"Ben Morrison" writes
>The problem with this approach is that I have no experience with modeling
>aircraft. I have downloaded blender and played around with it but that's
>about it. How long would you say it would take you to create this model,
>just so I have an idea. I was also wondering
Hi there,
I need some explanation about FGTileEntry::WorldCoordinate.
Its parameters are :
- sgCoord* obj_pos, must be the computed coordinates (cart + hpr)
- Point3D center, guess it is an offset in cartesian coord
- double lat, must be the lat (in deg) of the point to convert
- double lon, must
Ben Morrison wrote:
Yeah, I gave up on trying to work with Blender because of its interface.
One of my co-workers likes Blender but I think it is only because it is
free. I will look at AC3D.
I have a registered version of AC3D, and now prefer to work in blender -
once you learn the interface i
Le jeudi 12 mai 2005 Ã 09:46 -0400, Ben Morrison a Ãcrit :
>
> "Ben Morrison" writes
>
> >The problem with this approach is that I have no experience with modelling
> >aircraft. I have downloaded blender and played around with it but that's
> >about it. How long would you say it would take yo
* Ben Morrison -- Thursday 12 May 2005 15:46:
> Yeah, I gave up on trying to work with Blender because of its interface.
> One of my co-workers likes Blender but I think it is only because it is
> free. I will look at AC3D.
AC3D isn't only non-free, it also screwed its *paying* customers over, if
Gerard ROBIN wrote:
AC3D could be a good tool at the beginning when you start with 3D
modelling. But it is limited. You will discover quickly functionalities
missing. Look at the A380 wings shape. you cannot do it with AC3D.
Why not, is that forbidden?
Erik
Le jeudi 12 mai 2005 Ã 16:33 +0200, Erik Hofman a Ãcrit :
> Gerard ROBIN wrote:
>
> > AC3D could be a good tool at the beginning when you start with 3D
> > modelling. But it is limited. You will discover quickly functionalities
> > missing. Look at the A380 wings shape. you cannot do it with AC3D
Melchior FRANZ
>
> * Ben Morrison -- Thursday 12 May 2005 15:46:
> > Yeah, I gave up on trying to work with Blender because of its interface.
> > One of my co-workers likes Blender but I think it is only because it is
> > free. I will look at AC3D.
>
> AC3D isn't only non-free, it also screwed
This doesn't relate to this topic in anyway but the site looks like it is
partially down (www.flightgear.org). The menu on the left is missing. Has
anyone else noticed this? I am getting javascript errors and after viewing
the source it looks like the function call MainMenu() is causing an error
Ben Morrison wrote:
This doesn't relate to this topic in anyway but the site looks like it is
partially down (www.flightgear.org). The menu on the left is missing. Has
anyone else noticed this? I am getting javascript errors and after viewing
the source it looks like the function call MainMenu()
I am using Internet Explorer 6.0. The error message is "Object expected".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis L.
Olson
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 1:53 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Web site pro
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Ben Morrison wrote:
This doesn't relate to this topic in anyway but the site looks like
it is
partially down (www.flightgear.org). The menu on the left is
missing. Has
anyone else noticed this? I am getting javascript errors and after
viewing
the source it looks like th
Le jeudi 12 mai 2005 Ã 15:11 -0400, Ben Morrison a Ãcrit :
> I am using Internet Explorer 6.0. The error message is "Object expected".
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis L.
> Olson
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 1:53 PM
> To:
> Just an information: Linux + Mozilla no problem
Konqueror has no problem either.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Ampere K. Hardraade a Ãcrit :
Just an information: Linux + Mozilla no problem
Konqueror has no problem either.
Windows + firefox = no problem either.
-Fred
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Windows + firefox = no problem either.
Sounds like we need to find an expert in MSJavaScript ... :-(
Curt.
--
Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:
I know javascript if you send me the code, I can try and debug it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis L.
Olson
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 2:59 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Web site problems?
Ben Morrison wrote:
I know javascript if you send me the code, I can try and debug it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis L.
Olson
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 2:59 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel]
To make it work in Internet Explorer I changed the following line:
to
I think this will fix the problem.
Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis L.
Olson
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:09 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
S
* Ben Morrison -- Thursday 12 May 2005 22:35:
>
[...]
>
>
> I think this will fix the problem.
The validator doesn't think so:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flightgear.org%2Findex.shtml
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
F
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
The validator doesn't think so:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flightgear.org%2Findex.shtml
The point I think you are trying to make is that the "validator" still
has squawks. The proposed fix *does* make IE6 happy and linux/firefox
still works.
Cur
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 12 May 2005 22:52:
> The point I think you are trying to make is that the "validator" still
> has squawks.
No. The point was that the validator complains about the missing "type",
which is apparently a *BUG*. So the most obvious thing to do would have
been to fix the
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 12 May 2005 22:52:
The point I think you are trying to make is that the "validator" still
has squawks.
No. The point was that the validator complains about the missing "type",
which is apparently a *BUG*. So the most obvious thing to do w
Well then it should be:
Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melchior FRANZ
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:58 PM
To: flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Web site problems?
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 12 May
Ben Morrison wrote:
Well then it should be:
Not really, the validator is ignoring a meta tag in the header which has
been around since 1997 that describes that *every* script in the page
should be treated as "text/javascript".
Erik
___
Flightgear-de
On Thu, 12 May 2005 14:58:34 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > Windows + firefox = no problem either.
>
>
> Sounds like we need to find an expert in MSJavaScript ... :-(
..nah, just fix these wee errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%
Erik Hofman wrote:
Not really, the validator is ignoring a meta tag in the header which has
been around since 1997 that describes that *every* script in the page
should be treated as "text/javascript".
Actually not. Curtis forgot to add the following line to the header
section of the page:
Eri
Was HLA support ever added to flightgear?
Ben
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
On Thu, 12 May 2005 17:24:56 -0400, Ben wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Was HLA support ever added to flightgear?
..what do you mean by "HLA support"?
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios
Jon Stockill wrote:
> Ben Morrison wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I gave up on trying to work with Blender because of its interface.
>> One of my co-workers likes Blender but I think it is only because it is
>> free. I will look at AC3D.
>
>
> I have a registered version of AC3D, and now prefer to work in
> > Was HLA support ever added to flightgear?
>
> ..what do you mean by "HLA support"?
https://www.dmso.mil/public/transition/hla/
"The High Level Architecture (HLA) is a general purpose architecture for
simulation reuse
and interoperability. The HLA was developed under the leadership of the
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 12 May 2005 23:08:
> I'm happy to take web page patches in the future ...
OK. At the very same day that fgfs (the simulator) becomes bugfree,
I'll start to send patches for the website. Priorities ... :-P
m.
___
Fligh
* Ben Morrison -- Thursday 12 May 2005 23:24:
> Was HLA support ever added to flightgear?
$ find -name \*.cxx|xargs grep HLA || echo no
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/f
33 matches
Mail list logo
