On December 19, 2005 07:01 pm, scott wrote:
Ron Waite wrote:
Whenever I start to takeoff, no matter what plane I'm in, it pulls to
the right. Sometimes it will go straight for a few seconds then jerk
over to the right. Sometimes it will start going right from the
beginning, slowly and
On December 12, 2005 01:29 pm, Dave Culp wrote:
Thanks. That one is nicely lit. Here's one more with contrails:
http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/refuel-f16-003.jpg
The lighting isn't as good. I tried it with shadows enabled, but the
contrails don't look good with shadows. Maybe
On December 11, 2005 07:10 am, Pigeon wrote:
Hi all,
Cooked up some FG videos for everyone's pleasure...
http://pigeond.net/photos/flightgear/videos/
Perhaps in the future we could make some short video clips for
little parts of various FG flying tutorials too.
Pigeon.
On December 9, 2005 09:35 am, Gerard ROBIN wrote:
Again, i just get a new example with some snapshots which should
answer to your request, Chris
Just an indication , these are coming from Metar ( i do use it
everytime ) may be a BUG Somewhere.
2DClouds is OK
On December 10, 2005 09:39 pm, dene maxwell wrote:
Hi Syd,
Getting a pic of a wire-mesh texture is not a problem in NZ ( we invented
Hurricane wire fencing!!).
Does AC3D format support transparent/opaque appearances that would allow
wire-mesh fences to behave (lighting/shadows etc)
On December 7, 2005 06:17 pm, AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 22:56, Gerard ROBIN wrote:
Carrier elevators are working perfectly (CVS update).
We only need to define a Key Binding
for toggle property
property/ai/models/controls/elevators/property
which key could be
On December 4, 2005 01:38 pm, Vivian Meazza wrote:
I wish I could say 'no', but the fact is that it does. You will see a
marked drop in frame rate as someone joins, then it will go up again after
they are initialised, but not to the original rate. I'd like to think that
could be handles
On November 28, 2005 12:45 pm, dene maxwell wrote:
Thanks Eric,
Excuse my ignorance, what's FOV?
Dene
Field of view. Try pressing x/X.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
On November 26, 2005 12:46 pm, Gerard ROBIN wrote:
Le samedi 26 novembre 2005 à 21:21 +1300, T J a écrit :
The newly updated Concorde (v.2.1.) has an error with the nose. On my
computer, clicking on [ and ] does not move the nose up or down. Version
2.0 did not have this problem. Please can
On November 25, 2005 10:06 pm, dene maxwell wrote:
Ok, given i'll be 98se, going with 5000 series agp with as much system ram
as i can afford will give the best performance I can expect?
Have you thought about giving Linux a try?
Ampere
___
On November 22, 2005 04:37 pm, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
CVS-snapshots won't do, I think. Most of the normal users will only
install something when they've seen a version number go up.
Benno
We could always increase the revision number for the snapshots. For example,
0.9.10, 0.9.11, etc.
On November 21, 2005 03:45 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
Indeed, it's shocking to see how many people did not try one of the
prereleases.
Erik
Would that change anything? If they did try the pre-releases and reported
problems, would the final release really be delayed until the problem is
fixed?
On November 21, 2005 03:43 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Let me ask for some information, with no idea if this will help us move
forward or not, but it's an attempt.
1. Have you isolated which hardware, platform, drivers are affected? I
hear that some people running ATI hardware have no
On November 21, 2005 04:28 pm, Dave Culp wrote:
I've been flying multiplayer at pigeond.net, and I see myself at the
fg_server_map, along with several other people, but I don't see any other
airplanes in FG. I'm using the commands:
--multiplay=out,10,pigeond.net,5002
On November 21, 2005 04:53 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
This backtrace looks nonsensical ... gdb is confused obviously due to
missing symbols or some memory got stomped on. Did you also build
simgear with -g, since that seems to be where the actual error is
occuring. Hmmm, either gdb is really
On November 21, 2005 04:55 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Might I suggest doing releases more often? Maybe every two months
(like for the Linux kernel) is a bit much, but every three of four
months would be nice.
When having more regular releases, problems will be
On November 21, 2005 05:33 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
It's worth going back and double checking because it doesn't look like
the debugging symbols are in there correctly ... and make sure you don't
run strip on the binaries or libs because that explicitely removes the
debugging symbols.
On November 20, 2005 12:13 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
For Linux I've heard of people having excellent results with nvidia,
pretty ok results with ati (with some problems that crop up
occasionally.) And I've never heard of anyone running any serious
opengl applications with any other
On November 20, 2005 06:36 pm, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
Hi Christian,
I have to address this to Martin and those who have problems as *I* am
lucky with *no* problems at all.
