapromise on libpayload

libpayload struct pci_dev is missing a member named 'rom_size' needed by atapromise. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-atapromise_disable_on_libpayload/Ma

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Partial architecture support for alpha hppa m68k sh

New version: Add S390/S390x support. Only non-PCI non-rawaccess hardware is supported. No idea if it even compiles. I don't have hardware to test, it's a blind port. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-architecture_support_lite/Ma

[flashrom] [PATCH] Partial architecture support for alpha hppa m68k sh

Only non-PCI non-rawaccess hardware is supported. No idea if it even compiles. I don't have hardware to test, it's a blind port. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-architecture_support_lite/Ma

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Support device lists for programmers without PCI/USB IDs

On 18.08.2014 00:52, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Am 04.04.2013 06:57 schrieb Kyösti Mälkki: >> > On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 02:07 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >>> >> Am 03.04.2013 01:11 schrieb Kyösti Mälkki: >>>> >>> On Wed, 2013-04

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Allow global disable of all drivers requiring libusb* or libpci

On 20.02.2016 23:26, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Allow global disable of all drivers requiring libusb* or libpci > This is especially helpful for compile tests with CONFIG_EVERYTHING=yes, > but can also be used without CONFIG_EVERYTHING. > > Usage: > make CONFIG_ENABLE_L

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Allow global disable of all drivers requiring libusb* or libpci

On 20.02.2016 23:23, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 23:10:32 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> Allow global disable of all drivers requiring libusb* or libpci >> This is especially helpful for compile tests

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Allow global disable of all drivers requiring libusb* or libpci

=no CONFIG_ENABLE_LIBPCI_PROGRAMMERS=no Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-libpci_libusb_global_disable/Makefile === --- flashrom-libpci_libusb_global_disable/Makefile (Revision 1935) +++ fl

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Automatically disable atapromise on non-x86

On 20.02.2016 22:37, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 22:33:26 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> We do not support PCI port I/O on non-x86 (yet). >> Atapromise needs PCI port I/O. >> >> S

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Do not require PCI code for RayeR SPI driver

On 20.02.2016 22:42, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > CONFIG_RAYER_SPI only needs raw hardware access, but not libpci. > Disable CONFIG_RAYER_SPI on Android because of missing inb/outb. > Introduce NEED_RAW_ACCESS for raw memory access, PCI port I/O > and MSR access. > > Signed-o

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Do not require PCI code for RayeR SPI driver

On 20.02.2016 22:35, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 22:23:06 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> New version, include sys/types.h on FreeBSD specifically instead of for >> all OS. >> > liar! At least it

[flashrom] [PATCH] Automatically disable atapromise on non-x86

We do not support PCI port I/O on non-x86 (yet). Atapromise needs PCI port I/O. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-atapromise_x86_only/Makefile === --- fl

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Do not require PCI code for RayeR SPI driver

On 20.02.2016 21:46, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 20.02.2016 02:36, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> On 20.02.2016 01:24, Stefan Tauner wrote: >>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:10:41 +0100 >>> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Do not require PCI code for RayeR SPI driver

On 20.02.2016 02:36, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 20.02.2016 01:24, Stefan Tauner wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:10:41 +0100 >> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> --- flashrom-libpci_libusb_report_requirements/Make

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Include sys/glibc-syscalls.h instead of inexistent sys/io.h on Android.

t; +#elif defined(__linux__) || defined(__GLIBC__) > #include > #endif > Apart from the comment above, this is Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Regards, Carl-Daniel ___ flashrom mailing list flashrom@flashrom.org http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Do not require PCI code for RayeR SPI driver

On 20.02.2016 01:24, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:10:41 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: >> --- flashrom-libpci_libusb_report_requirements/Makefile 2016-02-17 >> 00:26:37.497626067 +0100 >> +++ flashr

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Makefile: fix overriding of make command line arguments.

efan Tauner <stefan.tau...@alumni.tuwien.ac.at> You missed one instance: CFLAGS += -Wno-format Even if compiling for DOS is probably not something where default packaging is involved, it would make the whole *FLAGS thing more consistent. Other than that, it's Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinge

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] fix chip size limiting in atapromise

hook, but whatever) below. > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Atapromise chip size limiting has two bugs I didn't catch during review, >> but only in the moment of commit. >> >> The cu

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Allow global disable of all drivers requiring libusb* or libpci

=no CONFIG_ENABLE_LIBPCI_PROGRAMMERS=no Note: This requires the rayer pci patch to work. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> --- flashrom-rayer_do_not_require_libpci/Makefile 2016-02-17 23:29:21.130268866 +0100 +++ flashrom-libpci_libusb_global_disable/Makefile 2016-02-

[flashrom] [PATCH] Allow global disable of all drivers requiring libusb* or libpci

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-libpci_libusb_global_disable/Makefile === --- flashrom-libpci_libusb_global_disable/Makefile (Revision 1926) +++ fl

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] List affected features for missing libraries

On 17.02.2016 23:21, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > List affected features for missing libraries > > If libpci, libusb0 or libusb1 are missing, make will now tell you which > currently enabled features require those libraries. > > Example output: > Checking for libusb-0.1/

