-devel] FlightGear on 32 bits versus 64 bits system
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:23 PM, James Turner wrote:
On 22 Sep 2008, at 23:05, Vivian Meazza wrote:
A binary search, which I'm also trying, takes days. At some point we
left
OSG 2.4, used an interim version, then migrated to osg 2.6. An osg
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear on 32 bits versus 64 bits system
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:23 PM, James Turner wrote:
On 22 Sep 2008, at 23:05, Vivian Meazza wrote:
A binary search, which I'm also trying, takes days. At some point we
left
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I'm profiling with absolutely _everything_ disabled (including replay). _If_
that had shown that the stagger went away I would have reintroduced features
one by one. But I can't even get that far atm. Still trying though, and
still trying to identify the cause. I note,
Curtis Olson wrote:
What aircraft is being flown in these tests? If hash.c looks like a
hotspot, that could also be triggered by an aircraft that had a lot of
new nasal code added. Or it could be newly added default system nasal
code? I don't know how much of FlightGear functions
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Er ... couple of words spring to mind there - grandmother and eggs :-). But
I know that you are trying to help.
Alright, I'm just about to lay down activities for FlightGear for the
second time (and now for good) because of this statement. There was a
time where i
Erik Hofman wrote:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Er ... couple of words spring to mind there - grandmother and eggs :-). But
I know that you are trying to help.
Alright, I'm just about to lay down activities for FlightGear for the
second time (and now for good) because of this statement. There
Tim Moore wrote:
I think you misunderstand the sense of the idiom teaching your grandmother
to
suck eggs. It implies nothing about the maturity of the teacher. Vivian
meant
that you were treating him like a child -- that's the teaching an elderly
person
to suck eggs part -- but I
Tim Moore wrote :
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Er ... couple of words spring to mind there - grandmother and eggs
:-). But
I know that you are trying to help.
I thought if was related to the chicken and egg problem, but I didn't
see why grandmother should be involved ;-)
I think you
On mercredi 17 septembre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
Hello,
Running without any problem with FG on a 32 bits computer (which my usual
computer)
recently, I have had to build FlightGear on a 64 bit computer with FC9.
Both computers have the same GPU (Nvidia 7800 GS AGP 8).
I was disappointed
On Monday 22 September 2008 12:16:13 gerard robin wrote:
Again on that topic, i was wrong about 64 bit , which has nothing to do
with the stutter/jitter within FG.
That's true (since we've seen the same stuttering on 32 bit machines as well).
However, even though in your case disabling fancy
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:54 AM, AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2008 12:16:13 gerard robin wrote:
Again on that topic, i was wrong about 64 bit , which has nothing to do
with the stutter/jitter within FG.
That's true (since we've seen the same stuttering on 32 bit machines as
On lundi 22 septembre 2008, Curtis Olson wrote:
I am hearing a pretty distinct glitch in the audio about once per second
... it's not so much of a hard break, but disruption in continuity. I'm
not sure if this is related to a pause in FlightGear, or the openal drivers
on Fedora 9, or what?
AJ wrote
On Monday 22 September 2008 12:16:13 gerard robin wrote:
Again on that topic, i was wrong about 64 bit , which has nothing to do
with the stutter/jitter within FG.
That's true (since we've seen the same stuttering on 32 bit machines as
well).
However, even though in your
Hi Vivian,
Vivian Meazza wrote :
As you know, I am. I have profiled the cvs-head. Nasal/hash.c seems to
be a _very_ significant CPU hog, but I can't link it to the staggers. I
note however that when I profile an old FG/osg from last Apr, it is stagger
free, and hash.c doesn't figure in the
Hi Fred,
Fred wrote:
Hi Vivian,
Vivian Meazza wrote :
As you know, I am. I have profiled the cvs-head. Nasal/hash.c seems to
be a _very_ significant CPU hog, but I can't link it to the staggers. I
note however that when I profile an old FG/osg from last Apr, it is
stagger
free,
Vivian Meazza wrote:
As you know, I am. I have profiled the cvs-head. Nasal/hash.c seems to be a
_very_ significant CPU hog, but I can't link it to the staggers. I note
however that when I profile an old FG/osg from last Apr, it is stagger free,
and hash.c doesn't figure in the profiling.
On lundi 22 septembre 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Hi Fred,
Fred wrote:
Hi Vivian,
Vivian Meazza wrote :
As you know, I am. I have profiled the cvs-head. Nasal/hash.c seems to
be a _very_ significant CPU hog, but I can't link it to the staggers. I
note however that when I profile
Hi Erik
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear on 32 bits versus 64 bits
system
Vivian Meazza wrote:
As you know, I am. I have profiled the cvs-head. Nasal/hash.c seems to
be a
_very_ significant CPU hog, but I can't link it to the staggers. I
gerard
On lundi 22 septembre 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Hi Fred,
Fred wrote:
Hi Vivian,
Vivian Meazza wrote :
As you know, I am. I have profiled the cvs-head. Nasal/hash.c seems
to
be a _very_ significant CPU hog, but I can't link it to the
staggers. I
note
On 22 Sep 2008, at 22:25, Vivian Meazza wrote:
AJ and I _think_ we are talking about the same problem. We might not
be,
although the description of the symptoms, which we have discussed many
times, seems to be the same. The underlying cause might not be the
same. It
might be the code,
On lundi 22 septembre 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote:
gerard
On lundi 22 septembre 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Hi Fred,
Fred wrote:
Hi Vivian,
Vivian Meazza wrote :
As you know, I am. I have profiled the cvs-head. Nasal/hash.c seems
to
be a _very_ significant
James
On 22 Sep 2008, at 22:25, Vivian Meazza wrote:
AJ and I _think_ we are talking about the same problem. We might not
be,
although the description of the symptoms, which we have discussed many
times, seems to be the same. The underlying cause might not be the
same. It
might
On 22 Sep 2008, at 23:05, Vivian Meazza wrote:
A binary search, which I'm also trying, takes days. At some point we
left
OSG 2.4, used an interim version, then migrated to osg 2.6. An osg
rebuild
here takes well over an hour. So far, I've come about halfway
forward from
Apr, which
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:23 PM, James Turner wrote:
On 22 Sep 2008, at 23:05, Vivian Meazza wrote:
A binary search, which I'm also trying, takes days. At some point we
left
OSG 2.4, used an interim version, then migrated to osg 2.6. An osg
rebuild
here takes well over an hour. So
Fred
Vivian Meazza wrote :
My latest build with MSVC9 (32 bit) is suffering severe jitter, so
much that
it is unusable, as I mentioned earlier. I have profiled the code, but
nothing obvious showed up yet. I'm continuing to look.
I tried to compile FG with MSVC9 and it is far more
25 matches
Mail list logo