When Martin told me about his problems with FG 0.9.9 and asked whether
it could be related to the FGTools program I only
On November 20, 2005 03:06 pm, Erik Hofman wrote:
Did you try disabling all of the new rendering features like shadows and
3d clouds?
Erik
Yes.
I'm pretty sure that this is an imcompatibility issue from SimGear's end, and
not some problems that is caused by misconfigurations or faulty
On November 20, 2005 06:46 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
For what it's worth v0.9.9 runs fine on all three windows machines I
have access to (admitedly all nvidia based.) One is a laptop, one is a
low end desktop, and the 3rd is a mid-to-lower range desktop. No doubt
we are trying to use more
On November 19, 2005 07:09 pm, David C. Chipman wrote:
Hi all,
This is the error I get in the terminal window when starting
fgfs:
opening file: /usr/share/FlightGear/data/Navaids/carrier_nav.dat
X Error of failed request: GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest
Major opcode of
On November 19, 2005 10:32 pm, David C. Chipman wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the output from glxinfo:
[snip]
I hope this helps someone on the list.
-David Chipman
So what card are you using?
Ampere
On November 16, 2005 01:18 am, Dene Maxwell wrote:
Today 01:18:56 am
After about an hour of flying, scrolling through the views and restoring
from the tower view to the chase view causes the aircraft(on auto-pilot) to
loose control and crash..
Under Win 98Me with all other precesses
On November 15, 2005 09:54 am, Andy Ross wrote:
I suspect you *could* do this with the animation code. At
start (from whatever binding creates the model) you copy the time
property to /where/ever/model-start-sec. Then you use a
subtraction node in the animation itself.
But honestly, things
On November 14, 2005 10:11 pm, Jon Berndt wrote:
And the wind blows them around over time.
ducking and running
:-)
Jon (B.)
The cross section of the contrail should be more like a spiral, and let's not
forget that the contrail rotates as well.
Ampere
On November 14, 2005 10:34 pm, Dave Culp wrote:
I'm trying to animate a model based on elapsed time (starting from when the
model first appears). Anyone know how to do this? I need the time to
start at zero when the model is first created, then tick at once per
second.
I see the Spitfire
On November 14, 2005 11:05 pm, Dave Culp wrote:
I want to animate an object, using the scale animation. Say I have a bit
of contrail which appears behind the user aircraft. I want that contrail
model to grow to about 2 or 3 times its starting size within 8 seconds. I
also want it to fade to
On November 12, 2005 01:46 pm, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
I took couple of pictures during a rainstorm (the storm in which the Air
France A340 crashed). May be they would help.
http://www.students.yorku.ca/home/perweb/41/ampere/DSC00047.JPG
http://www.students.yorku.ca/home/perweb/41/ampere
On November 12, 2005 01:05 pm, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
Perhaps there should be code to reduce visibility based on the amount of
rain, but still only provide whatever cloud cover that METAR calls for.
On the other hand, in a perfect world METAR would already be reporting
the reduction
On November 12, 2005 04:22 pm, Josh Babcock wrote:
At the risk of promoting copyright violations, I think you all should
check this out:
http://avaxhome.ru/ebooks/2005/11/10/detail/
Free Detail and Scale book in a pdf file. Hmm.
Josh
Woo... ahh...
Too bad I have no need for it.
I too
On November 12, 2005 06:54 pm, Josh Babcock wrote:
And?
And now I have enough data to build the models for a whole family of
aircrafts, which I intend to.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
On October 31, 2005 03:04 am, Vivian Meazza wrote:
This reminds me, It would be nice to have a multiplayer aircraft carrier
arena, where we could sit in the control tower and watch the takeoffs and
landings.
Mathias, Oliver and I are working on it ... I would think you will have it
by the
On September 29, 2005 09:05 am, Bill Galbraith wrote:
I built a DATCOM model for the A380, and passed it to Jon Berndt. He is
probably off-line for a day to two. I'm sure he will respond when he gets a
chance, updating us on the status of the A380 model.
You should send in your FDM so that it
On September 29, 2005 01:02 am, T J wrote:
Does anybody have any finnished/updated A380 files? If so could they please
send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
T J, you shouldn't even have the A380 on your computer in the first place, let
alone updates. The aircraft is not intended to be
On September 18, 2005 04:47 pm, syd wrote:
Hi Georg
Just to clear things up, I did the modelling and original flight
model,and Dave tweaked the flight model for much better performance.
