Hal V. Engel wrote:
It would be really nice to get a similar pano of a D/K cockpit since that
would be very helpful getting the cockpit modeled.
This is the only one I'm aware of,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Hi,
I recently implemented the GPWS according to the tutorial:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/GPWS and let it merged into FGdata
To my own surprise it isn't working, though I can remember that the same
tutorial worked perfectly shortly after fixing of the GPWS.
I tried to fix it and
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 11:33 +, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
I recently implemented the GPWS according to the tutorial:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/GPWS and let it merged into FGdata
To my own surprise it isn't working, though I can remember that the same
tutorial worked
On 30 Nov 2010, at 12:37, Scott Hamilton wrote:
I'd be interested to hear how this goes, I also implemented
everything according to the Wiki tutorial, I remember it all worked
quite a while ago, but I can't remember the last time I heard it
working...
Thorsten B has done a huge amount of
Hi
Thorsten B has done a huge amount of work on the GPWS in
the past few months, my impression is that with the latest
Git code, it's working better than at any point in its
history - with the caveat, assuming you have configured it
correctly!
James
We just followed ThorstenB's wiki
I'd like to let everyone know that I just finished a project assigning
each aircraft model/cockpit a number between 0 and 10 indicating the
visual level of quality of the cockpit. The results can be found in the
forum here:
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4t=10080
Why did I do
On 30 Nov 2010, at 13:14, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
commit c44948041b9356c9d16acc2d888de109bf7866e7
Author: Erik Hofman
Date: Mon Nov 29 09:57:45 2010 +0100
PAtch by Andreas Gaeb to eliminate NaN's in the location code
Erik, can you talk a little about what this patch fixes? I can
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 14:03 +, James Turner wrote:
On 30 Nov 2010, at 13:14, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
PAtch by Andreas Gaeb to eliminate NaN's in the location code
Erik, can you talk a little about what this patch fixes? I can read the
description, and it sounds really great,
thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
What do the numbers mean?
=
Roughly, anything below 5 means that it isn't really finished and that I
think they should be alpha status. 7 and 8 are really nice cockpits, and 9
an 10 usually create a spontaneous 'wow!'.
I think the
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
What do the numbers mean?
=
Roughly, anything below 5 means that it isn't really finished and that I
think they should be alpha status. 7 and 8 are really
Tim Moore wrote:
I for one really enjoyed the list and plan to check out some of the more
highly rated ones with which I'm not familiar. I can't believe that the
ratings will come as a surprise to any aircraft developer, and I hope that
their egos aren't so fragile as to be discouraged by a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Tim Moore timoor...@gmail.com wrote:
I for one really enjoyed the list and plan to check out some of the more
highly rated ones with which I'm not familiar. I can't believe that the
ratings will come as a surprise to any aircraft developer, and I hope that
On 30 Nov 2010, at 17:04, Tim Moore wrote:
If I were you, I'd refrain from posting ratings as 'delicate' as this
one.
I for one really enjoyed the list and plan to check out some of the more
highly rated ones with which I'm not familiar. I can't believe that the
ratings will come as a
I do like Thorsten's list, especially since he attached images of each single
cockpit.
This makes it clear at what time of development he checked the aircraft.
Anyway, it is still a delicate subject and I don't think we'll ever find a
rating system that
works for all...
Curt wrote:
1. It
Thanks Chris,
Your letter seems pretty fairly written. What's emerging as my biggest
concern with this guy is the number of people we are hearing from who
haven't been able to get a refund without filing a complaint with their
credit card company and going to extreme measures. That makes the
On 30 Nov 2010, at 17:30, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Bring us back to an old discussion. This was implemented in the wiki, but
without dozens of
people voting per-aircraft it isn't very usefull... (most votings are just
the single author's 5 stars
I guess :P)
I voted! And I didn't make a
Cool, I wasn't aware of the wiki voting
Here's a random idea: if we put the wiki link for each aircraft in the
corresponding aircraft-set.xml file we could automatically link to it from
the aircraft download page ...
Curt.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
I do like
Curt wrote:
Here's a random idea: if we put the wiki link for each aircraft in the
corresponding aircraft-set.xml
file we could automatically link to it from the aircraft download page ...
Wouldn't it be easier to create redirect in the wiki from (for example)
On 30 Nov 2010, at 18:16, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to create redirect in the wiki from (for example)
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/f-14b to
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Grumman_F-14_Tomcat
This would only require you to add a link with
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Thorsten B has done a huge amount of work on the GPWS in
the past few months, my impression is that with the latest
Git code, it's working better than at any point in its
history - with the caveat, assuming you have configured it
Hi ThorstenB,
Yes, I kind of adopted the GPWS. And there haven't been any
recent
changes, so the wiki description should still be correct
(unless there
was a mistake from the beginning...).
I tried it shortly after you finished the tutorial and it worked perfect.
Now it stopped working...
There is already an open source radar display screen
http://www.albatross.aero/
It can take as input asterix formated data (
http://www.eurocontrol.int/asterix/public/subsite_homepage/homepage.html)
If FG or MPserver can provide an asterisk stream then it can be easily fed
to albatross.
