Re: [Flightgear-devel] procedural bridge generation

2013-09-23 Thread Olivier
Thomas, De : Thomas Albrecht Envoyé le : Lundi 23 septembre 2013 22h38 Objet : Re: [Flightgear-devel] procedural bridge generation > I was thinking to circumvent the Terragear toolchain completely (for now), > and 'just' generate 3d bridge models > based on O

Re: [Flightgear-devel] procedural bridge generation

2013-09-23 Thread Thomas Albrecht
Hi Adrian, I was thinking to circumvent the Terragear toolchain completely (for now), and 'just' generate 3d bridge models based on OSM data. These could then go into the scenery DB, perhaps with a tag that indicates they were automatically generated. I _guess_ the next scenery build will inclu

[Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread Jörg Emmerich
Saikrishna wrote: Can you do a "sudo apt-get update" and then try it? Hi - yes -nice trick - i did not know yet. And it even works!!! It is installing now - I guess for a few hours - I will report the result! thanks --

[Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread Jörg Emmerich
Sorry i overlooked that you wrote simgear must be removed too. I did now remove it and retried - same result "flightgear : Depends: flightgear-data-all (>= 2.12.0) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages." ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread Saikrishna Arcot
Can you do a "sudo apt-get update" and then try it? Saikrishna Arcot On Mon 23 Sep 2013 11:57:06 AM EDT, Jörg Emmerich wrote: > Sorry > i overlooked that you wrote simgear must be removed too. > I did now remove it and retried - same result > > "flightgear : Depends: flightgear-data-all (>= 2.12.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread James Turner
On 23 Sep 2013, at 16:49, Markus Wanner wrote: > Any other aircraft that users might download which would fail if I patch > this one as well? > > Given that 2.12.0 was released with "compatability", are you going to > change this for a potential 2.12.1 or for 3.0? I'd prefer to leave as-is for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat.gz and TerraSync

2013-09-23 Thread James Turner
On 23 Sep 2013, at 15:19, Tomash Brechko wrote: > Sure I'm aware of this, and please feel free to change the internals at any > moment without notice (as a last resort I can add an option to the script to > create its own DB based on navdata - just don't see the reason for this at > the momen

[Flightgear-devel] Fwd: apt.dat.gz and TerraSync

2013-09-23 Thread James Turner
Begin forwarded message: > Could it be some special format comments in the C++ code and an extraction > script to update http://wiki.flightgear.org/List_of_Nasal_extension_functions > ? Wouldn't recommend Doxygen though, I think something grep-able would be > enough. Would be fine with me,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread Markus Wanner
On 09/23/2013 11:58 AM, James Turner wrote: > Actually, I spoke too soon - the ZLT-NT /is/ in the base package. I just > check the official FLightGear-2.12.0 tar.bz and the ZLT-NT is there > (good) and the reference to kt70-compatability is also there. So I'd > suggest to check your files or workfl

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread Gijs de Rooy
> Any other aircraft that users might download which would fail if I patch > this one as well? There may be aircraft outside official fgdata that need editing. Given that we've changed the property in-between releases, it would be good to mention it at http://wiki.flightgear.org/Aircraft_mainten

[Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread Jörg Emmerich
I retried again today 15:25 UTC and got emmerich@emma-work:~$ sudo apt-get install flightgear [sudo] password for emmerich: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be ins

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat.gz and TerraSync

2013-09-23 Thread Tomash Brechko
2013/9/23 James Turner > I think you should investigate the magvar() function: > Great, just what I need! As ever, the problem here is we have no way to auto-document what's exposed > to Nasal. > Could it be some special format comments in the C++ code and an extraction script to update http:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat.gz and TerraSync

2013-09-23 Thread Tomash Brechko
Hi, 2013/9/23 James Turner > I would greatly prefer you NOT do this, because the internal format of the > cache (eg, the fact it's a SQL DB) is deliberately opaque. > Sure I'm aware of this, and please feel free to change the internals at any moment without notice (as a last resort I can add an

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat.gz and TerraSync

2013-09-23 Thread James Turner
On 23 Sep 2013, at 13:58, Tomash Brechko wrote: > I use fgdata from git repo and so have a fresh copy of apt.dat.gz. I noted > that apt data is actually ahead of what is fetched with TerraSync: some > airports (at least UHPB, UIAE, UIUB, UIIB, but likely much more) present in > apt.dat.gz (a