What other panel funcionality would you suggest , I am only going on
photos , so there is a lot of guess
On September 16, 2005 04:32 pm, Mike Rawlins wrote:
Hi All,
Despite a good-faith effort searching the mailing list
archives, I've been unable to get AI traffic working.
Can someone please provide a brief (2-3 sentences)
HowTo?
The AI traffic is not really that advance at the moment. To see
On September 13, 2005 03:52 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
T J wrote:
How is the 1900D? Is the update posted yet?
It's in CVS, yes.
Erik
http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/data/Aircraft/b1900d/b1900d.tar.gz?tarball=1cvsroot=FlightGear-0.9
The above link should lead you right to
On September 12, 2005 03:58 am, Rick Simmons wrote:
So far I have been unable to attain straight and level flight. Using
keyboard control...
Use the mouse. You can do so by doing a right-click on the FlightGear window.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users
On September 9, 2005 05:22 am, T J wrote:
I recently downloaded the New York and London area scenaries from the
website. Trouble is none of the airports have buildings. Does anybody know
where I can download the buildings from? Thanks
Unfortunately, the scenery in FlightGear is very limited, as
On September 2, 2005 07:22 pm, T J wrote:
How do I get ATC to actually talk (i.e. I can hear the reply of what is
being said over the computer speakers?)
The functionality of the ATC is very limited at the moment, as the ATC will
only tell you what runway you should be landing at through text
On August 30, 2005 11:59 pm, RtX wrote:
Could someone elighten me on the --enable-real-weather-fetch option.
How does it work? At what intervals does it download weather? Could
this be the reason why sometimes in the sim, my aircraft will
drastically shake moreso than I would expect turbulence
On August 30, 2005 12:28 am, T J wrote:
Do you know when the 1900D and Citation will be developed to completion
(i.e. with mouse clickable panel.) I would also like to know if any
aircraft with detailed cockpits are avaliable for download anywhere, and
what the types of aircraft are. I have
On July 28, 2005 12:36 pm, Vivian Meazza wrote:
There was a theory going the rounds that it was the PAPI/VASI lights which
were/are the cause of the significant drop of frame rate around airports.
Vivian
Why can't just model them?
It is ridiculous to see each light taken only 4 pixels when
Here is the website for the server:
http://www.o-schroeder.de/fg_server
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
On July 14, 2005 04:37 pm, Robicd wrote:
I keep getting UDP packets regarding other users flying around but I
still don't see anyone with FGFS.
I am right beside runway 28R in KSFO at the moment. See if you can see me.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users
On July 14, 2005 04:54 pm, Robicd wrote:
I don't see anyone. Ethereal tells me there are Trep and aj2 online but
I don't see them :-( aj2 tells me he sees me. Do you too?
I am parked right at the KSFO 28R runway (in a taxiway).
I'm using fgfs 0.9.8a Win32 binary. Is this the problem?
I thought I saw someone, but then the plane disappeared and I go this message:
WARNGING: a disabled/broken routine has been called. This should be fixed!
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
The original message can be found here:
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=913mode=full
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
On July 13, 2005 02:35 pm, Andy Ross wrote:
Is this using the existing multiplayer code? I was under the impression
that it was p2p only; no servers...
Andy
I have no idea. You may want to contact the author using the E-mail address
is at the bottom of his post.
Ampere
On July 13, 2005 02:55 pm, Jon Stockill wrote:
Obviously some coordination is required to test this properly - so where
(and when) do we fly? Everyone to KSFO?
Jon
I want to fly in Europe. =P How about LFBO?
I live in Toronto, which is GMT -5:00. Since I am on summer break, I am
pretty
On June 27, 2005 10:36 am, Stephane Rodet wrote:
Hi Douglas,
I've seen such a thing (not a flight simulator, but the film of a
flight) at the Linuxtag in Karlsruhe, Germany, this week on the brand
new Cell processor. They are doing not mapping but ray tracing of such
images on a 3 ground.
On June 20, 2005 12:23 am, Andy Ross wrote:
Definitely a Harrier -- any of the original generation (Gr.3,
AV-8A, Sea Harrier FRS.1, the AV-8B has a much more complicated
set of avionics and isn't nearly as interesting for a pilot).
I assume you are going to code the entire Flight Control
On June 19, 2005 07:50 pm, Josh Babcock wrote:
Eventually I will probably do the last two no matter what. Along with
the B-29 they form the lineage of the Boeing 7X7 line, so I consider all
three to be very important aircraft.
Perhaps you should do some commercial airliners of the Boeing 7x7
On June 20, 2005 02:05 am, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On June 19, 2005 07:50 pm, Josh Babcock wrote:
Eventually I will probably do the last two no matter what. Along with
the B-29 they form the lineage of the Boeing 7X7 line, so I consider all
three to be very important aircraft.
