Hello,
I saw these files when I referenced images via my own protocol handler.
How can i avoid that FOP creates these files ?
Thanks in advance,
Heiko
jeremias2004/04/02 01:14:52
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf PDFTTFStream.java
PDFT1Stream.java PDFFactory.java PDFDocument.java
PDFOutline.java PDFObject.java PDFInfo.java
PDFEncryptionJCE.java
Log:
Changed
jeremias2004/04/02 01:15:10
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/truetype TTFFile.java
Log:
Changed logging to use static loggers from Jakarta Commons Logging (via
LogFactory).
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +54 -94
jeremias2004/04/02 01:15:16
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/type1 PFMFile.java
Log:
Changed logging to use static loggers from Jakarta Commons Logging (via
LogFactory).
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +9 -25
jeremias2004/04/02 01:16:12
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/apps TTFReader.java
PFMReader.java
Log:
Changed logging to use static loggers from Jakarta Commons Logging (via
LogFactory).
Changed the way Commons Logging is set up.
Some touch-up in
jeremias2004/04/02 01:16:49
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/svg PDFDocumentGraphics2D.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/render/pdf PDFRenderer.java
Log:
PDF library no longer gets a logger from its owner.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +0 -2
jeremias2004/04/02 01:05:41
Added: src .cvsignore
Log:
New directory private-resources can be added to the list of source directories in
your favourite IDE. In there you can place configuration files such as
simplelog.properties (configures the simple logger from Jakarta
As promised, I've changed the way the logger is fetched in the PDF
library and the font code. Instead of passing a Log instance from parent
to child (IoC, like with Avalon), logging-enabled classes fetch their
own logger via JCL's LogFactory. The code gets easier. I'm quite happy
with this.
As
On 02.04.2004 03:47:16 Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got home late today, so I didn't manage to finish
everything. I will
do that tomorrow morning.
Todos:
Actually, these todos were rather targeted at myself but I'm glad you
jumped in. THANKS!
Jeremias says: +1
On 02.04.2004 02:38:11 Glen Mazza wrote:
I'd like us to go ahead and make Simon Pepping our
newest FOP team member. He has provided steady ML
help and numerous patch contributions for the past few
months, and with the many layout patches that have
been coming in recently,
Hello Heiko,
to my knowledge, there's no code in FOP that creates these files and I
have never come across files named like this. Does your own protocol
handler generate these files? If yes, you're responsible to remove them.
Please follow up on the fop-user mailing list as it's the better place
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28130.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Team,
sorry but another newbie committer question:
I downloaded a patch program from the internet. Not sure if there is a
specific one I need, or whether they all conform to a standard. When I try to
run the patch program with unified patch file in the xml-fop directory, it
cant figure out
I agree with Christian. Are there hyphenation files available under LPPL
1.3 already? I'd like to have a look at the packaging.
Before including files under LPPL 1.3 in FOP we should clear it with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know who of you is also listening into
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (I know Peter
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28076.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
cbowditch2004/04/02 02:38:29
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr LineLayoutManager.java
TextLayoutManager.java
Log:
Applied Luca Furini's patch from bugzilla entry 28130.
Corrections to space adjustment for text justification
Revision Changes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28130.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Team,
sorry but another newbie committer question:
I downloaded a patch program from the internet. Not sure if there is a
specific one I need, or whether they all conform to a standard. When I
try to run the patch program with unified patch file in the xml-fop
directory,
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
Yes, Axis uses JCL just as I wanted. Concerning the discovery things,
they are using Commons Discovery [1]. I'm not sure myself what the
intent/benefit is behind it but I'm pretty sure we don't have to do the
same. For the moment, I think the current approach is quite
Chris Bowditch wrote:
One additional thing is to add a system property to each startup
configuration in your IDE where you need to configure logging. Working
with Eclipse I've added...
-Dorg.apache.commons.logging.Log=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SimpleLog
We would need to add this to
Hi Chris,
I'm applying the patches directly in Eclipse which provides graphical
helpers to resolve problems like this. Patches can even be copy/pasted.
I've had problem with the patch.exe myself in the past, but since I'm
using Eclipse I've had almost no problems anymore.
On 02.04.2004 12:26:20
I use this tool (I couldn't find a patch program in WinCVS):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=105874140111833w=2
Two other notes to read:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=106961785412734w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=106962776820285w=2
to apply the patch, I use:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi Chris,
I'm applying the patches directly in Eclipse which provides graphical
helpers to resolve problems like this. Patches can even be copy/pasted.
I've had problem with the patch.exe myself in the past, but since I'm
using Eclipse I've had almost no problems anymore.
Glen Mazza wrote:
Chris Bowditch wrote:
snip/
-Dorg.apache.commons.logging.Log=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SimpleLog
We would need to add this to FOP.sh or FOP.bat in CVS
It might be more efficient to store this information in the Ant build
file instead--I believe the .sh/.bat files just
Glen Mazza wrote:
I use this tool (I couldn't find a patch program in WinCVS):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=105874140111833w=2
Two other notes to read:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=106961785412734w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=106962776820285w=2
to apply the
FYI
Forwarded by Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Original Message ---
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:2 Apr 2004 12:50:43 -
Subject: cvs commit: gump/project xml-fop.xml
jeremias2004/04/02 04:50:42
On 02.04.2004 12:59:00 Chris Bowditch wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip/
As you may have seen I added a cvsignore file in the src directory. The
idea is to put a simplelog.properties (or other such configuration file) in
the src/private-resources directory so you can configure the
cbowditch2004/04/02 05:50:52
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow Block.java
Log:
Applied Luca Furini's patch from bugzilla entry 28021.
Corrections to behaviour of whitespace-treatment property
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +404 -391
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28021.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27901.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
cbowditch (at) apache.org wrote:
cbowditch2004/04/02 05:50:52
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow Block.java
Log:
Applied Luca Furini's patch from bugzilla entry 28021.
Corrections to behaviour of whitespace-treatment property
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +404
Christian Geisert wrote:
cbowditch (at) apache.org wrote:
cbowditch2004/04/02 05:50:52
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow Block.java
Log:
Applied Luca Furini's patch from bugzilla entry 28021.
Corrections to behaviour of whitespace-treatment property
Revision Changes
Chris Bowditch wrote:
[..]
Uh, looks like there went something wrong with the linefeeds.
And keyword substitution is wrong (ko instead of kkv)
Uh Oh! You are right. Ive fixed the file, so now how do I fix this in
CVS, just re-commit the file??
Yes ;-)
--
Christian
cbowditch2004/04/02 07:01:05
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow Block.java
Log:
corrected line endings. changed ko option to kkv
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +404 -404 xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Block.java
Index: Block.java
Thanks for your help. Chris.
Have a nice weekend,
Jerry
--- Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry wrote:
John,
Thank you for your message.
Yes, I realize the data in the byte array bt in
tiff
does not belong to the standard formatting object.
That is why I got the
Glen Mazza wrote:
I'd like us to go ahead and make Simon Pepping our
newest FOP team member. He has provided steady ML
help and numerous patch contributions for the past few
months, and with the many layout patches that have
been coming in recently, we could certainly use his
continued help on
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 09:58:43AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went through a similar thought process to you when I analysed the code in
Text and Line LMs. I'm taking a closer look at your patch now.
I believe the reason why justification still doesnt work after correcting the
issues
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 04:38:11PM -0800, Glen Mazza wrote:
Team,
I'd like us to go ahead and make Simon Pepping our
newest FOP team member. He has provided steady ML
help and numerous patch contributions for the past few
months, and with the many layout patches that have
been coming in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27901.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
39 matches
Mail list logo
