Here in Laconia it's bike week...so Motorcycles are ruling the streets, the
nights, the decibel level...
rrrRROOmelissa
Melissa McCarthy
Hours: whimsical or by appointment
>>>Adult, m
OK ... I won't.
Reid
On Jun 13, 2006, at 6:17 AM, Alan Bowman wrote:
don't tell me you're all in watching the world cup! it's all gone
very quiet..
and baseball hasn't even reached the all stra game yet!
From: "Allan Revich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
To:
Subject: RE: FLUXLIST: test
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:13:33 -0400
Still hockey in Canada. Edmonton still has a chance.
-Original Mess
On 2006 Jun 13, at 1:00 PM, JJ wrote:
Hi Rod!
Half Price Books in Mesquite...libraries pay better
but they are SO dull!
How're yer ears?
j.
Oh! practically right down the street!
I need to visit!
Ears are slowly getting better - I think - some issues,
but I'm gonna see how I feel whe
Still hockey in Canada. Edmonton still has a chance.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rod Stasick
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:32 PM
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: test
On 2006 Jun 13, at 11:52 AM, JJ wrote:
>
Hi Rod!
Half Price Books in Mesquite...libraries pay better
but they are SO dull!
How're yer ears?
j.
--- Rod Stasick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2006 Jun 13, at 11:52 AM, JJ wrote:
>
> > In Texas lately it's more about basketball
> > playoffs--the bookstore I work...
>
>
> Where?
>
On 2006 Jun 13, at 11:52 AM, JJ wrote:
In Texas lately it's more about basketball
playoffs--the bookstore I work...
Where?
Rod
---
Now playing: The Fourth Tower of Inverness - Hi Oh Silver, Awaay!
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alan Bowman
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 6:18 AM
> To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
> Subject: FLUXLIST: test
>
>
>
> don't tell me you're all in watching the world cup!
> it's all gone very
> quiet..
>
>
of course i am watching!
on both spanish and english tv!
From: "bibiana padilla maltos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: RE: FLUXLIST: test
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:01:11 -0700
ah... hmmm... noo...
Original
well... i can tell you France is doing warm ups to start the game, and
Brazil will play in about 4 hours.
Original Message Follows
From: "Allan Revich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
To:
Subject: RE: FLUXLIST: test
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:
You passed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Bowman
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 6:18 AM
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: FLUXLIST: test
don't tell me you're all in watching the world cup! it's all gone very
quiet..
ah... hmmm... noo...
Original Message Follows
From: Alan Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: FLUXLIST: test
Date: 13 Jun 2006 10:17:37 -
don't tell me you're all in watching the world cup! it's all gone very
quiet..
don't tell me you're all in watching the world cup! it's all gone very
quiet..
Test headache
,scrub ,note ,crash ,bent ,seat ,spill
,towel ,gusher ,speeding ,misty ,splasher ,hopping
,ant , tongue, lab ,loot ,test ,shake
,creeper ,knower ,headache ,seeping ,dollar ,sprawler
,gum ,mote ,gnat ,lock ,teat ,smoke
,folder ,runner ,grabber ,caller ,factor ,sobster
John M.
Congratulations Walter. You passed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walter Cianciusi
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:56 AM
To: Fluxlist
Subject: FLUXLIST: Test
Test
Test
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 October 2005 22:57
To: fluxlist@scribble.com
Subject: FLUXLIST: test test
I hope this works
it worked for me
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fluxlist@scribble.com
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 5:57
PM
Subject: FLUXLIST: test test
I hope this works
got it
***
BIBIANA PADILLA MALTOS
Original Message Follows
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
To: fluxlist@scribble.com
Subject: FLUXLIST: test test
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:57:12 EDT
I hope this works
I hope this works
In a message dated 5/24/05 2:51:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
test!!!
false
by Madawg
test!!!
zio billy!!
In a message dated 2/17/04 3:42:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Test-tea
Test
"while vacuuming the carpet I found
a dime!"
ARTNATURAL
At 10:46 Uhr +0100 16.07.2001, Roger Stevens wrote:
>I brought my harp to the party
>and nobody asked me to play
Yeah, but arent we all playing some kind of harp ?
Lilith had a harp in Roma, nice instrument. Bom sharkar !