Perhaps
On June 20, 2005 04:17 pm, Andy Ross wrote:
YASim isn't a fluid dynamics simulator, which is basically required
for turning details like wing planform or airfoil shapes into actual
performance data. And in practice that kind of shape data needs to be
far (!) more accurate than a typical 3D
The problem reported is from Avsim. Please go to
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=872mode=full
to see the full description of the problem.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
On May 3, 2005 06:56 pm, Mike Rawlins wrote:
After doing some testing on the first group above, I
note that the geometry seems to be the only parameter
that increases frame rate for me. I had been using
--geometry=1400x1020 on my Dell laptop (1.4 GHz
processor, 2 GB RAM, NVIDIA card), giving
On May 4, 2005 12:31 am, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
hmm... should this be made a default parameter when FlightGear is launched?
Ampere
Nevermind. It just resizes the size of the window.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users
On April 20, 2005 02:04 am, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
You probably need to merge all individual quads and triangles into single
surface for the wing extrado or the fuselage, and remove duplicated
vertices. PLIB only smooth shared edges and shared vertices. Seperated
objects are flat.
-Fred
I
Huh? The first picture is from the MDL file. The reported problems are
shown in the right picture.
I know that. The left picture is what I was referring to.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
On April 12, 2005 07:48 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
A soaring simulator is just too specific and FG tends to be a general
purpose, powered flight simulator.
I disagree.
Adding such thing as thermals into FlightGear will only add to the realisim.
Just because thermals are used by gliders, that
On April 11, 2005 08:28 am, Nick Coleman wrote:
I'm pretty familiar with compiling FG from source and CVS. Are there
any special considerations I need to look out for when compiling FG for
my Debian system? Things like PREFIX flags etc so that the binaries
end up in the 'correct' place?
Let's have some sound to go with it:
http://audio.liveatc.net:8010/kont.m3u
Or this:
http://www.lowapproach.com/socalapproach.ram
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
On February 18, 2005 04:06 pm, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On February 17, 2005 02:42 pm, Josh Babcock wrote:
Found a link to this on fark.com.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=777174size=Lsok=photo_nr=prev_i
d= next_id=
Josh
This photo brings up one question again: curved
On February 17, 2005 02:42 pm, Josh Babcock wrote:
Found a link to this on fark.com.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=777174size=Lsok=photo_nr=prev_id=
next_id=
Josh
This photo brings up one question again: curved taxiways.
With aircrafts like the A380 and B747, you can't make a turn
On February 1, 2005 03:36 pm, Dean Williams wrote:
The installaton at 0x0938b08b reference memory at 0x0b41d2ff. The
memory could not be written!...whatever that means.
Perhaps this is an out of memory error?
I have a similar problem in Linux a few weeks ago:
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=573mode=full
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
On January 25, 2005 05:11 pm, Erik Hofman wrote:
In case anyone wonders, I've been working on a fix for it for one and a
half day ...
Erik
lol...
I was expecting to see the word weeks, months or even years until the
very last word. =)
Ampere
___
On January 23, 2005 09:41 pm, Li-lun Wang wrote:
Hi,
My computer is a ThinkPad X31 with Pentium-M 1.4G CPU and ATI Radeon
Mobility M6 LY. I manually tweaked the ports tree and installed
FlightGear 0.9.8 on my FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE. Everything seemed to work
except that the frame rate was only
On January 21, 2005 07:39 pm, Greg Trounson wrote:
So, when do you think we'll be able to fly one of these big guys in
FlightGear? :)
Anyone working on a model?
Greg
http://www.flightgear.org/Gallery/
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
On January 2, 2005 01:11 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
Where can I get cities like New York with good graphics?
..define good graphics, the 0.9.7 scenery is the latest, chk the
FG scenery section.
Something like this perhaps?
That's the same guy asking the same question on Avsim.
Ampere
On December 22, 2004 07:24 am, William Earnest wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Flight Gear and Cockpit
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:14:42 +0100
From: Roger Wielgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is an OpenAL issue:
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=473mode=full
Someone on the mailing list also reached the same conclusion.
Ampere
On December 22, 2004 06:07 pm, Florian Pose wrote:
Hello there!
I compiled FlightGear 0.9.6 on my SuSE 9.0 system. I
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=496mode=full
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
On December 18, 2004 09:44 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Of course, there's the old joke I have to repeat ...
*A reporter was interviewing an old Scandinavian fighter pilot, on live
television, asking him how it was in the war.
