Dear Whatever, for 2000 Euro/h I will do it for you :-
JOJ
..dear throttle1000, for 1000 US$ per hour,
I would be _pleased_ to to this job for you. ;-)
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman
Butthe problem is:FGFS doesn't support moving
parts,jetsandpropelleron/off, ...
When you plot the model, all of these things appear
together!
Try with this FS98 model: http://www.simviation.com/files/military/f14a9801.zip
This sound system seems to work very
well in Windows. Might be better than
what is now used? Linuxable also.
http://www.openal.org/home/
JOJ
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On my computer sound stops playing after 5s!
PC/Win98.
JOJ
In any case, for the purposes of flight simulation, SL works well
enough and also works (as far as I know) on all our supported platforms.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
I have tested this several times .. even with my self
compiled version. The sound stops playing after few
seconds! Happens every time I run FGFS. And this is
the only game that does that! I run FU3, MSCombatSim,
and several other games WITHOUT any sound problem.
FGFS is the only soundless one.
First, the obvious solution is not to run 1.2.x ...
after all, the 1.4 series has been released stable.
I am not running any version since it cannot even
be downloaded! This bug was there 1/2 year ago!
Second, from memory (back when I was running 1.2)
the bug was only a problem with navaid
The idea would be to use the graphichs
part of MS files.
They have lot of nice airplane outside and
panel graphics.
That alone would take 1000 years to
do.
Yes. They have errors! But one should only
use what is
good and ignore what is not correct. I am
only saying that
those files are
That's it! Keep them separate. Just add what is missing. The user then
downloads these two parts and gets a nice airplane. The source package
needs only couble of planes .. as a demo. Rest could be downloaded from
several sites that support MSFS files. FGFS would only add the physics
file.
It is
We should not care about that! Just support the format! It would then be
the USER's problem - what he downloads and where from. Same as
with Autocad dwg files! Some are free to download and some are not.
But a common format helps to transfer IDEA's around the world. And
is better than 1000
Can I see a candidate here? :-)
JOJ
The .gau files are just .dll's. Up through FS5 they were popularly
believed
to be scrambled, but actually were simply compressed by an absurd
Lempel-Ziv on top of run-length scheme that enlarged more of them than
it
compressed. In FS2000 they switched to
I would not like to start to mess with this project too much. There seem
to be lot of peoble writing code already! Too many peoble messing
around just makes it worse.
JOJ
Okay, I see what you mean. The problem is that someone has to care
enough to write the code. So far, you seem to the
I agree! The geometry (contact points) is maybe usefull too? And the names
and makes data. As said all what is good could be used. It takes lot of time
to draw nice airplanes. And there is lot of none programmers who want to
do that. Why not let them to do it .. and consentrate on the physics?
I say what I think! And I think what I want! Realistic feedback is
never too bad. I am just realistic about my ability to produce code.
It's not too many lines a day. If I have too many projects - nothing
gets never done.
Hey
All I read is a lot of 'gripes' about why we aren't doing this and
Thanks for the link. My project is more to use real scanned
maps. Calibrate them and show position etc. information on
them. Using GPS and other data.
The maps can be aeromaps, roadmaps or any special maps
with special information on them. The user scans the maps and
uses computer to keep track
I just try to find a sim that makes the job. Hard to find!
And I really want to reuse those planes available in MSFS.
FGFS is still a demo. Not yet a usable product!
JOJ
happy flying your self - alone!
and after lurking for a year decide to make 15 posts or so
in the first 24 hours after
Not true! All windows should be equal after 95.
They all use the same WIN32 core. And they even
run the same exe files!
For a programmer there should only be one system:
WIN32 (95, 98, 2000, NT etc)
Additional to NT etc. in 95/98/etc there is a dos window
and the dos is simulated by the WIN32
The DOS is dead after 95. I know because I had
lot of problems since the WIN32 dos in WIN95 was
not any more a real dos. It was a WIN32 emulating dos.
The file name header was no more kept as it was in the
real DOS. I kept some secret bytes in the file header
space on the real DOS .. and it
17 matches
Mail list logo
