Dear Vivian,
Your figures sound about right as I also get very
frustrated with this also, in fact when I am filming making the movies I have
found something interesting!
When I use mibs for example and set it on a fixed heading to do straight in
line pan scans for panoramic
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 12:14, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> According to this chart, it seems you are right :
> http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/source/src/Aircraft/rep
>lay.cxx?view=graph&sortby=file&pathrev=PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029
>
> -Fred
Okay, I've just committed the port fr
Quoting Durk Talsma :
> On Tuesday 01 April 2008 22:39, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> >
> > So I conclude that:
> > 1. There is a problem with replay,
> > 2. MinGW has about the same performance gap between OSG and plib on XP as
> > gcc does on Linux.
> > 3. MinGW performance is probably as good as it ge
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 22:39, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
> So I conclude that:
> 1. There is a problem with replay,
> 2. MinGW has about the same performance gap between OSG and plib on XP as
> gcc does on Linux.
> 3. MinGW performance is probably as good as it gets.
> 4. Either MSVC8 doesn't compile
Tim Moore
> Sent: 01 April 2008 12:35
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Heiko Schulz wrote:
> |
> |> AND, with Linux and the
Hi
Frederic Bouvier schrieb am 01.04.2008 08:52:
> I have a Core2 Duo 2.66 ( E6600 ) and a 7600GT. I always saw the greatest fps
> increase after upgrading CPU and was disappointed by several GPU-only upgrade.
>
> All I can tell is that with the Seahawk, at KSFO, I have 75hz steady ( with
> vsync
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 13:10, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, LeeE wrote:
> > Hmm... [looks at watch and wonders if it's time to post
> > another missive about the _need_ for a redesign of FG to run on
> > MPP systems as it gets ever clearer that significant increases
> > in comput
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, LeeE wrote:
> Hmm... [looks at watch and wonders if it's time to post another
> missive about the _need_ for a redesign of FG to run on MPP systems
> as it gets ever clearer that significant increases in computing
> power have more or less stalled in terms of height (cpu speed
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 07:52, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Selon Vivian Meazza :
> > CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not surprised it runs
> > well!!! In particular I think the CoreDuo does threading better
> > than the P4. In case you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping
> > easily with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heiko Schulz wrote:
|
|> AND, with Linux and the same Graphics Card 7800 GS
|> 512 MB, i can notice the
|> same decrease of performance from FG-PLIB to FG-OSG
|> ,
|> I ever had about 20% less performance with OSG.
|>
|> I am running FG on AMD AT
--- Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Selon Vivian Meazza :
>
> > CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not
> surprised it runs well!!! In
> > particular I think the CoreDuo does threading
> better than the P4. In case
> > you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping easily
> with th
Selon Vivian Meazza :
> CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not surprised it runs well!!! In
> particular I think the CoreDuo does threading better than the P4. In case
> you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping easily with the output from FG-OSG
> - that's why the frame rates didn't increase.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Vivian Meazza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've tried both executables generated here using
> MSVC8, and Fred's pre-cooked binaries. So far as I can see the results are
> identical.
Here is a mingw32 build made with gcc 4.3.0 if you want to give it a try:
http://
> CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not surprised
> it runs well!!!
If you read carefully, I said that even on my old pc
there wasn't any trouble!
>In particular I think the CoreDuo does threading
better
> than the P4. In case
> you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping easily
> with the o
>
> AND, with Linux and the same Graphics Card 7800 GS
> 512 MB, i can notice the
> same decrease of performance from FG-PLIB to FG-OSG
> ,
> I ever had about 20% less performance with OSG.
>
> I am running FG on AMD ATHLON 3200 (32 bit) with
> AGP mothercard.
>
> May be OSG is mor
On lun 31 mars 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote:
SNIP
> >
> > Even on my old PC with a FX5200 OSG run very pretty at
> > least.
> > It is true that OSG is slower than plib- but the
> > graphic is much better (exxept the 3D-clouds and the
> > missing shadows)- please not another discussion about
> > OSG v
Heiko Schulz wrote
> Sent: 31 March 2008 20:45
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP
>
>
>
Vivian Meazza schrieb:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > About 10 days ago I got fed up with low frame
--- Vivian Meazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi
>
> About 10 days ago I got fed up with low frame rates
> using OSG around KSFO,
> so I went out and bought the best nVidia AGP card
> that I could find - 7600gs
> with 512Mb of VRAM. I fitted it with great
> anticipation to my machine - P4
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
