Re: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-22 Thread Gerard ROBIN
Le mercredi 14 septembre 2005 à 22:22 +0100, AJ MacLeod a écrit :

 
 The more people testing CVS and finding bugs, the better the next release is 
 going to be, and that benefits everyone.
 
 Cheers,
 AJ
 
Recently i tried to use again the CVS release, 
We cannot fly under a bridge or taxiing   into a hangar.
Is it a bug. ?

Cheers
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread Mike Rawlins

I'm considering doing an update of my version 0.9.8
which I installed after its release in February.  At
that time I installed plib, simgear, and FG through
CVS checkout of source and data to my system running
linux (FC2).  The previous few full installs
(configure, make, make install) I've done in the past
have gone well, and after 15-20 minutes of issuing
commands everything usually works.  

Can anyone give me a few pros and cons to doing an
update?

I believe the command is update after logging in to
cvs, correct?  What is the exact syntax?

Are there lots of nifty new additions to the sim that
suggest I might want to do the update?

I'm really pretty happy right now flying 0.9.8 as it
was released.  Want to be sure I know what I'm doing
before trying to update (and maybe screw up what I
have now...).

Cheers,
Mike

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread Erik Hofman

Mike Rawlins wrote:

I'm considering doing an update of my version 0.9.8
which I installed after its release in February.  At
that time I installed plib, simgear, and FG through
CVS checkout of source and data to my system running
linux (FC2).  The previous few full installs
(configure, make, make install) I've done in the past
have gone well, and after 15-20 minutes of issuing
commands everything usually works.  


Can anyone give me a few pros and cons to doing an
update?

I believe the command is update after logging in to
cvs, correct?  What is the exact syntax?


cvs -z3 up -Pd


Are there lots of nifty new additions to the sim that
suggest I might want to do the update?


Yes, we've been very active lately (thanks anyone).


I'm really pretty happy right now flying 0.9.8 as it
was released.  Want to be sure I know what I'm doing
before trying to update (and maybe screw up what I
have now...).


Maybe you just want ot back it up before doing the update?

Erik

___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread AJ MacLeod
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 14:29, Mike Rawlins wrote:
 I believe the command is update after logging in to
 cvs, correct?  What is the exact syntax?
The instructions on the cvs downloads page on the FG and SG websites are 
pretty straightforward - if you follow them you shouldn't go too far wrong.

 Are there lots of nifty new additions to the sim that
 suggest I might want to do the update?

Certainly - graphics-wise we now have some very nice 3d clouds and shadows for 
both aircraft and buildings.  The carrier is pretty much fully operational - 
i.e. one can take off and land on it, as well as have a degree of control 
over its course (order it to head into the wind, for example).  The other, 
really excellent update that I can think of is to the mulitplayer system.

Credit for this lies mainly with Oliver Schroeder 
(http://www.o-schroeder.de/fg_server).  His latest patch has not made it into 
CVS yet, and can be found here for now 
http://www.adeptopensource.co.uk/personal/misc/mp-os2-3.patch

That patch is just OS' os2-2 patch trivially modifed to compile against the 
most current CVS which changed while he was away - I'm sure he'll have an 
updated version on his own website very shortly.

Instructions for joining the FlightGear multiplayer server can be found on the 
FlightGear wiki and on Oliver's website... a great online map of currently 
connected clients is available at 
http://pigeond.net/flightgear/fg_server_map.html

The difference that having real traffic makes to the whole FG experience is 
amazing!

 I'm really pretty happy right now flying 0.9.8 as it
 was released.  Want to be sure I know what I'm doing
 before trying to update (and maybe screw up what I
 have now...).

Like Curt said, you can keep both, as I do - I just build and install the 
latest CVS under my /home directory, by specifiying appropriate --prefix when 
running ./configure.

Cheers,

AJ

___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread Mike Rawlins

--- AJ MacLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wednesday 14 September 2005 14:29, Mike Rawlins
 wrote:

  I'm really pretty happy right now flying 0.9.8 as
 it
  was released.  Want to be sure I know what I'm
 doing
  before trying to update (and maybe screw up what I
  have now...).
 
 Like Curt said, you can keep both, as I do - I just
 build and install the 
 latest CVS under my /home directory, by specifiying
 appropriate --prefix when 
 running ./configure.
 
 Cheers,
 
 AJ

Thanks AJ, Curt, and Erik.  Sounds like I should do a
complete build and install from cvs rather than using
the update command.  What is the advantage of doing
cvs update?  Seems to me that update would be used
more frequently than a full checkout (eg weekly
basis).  So since it's been 7-8 months since I
installed 0.9.8, I might as well do a complete install
of source to another directory.  And as Curt said,
this will allow me to keep the working version as it
now stands.

Mike





__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread Gerard ROBIN
Le mercredi 14 septembre 2005 à 15:40 +0100, AJ MacLeod a écrit :
 On Wednesday 14 September 2005 14:29, Mike Rawlins wrote:
  I believe the command is update after logging in to
  cvs, correct?  What is the exact syntax?
 The instructions on the cvs downloads page on the FG and SG websites are 
 pretty straightforward - if you follow them you shouldn't go too far wrong.
 
  Are there lots of nifty new additions to the sim that
  suggest I might want to do the update?
 
 Certainly - graphics-wise we now have some very nice 3d clouds and shadows 
 for 
 both aircraft and buildings.  The carrier is pretty much fully operational - 
 i.e. one can take off and land on it, as well as have a degree of control 
 over its course (order it to head into the wind, for example).  The other, 
 really excellent update that I can think of is to the mulitplayer system.
 