The g2k affair, hmmm. Had many sides. Harping in the internet,
irony, i
, Roger Stevens wrote:
>>>As much as it might be valid in general, I think we are a private list.
>
>>I agree.
>>Whoever said the list was a democracy?
>
>But, on the other hand, see it as a party, and we, as a group, could decide
>to go.
>
true
I brought my harp to the party
and nobody asked m
At 9:47 Uhr +0100 16.07.2001, Roger Stevens wrote:
>>As much as it might be valid in general, I think we are a private list.
>I agree.
>Whoever said the list was a democracy?
But, on the other hand, see it as a party, and we, as a group, could decide
to go.
Well, some people working within the network had some of these attitudes.
Some not. None of them had all of them. Many people working outside the
network had many of them. Some all.
Reed Altemus wrote:
Well, like the attitude that once you have
an approach to a problem, you then thinkof some
ROTECTED]>
Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fecha: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:25:44 +0200
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
Of course, nobody defined it. Why is that so strange?
Reed Altemus wrote:
Secondly, George Maciunas did certainly not define Fluxus.
To which I would
>As much as it might be valid in general, I think we are a private list.
>Somebody is paying for it.
>And he can do whatever he wants. Thats life.
>
>H.
>
I agree.
Whoever said the list was a democracy?
Eric,
>Listowners, who try to solve disputes by banning people should meet no
>respect.
>
>Listowners not respected should step down.
As much as it might be valid in general, I think we are a private list.
Somebody is paying for it.
And he can do whatever he wants. Thats life.
H.
At 18:41 Uhr -0400 15.07.2001, Reed Altemus wrote:
>So no, it is not so strange to me that there is no definition of Fluxus.
> RA Of course, nobody defined >it. Why is that so strange?
And what is the difference between a definition and those rules of Ken ?
Just Kens "art" or art ?
Well, who
Oh, yeah!
TESTIFY - to swear upon one's testicles.
My mailbox reeks of testosterone now.
Cheerful regards from Sunny Seattle
Tom Grothus
--
>From: Rod Stasick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: FLUXLIST: test y
>Date: Sun, Jul 15, 2001, 3:54 PM
Well, like the attitude that once you have an approach to a problem, you then think
of something else, a different approach, an alternative, instead. To me that is a very Fluxus
attitude. Or the attitude that every person has something to offer, everyone is an artist, of
non-elitist art, to me
High, dear Fluxlisters!
>I'm giving you the choice to either stop this
>pointless agitation and contribute to the list in a positive way or
>I remove you both from the list permanently ..
>this decision will NOT be voted
>upon apart from by the owner group!
>
Brahmahaha!
> we let Eric and hi
Title: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
i wonder if this words
can not be considered an intend
of jump to the fire
by ken friedman.
> Call for papers
FLUXUS was an international community of artists, architects,
designers, and composers described as "the most radical and
experimental art
as in:
"testy"
--
Enzyme Becomes Housing Complex
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
What do you mean by attitude? Which attitude?
Reed Altemus wrote:
Hey, you're the one who brought up the "definition"
problem, not me! Thought you weregonna slip that past me eh? No, of course
no one defined Fluxus, from what I understandthe less defined it was the
harder it was for anyone t
Hey, you're the one who brought up the "definition" problem, not me! Thought you were
gonna slip that past me eh? No, of course no one defined Fluxus, from what I understand
the less defined it was the harder it was for anyone to coopt it- for me it remains an attitude,
not an ism. I think Geor
Of course, nobody defined it. Why is that so strange?
Reed Altemus wrote:
Secondly, George Maciunas did certainly not define Fluxus.
To which I would reply: neither did or do you, Mr. Anderson, sir. In
certain areas he
defined it well enough for me.
RA
Reed Altemus wrote:
Hey Eric,
members
This is plain silly. Of course I can unsubscribe. Of course I can start
my own list. However, I can also express my opinion about this list.
Listowners, who try to solve disputes by banning people should meet no
respect.
Listowners not respected should step down.
Eric Andersen
George Fre
Secondly, George Maciunas did certainly not define Fluxus.
To which I would reply: neither did or do you, Mr. Anderson, sir. In certain areas he
defined it well enough for me.
RA
Reed Altemus wrote:
Hey Eric,
members that none of the original artists from the Flux festivalsconsidered KenFri
Dear Heiko,
Heiko Recktenwald wrote:
> what did you or do you think of Dick Higgins ?
