Hi,
Second thought - would it be possible to setup a 'moderation' team to
monitor the chat on the server in (semi) regular intervals? i could
imagine if there were a bridge between the servers and irc that you
would get a few people volunteering to join.
say this bridge merely bridges chat, an
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2010, at 18:10, Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
>
>> In that case you bandwidth payload for no good reason.
>>
>>
> No worse than at present. As I said earlier, I would also put a filter on the
> sender to filter the "casu
Stefan Seifert wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 October 2010 18:57:05 Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
>
>
>> Implementing such a filter on the client side will open your eyes to the
>> pitfalls of that quite quickly - i'll just compile fg myself, and apply
>> a patch which disab
Gene Buckle wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
>
>> Oh dear ...
>>
>> http://www.noswearing.com/dictionary
>>
>> I was going to say that we could probably do a pretty good job at coming up
>> with a list ourselves, then I saw this site and realized I'm a complete
>> novice ...
>
Hello Jack,
I must say i am sorry for the experience you get on the Flightgear
Multiplayer Servers. I myself can fully understand your answer to the
question and not understand the reaction of another user.
If i am not mistaken an Ignore feature is to come in the next stable
release, which wil
On 10/13/2010 10:59 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>
>
>> Curtis Olson wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi, the page:
http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#v2.0.0
says: "Version 2.0.0 [...] is
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Gary and Stuart,
>
> We could certainly explore the donation route. I'm doing a little bit
> of research to try to determine what the realistic costs would be to
> setup a dedicated server to run a multiplayer system. That will give
> us a better idea what we need to shoo
Stefan Seifert wrote:
> On Thursday 07 October 2010 17:38:13 Curtis Olson wrote:
>
>
>> I haven't researched this, but I wonder what a fair price would be to rent
>> a dedicated linux server with an unmetered 100mbit connection to the
>> internet? Would that be sufficient to run a good multiplay
Reagan Thomas wrote:
> Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
>
>> i once took care of sorting out the legal situation of OpenTTD.
>> OpenTTD was reverse engeneered from Transport Tycoon (Deluxe, IIRC).
>> This work was done in Sweden, where now law prohibited the reverse
&
, before needing to
take action - some companies even risk that - and there is usually a lot
more money to be gotten than with Flightgear or other GPL released projects.
greets
Nathanael Rebsch
On 06/22/2010 01:56 AM, Peter Morgan wrote:
> sorry.. I am definately not good as explaining thi
useless
stuff all the time.
however, i personally would suggest that you do some activities outside.
with outside i mean something like ... SPORTS?
have some fresh air - stop moaning about! and perhaps you'll get to
enjoy some nice things about life instead of constantly complaning about
wha
Hi,
if you want some ideas, i used my scroll wheel on a saitec cyborg-x, see
attachment.
greets
Nathanael Rebsch
Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi all,
Inspired by the recent linux tag meeting, I decided to see whether I
could overhaul the Saitek Pro Flight Yoke configuration. Although just
would hit the server?
- do you use other methods other than round robin dns? (i.e. letting
users chose themselves?)
thanks.
Nathanael Rebsch
i have
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Hi Nathanael,
>
> It doesn't look like anyone replied yet. Here is a bit of info.
>
> The flightgear
sitory would be a better solution for the
project.
regardles of the version controll system in place though, it'd be better
you used one repository, rather than this current situation on mix and
match and merging back.
that's just to count as an en
James Turner wrote:
> On 24 Dec 2009, at 06:36, Peter Brown wrote:
>
>
>> -the route manager sometimes will open with 36000 feet in the hold altitude
>> box, and 7240 kts in the hold speed box. Any attempt to change them will
>> default back to these amounts. I am trying to see if relates to
James Sleeman wrote:
> On 28/11/09 01:59, Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
>>
>> enable users to load modules, see /etc/default/pulse
>>
> Doesn't appear to make a difference.
sorry, i meant /etc/default/pulseaudio, but i assume you found the file
i meant ^^
i also in
I have edited /etc/default/pulse and made sure users are allowed to load
additional modules,
i also installed all modules i could find, and simple left .alsoftrc
state drivers=oss
i no longer need to kill pulse for it to work
(thou there was a need to restart services (which is tricky if pulse i
Erik Hofman wrote:
> James Sleeman wrote:
>
>
>> So, does anybody have the current CVS working well with pulse+alsa or
>> pulse on it's own?
>>
>
> I've never been a fan of pulse audio and will never use it in the
> future. Let's face it, it's like sending OpenGL streams through a
> soft
James Sleeman wrote:
> On 28/11/09 01:41, Martin Spott wrote:
>
>> experience is with leaving the system-wide "drivers" setting as is -
>> which typically means to leave the declaration emtpy - and not setting
>> anything different in the private config
>>
> In this case it selects the alsa
19 matches
Mail list logo