Vell, said the old guy, vee used to fly
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=484mode=full
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
On December 12, 2004 03:52 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=442;
mode=full
Changing the content inside fgfsrc didn't work. I am out of idea. =(
I think he's using fgrun. That utility will always overwrite the
contents of the
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=442mode=full
Changing the content inside fgfsrc didn't work. I am out of idea. =(
While we are at it:
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=446mode=full
I can't find any similar problem in the
On December 10, 2004 07:28 am, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Umm ... that will generate yet another bounce reply from White_Wind, no?
Better send that to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or the flightgear-users list
maintainer. ;-)
m.
That gives me such a good idea. It will be funny to have mail bouncing back
On December 9, 2004 08:13 pm, Jon Stockill wrote:
Lee Elliott wrote:
Debian unstable on all my systems.
Slackware 10.0 here (as you'd probably guessed by the slackware packages
I keep producing).
Debian unstable here.
___
Flightgear-users mailing
On December 7, 2004 03:52 am, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Ampere K. Hardraade -- Tuesday 07 December 2004 05:48:
Perhaps it will be a good idea to think about having a config-file that
is loaded everytime Flightgear starts?
Good Idea. We could call it system.fgfsrc, or ~/.fgfsrc, or even
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=428mode=full
In addition to the flying backward problem that he described, there also
seems to be holes in the ground in his screenshot. Has anybody got the same
error as he does? I have never encountered errors like these, so
I apologize for not doing the homework for him before brining the question to
here.
Ampere
On December 6, 2004 03:38 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=45m
ode=full
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=45mode=full
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=423mode=full
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
The 747 does that too. I haven't try it out in 0.9.6, but as I recall,
applying heavy brake during landing will cause the nose landing gear to sink
into the ground thus leading to a crash.
My guess is that every aircraft does that.
Ampere
On November 5, 2004 03:39 pm, Giles Robertson wrote:
That would certain help.
Ampere
On November 4, 2004 04:28 pm, David Megginson wrote:
Thanks. I didn't manage it easily, but in a past life I was a
philologist working on medieval Germanic languages, so I can sometimes
fake it.
All the best,
David
On November 1, 2004 03:07 pm, Erik Hofman wrote:
Assuming we have support in cvs for multiple liveries (I haven't been
paying attention to that feature) then we should check with this artist
to see if we can include his work in the cvs version of FlightGear.
We have (I thinks since 0.9.4,
Perhaps I should just come to you for help in getting permission next time? =P
On a serious note, may be it will help if there is a person who can ask the
aircraft manufacturers for data using FlightGear's name?
Companies like Airbus and Boeing are giant coporation. They probably don't
have
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=302mode=full
Fatal Error: Could not gen source
This looks like a message from simgear, openal. If you google
gen source flight gear, you find this link:
http://www.simgear.org/doxygen/sample__openal_8cxx-source.html
This the
On October 22, 2004 04:41 am, Boris Koenig wrote:
well, functionally - pretty much yes I'd say, visually certainly not -
while I personally don't really like that fancy stuff - to be honest,
I usually don't even cope with it in the first place, I know some
applications (also flight simulators
On October 21, 2004 04:49 pm, C Sanjayan Rosenmund wrote:
Someone mentioned the ability of installing and uninstalling aircraft,
and possibly loading them as modules. This brought up (for me) the idea
of moving back the starting point when the program loads. Instead of
starting in the aircraft
One of the problems, as I pointed out earlier, is that the download size of
the base package is a bit on the huge size. Including all aircrafts into an
already big download will not be a good idea. So, the best option will still
be removing all the work-in-progress aircrafts from the base
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topicforum=198topic_id=303mode=full
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_mesgforum=198topic_id=302mesg_id=302page=
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Boris was writting a tutorial part of FlightGear, but there haven't been any
word about it. http://flitetutor.sourceforge.net/include.php?path=start.php
Ampere
On October 16, 2004 19:32, Josef Krzywon wrote:
I've
tried to search for a good manual wich explains me how to set the
Radio-stack
Nevermind; just found out that they are the exact same thing.
Ampere
On October 15, 2004 00:25, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Are you sure it is not the Chinese's Z-9G? The Z-9G is an export version
afterall.
http://images.google.ca/images?hl=enlr=ie=ISO-8859-1q=z-9gbtnG=Search
Ampere
How do I check them out?
Thanks in advance,
Ampere
On October 7, 2004 20:48, Nick Coleman wrote:
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation has had a stream of posts this last few
days of cockpit interiors, mainly on historical planes.
May interest some modellers here,
Nick
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