Dick was one of my best friends. A great artist and scholar.
> Al Hanson ? Was he an "artist" ?
> Which works would you say are "art" ? (I liked the early theoretical things
> on Happenings most.
> And his s
I don't care what you find interesting or not. I just explained a few things
as a response to Sol's wish to ban 2 more persons from the list.
Secondly, George Maciunas did certainly not define Fluxus.
Eric Andersen
Reed Altemus wrote:
Hey Eric,
members
that none of the original artists from
Dear John,
you make me laugh.
> At 11:32 AM 7/14/01, you wrote:
>
> StAubryThomas:
>
> Piss off, will you.
>
> The "High/Hugh" is not remotely amusing, and is, in fact, tedious in the
> extreme.
>
> Slide back to your burrow like a good rodent, will you?
>
> Now, about planting...
>
>
> did you laugh?
>
> XXX
> Ernest
>
>
Yeah, I laughed.
Perhaps I'm easily amused.
000
BadgerGirl
>> StAubryThomas:
>>
>> Piss off, will you.
I like him. Even if he writes sometimes things I see in a different way.
It was extremly stupid by whoever was responsible for this to block a topic
from discussion and not a person/sender.
Okay. This topic seems done. If anyone else has something
disparaging to say about Eric/Tamas, it seems like it's
already been said.
Lets talk about other things. Has anyone heard anything
about the game show exhibit at the Mass Moca? I went there
a few weeks ago. It was the first time I had
At 11:32 AM 7/14/01, you wrote:
StAubryThomas:
Piss off, will you.
The "High/Hugh" is not remotely amusing, and is, in fact, tedious in the
extreme.
Slide back to your burrow like a good rodent, will you?
Now, about planting...
>High!
>
>On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Carol Starr wrote:
>
> > MUCH
At 1:01 Uhr +0200 14.07.2001, Eric Andersen wrote:
>Not only highly appreciated by Emmett Williams, Arthur Koepcke, Tomas
>Schmit and
>myself but by most artists connected to the network and finally by
>George Maciunas
>with a delay of some 10 years.
Well, as you seem to know them all, what did y
Our thoughts on "voting."
http://www.geocities.com/fluxlist/voting.html?995135158960
At 01:01 AM 7/14/01 +0200, Eric Anderson wrote:
>I still think Bukoff and the rest of the old listowners should step down
>asap.
And what purpose would be served by that?
The term "listowner" is a technical term related to the software, kindly
hosted by scribble.com, that operates the e-mail l
Hey Eric,
members that none of the original artists from the Flux festivals
considered Ken
Friedman to be an artist. We all saw him as an agent and promoter. And
most of
Did it ever occur to you that some people on the list don't give a flying fuck
what "the original artists from the Flux fes
no-thing
is
some-thing
is
same-thing
...pez
> De: Carol Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Fecha: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 09:23:25 +0100
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>
> MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING
>
>
> --
&
Sol brought Ken Friedman's name up. I didn't
alan bowman wrote:
> why does eric constantly have to refer to ken friedman, why does he bring up
> ken's name?
> was ken involved in the G2000 thing, or tamas' tests?
>
> let's vote
>
> hands up who give a
>
> ahem!
High!
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Carol Starr wrote:
> MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING
>
It's about Parity, Sisterhood, Leave.
Hugh!
a101a
--- Carol Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING
MUCH DOO-DOO ABOUT NOTHING is more like it.
I'm ready for the happy pictures and stories from our
London/Tate excursion!
Rod (in the morning, before his tai chi and his chai tea)
--
~
bevy \BEV-ee\, noun:
1. A group;
MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING
--
carol starr
taos, new mexico, usa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey, hey
i'm not ready to vote!!!
but if i must to do
i vote for ??
(see next event)
"let genius-2mil rest in peace"
...pez
> De: "alan bowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Fecha: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:29:08 +0200
> Para:
i
don't
belive
in
god
(pausa)
...pez
> De: "narvis & ...pez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Fecha: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:25:17 -0400
> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>
> a nostalgic event
why does eric constantly have to refer to ken friedman, why does he bring up
ken's name?
was ken involved in the G2000 thing, or tamas' tests?
let's vote
hands up who give a
ahem!
http://www.originalism.com/
http://www.feniks.com/vote.html
Cheers!
