-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Berndt
Sent: 20 June 2005 01:33
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Short Reference Document error?
So, you think the UK is part of Europe
Gerard Robin wrote:
Le dimanche 19 juin 2005 à 23:27 +0200, Harald JOHNSEN a écrit :
Now I don't understand. Flightgear uses a key, its the same for all
contries whatever keyboard you use. What changes
is the position of this letter on the keyboard, not the key because we
are not using
On Sunday 19 June 2005 13:50, Jon Berndt wrote:
This short reference:
http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/FGShortRef.pdf
shows the rudder control on the numeric keypad as being the 0 and ,
(comma) keys. There is no comma on the numeric keypad. This is confusing.
IMNSHO the really confusing part
This short reference:
http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/FGShortRef.pdf
shows the rudder control on the numeric keypad as being the 0 and , (comma)
keys. There
is no comma on the numeric keypad. This is confusing.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Jon Berndt wrote:
shows the rudder control on the numeric keypad as being the 0 and , (comma)
keys. There
is no comma on the numeric keypad. This is confusing.
This was written by a German (Michael Basler) - we acually _have_ a
comma as the decimal separator on the numeric keypad :-)
I
On Sunday 19 June 2005 13:50, Jon Berndt wrote:
This short reference:
http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/FGShortRef.pdf
shows the rudder control on the numeric keypad as being the 0 and ,
(comma) keys. There is no comma on the numeric keypad. This is confusing.
Then you have a keyboard with US
So there's nothing wrong with it, it's just that every user has another kind
of keyboard layout. ;)
Best Regards,
Oliver C.
Aha! Well, yes, I understand, now, but for newbies from the U.S. it will be
wrong. I'll
modify the PDF and send it to Curt (or whoever maintains that doc). It needs
Le dimanche 19 juin 2005 20:03 +0200, Oliver C. a crit :
On Sunday 19 June 2005 13:50, Jon Berndt wrote:
This short reference:
http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/FGShortRef.pdf
shows the rudder control on the numeric keypad as being the 0 and ,
(comma) keys. There is no comma on the
Jon Berndt wrote:
Aha! Well, yes, I understand, now, but for newbies from the U.S. it
will be wrong. I'll modify the PDF and send it to Curt (or whoever
maintains that doc). It needs to be clear.
Aha ? In fact the notation in the cheat sheet _is_ correct and clear,
why the hell do you want to
Aha ? In fact the notation in the cheat sheet _is_ correct and clear,
why the hell do you want to break it ? It's just a matter of point of
view an I assume there are _many_ FlightGear users out there that have
a comma as a decimal separator - it's just that they probably don't
live in the
Jon Berndt wrote:
Aha ? In fact the notation in the cheat sheet _is_ correct and clear,
why the hell do you want to break it ? It's just a matter of point of
view an I assume there are _many_ FlightGear users out there that have
a comma as a decimal separator - it's just that they probably
Hi guys,
Since you are updating the documentation, I think it might be a good
idea to include the byte order lists of the various input/ouput
protocols. It would help someone who would want to fly flightgear
through some external application, and especially help those who are
building external
On Sunday 19 June 2005 22:20, Jon Berndt wrote:
Aha ? In fact the notation in the cheat sheet _is_ correct and clear,
why the hell do you want to break it ? It's just a matter of point of
view an I assume there are _many_ FlightGear users out there that have
a comma as a decimal separator
Jon Berndt wrote:
I think you are making a disingenuous assumption, here, on what I am saying. It
IS correct
and clear for*European*users, yes. All that I did to the PDF document was to
add a _note_
in the appropriate section in brackets that says: [U.S. keyboards use .
instead of
,]
Now
Hear hear.
- Original Message -
From: Oliver C.
To: FlightGear developers
discussions
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] "Short
Reference" Document error?
On Sunday 19 June 2005 22:20, Jon Berndt wrote:
Aha
Jon Berndt wrote:
Are you opposed, in principle, to providing U.S. users with accurate
information? I don't
understand what's got you so hot about this. It's an international project.
Let's be clear
for everyone.
This complies entirely with my intention. Please excuse me for missing
the
Le dimanche 19 juin 2005 23:27 +0200, Harald JOHNSEN a crit :
Jon Berndt wrote:
I think you are making a disingenuous assumption, here, on what I am saying.
It IS correct
and clear for*European*users, yes. All that I did to the PDF document was to
add a _note_
in the appropriate section
So, you think the UK is part of Europe, eh? We use the same convention as
the US for ./,
Vivian.
Heh. :-) What's above the number 4 (not on the numeric keypad)? Is it a $
or a ?
(not sure that will print correctly)?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel
This complies entirely with my intention. Please excuse me for missing
the point - from reading your comment I had the impression you simply
changed the comma to a dot in the PDF. Please send me a copy of your
PDF and I'll change the TeX source accordingly.
Thanks - will do.
I'm currently
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:33:19 -0500, Jon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, you think the UK is part of Europe, eh? We use the same
convention as the US for ./,
Vivian.
Heh. :-) What's above the number 4 (not on the numeric keypad)? Is
it a $ or a ? (not sure that will print
Oliver C. wrote:
Maybe it sounded in your first letter like that you may be one of
those Americans who allways try to make the USA the center of the
world.
It should be pointed out that those Americans live almost
exclusively in your television set. Real people, even republicans,
are
21 matches
Mail list logo