[Flightgear-devel] apt.dat.gz and TerraSync

2013-09-23 Thread Tomash Brechko
Hello, I use fgdata from git repo and so have a fresh copy of apt.dat.gz. I noted that apt data is actually ahead of what is fetched with TerraSync: some airports (at least UHPB, UIAE, UIUB, UIIB, but likely much more) present in apt.dat.gz (and thus shown in Atlas) but not in the scenery (fgfs -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread Saikrishna Arcot
There is, but I think I screwed something up in that list (my version condition might have been wrong). Saikrishna Arcot On Mon 23 Sep 2013 08:40:40 AM EDT, James Turner wrote: > > On 23 Sep 2013, at 12:31, Saikrishna Arcot > wrote: > >> I've updated my PPA >>

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread James Turner
On 23 Sep 2013, at 12:31, Saikrishna Arcot wrote: > I've updated my PPA to FlightGear 2.12. See my forum post for instructions on > how to install 2.12. I guess .deb has no support for a 'replaces' list like RPM, so you can't name the old packages and hence make upgrade work? James--

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread Saikrishna Arcot
I've updated my PPA to FlightGear 2.12. See my forum post for instructions on how to install 2.12. On Mon 23 Sep 2013 04:21:39 AM EDT, Jörg Emmerich wrote: > > Wonderful > just

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread Saikrishna Arcot
If you are referring to my FlightGear PPA, then there is a problem upgrading to 2.12. I had tried the upgrade, but seeing that it failed, I then disabled the PPA in the hopes that no one else would get the buggy packages. I should have a fix out within hours. "Jörg Emmerich" wrote: >Wonderful

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread James Turner
On 23 Sep 2013, at 10:46, Markus Wanner wrote: > On 09/23/2013 11:27 AM, James Turner wrote: >> The affected aircraft isn't in the base package, but /is/ in fgdata Git. >> So wearing the 'Debian maintainer' hat you did the right thing, but from >> the terms of flightgear patches, we check /all/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread Markus Wanner
On 09/23/2013 11:27 AM, James Turner wrote: > The affected aircraft isn't in the base package, but /is/ in fgdata Git. > So wearing the 'Debian maintainer' hat you did the right thing, but from > the terms of flightgear patches, we check /all/ aircraft, not just those > included in the base package

[Flightgear-devel] [BUG] FGRUN internationalization

2013-09-23 Thread Lizandro
Hi Fred! The Portuguese translation is not working in FGRUN for Windows version 1.7.0. Translation is working correctly in version 1.6.2 of FGRUN. Could you please check? Regards,* * *Lizandro Falcão* -- LIMITED TIME S

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread James Turner
On 23 Sep 2013, at 10:18, Markus Wanner wrote: > Of course, I did a quick grep in the 2.12 fgdata, but didn't find > anything relevant. (Navaids/ReadMe.FG226.txt was the only hit.) The affected aircraft isn't in the base package, but /is/ in fgdata Git. So wearing the 'Debian maintainer' hat

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread Markus Wanner
Anders, On 09/23/2013 10:10 AM, Anders Gidenstam wrote: > Very good, except that one of the instances corrected is the name of a > property tree node. Hence, fgdata is a dependency that may be > affected too and needs to be checked. Of course, I did a quick grep in the 2.12 fgdata, but didn't f

[Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.12 UBUNTU

2013-09-23 Thread Jörg Emmerich
Wonderful just saw for the first time the complete FGFS-packages in UBUNTU-Synaptik - just great! (I spotted it because it seems UBUNTU tried an automatic upgrade to 10.12 - and failed. So I removed all previously installed pieces and tried from scrap:) BUT sorry: The major "flightgear-data-all" s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013, Markus Wanner wrote: > Hi, > > standard checking procedures on Debian revealed a spelling error: > "compatability" occurs a couple of times in the sources. > > I'm a bit worried about the "kt70-compatibility" boolean flag, but > corrected its spelling for the Debian release. >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] spelling fix: compatability

2013-09-23 Thread James Turner
On 22 Sep 2013, at 22:06, Markus Wanner wrote: > standard checking procedures on Debian revealed a spelling error: > "compatability" occurs a couple of times in the sources. > > I'm a bit worried about the "kt70-compatibility" boolean flag, but > corrected its spelling for the Debian release. >