At 10:03 AM 7/10/01 +0200, Keiron Liddle wrote:
>
>On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 12:47:02 Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>> Not only all of the above, but we need to ensure that areas actually have
>>
>> all the properties they are supposed to have. OK, there is still the
>> question, do you really want to add a
On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 12:47:02 Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> Not only all of the above, but we need to ensure that areas actually have
>
> all the properties they are supposed to have. OK, there is still the
> question, do you really want to add a property to foproperties.xml just
> so
> you can prin
Keiron Liddle wrote:
>
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 23:33:21 Karen Lease wrote:
> > Hi Keiron,
> > Problem:
> > For some reason, certainly relating to ClassLoader behavior, if I run
> > "build.sh test" in my xml-fop directory, the version checking code in
> > RunTest is finding the ./conf/config.xml
At 09:23 AM 7/9/01 +0200, Keiron Liddle wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 23:33:21 Karen Lease wrote:
>> Question:
>> I see that the XML "rendering" doesn't have lots of traits, no Area
>> Container positioning for example, no line-height information etc. Is it
>> a reasonable thing to enhance the outpu
On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 23:33:21 Karen Lease wrote:
> Hi Keiron,
>
> It looks like you are the testing guru. Thanks for taking the initiative
> on this; I agree that it's crucial.
>
> I've finally got around to looking at this in more detail, as I'm trying
> to add some good cases for tables. I hav
At 11:33 PM 7/6/01 +0200, Karen Lease wrote:
>Question:
>I see that the XML "rendering" doesn't have lots of traits, no Area
>Container positioning for example, no line-height information etc. Is it
>a reasonable thing to enhance the output format to include (eventually)
>all the traits which are
Hi Keiron,
It looks like you are the testing guru. Thanks for taking the initiative
on this; I agree that it's crucial.
I've finally got around to looking at this in more detail, as I'm trying
to add some good cases for tables. I have one problem and one question.
Problem:
For some reason, cert