John Blower/FeNiKs Business Communications
795 Mammoth Rd, #23, Manchester, NH 03104
V: 603 668 5601 F: 707 220 7490
Trainer at Large/Ace Copywriter
http://www.feniks.com/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although I have been on fluxlist a year and a half, and have not experienced the
"genius" trip, I don't think it's the point here.
What I have read of Fluxus is that there have always been conflicts and
bittering, and bickerings, and I find it sad that what could end as stated
points, and not res
you want.
As far as I'm concerned, Max Herman is no John Cage. The roots of Fluxus are
anti-ego. That's the reason for casting dice. The G2K program has nothing to
do with Fluxus and it has no place on Fluxlist.
Tom Grothus
--
>From: "narvis & ...pez" <
do the job)
...p
> De: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Fecha: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 02:20:24 +0200
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>
> I entirely agree to it all / Eric
>
>
>
>
> "narvi
Probably not / Eric
Deborah wrote:
> At 01:01 AM 7/14/01 +0200, you wrote:
> >As always, ex-listowner Sol doesn't get it.
> >
> >1.
> >
> >2.
> >
> >3.
> >
> >4.
> >
> >5.
>
> >6.
> >
> >7.
> >
> >8.
> >
> >9.
> >
> >Best wishes to all and especially to the ones who get it.
> >Eric Andersen.
>
At 01:01 AM 7/14/01 +0200, you wrote:
>As always, ex-listowner Sol doesn't get it.
>
>1.
>
>2.
>
>3.
>
>4.
>
>5.
>6.
>
>7.
>
>8.
>
>9.
>
>Best wishes to all and especially to the ones who get it.
>Eric Andersen.
Is this going to be over soon?
Deborah
L PROTECTED]>
> > Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Fecha: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
> > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, narvis & ...pez wrote:
> >
> >> maybe we have an other g
ROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, narvis & ...pez wrote:
>
>> maybe we have an other genius 2000
>> or similar god in campaing again?
>
> Well, if this was a _real Fluxist fluxlist, the (apparently)
> one person banned (G-2000),
Hornworms can be kept away from tomato plants by companion
planting with basil, and borage.
http://www.hortsource.com/beneficicialplants.htm
As always, ex-listowner Sol doesn't get it.
1.
Tamas is not my sidekick and I am not his sidekick.
2.
More people are driven away from the list due to boredom than dispute.
3.
I didn't kick Ken Friedman off the list. He left out of plain
embarrassment after
he realized that it was absolutely ri
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, narvis & ...pez wrote:
> maybe we have an other genius 2000
> or similar god in campaing again?
Well, if this was a _real Fluxist fluxlist, the (apparently)
one person banned (G-2000), would be the logical choice as
new (sole) list-owner.
/:b
>
>I live in a democracy
>(not an ideal one, I admit)
>but my websites
>my books
>my house
>my car
>my garden
Hey Roger,
I live in "Mexico's cradle of democracy -Baja California" does it count?
xxbb
_
Get Your Private, Free
Hi Alex,
Actually I too do not want to see anyone kicked off Fluxlist. In fact I urge
people to kick people onto Fluxlist. Although I suggest the use of soft
shoes.
cheers,
Sol.
>much aware that they're being funny. Everyone always responds to their
>posts which such dead earnestness...aincha got no sensa hewma?
>
>Come on kids,
>
>Lighten up.
>
>BadgerGirl
>
>------
> >From: Eryk Salvaggio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
by the way
IS the fluxlist a democracy?
I live in a democracy
(not an ideal one, I admit)
but my websites
my books
my house
my car
my garden
they are not democracies
I ask troublemakers to leave
it's nice to share your lettuces with slugs and snails
but if you want edible lettuces...
XXX
Agen
Hi
>
>I get the feeling I'm the only one who thinks Eric and Tamas are funny.
And
possibly
I wondered if it was an event
maybe funny
but reading through it all
I can't see the humour
>I don't mean that ironically. More to the point, I believe they are very
>much aware that they're being funny
>What they are asking for carries no weight, and you are escalating
Blablablabla. Please give us a definition for "censorship".
>So - what is/ was genius 2000?
An online personality by some idiot. He was spamming the list with shit.
Question remains how this should have been adressed properly.
