Hello Gerard,
> The Computer which run FG is:
>
> With LInux fedora core 5
ok, I have fedora core 6
>
> Cpu AMD Athlon XP3200 (32 bit)
> Memory 3 GB DDR dual channel 3200
CPU AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (no dual core)
Memory 2 GB ECC DDR dual channel 3200
>
> GPU NVIDIA 7800GS 500MZ Memory 512 Mo DD
On Sun 13 May 2007 17:41, Matthias Boerner wrote:
> Hello Gerard,
>
> > Hello Mathias,
> >
> > Your "10-20 frames more", seems to me very poor regarding the
> > comparison, i get from 10 to 15 fps with the recent one and a now
> > with that old one i recover from 60 to 85, which is a huge
> > diffe
Hello Gerard,
> Hello Mathias,
>
> Your "10-20 frames more", seems to me very poor regarding the
> comparison, i get from 10 to 15 fps with the recent one and a now
> with that old one i recover from 60 to 85, which is a huge
> difference.
I get an performance increase from about 80/90 fps to 100
On Sat 12 May 2007 23:01, Matthias Boerner wrote:
> Hallo Georg,
>
> I have done a "fresh" checkout of OSG, PLIB, SimGear and FlightGear
> today at 3 pm in the afternoon. Everything compiled without a problem.
> But I don't realize a drop in frame rates. But in contrast to my last
> checkout of 24t
On Sunday 13 May 2007 10:16:43 Georg Vollnhals wrote:
Hi Georg,
> Hi Matthias and Nick,
>
> I only can confirm this.
> After Matthias' post I did a complete new compile cycle last night(OSG,
> SimGear, FlightGear) and had a look on the framerates at 2 wellknown
> places.
>
> Unfortunately the pro
On Saturday 12 May 2007 22:01:42 Matthias Boerner wrote:
> Hallo Georg,
>
> I have done a "fresh" checkout of OSG, PLIB, SimGear and FlightGear
> today at 3 pm in the afternoon. Everything compiled without a problem.
> But I don't realize a drop in frame rates. But in contrast to my last
> checkout
Hallo Georg,
I have done a "fresh" checkout of OSG, PLIB, SimGear and FlightGear
today at 3 pm in the afternoon. Everything compiled without a problem.
But I don't realize a drop in frame rates. But in contrast to my last
checkout of 24th April I get about 10-20 frames more. So I think
everyt
On Sat 12 May 2007 02:29, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
> Georg Vollnhals schrieb:
>
>
> Just as a feedback, compiled without problem with the latest
> SimGear/FlightGear CVS. Now my old framerates are back. Really a big
> difference!
> There are several strange little display errors but I can live with
Georg Vollnhals schrieb:
> gh.robin schrieb:
>
>>>
>>>
>> Hello Georg,
>>
>> Because, i have a lot of backup (SG/FG/OSG) , i did rebuilt FG with an
>> older
>> OSG (10-04-2007) i had kept.
>>
>> Not from a new download
>>
>>
>> The best, i guess, for you is to download from my U
gh.robin schrieb:
>>
> Hello Georg,
>
> Because, i have a lot of backup (SG/FG/OSG) , i did rebuilt FG with an
> older
> OSG (10-04-2007) i had kept.
>
> Not from a new download
>
>
> The best, i guess, for you is to download from my URL the sources.
>
> I have built a tar.gz file which
On Fri 11 May 2007 22:30, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
> gh.robin schrieb:
> > Again,
> > After many research, i have found an OSG svn/cvs version which suit to
> > me, good frame rate close to that one i get with plib (plib with 3D
> > clouds and shadow).
> >
> > That version is dated 10-04-2007.
>
gh.robin schrieb:
> Again,
> After many research, i have found an OSG svn/cvs version which suit to me,
> good frame rate close to that one i get with plib (plib with 3D clouds and
> shadow).
>
> That version is dated 10-04-2007.
>
> Regards
>
>
Hi Gérard,
as my OSG framerate has dropped
On Fri 11 May 2007 15:28, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Nick Warne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am surprised nobody using CVS/SVN FG/SG/OSG reports this issue (or
> > replied to this) - there was a lot of chatter about it in IRC.
>
> The OSG SVN from last friday works for me as usual (with
On 5/10/07, Nick Warne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am surprised nobody using CVS/SVN FG/SG/OSG reports this issue (or replied
> to this) - there was a lot of chatter about it in IRC.
The OSG SVN from last friday works for me as usual (with SG/FG CVS
from the same time). I have given the exact
Nick Warne wrote
>
>
> On Thursday 10 May 2007 00:23:01 gh.robin wrote:
> > On Mon 7 May 2007 17:05, Nick Warne wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > There seems to be an issue, reported by a few in IRC.
> > >
> > > Latest build from SVN/CVS makes FG unusable. Frame rates
> are (for
> > > me) at l
On Thursday 10 May 2007 00:23:01 gh.robin wrote:
> On Mon 7 May 2007 17:05, Nick Warne wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There seems to be an issue, reported by a few in IRC.
> >
> > Latest build from SVN/CVS makes FG unusable. Frame rates are (for me) at
> > least 60% worse.
> >
> > E.g. pc7 at FHAW - b
On Mon 7 May 2007 17:05, Nick Warne wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There seems to be an issue, reported by a few in IRC.
>
> Latest build from SVN/CVS makes FG unusable. Frame rates are (for me) at
> least 60% worse.
>
> E.g. pc7 at FHAW - before 43 - today after updates, 18.
>
> Lightning at KSFO - before
Hi all,
There seems to be an issue, reported by a few in IRC.
Latest build from SVN/CVS makes FG unusable. Frame rates are (for me) at
least 60% worse.
E.g. pc7 at FHAW - before 43 - today after updates, 18.
Lightning at KSFO - before 19 - today after updates 6 (unusable).
Nick
18 matches
Mail list logo