Ho it is not perfect:
with metar activated  FG crash with Yasim ac FDM and gives some smog
with JSB ac FDM.

I think you must wait before using CVS.


___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Mike Rawlins wrote:


Thanks AJ, Curt, and Erik.  Sounds like I should do a
complete build and install from cvs rather than using
the update command.  What is the advantage of doing
cvs update?



The advantage of cvs update is that you can keep your source tree 
current with all the latest development changes.


If you are talking about your bringing your v0.9.8 tree up to current 
and trying to decide if you should check out a new tree, or just update 
the existing one, that's more of a personal preference.


If you want to keep your v0.9.8 tree intact then just check out a new 
copy.  If you are worried about bandwidth, then a cvs udpate might save 
you a few bytes transfered.



Seems to me that update would be used
more frequently than a full checkout (eg weekly
basis).  So since it's been 7-8 months since I
installed 0.9.8, I might as well do a complete install
of source to another directory.  And as Curt said,
this will allow me to keep the working version as it
now stands.



Yup, cvs is just a tool, you get to decide how best you want to use it. :-)

Curt.

--
Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project  http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread AJ MacLeod
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 19:34, Gerard ROBIN wrote:
 Ho it is not perfect:
No software ever is, to my knowledge :-)

 with metar activated  FG crash with Yasim ac FDM and gives some smog
 with JSB ac FDM.
True, I'd forgotten to mention that temporary pitfall.  I'm sure Harald will 
have it patched in no time though.  Hardly a reason to avoid testing the 
other features...

 I think you must wait before using CVS.
Rubbish - just don't enable METAR for now.  I doubt it's enabled by default 
anyway, and if someone with the wits to check out and compile the CVS version 
comes across a problem, they're likely to have the wits to search the list 
archives and soon see how to work around.

The more people testing CVS and finding bugs, the better the next release is 
going to be, and that benefits everyone.

Cheers,
AJ

___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread Gerard ROBIN
Le mercredi 14 septembre 2005 à 22:22 +0100, AJ MacLeod a écrit :
 On Wednesday 14 September 2005 19:34, Gerard ROBIN wrote:
  Ho it is not perfect:
 No software ever is, to my knowledge :-)
 
  with metar activated  FG crash with Yasim ac FDM and gives some smog
  with JSB ac FDM.
 True, I'd forgotten to mention that temporary pitfall.  I'm sure Harald will 
 have it patched in no time though.  Hardly a reason to avoid testing the 
 other features...
 
  I think you must wait before using CVS.
 Rubbish - just don't enable METAR for now.  I doubt it's enabled by default 
 anyway, and if someone with the wits to check out and compile the CVS version 
 comes across a problem, they're likely to have the wits to search the list 
 archives and soon see how to work around.
 
 The more people testing CVS and finding bugs, the better the next release is 
 going to be, and that benefits everyone.
 
 Cheers,
 AJ
 
OK it is not any perfect system, I just mean, if we recommend somebody
to use CVS, the limitations must be explained.
It is not a stable solution, i accept that some advantages are existing,
but we get many disagreements from hard modifications, especially when
we spend a lot of time in developing new models on the 9.8 -base, and
using functionalities which suddenly disappear.
I have been fg-devel subscriber (and i give up) to conclude that is
better to wait the next stable release rather than running permanently
behind an uncontrolled system (from the user point of view).
It is not a criticism 
I applause to the progress and the quality of FG, but a usual user must
know where he is going to when he goes to CVS.


___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread Jon Berndt
  with metar activated  FG crash with Yasim ac FDM and gives some smog
  with JSB ac FDM.
 True, I'd forgotten to mention that temporary pitfall.  I'm sure Harald will 
 have it patched in no time though.  Hardly a reason to avoid testing the 
 other features...

Strange. Why should choice of FDM make a difference?

Jon


___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread George Patterson
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 19:18 -0500, Jon Berndt wrote:
   with metar activated  FG crash with Yasim ac FDM and gives some smog
   with JSB ac FDM.
  True, I'd forgotten to mention that temporary pitfall.  I'm sure Harald 
  will 
  have it patched in no time though.  Hardly a reason to avoid testing the 
  other features...
 
 Strange. Why should choice of FDM make a difference?
 
 Jon

Jon, 

I can't answer that one. 

However Pigeon (sorry don't know his real name) and I confirmed that bug
last night. He was going to post a back trace to the devel list.


George


___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-users] Updating v0.9.8 via CVS

2005-09-14 Thread Gerard ROBIN
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 10:16 +0930, George Patterson a écrit :
 On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 19:18 -0500, Jon Berndt wrote:
with metar activated  FG crash with Yasim ac FDM and gives some smog
with JSB ac FDM.
   True, I'd forgotten to mention that temporary pitfall.  I'm sure Harald 
   will 
   have it patched in no time though.  Hardly a reason to avoid testing the 
   other features...
  
  Strange. Why should choice of FDM make a difference?
  
  Jon
 
 Jon, 
 
 I can't answer that one. 
 
 However Pigeon (sorry don't know his real name) and I confirmed that bug
 last night. He was going to post a back trace to the devel list.
 
 
 George
 
 
Because i am no longer Devel subscriber i cannot give directly the
following information:

The cause of the crash is coming from fgclouds.cxx line 48
 === last_scenario( none ),
none is in conflict withmetar

May be that could help

Cheers
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d