Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-06 Thread Kirk Fraser
Most likely your personal skills at natural language are insufficient to understand Revelation in the Bible, like mine were until I spent lots of time learning. Now I can predict the current Pope Francis will eventually help create the 7 nation Islamic Caliphate with 3 extra-national military

Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-05 Thread Kirk Fraser
, inventions are best communicated to the world in English since automatic machine translation is frequently imperfect. On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Julian Leviston jul...@leviston.net wrote: On 05/04/2013, at 7:19 AM, Kirk Fraser overcomer@gmail.com wrote: The main source of invention

Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-05 Thread Kirk Fraser
-0700, Kirk Fraser wrote: […] Truly worthwhile inventions judging by percent of Nobel Prize awards are by Jews, hence in Hebrew. […] Are your saying that most Nobel prize winning Jews were using Hebrew to think the thoughts that lead them to the Nobel prize? That looks really improbable

Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-05 Thread Kirk Fraser
to overachieving but I would argue that is impossible. It is impossible to overachieve. But that would be me exercising liberalism by going off topic - inefficient. On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Gath-Gealaich gath.na.geala...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Kirk Fraser overcomer

Re: [fonc] 37 Ways That Words Can Be Wrong

2013-04-05 Thread Kirk Fraser
, but I won't forgive you for denying me access to notions that you don't like. Or simply disregard anything you have to say about the subject. Loup. On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:32:47PM +0200, Gath-Gealaich wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Kirk Fraser overcomer@gmail.com wrote

Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-04 Thread Kirk Fraser
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John Carlson yottz...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't see lojban mentioned. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban Consider it equal to Esperanto in context of my argument. ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org

Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-04 Thread Kirk Fraser
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Tristan Slominski tristan.slomin...@gmail.com wrote: Thus a major improvement for world computing would be careful adherence to a world wide natural language That seems to be contrary to how the world works. We can't even agree whether to read bytes from

Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-04 Thread Kirk Fraser
and human understandable language...huge difference. On Apr 4, 2013 3:39 PM, Kirk Fraser overcomer@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John Carlson yottz...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't see lojban mentioned. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban Consider it equal to Esperanto

Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-04 Thread Kirk Fraser
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Gath-Gealaich gath.na.geala...@gmail.comwrote: The first math language Fortran was soon displaced in business by more readable code afforded by Cobol's longer variable names. Fortran was displaced in business because early Fortran had no structures and random

Re: [fonc] Natural Language Wins

2013-04-04 Thread Kirk Fraser
Liberal dictionaries have definitions that are by default wrong. For evidence of language decay, read definitions from the 1988 Webster's Collegiate vs. the current Webster's. Pure word and definition is needed to understand truth. People who love to lie get along without words meaning things.