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] List affected features for missing libraries

DIPROG. Please install libusb-0.1 headers or libusb-compat headers. See README for more information. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tau...@alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Urja Rannikko <urja...@gmai

[flashrom] [PATCH] Do not require PCI code for RayeR SPI driver

This patch depends on Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] List affected features for missing libraries CONFIG_RAYER_SPI only needs raw hardware access, but not libpci. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> diff -ur flashrom-libpci_libusb_report_requirements/hwac

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] List affected features for missing libraries

-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-libpci_libusb_report_requirements/Makefile === --- flashrom-libpci_libusb_report_requirements/Makefile (Revision 1924) +++ fl

Re: [flashrom] New SPI NOR Flash product Support

Hi Victor, your best bet is probably Stefan Tauner who is the flashrom release engineer and de facto maintainer right now. He knows best how to make sure your products are supported in flashrom. Other people may be interested in helping out as well. Regards, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger On 09.02.2016

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add atapromise programmer

Hi Joseph, thanks! Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> and committed in r1916 with the following commit message: Add atapromise programmer Supported controllers are Promise PDC20262 (FastTrak66/Ultra66), PDC20265 (FastTrak100 Lite/Ultra100), PD

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add atapromise programmer

again for submitting the patch and for addressing all our concerns. Regards, Carl-Daniel On 14.01.2016 13:23, Joseph C. Lehner wrote: > I've addressed the issues you pointed out. Thanks for your input, > here is the updated patch. > > On 2016-01-13 22:53, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add atapromise programmer

Hi Joseph, side note: Urja added his Acked-by on IRC. Regards, Carl-Daniel On 17.01.2016 00:46, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > thanks! > Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> > and committed in r1916 with the following co

Re: [flashrom] Issue with internal access to the W39V040FB

Hi Andrey, On 15.01.2016 15:33, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >>> >> Hi Andrey, >>> >> >>> >> please post complete logs of a working and non-working probe as well as >>> >> the exact flashrom version you are using. The output of

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Pimp the manpage to create nicer hyperlinks and HTML output.

On 14.01.2016 00:19, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 03:27:04 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Code looks good. >> >> There are quite a few hyperlinks to flashrom.org in there. Some use >> http, some use ht

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add atapromise programmer

e hardware should be able to address. Oh, and a few more comments below... On 13.01.2016 02:44, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > thanks for your patch! > > > On 13.01.2016 01:17, Joseph Lehner wrote: >> On 2016-01-13 00:29, Joseph Lehner wrote: >>> This patch adds a new

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add atapromise programmer

using >> > -c >> > ) >> > *) Remove the bridge fixup/break stuff because it's not actually >> > neccessary (turns >> > out the bridge was misconfigured because I had to hot-plug the controller, >> > after a >> > failed flash prevented my ma

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Pimp the manpage to create nicer hyperlinks and HTML output.

lumni.tuwien.ac.at> > --- > Makefile| 8 +++- > flashrom.8.tmpl | 126 > ++-- > 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:08:20 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfing

Re: [flashrom] flashrom as programmer slow because it reads the whole SPI Flash contents before writing anything

Hi Ruben, On 11.01.2016 14:58, R. Diez wrote: > I am trying to use flashrom with a fast generic FTDI FT2232H adapter > as an SPI Flash programmer in a small production line. > > The SPI Flash chip can hold 8 MiB of data, but we are only using the > first 512 KiB of it. > > I found flashrom to be

Re: [flashrom] BX100: there is a Linux tool to flash ROM images through any SATA adapter

Hi Elmar, On 12.01.2016 21:48, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > I have just tested this utility: > > ./msecli -U -i ../opt/frimware/MU02 -m BX100 > ./msecli -L > > did work as expected (flashing the firmware and listing the firmware > status of the device) besides the many other useful options it

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add atapromise programmer

Hi Joseph, thanks for your patch! On 13.01.2016 01:17, Joseph Lehner wrote: > On 2016-01-13 00:29, Joseph Lehner wrote: >> This patch adds a new programmer that supports (admittedly ancient) Promise >> ATA >> controllers. I've successfully tested this on an Ultra100 controller I had >> lying

Re: [flashrom] Proposed changes to flashrom hosting and workflow

On 07.01.2016 13:48, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 07.01.2016 09:28, Stefan Tauner wrote: >> On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 09:13:17 +0100 >> Patrick Georgi <pgeo...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> 2016-01-07 9:09 GMT+01:00 Stefan Tauner <stefan.tau...@alumni.tuwien.a

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Pimp the manpage to create nicer hyperlinks and HTML output.

On 08.01.2016 08:57, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 21:08:21 +0100 > Stefan Tauner wrote: > >> Also, add a target to the makefile to build a flashrom.8.html with groff. >> >> FIXME: svn:ignore for the html >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add infrastructure to support libusb-1.0.

On 07.01.2016 19:50, Stefan Tauner wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner Thanks! Comments below. > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 6ddca58..500f71f 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -966,6 +986,24 @@ ifeq ($(CHECK_LIBUSB0), yes) >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >