dene maxwell
Hi guys,
I placed Nimitz (v098a) in my local harbour (Wellington, New Zealand) at
-41.246433 LAT, 174.886783 LONG, heading 198. The took off from NZWN on
runway 34.
Very enjoyable flight except the deck of the Nimitz under FGv098a doesn't
seem solid. Was only using the
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:31:07 +0200 (IST), Vassilii wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The CH Products Yoke and Pedals (USB) has worked fine here for at
least 2 years.
Regards
Sid.
Thanks to Sid and all the other recommenders of the things to use with
fgfs. I got a set of the above
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:56:42 +, David wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul Duncan writes:
Yeah, I think you're right. So, suppose we say start
off with Cessna 172 at KSFO *without* the Nimitz
scenario loaded.
You need a given time as well, to count the lighting
dene maxwell writes
How do i find what FPS i'm running under windows/FGv098a?
Start the sim then from the FILE drop down menu choose
Browse Internal Properties then choose SIM/ and then
frame-rate[0]
Cheers Innis
___
Flightgear-users mailing
Your idea is good,
Unfortunately we have others parameters, which are difficult to
measure,
what are the consequences, from AI (AC tanker, Carrier Nimitz, and
others) from Atlas (which geometry), which AC, and so on
Does FG running standalone ( i do have others appli running they
Hello you two!
Can you let me in on this? On Windows, can I add another carrier and set up the
TACAN as you describe?
Regards
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Gerard ROBIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 12:40 AM
To: FlightGear user discussions
Subject: RE:
From: Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
To: 'FlightGear user discussions' flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: RE: [Flightgear-users] Carrier Deck (v098a)
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:09:24 -
dene maxwell
Hi guys,
Martin
Hello you two!
Can you let me in on this? On Windows, can I add another carrier and set
up the TACAN as you describe?
Regards
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Gerard ROBIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 12:40 AM
To: FlightGear user
* Jon Stockill -- Friday 25 November 2005 19:52:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Jon Stockill -- Friday 25 November 2005 18:53:
unfortunately the scenery code doesn't place models
in tiles where there's no terrain - so they never show up.
What about delivering those with a tiny *.btg.gz
This is a great idea. Some wizard for new users that gives maximum eye
candy on their while still maintaining non-jerky FPS would be very
helpful, rather than having them manually twiddle the rendering
options/resolutions/cache sizes.
___
..tsk tsk, try 'aptitude dist-upgrade'. ;o)
:-) what scared me is that I remembered seeing kernel-source-2.6.11
etc and suddenly they were gone! I have just upgraded one of the computers
over to etch+2.6.14 this morning, noticing the linux-image-2.6.14 there
myself...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 10:49 +0100, MPCEE French Bureau a écrit :
Hello you two!
Can you let me in on this? On Windows, can I add another carrier and set up
the TACAN as you describe?
Regards
Martin
Hello Martin,
My personal configuration is not fair to be used in a generic
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 08:09 +, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
dene maxwell
Hi guys,
I placed Nimitz (v098a) in my local harbour (Wellington, New Zealand) at
-41.246433 LAT, 174.886783 LONG, heading 198. The took off from NZWN on
runway 34.
Very enjoyable flight except the
dene maxwell wrote:
When ever I run FG on ME I kill all processes except Explorer and
Systray (Before starting FG obviously :-)
Cheers
Dene
Superb!
What happens is the FPS drops and hickups keep happening yet they are
less severe, enough to keep the plane pilotable. In 1280x1024 mode
dene maxwell wrote:
How do i find what FPS i'm running under windows/FGv098a?
Type h to get the HUD then I to get the other HUD,
which displays the FPS down left.
Cycle H and h to get optimal color and brightness.
Eric
___
Flightgear-users
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 13:53 +0100, Gerard ROBIN a écrit :
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 10:49 +0100, MPCEE French Bureau a écrit :
Hello you two!
Can you let me in on this? On Windows, can I add another carrier and set up
the TACAN as you describe?