Regards,
Thorsten wrote
-Original Message-
From: thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi [mailto:thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi]
Sent: 30 November 2010 10:49
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft model/cockpit rating
I'd like to let everyone know that I just finished a
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:15:39 + (GMT)
From: The Flight Simulator Network m...@flightsimulatornetwork.com
Reply-To: do-not-re...@flightsimulatornetwork.com
To: ge...@deltasoft.com ge...@deltasoft.com
Subject: Flight Pro Sim
A message to all members of
Eftychios Eftychiou wrote:
There is already an open source radar display screen
http://www.albatross.aero/
I'm surprised to read that they're actually now having source code on
offer, do you have a pointer to the code ?
It can take as input asterix formated data (
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
I had a look into, even ported the related subsystems over to the 733, but no
success.
Scott (working on the A380) noticed the same with the wiki-tutorial and the
GPWS. Interesting to know and maybe a hint: A380 and 733 are both JSBsim.
James Turner wrote:
A thick-skin is a requirement for [...]
everyone who's seriously trying to survive in the FlightGear
developer's shark tank ;-)
[...], but I'd hate to do
anything which means people keep aircraft 'secret' until they are
'finished' - we already know that leads to
Last time I used the radar-altimeter instrument it took too much time
IMO to update.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
I had a look into, even ported the related subsystems over to the 733, but
no success.
Scott (working on the A380) noticed the same with the
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
James Turner wrote:
A thick-skin is a requirement for [...]
everyone who's seriously trying to survive in the FlightGear
developer's shark tank ;-)
Any time someone criticizes my work I just watch a funny cat video like this
one
Curtis Olson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:41 AM, cullam Bruce-Lockhart wrote:
1. you could cut out holes where the cliff polygons are situated, leaving
these areas open in the final terragear result, and then place custom object
models in those holes. You might be able to leverage
Cheers Curt,
I'll keep writing letters to any e-site that publishes his material. I've also
asked my facebook friends to click on his ads, then go back and remove them for
being misleading.
For at least the last 20 years I've happily stood up and raised my fist against
many persons or
Curtis Olson wrote:
Any time someone criticizes my work I just watch a funny cat video like this
one and that really helps me feel better ...
Aaaah, good recipe, will try next time ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Hi,
Right, that is related to the problem. Depending on
configuration the
GPWS relies on a specific altitude source which is only
available for
YASim right now.
You could switch the category-8 parameter to 3
(instead of 2) -
and the GPWS will work with JSBSim and other FDMs.
Yep, does
On 30 Nov 2010, at 21:55, Heiko Schulz wrote:
We had this now several times now here on the list.
My thought about this is before I report a bug to the bug-tracker, I want to
know first if the bug isn't sitting in front of the pc.;-)
It's much better to create a bug, and have it closed 30
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:10:19 +0100, Gijs wrote in message
dub102-w12a229e288e123c22a53c5d3...@phx.gbl:
In order to promote our statement, I've created a YouTube video,
explaining some basic things about FlightSimPro and the like, and
reference the viewers to our statement. If we all vote
Hi folks,
both sites - actually just two different Apache virtual hosts, running
on the same system, fed from the same database - are subject to being
transferred to a new system. Therefore you might will encounter
inconsistencies during the phase of system- and DNS-transition,
probably for
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
As this is a pretty accurate emulation of the real thing (or maybe it is even
the real thing.. ;-)), how it gets its datas in real life? What is the source
in reallife?
The RL device may be configured to a number of radio altimeters -
I think the list is a good start , but as already mentioned , I'm my
own worst critic.
Rating my own work , I'd say decent 3d model , working FDM's but
plenty of room for improvement ,
and a FAIL for autopilot configuration .
Hopefully I can get back to work on them once life stabilizes here ,
and
Hi guys, how do I set the path for the development aircraft ...
outside the FG-ROOT/Aircraft. I did some searching but couldn't find
the email that announced this recent change.
Thanks
--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D
found it :
--fg-aircraft=/my/addons;
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:04 PM, syd adams adams@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, how do I set the path for the development aircraft ...
outside the FG-ROOT/Aircraft. I did some searching but couldn't find
the email that announced this recent change.
how can i render the 3d clouds in the server according to the setting by the
client?i just simple add a new item in the fdm for
expeiment:fgSetString(/environment/clouds/layer[0]/coverage, few);but it
didn't work.Is it possible to render the 3d clouds in real time accustomed to
the
I also needed to add an entry in Nasal/IOrules to allow reading in my
custom aircraft directories when using this in order for most aircraft
to load properly. This should be changed imho as IOrules has a READ
entry for $FG_AIRCRAFT/* already, and I would think explicitly added
aircraft
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
Eftychios Eftychiou wrote:
There is already an open source radar display screen
http://www.albatross.aero/
I'm surprised to read that they're actually now having source code on
offer, do you have a pointer to the
43 matches
Mail list logo
