I'm not so keen on computing and programming - so if
this works good, I don't see any problems!
--- LeeE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same
> box as FG - it could
> communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG
> would automatically
> start
I'm not so keen on computing and programming - so if
this works good, I don't see any problems!
--- LeeE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same
> box as FG - it could
> communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG
> would automatically
> start
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG would automatically
start a local process to use if a net or lan server isn't specified.
LeeE
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:17, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> hmmm... good idea fo
hmmm... good idea for mp and network.
But it still costs money to have internet and maybe
some flightschools, which want to use FGFS don't want
this because.
I think there should be still a possibility to have
this all on one pc without network.
HHS
--- leee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Tue
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 06:56, Durk Talsma wrote:
> On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
> > On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
> > > good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
>
On Nov 6, 2007 8:22 PM, Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Assuming that AI aircraft behave in a reasonably sane fashion, you'd only need
> to take care of elevation points across the runways and taxiways. These data
> could be sampled straight from the flightgear scenery, and perhaps store
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:22, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Assuming that AI aircraft behave in a reasonably sane fashion, you'd only
> need to take care of elevation points across the runways and taxiways.
> These data could be sampled straight from the flightgear scenery, and
> perhaps stored locally
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 10:41, Tim Moore wrote:
>
> I'd be a bit concerned about the performance implications of this approach.
> If the intent is to run this program on the same machine as FlightGear,
> then there will need to be a fair amount of tuning to make sure that the
> real-time Flight
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 09:25, Oliver Schroeder wrote:
>
> I really think, setting up a mp-client which feeds traffic is the right way
> to go. That way it does not matter, if the traffic is real or artificial.
> And best of all, flightgear itself does not need any changes at all.
> In fact, th
> Tim Moore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Oliver Schroeder wrote:
> > I really think, setting up a mp-client which feeds traffic is the right way
> > to
> > go. That way it does not matter, if the traffic is real or
artificial. And
> > best of all, flightgear it
Carroll Barry wrote:
> I don't have access to a live feed but I'm hoping to get a delayed
> one
>
perhaps, in the same way as fboweb @ http://www.fboweb.com/ has.
Aviation Data Systems (who produce fboweb.com) are listed as a Class 1 ASDI
Direct subscriber on the ASDI website - so they have acc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
>> On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
>>> Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
>>> even just AI? So that every
Hi Stuart, Thomas, Oliver
Firstly thank-you to everyone so far, some good ideas have been put forward and
It is seeming more likely that this might work.
I don't have access to a live feed but I'm hoping to get a delayed one perhaps,
in the same way as fboweb @ http://www.fboweb.com/ has.
I'll
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
> On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
> > Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
> > even just AI? So that every client would see the same traffic.
>
> Note: This is moving into a slightly di
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
> > good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
> > traffic - would be great!
>
> Yeah! How about setting up an mp-s
Csaba Halász wrote:
> On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
>> good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
>> traffic - would be great!
>
> Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
> ev
--- Carroll Barry wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the
> moment I am using tracking data from this site:
> http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html
>
> What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircraft
> programmatically
Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Carroll Barry:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Would your solution allow me to manually control
> what might be thousands or aircraft?
>
> I haven't looked into the multiplayer protocol yet because I am just using
> the standalone exe on my pc. Would I be
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the reply. Would your solution allow me to manually control what
might be thousands or aircraft?
I haven't looked into the multiplayer protocol yet because I am just using the
standalone exe on my pc. Would I be correct in thinking that I would implement
the following:
or all the replies,
Barry.
-Original Message-
From: "Leidson Campos A. Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlightGear developers discussions"
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:32:26 -0300
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Programmatic control of AI traffic
Hi Barry,
I
Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Carroll Barry:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the
> moment I am using tracking data from this site:
> http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html
>
> What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircr
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
> good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
> traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
HHS
--- Carroll Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time
> air traffic. At the moment I am using t
Hi Barry,
I did a work to a Brazilian institute past year and the software to control
the aircraft, in fact control the flighgear simulator, exactly like your
project.
I did a C module that interacts with Telnet server of FlightGear and
controls the flight using the telnet properties/commands.
I
Hello all,
I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the moment
I am using tracking data from this site: http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html
What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircraft
programmatically from a c++ application.
I have tried
25 matches
Mail list logo