Regards
Martin
Hi, just a real quick one. Definately not scared off -
nobodies threatened to fire bomb my house yet ;-) But
I'm just getting ready to leave the US and get back to
the UK. I'll be back on the list later this week when
I'm over the jet lag, and I'll catch up on everyone's
ideas :-)
TTFN!
Paul
* Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 28 November 2005 11:55:
* Jon Stockill -- Friday 25 November 2005 18:53:
unfortunately the scenery code doesn't place models
in tiles where there's no terrain - so they never show up.
The problem is that the objects are placed relative to the tile
center. And
Hi Eric,
What would be interesting is to kill each process in turn and find the one
that has the greatest effect then compare notes with other ME users.
A reboot in between each iteration may make it a more valid test to minimise
the effect of memory leaks etc.
Cheers
Dene
From: Eric
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I've fixed that. The platforms show up in my copy of FlightGear now. :-)
Have to clean up first, and then to persuade one of the overlords.
I'd better work on a nicer looking platform model then (unless someone
already has one?) The current one was just put in as a
Thanks Eric,
Excuse my ignorance, what's FOV?
Dene
From: Eric Brasseur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Frames/Second and Hardware survey
On November 28, 2005 12:45 pm, dene maxwell wrote:
Thanks Eric,
Excuse my ignorance, what's FOV?
Dene
Field of view. Try pressing x/X.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Hi again
I used the version, which was released on 17. november.
Is this the final version ?
Thanks for helping
bye
olaf
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 21:05 +0100, olaf a écrit :
Hi again
I used the version, which was released on 17. november.
Is this the final version ?
Thanks for helping
bye
olaf
Mine is 2005-20-11 dated
--
Gerard
___
Flightgear-users
Hello to French people and others.
Scenery 0.9.9 Airport LFPO is wrong:
The runway axis is beside the Aircraft axis.
And the AC Standby on the grass (not very good for B747)
Some time ago i did say that error with 0.9.8.
Nobody seems to be interested.
I did rebuild that scenery and everything is
Hi,
when I start Flightgear at EDDF my plane is allways positioned at the
end of runway 36. Unfortunately there is no runway 36. There is a runway
18, but it is only used in one direction (18). I allready checked
apt.dat, but it lists only one line per runway. Is there any way to
correct
Carsten Hoefer wrote:
when I start Flightgear at EDDF my plane is allways positioned at the
end of runway 36. Unfortunately there is no runway 36. There is a
runway 18, but it is only used in one direction (18). I allready
checked apt.dat, but it lists only one line per runway. Is there any
Hi Eric
Further to FPS, I'm running FGv098a on ME. 1.8Ghz P4, 256M RAM, GF2 MX
32Mbyte.
Killing all processes (Virus Protection, Firewall, CD writer wizard, Printer
Toolbox, enhanced keyboard) except Systray, Explorer, wkcalrem,devldr16,
loadqm.
Running Fairchild A10 @ 300kts, I get 60fps
Curtis L. Olson schrieb:
Carsten Hoefer wrote:
when I start Flightgear at EDDF my plane is allways positioned at the
end of runway 36. Unfortunately there is no runway 36. There is a
runway 18, but it is only used in one direction (18). I allready
checked apt.dat, but it lists only one line
Carsten Hoefer wrote:
when I start Flightgear at EDDF my plane is allways positioned at the
end of runway 36. Unfortunately there is no runway 36. There is a runway
18, but it is only used in one direction (18).
Is this the airport? :
Andy Ross writes:
Carsten Hoefer wrote:
when I start Flightgear at EDDF my plane is allways positioned at the
end of runway 36. Unfortunately there is no runway 36. There is a runway
18, but it is only used in one direction (18).
Is this the airport? :
Andy Ross schrieb:
Carsten Hoefer wrote:
when I start Flightgear at EDDF my plane is allways positioned at the
end of runway 36. Unfortunately there is no runway 36. There is a runway
18, but it is only used in one direction (18).