Was there any "censorship" ?
I think he would have been kicked off every list.
H.
>
>I (and probably a lot of others)
>haven't
Jul 2001 13:44:32 +0200
> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>
>
> High, dear Fluxlisters!
>
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, ann klefstad wrote:
>
>> Low. Genius 2000 was totally, completely, boring, rude, nonconstructive,
>> confrontation
stness...aincha got no sensa hewma?
Come on kids,
Lighten up.
BadgerGirl
--
>From: Eryk Salvaggio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>Date: Thu, Jul 12, 2001, 5:00 PM
>
> Sol is over reacting. If you don't like Eric or Ta
hi sol,
i'm with you 100%.
i would be less tolerant than you and would dump anderson now. all he ever
does is make trouble. i am very happy with FLUXLIST and have had wonderful
experiences with the list and its members.
bests, carol
Sol Nte wrote:
>
> Tamas wrote:
>
> >If the Fluxlisters majo
Sol is over reacting. If you don't like Eric or Tamas, ignore
them. Censorship and ostracism is never the answer.
What they are asking for carries no weight, and you are escalating
the issue and making it appear as though people are listening by
declaring them a threat to the list. You want to
> High, dear Fluxlisters!
>
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, ann klefstad wrote:
>
> > Low. Genius 2000 was totally, completely, boring, rude, nonconstructive,
> > confrontational, one-note, just like all of your posts tend to be. Your
> > obligatory cuteness ("High! Hugh!") is embarrassing, the content of
Dear John,
> At 11:26 PM 7/11/01, you wrote:
> >Low. Genius 2000 was totally, completely, boring, rude, nonconstructive,
> >confrontational, one-note, just like all of your posts tend to be.
This is so untrue! It wasn't.
Your
> >obligatory cuteness ("High! Hugh!") is embarrassing, th
At 04:27 PM 7/12/01 +0100, you wrote:
>I apologise to anyone who has just joined the list as it may seem at the
>moment that being on this list is somewhat of a waste of time. Please rest
>assured that this list has a good culture that is only occasionally
>compromised as is occurring at the momen
I'm with you, Sol!
Thanks,
John
At 04:27 PM 7/12/01 +0100, you wrote:
Tamas wrote:
>If the Fluxlisters majority will vote YES,
then we shall vote about the voting about
the exclusion of ann klefstad.<
My response:
Dear Tamas and Eric,
There is no question of excluding Ann from the list!
I
Tamas wrote:
>If the Fluxlisters majority will vote YES,
then we shall vote about the voting about
the exclusion of ann klefstad.<
My response:
Dear Tamas and Eric,
There is no question of excluding Ann from the list!
I personally have had enough of your tedious agitation on this list. For tw
High, dear Fluxlisters!
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, ann klefstad wrote:
> Low. Genius 2000 was totally, completely, boring, rude, nonconstructive,
> confrontational, one-note, just like all of your posts tend to be. Your
> obligatory cuteness ("High! Hugh!") is embarrassing, the content of the
> messa
Hi Roger and all,
>So - what is/ was genius 2000?
It and its creator were the cause of serious flames and tensions on Fluxlist
in the summer of 1999. Mainly because the list was constantly bombarded with
information about it. Nevertheless it was single-handedly responsible for
the need to create
So - what is/ was genius 2000?
I (and probably a lot of others)
haven't a clue what anyone's been talking about on this topic these last few
weeks
XXX
Roger
At 11:26 PM 7/11/01, you wrote:
>Low. Genius 2000 was totally, completely, boring, rude, nonconstructive,
>confrontational, one-note, just like all of your posts tend to be. Your
>obligatory cuteness ("High! Hugh!") is embarrassing, the content of the
>messages bracketed between them is equally br
Low. Genius 2000 was totally, completely, boring, rude, nonconstructive,
confrontational, one-note, just like all of your posts tend to be. Your
obligatory cuteness ("High! Hugh!") is embarrassing, the content of the
messages bracketed between them is equally brainless, and your campaign
against s
High!
Long live Genius 2000!
Hugh!
a101a
High!
Penius 2000
Hugh!
aa
High!
enius 2000
Hugh!
aa
High!
Genius
Hugh!
aa
High!
Genius 2001
Hugh!
aa
High!
Genius 000
Hugh!
aa
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
