On Monday 09 August 2004 17:13, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Gunnstein Lye -- Monday 09 August 2004 16:35:
Seriously though, it seems the problem here is that most, but not all,
find it logical to map the up/down behaviour of a collective to the
backward/forward motion of a joystick (or joystick
* Gunnstein Lye -- Tuesday 10 August 2004 10:18:
On Monday 09 August 2004 17:13, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
pull - raise, push - sink. It doesn't matter how the
joystick is mounted. This is the right and realistic way. The other may be
consistent with fixed wing and newbie friendly, but fgfs'
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:57:24 +0200, Melchior wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, that's widely known. But nobody would seriously assume that
anywhere the collective lever is pushed down to raise, and pulled up
to sink.
..heh, precicely this is done by many R/C
Martin Spott said:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:57:24 +0200, Melchior wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, that's widely known. But nobody would seriously assume that
anywhere the collective lever is pushed down to raise, and pulled up
to sink.
..heh,
On Monday 09 August 2004 15:22, Jim Wilson wrote:
Martin Spott said:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:57:24 +0200, Melchior wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, that's widely known. But nobody would seriously assume that
anywhere the collective lever is pushed down
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:49:37 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:57:24 +0200, Melchior wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, that's widely known. But nobody would seriously assume that
anywhere the collective lever is
Jim Wilson wrote:
My preference would probably be Alex's original patch.
_My_ preference would be to put as default what the BO-maintainer
prefers as his _personal_ choice and add an optional property,
reverting the default behaviour, that every user can put into his
~/.fgfsrc
When we've got
* Gunnstein Lye -- Monday 09 August 2004 16:35:
Seriously though, it seems the problem here is that most, but not all, find it
logical to map the up/down behaviour of a collective to the backward/forward
motion of a joystick (or joystick throttle). There is no right or wrong here,
as there
* Martin Spott -- Monday 09 August 2004 17:07:
_My_ preference would be to put as default what the BO-maintainer
prefers as his _personal_
My preference would be that this is consistent with all future helicopters,
so it wouldn't really my choice alone. But our main goal is and should be
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So far we have only one user who disagrees with realistic
collective, so we might not even need a property. Just revert part
of today's patch. :-)
i am not the only one who disagrees with the realistic collective
(but you can choose to ignore any
* Jeff Sinsay -- Saturday 07 August 2004 16:28:
Yes indeed, when looking from the top down American Helicopters
rotate-counter clockwise, while European/Russian Helis rotate
clockwise.
Yes, that's widely known. But nobody would seriously assume that
anywhere the collective lever is pushed
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:57:24 +0200, Melchior wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Jeff Sinsay -- Saturday 07 August 2004 16:28:
Yes indeed, when looking from the top down American Helicopters
rotate-counter clockwise, while European/Russian Helis rotate
clockwise.
Yes, that's widely
12 matches
Mail list logo