Is this the airport? :
Bravo ;-))
It seems that europe is not very well represented. I did never flew
above our capital, but I can tell that not (so) far away from my home,
in Pisa neither la torre pendente nor Piazza dei Miracoli and not
even the superb duomo, or at least the batistero are present.
I do
dene maxwell schrieb:
Hi guys,
I placed Nimitz (v098a) in my local harbour (Wellington, New Zealand)
at -41.246433 LAT, 174.886783 LONG, heading 198. The took off from
NZWN on runway 34.
Very enjoyable flight except the deck of the Nimitz under FGv098a
doesn't seem solid. Was only using
Carsten Hoefer wrote:
Yes it's this airport. I do live next to it and any plane starting on 36
would fly directly over my flat.
The official airport site states, that runway 18 is only allowed in this
direction.
The key words being in this direction. Runway 36 is still
presumably allowed
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 22:45 +0100, Valérie et Vincent a écrit :
Bravo ;-))
It seems that europe is not very well represented. I did never flew
above our capital, but I can tell that not (so) far away from my home,
in Pisa neither la torre pendente nor Piazza dei Miracoli and
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 14:00 -0800, Andy Ross a écrit :
Carsten Hoefer wrote:
Yes it's this airport. I do live next to it and any plane starting on 36
would fly directly over my flat.
The official airport site states, that runway 18 is only allowed in this
direction.
The key words
Hi,
This raises an interesting question, here in New Zealand and Australia we
have public sites that Aeronautical Information Publications can be
downloaded from. These consist of approach templates, Operation Data etc. Do
other countries have similar sites? I feel this might be a handy
Andy Ross schrieb:
Carsten Hoefer wrote:
Yes it's this airport. I do live next to it and any plane starting on 36
would fly directly over my flat.
The official airport site states, that runway 18 is only allowed in this
direction.
The key words being in this direction. Runway 36 is
No wonder it stays at 55 the entire flight..:-
thanks
Dene
From: Gerard ROBIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Frames/Second and Hardware
On Monday 28 November 2005 23:00, Andy Ross wrote:
Basically, it sounds like you are asking the FlightGear/X-Plane
airport database to understand that takeoffs are not allowed on runway
36 and therefore place the aircraft on some other runway at startup,
which is something is just isn't
Gerard ROBIN wrote:
I do not understand why that error continue to be there, i gave the
information in June, i rebuilt that scenery, i offered it.
Nothing is done with the 0.9.9 Scenery.
Airport updates need to be sent to Robin Peel. That way they are fixed
at source, and everyone benefits
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 22:57 +, Jon Stockill a écrit :
Gerard ROBIN wrote:
I do not understand why that error continue to be there, i gave the
information in June, i rebuilt that scenery, i offered it.
Nothing is done with the 0.9.9 Scenery.
Airport updates need to be sent
Josh Babcock writes:
David Luff wrote:
Isn't one of the Nepalese ones with a big mountain at one end (Lukla?)
effectively unidirectional due to the obstacle?
It can't be, since you have to take off in the opposite direction that
you land. A one direction runway would have you
Le mardi 29 novembre 2005 à 00:32 +, David Luff a écrit :
Gerard ROBIN writes:
What can be said when the AC is out of the Runway ?
See the other thread :
Scenery 0.9.9 Airport LFPO (Paris
Orly) is wrong
This looks at first glance like a mismatch between the generated
Hi there
Paul Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] was reputed to have said:
It seems we could do with a little spreadsheet like we
used to have which gives frames/second for a given
hardware/OS combination. If you guys on the list could
E-mail me the following info, I'll make a nice little
Just found this program yesterday... LOVE IT!
Everything works well (even got my old CH flightstick
to work!), but whenever I choose an aircraft with a 3d
panel, I get a BLANK panel. I've read some of the
docs, and looked at some of the xml files, but could
sure use some pointers. Anybody know
Hi,
I am new to using FlightGear and am currently working on a
project that involves a flight simulator with a Cessna cockpit and a screen
that is divided into 3 sections in sort of a wrap around(not fully, but tilted
to give a more panoramic view. Each board is displayed using a
48 matches
Mail list logo
